iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Clinton Slams Israel's Settlement Plans: 'Deeply Negative Signal'

Hillary Clinton

MATTHEW LEE   03/12/10 11:39 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday delivered a stinging rebuke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his government's announcement this week of new Jewish housing in east Jerusalem, calling it "a deeply negative signal" for the Mideast peace process and ties with the U.S.

The State Department said Clinton spoke to Netanyahu by phone for 43 minutes to vent U.S. frustration with Tuesday's announcement that cast a pall over a visit to Israel by Vice President Joe Biden and endangered indirect peace talks with the Palestinians that the Obama administration had announced just a day earlier.

The length and unusually blunt tone of Clinton's call underscored the administration's concern about prospects for the negotiations it has been trying to organize for more than a year and its anger over Israel's refusal to heed U.S. appeals not to make provocative gestures.

"The announcement of the settlements on the very day that the vice president was there was insulting," Clinton said in an interview with CNN Friday. "It was just really a very unfortunate and difficult moment for everyone, the U.S., our vice president who had gone to reassert America's strong support for Israeli security, and I regret deeply that that occurred and made that view known."

Clinton called "to make clear that the United States considered the announcement to be a deeply negative signal about Israel's approach to the bilateral relationship and counter to the spirit of the vice president's trip," State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters.

"The secretary said she could not understand how this happened, particularly in light of the United States' strong commitment to Israel's security and she made clear that the Israeli government needed to demonstrate not just through words but through specific actions that they are committed to this relationship and to the peace process," he said.

The harsh criticism of America's closest Mideast ally and questions about its commitment to the U.S.-Israeli relationship followed equally blunt condemnation of the housing announcement from the White House and Biden himself.

It also comes ahead of a trip to the region by U.S. Mideast peace envoy George Mitchell and a meeting in Moscow next week of the Quartet of Mideast peacemakers that Clinton will attend.

Hours after the call to Netanyahu, the Quartet – the U.S., European Union, United Nations and Russia – denounced the Israeli announcement in a statement from the world body's headquarters in New York where Clinton was addressing a commission on the status of women and meeting with U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon.

"The Quartet has agreed to closely monitor developments in Jerusalem and to keep under consideration additional steps that may be required to address the situation on the ground," the statement said.

It did not elaborate on what steps it would consider but said the Quartet members "would take full stock of the situation" when they meet in the Russian capital next Friday.

The Quartet has long urged both Israel and the Palestinians not to take any steps that could hinder peace talks. Crowley stressed that the United States objected to both the content and timing of the announcement and said Clinton had "reinforced that this action had undermined trust and confidence in the peace process and in America's interests."

Netanyahu has apologized for the timing, though not the substance, of the announcement to approve 1,600 new homes for Jews in east Jerusalem. The international community does not recognize Israel's annexation of east Jerusalem – captured in the 1967 Mideast war – and the Palestinians see that part of the city as their own future capital.

Earlier Friday, an Israeli cabinet minister said the government is moving to amend the country's planning procedures on sensitive political decisions because of the embarrassing diplomatic flap. Netanyahu has said he was not aware the announcement was going to be made during Biden's visit.

The Israeli announcement enraged the Palestinians and Arab states, jeopardizing the proximity talks Mitchell is to mediate. An Arab League advisory committee has already withdrawn its endorsement of the discussions.

In a bid to salvage those negotiations, Mitchell and the top U.S. diplomat for the Middle East, Jeffrey Feltman, called Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Arab League chief Amr Moussa and the foreign ministers of Egypt, Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates over the past two days, Crowley said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday delivered a stinging rebuke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his government's announcement this week of new Jewis...
WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday delivered a stinging rebuke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his government's announcement this week of new Jewis...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (69 total)
07:55 PM on 03/26/2010
The US has been allies with Israel for many years. The bottom is the land belongs to them as per the Bible. That is THEIR land, no ifs and's or buts about it. Are we going to be their ally or not. The Bible says " I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you" Isn't it possibe that the only reason we have lasted as long as we have as a nation is due to the fact that we have blessed and supported Israel who are God's people? Heaven help us if we in our arogance decide to pull our support now and side with Palestine to make what little strip of the land Israel does have left, even smaller. The white house is playing a dangerous game. You don't play with God or his people and think that there won't be divine consequences. Read your Bible sometime Hilary, it will be a blessing to you.
06:08 AM on 03/19/2010
Be strong Hillary!!!!
08:38 PM on 03/17/2010
Israel depends on the USA - we support their wellbeing with our money...because of that we have a say on what they do. We also have a say because we tend to pay for their sins..whatever Israel does against the Palestines becomes a sin of the USA.

We are attacked by the extreme Muslims for the sins of Israel. So yes we have a say. If they don't want our financial support anymore then we should use it to help the unemployed people of the USA instead of giving Israel our money while we in the US are going through a financial crisis.

ISRAEL IS BEING BULL HEADED. ALL THE MONEY HELPING THESE COUNTRIES LIKE ISRAEL SHOULD COME BACK HERE TO HELP OUR OWN PEOPLE IN NEED OF HELP DURING THIS TOUGH ECONOMY.
04:00 PM on 03/15/2010
The United States has EVERY right to demand that Israel stop building new settlements in Palestinian territory! Why??
1. We send well over 3 billion dollars a year to Israel. ($10 million per DAY) Don't push us Mr. Netanyahu... We CAN cancel the check!
2. Settlement building on Palestinian land has been condemned by the United Nations in several resolutions, including #242, and which Israel agreed to abide by (laughable, no?) These settlements are illegal and the Israelis know it.
3. The deliberate apartheid going on is not only illegal it is inhumane. The Palestinian people are methodically being starved out, bulldozed out and deprived of their livelihoods, all in an effort to creat a "pure" Jewish state. (Remind you of anything that happened back in the 40's??)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Rozgonyi
Writer and traveler
06:10 AM on 03/16/2010
Ms. Hass, please allow me to be your first fan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
08:52 PM on 03/16/2010
Susan let me be your second fan...and now we see that Israel brainwashes their children..
Israeli school textbooks as well as children’s storybooks, according to recent academic studies and surveys, portray Palestinians and Arabs as “murderers,” “rioters,” “suspicious,” and generally backward and unproductive. Direct delegitimization and negative stereotyping of Palestinians and Arabs are the rule rather than the exception in Israeli schoolbooks.

Professor Daniel Bar-Tal of Tel Aviv University studied 124 elementary, middle- and high school textbooks on grammar and Hebrew literature, history, geography and citizenship. Bar-Tal concluded that Israeli textbooks present the view that Jews are involved in a justified, even humanitarian, war against an Arab enemy that refuses to accept and acknowledge the existence and rights of Jews in Israel.

“The early textbooks tended to describe acts of Arabs as hostile, deviant, cruel, immoral, unfair, with the intention to hurt Jews and to annihilate the State of Israel. Within this frame of reference, Arabs were delegitimized by the use of such labels as ‘robbers,’ ‘bloodthirsty,’ and ‘killers,’” said Professor Bar-Tal, adding that there has been little positive revision in the curriculum over the years.

Bar-Tal pointed out that Israeli textbooks continue to present Jews as industrious, brave and determined to cope with the difficulties of “improving the country in ways they believe the Arabs are incapable of.”
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:18 PM on 03/15/2010
There is a faction in Israel who will undermine all attempts at peace, always have and always will. They are the obstacle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darwinia Amazonia
Naturalist in the Peruvian Amazon.
01:38 PM on 03/15/2010
US TO ISRAEL: CANCEL CONTROVERSIAL SETTLEMENT PLAN". REALLY, HOW SO?

If "US" refers to the vast majority of Americans; this is true; if "US" is the Obama and the Congress, then who in the World do imagine that they are fooling?

It is common knowledge, worldwide, that Israel and its U.S. and British diasporas working through the Israel Lobby produced the illegal War aggression against Iraq, which sacrificed the lives of over 4,000 American patriots and thousands of Iraqis, for the sole benefit of Israel.

Now, with Biden's recent secret meeting with Netanyahu, it evident that Israel still exerts control over the American president and congress; and that this denunciation is transparently nothing more than a failed attempt to conceal continuing Israeli political control, which is condemned by the vast majority of Americans, as well as all other nationalities in World.

If this conclusion is incorrect, Obama and the Congress will do more than perform another Israel Condemnation Show: it will break diplomatic relations and impose economic sanctions.
02:22 PM on 03/15/2010
hey darwin - don't want to interfere too much with your evolution, even knuckle draggers should have the right to offer their opinions in open forums, but, i was just wondering, if the israel exerts so much control over the american political process, wouldn't that mean obama owes his presidency to them and will stay in power as long as he pleases his co-conspirators in israel?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
78Thomas
12:16 PM on 03/15/2010
Finally! An administration that will stand up to Israel and the Israeli lobby.
09:07 AM on 03/15/2010
The truth unmasked, The union uncloaked!!! Who controls who!!!
US ofA is a colony of Israel run from and by Israel
Israel is 100% supported by tax payers money, for years, no different from a colony paying England tax of old.
The Brainy dwarf Israel, having total control of the giant brute, USA
Remind you of anything?
The scramble is now on !!! A full court press to cover up this embarrassing truth
09:32 AM on 03/15/2010
Interesting. Usually the nuts on Huffpo who spout the old conspiracy theories of the Jews controlling the world have much more fans than poor old cuniverse. Especially with all those nice exclamation points!!!!!!!
Yep, total control of USA, which is why they forced them into the Oslo process for which they have given up land and gotten only more terrorism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PublicOption09
It was worth the try!
10:26 AM on 03/15/2010
I'm not a believer in mass conspiracy, but I AM a believer in fairness. It is not fair to take land from a people and then CONTINUE to bulldoze your way across their land year after year. So are we saying the American indian, with the help of a foreign nation, has the right to BULLDOZE us?? This issue needs action, and thank you, President Obama, for expressing something for those who believe in simple fairness!
02:11 AM on 03/15/2010
Here's a quote from Uri Avnery's recent Article:
"But Biden and Obama did not give much cause for hope. They wiped the spit off their faces and smiled politely.

As the saying goes: when you spit in the face of a weakling, he pretends that it is raining. Does this apply to the president of the most powerful country in the world?"

I say yes it does. It's shameful how an American President can cower when confronted by a second-rate racist regime. It's downright embarassing.
06:56 AM on 03/15/2010
totally agree with you Donatella . . . words are not enough . . . action .. the plug has to be pulled on israel big time . . sanctions, trade embargoes, the whole works . . .
09:19 AM on 03/15/2010
I'm sure I'll be branded as anti-semetic; but how, over the years, did American foreign policy come to be held hostage by the Israelis? From Biblical times both the Palestinians and the Israelis can lay claim to much of the land now held by Israel. So why was there never a fair distribution of same and the establishment of two independent states? I was also appalled by one of Biden's comments in Israel (when he was attempting to backpedal from his earlier remards chastizing the Israeli government for the housing expansion in a disputed section of Jerusalem) that "America has no better friend than Israel. " I am sure that claim drew gasps from countries like England, Canada, Australia and Korea among others. These are countries whose soldiers fought and died along side American soldiers in two world wars, the Korean war and the Vietnam war. When has an Israeli soldier ever died fighting alongside of an American soldier? Quite the opposite: in 1967 they deliberately attacked the U.S.S. Liberty, killing 34 and wounding 171. Sadly, the U.S. government decided to bury the issue as a mistake (though all the evidence points to a deliberate attack) for fear of upsetting relations with Israel. We give Israel over 3 billion a year in military aid. Why don't we leverage that aid by threatening to withhold it until Israel gets real about a two-state solution?
12:55 PM on 03/16/2010
Oh, but it is my impression that you are turning matters on its head, topsy turvy. Is it not the case that we are speaking of Israeli INTERNAL and even LOCAL ISSUES, which building permits are, and that the U.S., and rather interestingly, people writing on this response thread, feel they have the right to DICTATE to Israelis, where they can and can not do which, and what their Capital is, or is not? Ever heard of such idiocy anywhere else existing? There was an interesting article by David Frum, yesterday, on CNN.com about how boundaries change, conquests are made and then kept, such as with the Hungarian Republic, Bosnia, etc., etc. People adjust to new boundaries and realities. Reality is, that The British Mandate was divided in several parts, of which Israel was one small sliver. Jordan was also created. And it is Jordan which has an 80% Palestinian population and Queen (Rania). Jordan is also much larger in territory than Israel is. The larger problem is that NO ONE wants these *Palestinians*. Gaza belonged to Egypt, and Egypt does not want Gaza and its population either. The larger problem may well be an economic one. There are no jobs for those *Palestinians*, all of whom, by now, were born in clearly identified countries, not one of which was Palestine.
10:45 PM on 03/14/2010
Petreaus wanted Isreal under his command at CENTCOM. Why? Pentagon must plan for war with Israel and taking out their Air Force in hours if they threaten to attack Iran.

American interests may be war with Israel. The problem is Isreal will continue to ignore the US until we do the necessary diplomatic & military action to cut off financial and military aid, end our veto in the UN, and Netnut know we will bomb Israel's Air Force to smitereens if they bomb Iran and keep on their authoritaritarian reach in destroying democracy in Israel, in imitation of George Bush's and Dick Cheney's authoritarian fait d'accompli in destroying American democracy. How can you tell: look at the Republican Party and the spinelessness of the Democrats and the autocrats of the Teabaggers.
photo
Aussieposter
And so it begins
10:41 PM on 03/14/2010
It would seem that the discussion here has fallen into whether the land in question is legally Israel’s. I see many comments here about land won in a defensive war. This should solve the confusion.

The legal counsel of the Israeli Foreign Ministry, Theodor Meron, was asked whether international law allowed settlement in the newly conquered land. In a memo marked "Top Secret," Mr. Meron wrote unequivocally, "My conclusion is that civilian settlement in the administered territories contravenes the explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention."

Mr. Meron took note of Israel's diplomatic argument that the West Bank was not "normal" occupied territory, because the land's status was uncertain. The pre-war border with Jordan had been a mere armistice line, and Jordan had annexed the West Bank unilaterally.

But he rejected that argument for two reasons. The first was diplomatic: the international community would not accept it and would regard settlement as showing "intent to annex the West Bank to Israel." The second was legal, he wrote: "In truth, certain Israeli actions are inconsistent with the claim that the West Bank is not occupied territory." For instance, he noted, a military decree issued on the third day of the war in June said that military courts must apply the Geneva Conventions in the West Bank.”

Thus Israel’s own legal advice was that the settlements were illegal
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Rozgonyi
Writer and traveler
06:13 AM on 03/16/2010
G'day from a former Sydneysider and Wollongonger.... your post is great, all except for this: " This should solve the confusion. " It made me chuckle, and then feel bad, because nothing could be further from the truth! Strewth!
12:22 PM on 03/16/2010
It is interesting to see the overheated and emotional reactions to the fact that building of 1600 apartments was approved. As building permits are local zoning issues, it is amazing that this has been elevated to International Diplomatic Issue Status! Even before that fact, Palestinians were collecting rocks and throwing those from the Temple Mount @ tourists and those praying at the Temple Wall. In addition more demonstrations and rockthrowing was planned, and today it continues, together with tire and garbage burning. The permit to build 116 apartments in a section where there are 250,000 Palestinians and 180,000 Jewish (Israeli) residents already living, is not building a settlement. But, anything will do if you are looking for action, right? Biden had also advised Israel to take more riks, whatever that meant, in dealing with the Palestinians, before the building permit. Some time ago, months or so, I read about a case of a child born in Jerusalem. On its passport is only mentioned Jerusalem, and no country, neither Israel, nor Palestine. It was taken to court, and the outcome was...still no country.One thing is certain, Palestine is not an existing country. There is another country, Jordan, with an 80% Palestinian population and a Palestinian Queen, Rania. Israel, interestingly enough, has an 80% Israeli population and a 20% Palestinian population.
08:58 PM on 03/14/2010
Netanyahu offered an apology for the timing of the announcement to build housing in East Jerusalem, but did not back down from plans to do so. Are Israel's plans a direct effort to instigate violence in Palestinian territories and beyond?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/world/middleeast/15mideast.html?hp
08:46 AM on 03/15/2010
but of course
08:24 PM on 03/14/2010
The walls will come tumbling down.
08:22 PM on 03/14/2010
Here's my recommend foreign policy: don't send money abroad, don't comment on foreign domestic issues.
09:08 PM on 03/14/2010
With comments like these out of Israel I totally agree.

Danny Danon, a Likud legislator and a deputy speaker of Parliament who supports additional settlement construction, said that Mrs. Clinton’s “meddling in internal Israeli decisions regarding the development of our capital, Jerusalem, is uninvited and unhelpful.”

“In fact, it is sheer chutzpah,” Mr. Danon said.

Israel would not even exist today without funding from the United States and sale of military hardware and weaponry.
10:00 PM on 03/14/2010
And that somehow gives the US the right to tell them they can't build homes for their people? Please. China lends us a lot of money, how would you feel if they disapproved of a housing plan in DC?
02:26 AM on 03/15/2010
Obama should grow a pair and declare that since Israel has colonized most of the Palestinian territory, he supports a one-state solution and all Palestinians should be made Israeli citizens. Then he should stop all forms of aid.

Of course that means that Israelis will eventually become a minority. They created the situation let them live with the consequences.

Unfortunately, our government cowers before the Israeli lobby and this "just reward" will not happen.
08:03 PM on 03/14/2010
I also wanted to comment on the Israeli use of the term anti-Semitism as a response to almost everything, including this alleged "rift" in their cherished relations with the US. I think it is inappropriate to so freely transplant a term basically invented in European context against the background of hideous unreasonable prejudice against Jews inspired by ethnic and religious and at times even pseudo-scientific hatred. To use such a term in the ME context today seems bit ridiculous. If there is a state that says it is based on Jewish values (or just a Jewish state) and than it starts killing in the name of those same values in order to grow itself ever larger, i find it difficult to believe that anyone on the receiving side of being killed and in the right state of mind would necessarily fall in love with those values, let alone be expected to do so. I cannot imagine myself doing that, and do not believe anyone else can.
02:43 AM on 03/15/2010
The meaning of "anti-Semite" has been transformed. In the past it meant "Someone who hated Jews" it has been transformed to mean "Someone who the Jews hate".
06:18 AM on 03/15/2010
Seems you have fairly pragmatically described in one sentence what it took me a whole paragraph.