iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Health Care Push: Back To His Grassroots

Obama Health Care

JULIE PACE and DAVID ESPO   03/ 8/10 11:31 PM ET   AP

GLENSIDE, Pa. — Stirring memories of his campaign for the White House, President Barack Obama made a spirited, shirt-sleeved appeal for passage of long-stalled health care changes Monday as Democratic congressional leaders worked behind the scenes on legislation they hope can quickly gain passage.

"Let's seize reform. It's within our grasp," the president implored his audience at Arcadia University, the first outside-the-Beltway appearance since he vowed last week to do everything in his power to push his health care plan into law.

The president's pitch was part denunciation of insurance companies – "they continue to ration care on the basis of who's sick and who's healthy," he said – and part criticism of his Republican critics. "You had 10 years. What happened? What were you doing?" he taunted members of a party that held the White House for eight years and control of Congress for a dozen.

The outcome could affect almost every American, changing the ways they receive and pay for health care – and extending coverage to tens of millions more people – if the legislation gains final approval.

"I'm kind of fired up," Obama said at the beginning of his remarks, a variation on his oft-stated 2008 refrain, "Fired up. Ready to go." And he included an appeal to his audience – many of whom were students – to help in the same ways they might in a campaign. "So I need you to knock on doors. Talk to your neighbors. Pick up the phone," he urged them.

Obama made his appeal as Democratic leaders in Congress worked on a rescue plan for legislation that once seemed on the cusp of passage, only to run into difficulty when Senate Republicans gained the seat they needed to block action on a final compromise.

The two-step approach now being pursued calls for the House to approve a Senate-passed bill from last year, despite House Democrats' opposition to several of its provisions. Both houses then would follow by approving a companion measure to make changes in that first bill.

In general, Obama wants legislation to expand health care to many millions who lack it, with subsidies to defray the costs for lower income families as well as small businesses. In addition, he has called on Congress to ban insurance industry practices such as denial of coverage because of pre-existing conditions.

Last month, prior to a daylong meeting with key lawmakers in both parties, Obama outlined several provisions he wants included in the second bill, at least some of which appear likely to be incorporated in some form. Several officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a Senate-passed excise tax on high-cost insurance plans would be scaled back in deference to objections from labor unions. In another White House proposal, a Senate-passed provision to raise Medicare taxes on the wages of upper income earners would probably be extended – possibly at a higher rate – to investment income such as interest and dividends as well.

The fix-it bill would also increase funds the Senate approved to defray the cost of premiums and out-of-pocket health care expenses for those at lower incomes who currently cannot afford health insurance. And it would gradually close a gap in coverage under the existing Medicare prescription drug program, a provision the House approved late last year and the White House backs. The Senate bill reduced but did not close the gap, but leaders have pledged support for the change.

In a new change sought by House Democrats, the fix-it bill would require businesses to count part-time workers when calculating penalties for failing to provide health coverage for employees. Smaller businesses would be exempt. The Senate bill would count only full-time workers in applying the penalties, but under the change, described by a Democratic aide, two part-time workers would count as one full-time worker. Businesses say that's unduly burdensome, but Democrats contend it would prevent businesses from avoiding penalties by hiring more workers part-time.

Separately, some House Democrats have been lobbying to add to the health care bill unrelated legislation overhauling the nation's student loan programs. The administration has called for all federal student loans to be originated in the Education Department instead of through banks and other lenders. The government's savings is estimated at about $87 billion over a decade, money that would be put into larger Pell Grants and other forms of student assistance. A stand-alone measure has cleared the House but is stalled in the Senate.

The White House has called for action on the broad health care legislation by March 18, but it seems virtually impossible for Congress to complete both bills by then. Officials said they did not expect the follow-up bill to be disclosed publicly until the end of the week at the earliest, and possibly not until next week.

Under the Democratic blueprint, the fix-it bill would come to the Senate under rules denying Republicans the ability to demand a 60-vote majority to clear the way for passage.

Obama's speech on Monday drew fresh criticism from Republicans in Congress, as well as a retort from the insurance industry.

"Americans don't want this bill. They're telling us to start over. The only people who don't seem to be getting the message are Democrat leaders in Washington," said Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader.

Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, said insurance industry workers "do not deserve to be vilified for political purposes. ... For every dollar spent on health care in America, less than one penny goes toward health plan profits. The focus needs to be on the other 99 cents." AHIP plans to spend more than $1 million to run television ads on cable stations nationwide beginning in the next few days to push back on the attacks on insurers.

Obama has long identified the insurance industry as an obstacle to changes along the lines he seeks, but the administration's actions and rhetoric seem to have escalated in recent days.

The president's proposal would give the government the right to limit excessive premium increases – a provision included after one firm announced a 39 percent increase in the price of individual policies sold in California. Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, convened a White House meeting with insurance executives last week, and followed up with a letter released in advance of Obama's speech.

It asks companies to "post on your Web sites the justification for any individual or small group rate increases you have implemented or proposed in 2010."

___

Espo reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Erica Werner contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
GLENSIDE, Pa. — Stirring memories of his campaign for the White House, President Barack Obama made a spirited, shirt-sleeved appeal for passage of long-stalled health care changes Monday as Demo...
GLENSIDE, Pa. — Stirring memories of his campaign for the White House, President Barack Obama made a spirited, shirt-sleeved appeal for passage of long-stalled health care changes Monday as Demo...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,791
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (86 total)
03:42 PM on 03/14/2010
Food for thought. If the proposed healthcare bill was political suicide for the sitting president wouldnt it be wise of Republicans to let it become law and wait for the inevitable and position themselves to retake the highest office in the land when it flops? Way to much energy being spent to prevent passage.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
07:26 AM on 03/11/2010
SpookyTwo Wrote:

> Hi Everybody.
> CABLE NEWS RACE
> TUES, MARCH 9, 2010
> FOXNEWS O'REILLY 3,499,000> TUES, MARCH 9, 2010

Here's the problem Spooky: nobody under 30 watches cable news. It is fading fast:

The Fox News demographic is the oldest on Cable News averaging 67 years old. Rush has an even older demogrpahic. Young people don't get their news from cable, AM or even from Television. Young people get their news from the internet.

According to Alexa, the top internet news/political sites are all Liberal. The New York times Online is the highest. Hu.ff.ington Post second highest, tied with Fox News. All the rest of the conservative sights are much lower:

1. New York Times 127
2. HP 221
3. Fox News 221
4. Wall Street Journal 512
5. Drudge Report 707
6. New York Post 1,663
7. World Net Daily 2,011
8. NewsMax 4,505
9. National Review 6,272
10. Rush Limbaugh 6,517
11. Human Events 19,235
12. Weekly Standard 21,035
13. Bill O'Reily 37,329
14. Sean Hannity 22,524
15. American Enterprise Inst. 99,791
16. Micheal Savage 3,793,061

http://www.alexa.com
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
07:26 AM on 03/11/2010
Hu.ff.ington P.ost second highest,
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
07:25 AM on 03/11/2010
The New York times Online is the highest. Huff.ington P.ost second highest,
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
07:25 AM on 03/11/2010
According to Alexa, the top internet news/political sites are all Liberal. The New York times Online is the highest. Huff.ington P.ost second highest,
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
07:24 AM on 03/11/2010
According to Alexa, the top internet news/political sites are all Liberal.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
07:24 AM on 03/11/2010
According to Alexa, ,
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
07:23 AM on 03/11/2010
According to Alexa, the top internet news/political sites are all Liberal. The New York times Online is the highest. Huff.ington Post second highest,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
THISTLE
12:00 PM on 03/10/2010
The media is all gaga over Obama finding his groove again, instead of exposing this for what it
really is. He has returned to campaign mode, he knows how to campaign, he doesn't know how
to govern, or lead. He is out giving those same old speeches again - "fired up, ready to go."
He needs to remind himself of what he told McCain - "the campaign is OVER." What he should
add is - time is up on leading, governing, he doesn't know how to do that. He gives speeches,
that's all. He has trouted out the dusty campaign speeches and is giving them again.
Where was he the entire last year? Where was his leadership, his fight, his passion?
He was on his knees to the Republicans. What he should be doing now is getting people
into a room and coming out with a deal. Not a deal for the insurance companies - giving them
30 million new customers. Not a deal for big pharma, but a deal for the American people.
This healthcare bill is an insult to the American people. As a Progressive, I stand with Congressman
Kucinich who has the guts, the honesty to expose this bill for the sham it is.
11:53 AM on 03/10/2010
What happened to drug price negotiation, a central provider reimbursement negotiator, standardizing the basic insurance package, and honest discussion of single payer?

All of these would have done more to cut costs than anything in the President's plan and they wouldn't have entrenched the power of insurers the way mandates do.

If insurance companies are so evil, why force me to buy their product?

And I don't believe the HHS will do anything to control insurers during the next Republican White House, nor do I expect much to be done under this one. It's not as if the Treasury and the Fed have done much to protect small investors on Wall Street.

More than anything this is about giving insurers new forced customers to replace all the Baby Boomers they're going to lose to Medicare.
09:52 AM on 03/10/2010
The President is much more comfortable campaigning than actually leading, or governing. His lack of accountability, or credibility, is much more suited for the campaign trail. He takes no questions from the press, doesn't listen to the American people and is destined to be the worse President in history. Worse than Jimmy Carter and that is really saying something. He has stuck his head in the sand in order to ram a healthcare bill through. The noise made at 2010 election will be un-mistakable.
08:28 AM on 03/10/2010
I'm wondering how much of the stimulus package is being parceled out this week by Nancy Pelosi to buy votes in the House of Representatives for the Senate health care bill. It's a good thing that money wasn't wasted on shovel-ready jobs and infrastructure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:29 AM on 03/10/2010
Typos: "dayt" and "who's" (Day, whose)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:27 AM on 03/10/2010
Obama has been in "road show" campaign mode since Inauguration Dayt. If it isn't health care, it's some other pretext for him to get out there and pretend to himself and everybody else he's still the bold, audacious and not-responsible-for-anything-yet Candidate who's mere descent upon Washington will dispel all evils like Moses parting the waters.
I admit, he's been doing this somewhat less in recent months, thankfully. During most of his first year it got to where you could hardly stand even to turn on the TV, otherwise known as Obamavision, the endless-loop Barackorama. I'm sure a mixture of practical responsibilities and waning hero-worship combined to keep him at home, and on the job, more. But at the end of the day, I anticipate no fundamental change in Obama's psyche. He will always see himself as the one (no Pun intended) who is audaciously and hopefully climbing the ladder to the next height of glory, though little interested in stopping at any rung long enough to get tainted with responsibilty.
That shtick worked for him up to the point where he got to the big desk where the buck stops. The shtick isn't working so well anymore. And it's only going to work worse and worse with every passing day.
Is it any surprise the one seeming to talk more than anyone about a one-term presidency is... Barack Obama?
Perhaps he's bored.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
12:55 AM on 03/10/2010
NOW Mr. President: PUBLIC OPTION: 76% THERE! + B1DEN!

We need 12 of these 13 + B1DEN!

Baucus - Only reason against it was need for 60 votes
By_rd - In his honor to insuring the health of every American.
Ca_rper - for Schumer’s “level playing field” public option Senate Finance
Fe!ng01d - Signed Oct 8 letter demanding public option
Hagan - Voted for HELP Committee public option
Hark!n - Voted for HELP Committee public option
Kohl - Signed Oct 8 letter demanding public option
McCask!11 - Voted for Schumer’s level playing field on Sen Finance
Ne1son (Bi11) - Voted for Schumer’s level playing field public option-Sen Finance
Re!d - I’ve told people I am in favor of the public option.”
R0ckefe11er - Voted for Schumer on Senate Finance Committee
Warner - Wants to contain costs, and he will vote if it includes public option
Webb - Told the Huffington Post he is open to a public health care option.

L0WER PR0BABILITY:

Beg!ch
Ba_yh
Pry0r
R!sch
C0nrad
La_ndr!eu
‘L1E’berman
L!nc01n
Ne1s0n, Ben

http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/01/29/list-of-51-senate-democrats-who-support-a-public-option-whats-stopping-them-now/