More

Romanoff Wins Democratic Caucuses; GOP Senate Contest Still Close

First Posted: 05/16/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:50 PM ET

DENVER (AP) -- Disgruntled Colorado voters in both major parties rejected political insiders in straw poll results at caucuses around the state that exposed deep unease with two Senate candidates seen as favored by Washington party bigwigs.

Tuesday's Republican and Democratic caucuses were just the first step for party nominations in Colorado. The nominees won't be picked until the Aug. 10 primaries - and in Colorado, caucus success sometimes bears little influence on who ultimately wins a nomination.

Few party leaders seemed surprised that rebellious sentiment pervaded both party caucuses, a possible warning sign for Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet and former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton, both of whom have large fundraising advantages over their opponents.

Colorado Democrats snubbed Sen. Michael Bennet in precinct straw polls in favor of a former state House speaker who railed against national Democratic leadership. Andrew Romanoff defeated Bennet handliy, even though Bennet swamped him in fundraising and had the blessing of top Democrats, including President Barack Obama.

The president campaigned in Denver last month for Bennet, who is considered one of the more vulnerable Democratic senators this fall. But the star power didn't sway Colorado Democrats who said they're disenchanted with party leaders in Congress.

"The same people still own and run Washington, no matter what party," said 72-year-old Denver Democrat Jeanette McIntosh, who chose Romanoff.

In Republican caucuses, former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton lost narrowly to Ken Buck, a northern Colorado prosecutor.

Buck trails Norton badly in fundraising but was backed by several tea party groups who have criticized Norton as a Washington-backed insider. Norton's brother-in-law, Charlie Black, is a powerful Republican lobbyist who advised Sen. John McCain during the 2008 presidential campaign.

Buck said his showing was evidence of conservatives' unrest with the GOP.

"Republicans want Republicans to act like Republicans. I say, 'Game on,'" Buck said Tuesday night.

Even the front-runners seemed aware of the discontent among party faithful.

Bennet talks as if he's not an incumbent in his first television ad, which is set to air Wednesday in Denver and Colorado Springs. He reminds voters he hasn't been in Congress long - he was appointed last year when Ken Salazar resigned to become interior secretary - and refers to sitting lawmakers as "them," instead of "us."

"I've been in Washington for only a year," he says. "But it didn't take that long to see the whole place is broken. It's time to give them a wake-up call."

Norton spent the evening at a caucus shaking hands with suburban Denver voters and downplaying her front-runner image.

"I don't see myself as the front-runner," Norton said. "I see myself as the one who represents Colorado values."

Party members also picked favorites in the governor's race, but that contest was less exciting on both sides.

Democrats had no race at all: No one has announced that they'll take on Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper to become the party's candidate to replace retiring Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter.

Republicans handed former Rep. Scott McInnis a wide victory over little-known Evergreen businessman Dan Maes. McInnis seized more than 60 percent of the caucus vote, even though Maes had courted tea party activists.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UPDATE (11:25): With 94% of precincts reporting, Ken Buck leads Jane Norton by 29 delegates, or 0.12%.

UPDATE (11:05): The spin begins. In an email, Bennet spokesman Craig Hughes declared the night a victory. "Competing against a political network built over nearly two decades is never easy, but not only did our opponent not do as well as expected, tonight gave us the opportunity to build a valuable grassroots base that will help us win in the fall," Hughes wrote.

Denver Post political editor Curtis Hubbard agrees, tweeting:

Romanoff in danger of dropping below 50%. Have to believe the campaign was hoping for a bigger margin of victory (Bennet at 42) #caucusCO


UPDATE (10:30): The last GOP update from 10:10 had Norton leading Ken Buck by less than 1% with 89% of the state reporting. Buck has run strong in Larimer County, which has reported only 30% of its results.

UPDATE (10:00):: The pivotal Denver County results are in. Andrew Romanoff secured 3318 Delegates (60.05) to Bennet's 1963 (35.53%). Romanoff leads statewide 53.44% to 41.24%. with 1951 precincts reporting.

Meanwhile, Jane Norton narrowly leads Ken Buck with 74.71% of precincts reporting. Norton, the frontrunner, has secured 38.29% of delegates to Buck's 34.35%.

(Live Coverage Below)

Democratic Results

GOP Results

With the 2010 Colorado caucuses upon us, party insiders and campaign staffers are working to temper expectations for 'establishment' candidates.

The Hill points out that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), which supports the incumbent Michael Bennet, is downplaying the significance of the caucuses by pointing out that former Democratic Colorado Senators Ken Salazar and Tom Strickland both lost the party caucuses before going on to win the party's nomination in the August primaries.

Bennet is expected to face a stiff challenge Tuesday night from former State House Speaker Andrew Romanoff, who counters Bennet's national support and money advantage with endorsements from dozens of state legislators and party activists. Although the most recent public polling showed Bennet ahead 40%-34%, Romanoff's local connections are expected to give him a big advantage in the caucuses.

The DSCC is also sending out press clippings that raise expectations for Romanoff.

Meanwhile, Nate Strauch, a spokesman for Republican front-runner Jane Norton,downplayed the results of the caucus in an interview with Politco, saying "the straw poll is a sideshow to the real purpose of tomorrow night: electing delegates to begin the nominating process. We're not taking anything for granted, and an unscientific straw poll isn't going to change our strategy one bit."

Polling shows Norton with a significant lead over her closest competitor, Ken Buck. Buck, however, recently received the endorsement of the state's largest tea party group. The state's right wing organizations are expected to make a big impact at Republican caucuses across the state.

Recent polling showed Norton with a smaller advantage against self-described 'conservatives' than she has against 'moderates.'

Check out, and contribute to, live coverage from the Colorado Political Institute Below:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

How to contribute:

Twitter: tweet news and delegate outcomes with the hash tag #caucusco

Email: You can email updates, questions, and media to mail@coloradopoliticalinstitute.com

Online: View and interact with live coverage right here at the Huffington Post Denver.

Embed The Stream: Grab the stream code from http://coloradopoliticalinstitute.org or get it from the stream below:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DENVER

DENVER (AP) -- Disgruntled Colorado voters in both major parties rejected political insiders in straw poll results at caucuses around the state that exposed deep unease with two Senate candidates see...
DENVER (AP) -- Disgruntled Colorado voters in both major parties rejected political insiders in straw poll results at caucuses around the state that exposed deep unease with two Senate candidates see...
Filed by Ethan Axelrod  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
noetical
Progressive Political Junkie & Geek
01:31 PM on 03/22/2010
BTW, you've listed the wrong URL in your instructions to "Embed The Stream." it's http://www.coloradopoliticalinstitute.com/ , not .org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenneth Webb
A passionate moderate who seeks the truth.
06:00 PM on 03/17/2010
Jane Norton looks like Mika from Morning Joe on MSNBC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
10:42 PM on 03/17/2010
whoa, now that's not nice to mika.
12:09 PM on 03/17/2010
My caucus, poorly attended as it was, went 31% Romanoff to 29% Bennet. A statistical dead heat. Still, I was encouraged that Romanoff did that well, considering how little I had heard from him in the days leading up to the caucus vote.

I support Romanoff for several reasons:

1) he's not accepting campaign money from anyone except voters
2) he has a hell of a good track record in the Colorado House as Representative and Speaker, thus he has experience, credibility, and shows leadership on issues that people care about.
3) he gets things done.
4) he diligently, tirelessly, and successfully worked both sides of the aisle on legislation.
5) he is humble to a fault (his biggest failing). In spite of a stellar record, he continually fails to blow his own horn, which could turn out to be a detriment.

Reasons I oppose Bennet:

1) he was appointed by Ritter, who I would have not supported had he run for Governer again.
2) he had the endorsement of many party bigwigs who are resistant to real change, including Obama, who had no business sticking his nose in this race.
3) he has been, and continues to receive tons of $$$ from DLC, DSCC, and corporate sources
4) although he has recently championed the public option, he didn't until Romanoff stepped up to challenge him for the Senate seat. In other words, Bennet must be pushed into doing what is right, a clear lack of leadership skills.
photo
toltec998
Power concedes nothing without a demand
01:16 PM on 03/17/2010
Where does Bennet's push for the Public Option and Filibuster reform weigh in on your pros and cons in consideration of Bennet? I favor Bennet but need to research Romanoff more. Your points help.
04:19 PM on 03/17/2010
Good question. Thanks for asking. Several posters have already mentioned this, but I will put it in context.

Bennet did nothing in the Senate until Romanoff announced his candidacy. Until that time, there was a hue and cry to get Bennet to take any position on Health Care Reform, Employee Fair Choice Act, and others, to no effect. He was immovable. Only after Romanoff jumped in, did Bennet get off his keester and start talking like a Democrat. I strongly suspect he got his game plan for the public option directly from Obama, and so far, it has been ineffective, in spite of all the publicity. That is NOT leadership. That is not the representation I want in the US Senate.
12:08 PM on 03/17/2010
Anyone but Norton or Buck. Good for Weld County and Pakistan, in terms of social values. Bad for Colorado and anything following the 19th century.
10:18 AM on 03/17/2010
My precinct went for bennet. That said, the entire caucus process is a joke and makes us look like a backwoods, hick state. We need primary elections.
10:29 AM on 03/17/2010
The primary is in August. This is the nominating process we're in now.
03:12 PM on 03/17/2010
Dear God - I could not agree with this more. I have never been so disgusted with the human race in my life than in 2008's caucuses. I was cringing at the stupidity of fellow voters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
10:14 AM on 03/17/2010
this has nothing to do with Obama. I like Obama and I voted for romanoff. this has to do with Bennet and Romanoff- who was best. Me, I chose Romanoff because I felt that, while I like the New Bennet (the progressive one), I can't be sure that guy's going to permanently replace the Old Bennet (the one who did squat). That's why I chose Romanoff. it's a local matter. I still support Obama.
10:31 AM on 03/17/2010
So do I, but it broke many years of precedent for Obama to back Bennet publicly before he is the nominee. Bennet already has a big fundraising advantage, and it didn't set well with a lot of people for the president to choose sides this early.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
10:41 PM on 03/17/2010
I agree. it would have been better for obama to have let the primary process work itself out. it didn't annoy me at all, but i do understand it bothered others.
09:52 AM on 03/17/2010
The numbers this morning - Pueblo has yet to report - show an almost 2000 delegate lead for Andrew, 400 more than the number of undecideds. That, friends, is a convincing and significant win over an incumbent Senator. It was a mistake for Obama to come down here and raise money for Bennet during the primary process, and this proves it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Corpsman Up
09:34 AM on 03/17/2010
Good thing that barry campaigned for bennett or this really would have been a blow-out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pyrum
04:51 AM on 03/17/2010
Jane Norton is a warmongering, Bush style "big government conservative" of the type the GOP would do well to get away from. Ken Buck is more traditionally conservative. Go Ken Buck, you're at least taking a few steps in the right direction!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ariveria
09:11 AM on 03/17/2010
doesnt really matter. they are both conservatives who hate america and want to destroy they middle class.

"a lie repeated often enough becomes the truth"
glenn beck
information czar fox news
the view 5/20/09

"when the truth is found to be lies"
jefferson airplane
12:05 PM on 03/17/2010
I'm not sure oppressive policies vis-a-vis gays and lesbians is anywhere near the right direction. Who wants another loon like Tom Tancredo representing Colorado? I don't see how Buck would be any better than ol' Messican hatin' Tom!
01:17 AM on 03/17/2010
Bennett was a backdoor political appointee, who has changed his tune in the last month to appease the Colorado grassroots dems. He's going all out to get the primary vote and then most likely back to business as usual, as was the case last year. It's sad to see the DSCC discount the caucus and come out in a statement saying it means nothing. Hmmmmm....if memory serves us well Washington, Obama was spurred to victory in Colorado through the caucus process where the energy provided momentum for further grassroots political will by the citizens of the state. I'm disappointed to see the DSCC come out in an uninformed manner supporting Bennett who is polling behind Romanoff against the Republican opponent. Andrew Romanoff is a valued and demonstrated leader who also appeals to independents. Washington either stay out of the election or support Romanoff who is the most likely to beat the Republican candidate. I don't want Washington electing our next U.S. Senator...let the people decide, rather than your slanted ads and corporate donations. If you had a clue about politics in this State you would know why, respect and understand why Romanoff dominates the caucus process tonight.
10:17 AM on 03/17/2010
Caucuses in general mean slightly less than a bucket of warm chicken spit. They are such a small sampling and so easily skewed. Teh entire caucus system needs to be abandoned in favor of primary elections.
01:52 PM on 03/17/2010
The primary's in August. The way I understand the caucuses it's just to ensure that any candidate has enough votes as to make them viable to participate in the primary. It's also to review the party platform, and there are housekeeping issues as well. Anybody thinks I need straightening out on this explanation, please do!
12:15 AM on 03/17/2010
This is all about righting a wrong. When Michael Bennet was appointed by Governor Ritter after Salazar was named to head to the DOI, most democrats felt like Andrew Romanoff should have been the guy. After all, he had more than paid his dues in both the state house and senate and was responsible for important legislation here in Colorado. He's well known throughout the state and not just in the Denver Metro area.

While I appreciate Bennet's recent stance on the Public Option, it would have been nice if he had split with the Blue Dogs last summer instead of after he realized that he was in trouble with Romanoff. The DNC has got to start listening to people on the ground instead of quazi-democrats like Ritter. Look what happened in Massachusetts with the wrong candidate. Bring back Howard Dean and the 50 State Strategy!
11:13 AM on 03/17/2010
That's right, Bennet's support for HCR looks like nothing more than a reaction to the primary challenge. Romanoff, on the other hand, has supported not just a public option but single payer from day one. I fear that Bennet is only a Corporatist in Progressive clothing, and we've GOT to stop sending Corporatists to Washington.

If it comes down to Bennet vs Norton (or Buck, or Wiens, or whatever crackpot the GOP settle on), of course I'll support Bennet, but Andrew Romanoff is by far the better choice.
01:11 PM on 03/18/2010
"we've GOT to stop sending Corporatists to Washington/"

first, anyone who uses teh asinine term "corporatist" comes across as a street corner, sandwich board wearing loony.

Second, using that ridiculous term, better a corporatist than a republican, which is the only real world alternative.
11:34 PM on 03/16/2010
8 - 7 in favor of Romanoff in my caucus!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mycotropic
HANDS UP, WHO LIKES ME?
01:15 AM on 03/17/2010
54 to 60 with Andrew losing in my HD but that's a statistical dead heat. SOMEONE has to get Andrew to understand that the 9 independents don't want him throwing ANY mud. None. Same to you Bennett; KEEP IT CLEAN.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laura Hopkins 1
11:15 PM on 03/16/2010
My precinct when unanimously for Romanoff tonight!
photo
GirlOutWest
I hope to be the person my dog thinks I am.
10:52 PM on 03/16/2010
Bennett won in my precinct. It was close though. Big turnout.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TazoWolf
Med student, Colorado
10:33 PM on 03/16/2010
I'm leaning in favor of Bennett. I'm very pleased with the stance he's taken on health reform re: the public option and how he's garnered support for it in the Senate after it had appeared a lost cause there. I'm also in favor of his ideas on filibuster reform. Thus far, he's proven to be a politician who hasn't been bought.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Icantbelieveher
What you do for the least of my brethren, you do f
10:45 PM on 03/16/2010
He only took that stance after he found out about the primary. The majority of his campaign contributions have come from out of state interests, whereas Romanoff has elected not to accept any corporate money. Bennet voted against cramdown that would have helped homeowners, and he joined in with Bayh and the conservadems his first month in office.

He's only pretending to be progressive and his letter to President Obama went out the day after Obama came to town to campaign for him! Obama knows what to say to get elected, that's for sure!

Romanoff has worked for the people since day one. I don't trust Bennet, and he left Denver County Schools in worse shape than he found them!