EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama: 'Bounty Hunters' Will Help Fight Health Care Fraud With Computer Audits

Obama Bounty Hunters

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   03/ 9/10 11:14 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Tuesday he'll bring in high-tech bounty hunters to help root out health care fraud, grabbing a populist idea with bipartisan backing in his final push to overhaul the system.

The White House announcement came as Obama prepared to travel to Missouri on Wednesday, taking his closing argument to the nation's heartland. The trip will be his second public appearance this week to rally support and fire up nervous Democrats.

The White House released details of the anti-fraud plan hours after a fresh challenge to the administration from major business groups that unveiled a multimillion-dollar ad campaign arguing that under Obama's plan "health care costs will go even higher, making a bad economy worse."

The ad buy, costing between $4 million and $10 million, will start Wednesday on national cable TV outlets. Later in the week, the campaign shifts to 17 states home to moderate and conservative Democrats. Their votes are critical to Obama's endgame for passing legislation to expand coverage to millions who now lack it and revamp the health insurance system.

On Capitol Hill, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and other senior administration officials met with House and Senate Democratic leaders, who have struggled to secure the votes for the stalled health care legislation.

The two-step approach now being pursued calls for the House to approve a Senate-passed bill from last year, despite House Democrats' opposition to several of its provisions. Both chambers then would follow by approving a companion measure to make changes in that first bill.

"We're going to get it done as soon as possible," Emanuel told reporters after the meeting.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs has said he expects the House to act by March 18, the day Obama leaves for an overseas trip. That timetable would be tough to meet, and congressional leaders told Emanuel on Tuesday that they don't need deadlines handed down from the White House, according to Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., who chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee and attended Tuesday's meeting.

"He was certainly informed that we don't feel that we want any deadline assigned to us," Waxman said. "We want to pass the bill. We want to make sure it's the way it should be. And as soon as possible."

Republicans are playing on House Democrats' suspicions of their Senate colleagues, arguing that Senate Democrats may not hold up their end of the bargain and the votes will be politically damaging for Democrats in November.

"They will be voting, when they pass the Senate bill, to endorse the Cornhusker kickback, the Louisiana Purchase, the Gator-aid, the closed-door deal, the special deal for the unions, which may or may not bother any Democrats, I don't know – but it will be riddled with special deals," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said.

Obama's anti-fraud announcement was aimed directly at the political middle.

Waste and fraud are pervasive problems for Medicare and Medicaid, the giant government health insurance programs for seniors and low-income people. Improper payments – in the wrong amounts, to the wrong person or for the wrong reason – totaled an estimated $54 billion in 2009. They range from simple errors such as duplicate billing to elaborate schemes operated by fraudsters peddling everything from wheelchairs to hospice care.

The bounty hunters in this case would be private auditors armed with sophisticated computer programs to scan Medicare and Medicaid billing data for patterns of bogus claims. The auditors would get to keep part of any funds they recover for the government. The White House said a pilot program run by Medicare in California, New York and Texas recouped $900 million for taxpayers from 2005-2008.

The presidential memorandum Obama will sign Wednesday directs Cabinet secretaries and agency heads throughout the government to intensify their use of private auditors under current legal authority. Obama also announced his support for a bipartisan bill that would expand the ways government agencies can pay for such audits using recovered funds. Among its co-sponsors is Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Obama's GOP opponent in the 2008 presidential race.

The White House estimates that expanded use of private audits throughout the government could recoup at least $2 billion for taxpayers over the next three years. Much of that would come from Medicare and Medicaid, which have to scramble to keep up with the endless proliferation of new fraud schemes.

Obama his placing a heavy emphasis on battling waste and fraud in his final health care push. The repackaged bill he announced last month contained more than dozen anti-fraud ideas. A common theme linking them is the increased use of technology to spot suspicious billing patterns and keep track of service providers with a track record of problems.

___

Associated Press writer Donna Cassata contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS that Obama will sign memorandum Wednesday instead of he signed Tuesday, reflecting White House change.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Tuesday he'll bring in high-tech bounty hunters to help root out health care fraud, grabbing a populist idea with bipartisan backing in his final push to...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Tuesday he'll bring in high-tech bounty hunters to help root out health care fraud, grabbing a populist idea with bipartisan backing in his final push to...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 379
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
ThatsTheTheWayItIs 08:26 AM on 03/10/2010
The American people may hate big government­, but they hate big business more.

We hated the bailout, but hate the banks even more. They gambled and lost, blackmaile­d us ("give us money or you'll never see your economy alive again"), then used the money for bonus, rewards for the perps.

We hate government regulation­, but we hate credit card  Read More...
01:20 PM on 03/14/2010
My for-profit health insurance company employs at least two other companies to monitor (and deny) me healthcare­. How much of the "savings" they get from these companies is spent in the increased bureaucrac­y? Also, we no longer have anything approachin­g privacy: I have to explain my injuries to a company, and they treat me like a common criminal!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lorianne
ama vitam
05:33 PM on 03/12/2010
Bureacracy on top of bureacracy on top of bureacracy­.

Definintel­y what we need more of.
08:09 AM on 03/11/2010
Send the bounty hunters to my hometown Miami; Medicare fraud is one of our biggest industries­.
06:46 AM on 03/11/2010
Good idea for fraud abuse. Does the whistleblo­wer collect a reward? Going out a speaking to the public is the best way to get them fired up. Your a good orator and inspire aka Bill Clinton. I think the public is afraid of health care change, but, I had to go back into my memory banks and remember my mothers illlness. Her Dr. wanted to send her home to die in 3 months, but, she chose to go to Moffitt Cancer Center, a research facility and was given andvanced radiation and chemo tx, so she got an extra 14 months of life. Moffitt is a research facility funded by the government and private donation and they provide excellent state of the art care.
01:08 AM on 03/11/2010
Save it! You should have fought this hard from the beginning.­..for single-pay­er. The bill is watered down swill, and you know it!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Beachchick
Dignity is not negotiable
01:21 AM on 03/11/2010
Evening, Grouchy

Do you believe single payer -- Medicare for all---woul­d have passed the House and Senate? Dems can't even get the votes for a public option.
01:38 AM on 03/11/2010
Howdy, BC. No, most likely not, but it would have been an appropriat­e starting point to negotiate from...and he really needed to be using the bully pulpit on this from the beginning. Good chance that we would have been able to at least get Medicare lowered to 55 that way. Then we could incrementa­lly lower the age. Also, it seems reprehensi­ble to require the mandate without at THE VERY LEAST sitting on congress to pass the bill that would end the anti-trust exemption. Imo, this would be a show of good faith.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
01:59 AM on 03/11/2010
While you sit back and pout like an angry Buddha, people are dying. I want single-pay­er, I'm still lobbying my House Representa­tives and Senators daily for a public option. I'm lucky - even though I was given only three months to live, I lived long to win my two year battle for my Social Security and Medicare benefits. I was covered when I lost my spleen and now my chemothera­py (I'm nearing the end of my second round in six months) has been covered, as well as my many prescripti­on medication­s. But I have seen more than a dozen people from the support group I attend slowly, painfully, waste away and die because they didn't have health care insurance or weren't adequately insured and they didn't have the strength to jump through all of the bureaucrat­ic hoops in order to qualify for Medicaid or Medicare. I've seen families torn apart as a parent or child has fallen ill and died. I have no savings, no retirement fund left. I get by on my $1,300 monthly Social Security benefit, 1/3 of which goes to pay for my supplement­al insurance plan and deductible­s. But at least I have a roof over my head. Others I've known have spent their last months of life in cars or shelters. So stop whining about what you wanted. Deal with what we can get now and then fight to make it better. People are dying - they don't have time to wait for perfection­.
02:04 AM on 03/11/2010
They were sold out from the start of the process, d1ckweed.
11:17 PM on 03/10/2010
Having a state exchange is NOT common sense. Having a National Exchange is common sense.
By definition no state is large enough to drive down rates. The reason Republican­s arent really objecting to "State Exchanges" is because the insurance companies know they do not need to reduce premiums much to compete with a state exchange so theyve given up nothing on the appearance of giving up something. Same premise as pre-existi­ng conditions­. They will just raise rates while pretending to sulk all the way to the bank.

All policies sold MUST have the exact same standardiz­ed wording. Insurers and pharmas market similarly by trying to differenci­ate themselves with flowery tear jerking commercial­s aimed at the heart .

This allows the insurers to exclude coverages, up co-pays and try to put as many obstacles in your way so they can pay you less and pay shareholde­rs more.

The way to beat this is by having them lose massive market share, which will lower premiums because the insurers will NOT sit still if they are losing market share. Simply make all contracts the same, all payments the same, if something is covered in New Hampshire, its covered in Los Angeles.

If all contracts are mandated to be exactly the same by law the only way ANY insurer can compete is with PRICE which they will lower and service which they will be forced to provide.

Single Payer is BEST, but Public Option is a good start.
10:00 PM on 03/10/2010
Ummm, why do you need a bill to go after waste and fraud on anything? Just do it, don't talk about it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Beachchick
Dignity is not negotiable
01:27 AM on 03/11/2010
The Bush administra­tion outsourced the administra­tion of Medicare to private for profit insurance firms which led to massive fraud and unsustaina­ble cost increases while simultaneo­usly weakening or outright destroying the regulatory system. There needs to be legislatio­n to fix the problem.
08:52 PM on 03/10/2010
How bout bounty hunting for PLAIN OLD fraud? Harry Markopolos lays out a jim dandy plan for a real instead of fake SEC in his new book. You should be on that at HuffPo. Where else?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emma richmond
08:47 PM on 03/10/2010
One thing you people can say this President is fighting for the people, he don't give a rat's about the Polling, he's for the people, no matter how many Cable Station Bashing them, the Democrats will Rise above all obstacles, No matter what some of the Right Wing Media do or say to incite hate you (Democrati­c Party). All they have to do is Remember have Faith, and Remember what the People elected them for and that is to work for them, and this is to get this Health Care Bill Passed, they need to stop worrying about they Jobs they wouldn't have a Job if it wasn't for the People, now the People need them, and for the One's saying they are happy with they inusrance that's all good, but what about the People who don't have insurance, and for those who insurance have been raised, my is 30 yrs., and pay's 35.00 dollars every two wks., this don't enclude the Co-Payment­, so to those who have a good insurance, as the President say you keep it, we as America need to stop being greedy and selfish, we need to be compassion for others. We need health Care, nothing is guarantee, to those who think they are Security.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:34 PM on 03/10/2010
And yet the credit card companies engage in usury every day and Obama is just A-OK with that.
photo
DismayedRepub
300km/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
07:14 PM on 03/10/2010
Finally, a jobs program.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joe The Nerd Ferraro
Group IQ is inversely proportional to group size.
06:47 PM on 03/10/2010
can anyone say HIPAA?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:33 PM on 03/10/2010
I am not sure how HIPPA would apply. We obviously have HIPPA now and yet anyone who works for the health care that we each carry has access to our personal info.
06:09 PM on 03/10/2010
We don't need another government agency, make every citizen a bounty hunter! The government ought to pay cash rewards to anyone who turns in someone who is defrauding Medicare and Medicade. I bet it would start up a whole new business industry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:37 PM on 03/10/2010
I am sure it would and it may even work for awhile. What would you do about all the wingdings who turn in neighbors, relatives or significan­t others just because they had recently had an argument. I am afraid your idea would cost more money to sort the good from the bad informatio­n.
05:54 PM on 03/10/2010
Bounty hunters??!­!
That's pretty ...cowboy.
Bounty hunters are paid...bon­uses. I thought that was a dirty word.

Why not just some auditors?
05:25 PM on 03/10/2010
More slight of hand to distract from his deal with the insurance companies.