iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jene Newsome Discharged: Rapid City Police Told Air Force That Sergeant Was Lesbian

Jene Newsome

TIMBERLY ROSS   03/13/10 09:35 PM ET   AP

Jene Newsome played by the rules as an Air Force sergeant: She never told anyone in the military she was a lesbian. The 28-year-old's honorable discharge under the "don't ask, don't tell" policy came only after police officers in Rapid City, S.D., saw an Iowa marriage certificate in her home and told the nearby Ellsworth Air Force Base.

Newsome and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a complaint against the western South Dakota police department, claiming the officers violated her privacy when they informed the military about her sexual orientation. The case also highlights concerns over the ability of third parties to "out" service members, especially as the Pentagon has started reviewing the 1993 "don't ask, don't tell" law.

"I played by 'don't ask, don't tell,'" Newsome told The Associated Press by telephone.

"I just don't agree with what the Rapid City police department did. ... They violated a lot of internal policies on their end, and I feel like my privacy was violated."

The "don't ask, don't tell" policy has come under renewed debate after Defense Secretary Robert Gates called for a sweeping internal study on the law earlier this year.

As the review is under way, officials were also expected to suggest ways to relax enforcement that may include minimizing cases of third-party outings. In particular, Gates has suggested that the military might not have to expel someone whose sexual orientation was revealed by a third party out of vindictiveness or suspect motives.

The Rapid City Police Department says Newsome, an aircraft armament system craftsman who spent nine years in the Air Force, was not cooperative when they showed up at her home in November with an arrest warrant for her partner, who was wanted on theft charges in Fairbanks, Alaska.

Newsome was at work at the base at the time and refused to immediately come home and assist the officers in finding her partner, whom she married in Iowa – where gay marriage is legal – in October.

Police officers, who said they spotted the marriage license on the kitchen table through a window of Newsome's home, alerted the base, police Chief Steve Allender said in a statement sent to the AP. The license was relevant to the investigation because it showed both the relationship and residency of the two women, he said.

"It's an emotional issue and it's unfortunate that Newsome lost her job, but I disagree with the notion that our department might be expected to ignore the license, or not document the license, or withhold it from the Air Force once we did know about it," Allender said Saturday. "It was a part of the case, part of the report and the Air Force was privileged to the information."

He said his department does not seek to expose gay military personnel or investigate the sexuality of Rapid City residents.

Allender said the department was finishing its internal investigation and has determined the officers acted appropriately. They have not been placed on leave during the investigation.

Newsome's partner is currently out on bail on one felony and three misdemeanor counts of theft stemming from an incident last year, court officials in Fairbanks said. More information was not immediately available, and Newsome said she didn't know the status of the case and didn't provide more details about it.

In the complaint filed last month with the department, ACLU South Dakota said police had no legal reason to tell the military Newsome was a lesbian and that officers knew if they did, it would jeopardize her military career.

Newsome, who was discharged in January, said she didn't know where the marriage license was in her home when police came to her house on Nov. 20 and claims the officers were retaliating because she wouldn't help with her partner's arrest.

"This information was intentionally turned over because of 'don't ask, don't tell' and to out Jene so that she would lose her military status," said Robert Doody, executive director of ACLU South Dakota. The ACLU is focusing its complaint on the police department, not the military, and Newsome said she and her attorney have not yet decided on whether to file a lawsuit.

"The 'don't ask, don't tell' piece is important and critical to this, but also it's a police misconduct case," Doody said.

A U.S. Air Force spokesman, Senior Airman Adam Grant, said Ellsworth follows all laws set out by Congress and the Defense Department, and he would not comment specifically on Newsome's discharge, citing privacy policy.

More than 13,500 service members have been discharged under the law since 1994, according to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which is lobbying for its repeal. Kevin Nix, communications director of the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, couldn't speak about Newsome's case, but said when "someone is outed by a third party, which it sounds like this was, or by a police officer, then, yeah ... I'm not surprised the person was discharged."

Though rare, third-party outing can be especially damaging to service members who wanted to keep their sexual orientation hidden, experts say.

Even though 80 percent of "don't ask, don't tell" discharges come from gay and lesbian service members who out themselves, third-party outings are "some of the most heinous instances of 'don't, ask, don't tell,'" said Nathaniel Frank, a research fellow with the Palm Center think tank at the University of California, Santa Barbara and a New York University professor.

Newsome, who is originally from Harrisburg, Pa., is currently on the road, driving to Alaska. She said she'd been looking forward to the time when the military would alter its policies regarding gays and lesbians. But that change didn't come in time to save her career.

"I felt like it was getting close," she said. "I was really hopeful."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Jene Newsome played by the rules as an Air Force sergeant: She never told anyone in the military she was a lesbian. The 28-year-old's honorable discharge under the "don't ask, don't tell" policy came ...
Jene Newsome played by the rules as an Air Force sergeant: She never told anyone in the military she was a lesbian. The 28-year-old's honorable discharge under the "don't ask, don't tell" policy came ...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,090
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
10:41 AM on 05/08/2010
Probably a closeted cop who did this
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:55 PM on 03/25/2010
Everyone who has been dismissed under this ridiculous law (DADT) MUST be reinstate with full pay and rank!

And yes, this is a big F #%^ n' deal!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
06:08 PM on 03/23/2010
This is just pure B.S. Not only is it a slap in the face to a soldier, and woman and a Black woman- it's a slap i the face to everyone who considers themselves patriotic. How much more will we tolerate before we become a fascist state? Really. The whole issue disgusts me- when will we grow up and just let people's personal lives be their personal lives? This woman was a credit to the military and this is how she is treated? Basically because some cop chose to push his bigotry onto her. So how will he be rewarded? Should we tell him, and those who discharged her, what great heroes they are? Bigots are never heroes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fudgefase
Boldly going nowhere...
12:07 PM on 03/23/2010
How often has my hubby told me off for leaving letters etc lying around? But I think even I would have put the marriage license away somewhere safe after a week!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sfstewart
12:31 AM on 03/23/2010
This is some bullshyte.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diepiriye Kuku-Siemons
Dr. Kuku is out-n-proud, Nigerian-American writer.
08:37 PM on 03/22/2010
Wow, other people's moral judgments just get sicker and sicker. Just goes to show that it never pays to ask a people to deny themselves. Arg! And here I was just sifting through the current news, looking for health care coverage, but got assaulted with this crap in the headlines. Caution, when I watched this clip on CNN.com it was preceded by a candy bar commercial where a family father ogles over a trio of teen girls in front of his wife who stands next to him struggling with their infant. The sweet confection gave the man time enough to think of an amenable excuse for checking out the prepubertal set of scantily clad young maidens: "I'm looking at potential babysitters." He was gonna exploit them one way or another- or both! But there was also another story about an announcement in a store in Jersey: "Attention Wal-Mart customers, all Black people leave the store now." So, this should all situate the following clip about a military service woman being granted a marriage license by one state, outed to her government employer by the police, and dropped by the sidelines by our society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seán O'Nilbud
Drunken Master
05:13 PM on 03/18/2010
She should kill the pigs involved including the boss who allowed this to happen. Send a clear message.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jd43
03:43 PM on 03/18/2010
Figures the cops would do something like this.
06:31 AM on 03/17/2010
let see what comes out of this issue
01:12 PM on 03/16/2010
I wonder, did Sgt Newsome have to take any kind of oath, when she enlisted, or re-enlisted? It is also more than disturbing that the military did not offer her annual training, as they do every other airman and soldier, concerning the policy on DADT.

Maybe the day that Sgt Newsome was out getting her eyebrow peirced, was the day they offered training wherein she would have learned that although gay sexual orientation was tolerated, that any overt conduct, such as going out and marrying someone of the same sex, and it being a public record, might be not only against the policies in place, but against the UCMJ, federal code and disobedience to standing orders and directives.

Also, she probably was not told that soldiers, the real ones, not the ones playing games, would not be discharged if in mission critical job functions, or had exemplary service records. Geez, maybe if she was only given the chance to be a better troop, not distracted by her partner, and always playing games, she could have done better. But, again, maybe the police, or the Air Force is to blame.

But since she states in the article, 'she was playing their game', I dont see how they can hold her to the same standards of a professional soldier, or Non-Commissioned Officer; it just doesnt seem fair to hold her to the same rules, because being a lesbian, she should be special and exempt from those silly rules and standards.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
03:49 PM on 03/18/2010
Dear PuzzlePalace:

I think you eloquently expressed the good soldier's side of this argument. That is the military mentality. There is no question that that mindset is essential to good order and proper discipline. My hope is that all good soldiers hold true to that code, when all of the military gets new orders under the authority of their Commander in Chief, that this divisive and destructive policy called "Don't Ask; Don't Tell." is ended. When gay men and lesbian women can server their country without "playing games," under, what I believe to be, more enlightened rules, can we expect to see those new regulations observed with equal attention to the letter of the revised UCMJ?

I post frequently on military.com. I have read the mutinous musings of troops, who openly promise to defy those new regs. Many of them explicitly threaten to violently impose their own version of barack's justice on any service member who dares to serve as an openly gay man or lesbian woman. You can read those threats for yourself. i would like to hear your thoughts on the Command's responsibility to discipline those service members, who would consider themselves "special and exempt from those silly rules and standards."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seán O'Nilbud
Drunken Master
05:17 PM on 03/18/2010
You seem sleepy or slow or something. Why should anyone tell a soldier they can't get married. That's so stupid, and you agree with it. You should maybe become smarter. You completely misread the"playing the game" remark in a really funny way that shows your fear of your own homosexuality.
photo
TheInconvenientTruth
Sometimes the Truth Can Be Brutal
08:37 AM on 03/16/2010
Nothing will come out of an ACLU lawsuit or any other grievance claim and here's why: In the eyes of the military, she is ultimately responsible for the actions of her dependents--in this case the woman to whom she is married. All police departments near military installations are aware of this and it's not uncommon for them to reach out to military officials (base police, investigators, unit commanders) for assistance with contacting/gaining access to military personnel involved in their investigations. It's debateable and most likely unprovable whether the disclosure of her sexuality was intentional or simply an unavoidable by-product of the police department contacting military representatives for assistance with obtaining her cooperation. Under these circumstances, disclosing the nature of her relationship to the other woman to military officials was unescapable--unfortunately she was outted in the process.
08:56 AM on 03/16/2010
I can see the police dept. contacting the base about the partner. That's a given. But for them to say they saw a marriage license thru a window is absurd. Something smells here.
photo
TheInconvenientTruth
Sometimes the Truth Can Be Brutal
09:23 AM on 03/16/2010
I agree...spotting the marriage certificate through the window seems like a bit of a stretch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Henry Juhala
10:41 PM on 03/22/2010
How can there be a dependent if the Iowa license is not recognized as a viable legal document in the eyes of the military or South Dakota? RCPD acknowledged they knew ahead of time the likely consequences if they disclosed the marital relationship and the license. There was no discussion of the ethics ahead of time. They just disclosed it. Ms. Newsome has not been charged with any crime. RCPD reported information as if Ms. Newsome had a legal dependent relationship with someone else who committed a crime. Yet, specifically as identified in DOMA and by South Dakota's anti-gay marriage law, there was no spouse to recognize. However, there are SPECIAL circumstances to consider. That is the whole point of DADT. Just because what RCPD reported is protocol does not make it ethical, just or right. Perhaps because it is protocol, without sensitivity to DADT, it is dangerously wrong, unjust and unethical. Whatever information needed to be conveyed to Ellsworth, it likely could have been done without identifying a license that is specifically rendered invalid by South Dakota law (a law which is likely unconstitutional). The information could have been conveyed without calling Ms. Newsome's friend "spouse" or "wife". How is that valid terminology when South Dakota law otherwise specifically denies the legal validity of such relationships. Ms. Newsome lost her livelihood specifically as a consequence of RCPD disclosing sensitive relationship information to the military. The military did not ask. Newsome did not tell. RCPD is wholly responsible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:37 AM on 03/16/2010
That's gotta be a tort. She should (and this being America, likely will) sue the cop and the force for destroying her career.
12:29 AM on 03/16/2010
This is just ridiculous. Obama needs to repeal Don't ask, don't tell, quickly. That law is outdated and meaningless. Who cares who people sleep with so long as it's not done on military time and on military bases. Since these entities are paid for by all taxpayers and some Americans don't agree with same sex marriage. The govt. should outlaw it on the bases and during miliarty time. But off site, they can do what they want, so long as it's appropriate conduct when they are in uniform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Womanvoter4Obama
Opting out of badges=good decision
06:12 AM on 03/16/2010
I agree it is beyond ridiculous! And seeing her marriage license on the kitchen table through a window sounds beyond far fetched. You'd have to have amazing eyesight to see the print, from a distance lying on a table. Unless it was propped up in a magnfying picture frame I don't buy it. This was a petty act of revenge that I hope gets taken up in criminal and civil court. Seems the only way people learn proper procedure is when they are hit in the pocketbook. They don't even attempt to sound apologetic in their "apology"!!
jerryatthebeach
Till Death Do You Barrier Island...
10:12 PM on 03/15/2010
This could turn into a huge ACLU case.
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
09:03 PM on 03/15/2010
The police did not have to notify the Air Force..bull....repeal DADT will that police dept. pay for the thousands of dollars it takes to train a replacement?