NYR More

Tudor Dynasty Re-Examined In New Book

Tudors

BOB SALSBERG   03/15/10 01:00 AM ET   AP

"The Tudors: The Complete Story of England's Most Notorious Dynasty" (Delacorte Press, 640 pages, $30) by G.J. Meyer: Five centuries have not diminished the appetite for all things Tudor. Henry VIII, his six wives and his equally intriguing children are endlessly being reinvented in the popular media. Veritable rock stars of the English monarchy, their lives easily eclipse anything our own celebrity-obsessed, reality show culture can spit out.

In what is billed as the first complete history of the Tudor dynasty to be published in two decades, G.J. Meyer ironically begins "The Tudors: The Complete Story of England's Most Notorious Dynasty" by wondering if it even qualifies as a dynasty. The Tudors, for all their notoriety, ruled England through just three generations over 118 years; by contrast, the Plantagenet dynasty that ended when Henry Tudor (Henry VIII's father) rose from virtual obscurity to vanquish Richard III on Bosworth Field held sway for 331 years.

But even if their time on history's stage was relatively short, Tudor rule shook the foundation of English society and altered the political map of Europe in ways that reverberate to the present day. Meyer sets out to retell the story in ways that challenge centuries of myth; readers who long for the more romantic, heroic version of the Tudor legend won't find it here.

The author's portrait of Henry VIII is particularly harsh.

The Henry we meet here was more than just brash, more than just vain. He was an impulsive, self-absorbed and insatiably greedy tyrant, exceptionally brutal even by the often barbaric standards of his day. He was also a bad manager, squandering the Crown's finances on military misadventures and opulent palaces.

The dark side of Henry's personality pervades what became known as the king's "Great Matter." His bid to divorce Catherine of Aragon and marry Anne Boleyn led ultimately to England's separation from the Roman Catholic Church. Here, Meyer seems less critical of the break itself than of the manipulative, cynical and heavy-handed way in which it was carried out.

In his quest for total subservience, Henry becomes a killing machine. Friend and foe alike are eliminated, some fortunate enough to merely lose their heads while others are emasculated and disemboweled before being drawn and quartered.

It was left to Henry's three children, Edward VI, Mary I and Elizabeth I, to sort out the tangled religious and political conflicts their father left behind. The results were often disastrous.

Elizabeth's long reign has often been viewed as a relatively stable, peaceful and enlightened period in English history. Meyer is far less impressed, portraying Elizabeth not as a strong heroine but as a rather shallow and selfish monarch whose primary goal amounted to nothing more than her own survival.

In the end, the unmarried and childless queen's refusal to publicly name a successor finishes the Tudor dynasty and launches her country into a new period of uncertainty.

Meyer is quick to inform readers when the spotty and occasionally contradictory historical record simply does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn about a particular event or motive. The author also disperses "background" chapters throughout the book on subjects ranging from Parliament to the English theater, providing valuable insight into the Tudor period without detracting from a thoroughly readable and often compelling narrative.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BOOKS

Filed by Jessie Kunhardt  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:41 AM on 03/17/2010
Sounds like a good one.
And yes, people made a lot of money romanticizing the Tudors, but I'm sure serious historians would be hard pressed to find any monarchy in any country (pre-1950) that was more than a straightforward military dictatorship.
The only difference between Stalin and any czar is the primal and bone-stupid belief that kings are appointed by some all-wise god.
Good thing that kind of idiocy never shows up anymore, eh?
No, wait! ... Never mind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deli
Life after death, why wait?
05:05 PM on 03/16/2010
On that note, I highly recommend The Six Wives of Henry VIII from Masterpiece Theatre circa 1970 on Netflix. I can't wait for this book, I've exhausted every movie, mini-series, and Wikipedia rabbit hole I can find on the Tudors. The obsession began innocently enough pursuing some visuals for a crush on Jonathan Rhys Meyers in The Tudors on Showtime (I watched on Netflix after the fact in just a few sittings); but of course that reflected few realities. Researching each character has taken me back to the Roman Empire and all the way forward to the modern Royals. It is amazing what has gone on in this world.
12:46 PM on 03/16/2010
This work sounds like it will be a fine addition to my book shelf once I finish reading it. I love it when new research gives us a fuller rendering of events and pokes holes in previous conceptions about how and why things happened.

Ah, Tudor or not Tudor, that is thew question. For whether is is nobler to suffer the verbal slings and arrows of a gluttonous monarch desperate to sire a son or notice the outrageous fortune accumulated by a queen who has an admiral ram it up the backside of the Spanish Armada and the attendant nudge nudge wink wink freebooting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Dickey
Futurist-Historian-Astrologer
12:41 PM on 03/16/2010
Definitely a must read for me.
photo
philhellene
Far Left and Proud of It!
07:15 PM on 03/15/2010
So, why was Henry VIII so obsessed with dynastic succession?

England has just ended a thirty-year civil war (War of the Roses 1455-85) which was all about succession. So, avoidance of a repeat was probably one consideration.
12:47 PM on 03/16/2010
It's all about the potency of the potentate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
01:42 PM on 03/15/2010
What we know of Elizabeth I is what she wanted us to primarily know so this is one book I'm going to read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
learninglife
Be the change you want to see in the world
11:53 AM on 03/15/2010
"The Henry we meet here was more than just brash, more than just vain. He was an impulsive, self-absorbed and insatiably greedy tyrant, exceptionally brutal even by the often barbaric standards of his day."

I had already concluded that Henry wasn't the most pleasant fellow - something to do with beheading wives.
10:51 AM on 03/15/2010
"In the end, the unmarried and childless queen's refusal to publicly name a successor finishes the Tudor dynasty and launches her country into a new period of uncertainty."

Well, not exactly. In fact, not at all. Elizabeth I had already decided before her death to pass the crown onto her cousin's son, James I. He directly inherited the throne, no unrest or uncertainty about it. He was a lousy ruler who created alot of problems for England, which did go thru turbulent times, but it was because of his ineptness as a ruler, not because Elizabeth failed to name an heir.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ESerafina42
Abandoned by wolves, raised by Republicans.
11:55 AM on 03/15/2010
That sentence bugged me too. The dynasty was finished whether Elizabeth named an heir or not. The only question was *what* the new dynasty would be. There were no more Tudors.

She also knew from her own experience as her sister's heir how many plots and intrigues would form around that person, and, as happened, how everyone would abandon her in her last hours in the rush to get in good with the new monarch.

I hope he didn't completely accentuate the bad at the expense of the good. Both Henry and Elizabeth were exceptionally well educated and erudite people, and I suppose Elizabeth must have done *something* right to stay on the throne for 45 years and keep her country mostly prosperous and at peace, considering the mess she inherited. She also had good reason to worry about surviving, considering the experiences of her first quarter-century.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
01:45 PM on 03/15/2010
Henry VIII was a psychopath and for all his intelligence was at heart a little boy who never grew up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abliss2379
02:39 PM on 03/15/2010
There was a tie between the Stuarts and Tudors--Henry's sister was married to the Scots king. If
I've got my generations correct, Mary Queen of Scots was this sister's granddaughter, making her son James VI and I the great grandson and quite possibly a viable candidate even if E2 hadn't named an heir, I would think (helps that he was raised away from his mother and as a Protestant, too).