iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Reid Promises Separate Public Option Vote In Next Few Months

Reid

First Posted: 05/19/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:55 PM ET

Hoping to assuage progressive Democrats who remain disappointed with the content of the health care reform bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) committed on Friday to holding a separate vote on a public option in the coming months.

In a letter to two of his more progressive colleagues in the Senate -- Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Bernie Sanders of Vermont -- the Nevada Democrat implicitly apologized for his inability to get a government-run insurance plan into the final piece of health care legislation and promised to keep working to get the policy into law.

As you know, I am a strong supporter of a public option, and I included the HELP Committee's public option in the bill I brought to the senate floor last year. I was disappointed when it became clear that we did not have the votes to keep it.


Nevertheless, like you, I remain committed to pursuing the public option. While I believe that the legislation we are considering does much to provide affordable coverage to millions of Americans and curb insurance company abuses, I also believe that the public option would provide additional competition to make insurance even more affordable. As we have discussed, I will work to ensure that we are able to vote on the public option in the coming months.

The letter is a clear sign that Reid's commitment to the public option throughout the health care debate has been as much personal as political. The Nevada Democrat, on several occasions, tried to corral the 60 votes needed to pass variations of the public plan -- but to no avail. His willingness to give the policy a separate hearing appears to be a thank you of sorts to the caucus's more progressive members for not jumping ship.

UPDATE: It also achieved a practical objective for the Majority Leader. Later on Friday, Sen. Bernie Sander's announced that he would drop his efforts to include a public option as a amendment to the health care reconciliation package -- forgoing a potentially tricky vote for the party.

"Given the very delicate situation at this time and the challenge facing Speaker Pelosi as she rounds up votes, Bernie and other senators have concluded that offering a public option amendment now could undermine the entire process," said Sanders spokesman Will Wiquist.

The search now is for a vehicle outside health care reform to get a public plan into law. The same institutional hurdles that killed the provision in the previous go-rounds -- mainly that there aren't 60 supportive senators to break a filibuster -- remain. But aides on the Hill are already looking to future reconciliation vehicles to which they can attach the public plan, which would, in turn, allow for it to pass via an up-or-down vote.

"I very much appreciate Majority Leader Reid's continuing support for a public option and I am grateful for his commitment to bring legislation before the full Senate within the next several months," Sen. Sanders said in response to Reid's letter. "It's imperative that we have a vote on this issue and I'm glad that is going to happen... It is my judgment that a majority of members in the House and Senate would support a public option when it comes up for a vote."

HERE IS THE FULL LETTER:


POrEID
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Hoping to assuage progressive Democrats who remain disappointed with the content of the health care reform bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) committed on Friday to holding a separate vo...
Hoping to assuage progressive Democrats who remain disappointed with the content of the health care reform bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) committed on Friday to holding a separate vo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,001
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
tony wise
06:44 PM on 03/29/2010
I personally believe if congress had at least really tried, if obama had not sold the public option off the table in a backroom deal, we could have seen it. remember most polls showed america wanted obama to scrap the bill, make a newer, BETTER one. 67 % approved of public option. thats a pretty high number. sure its justa poll..but what it does is show there is a great amount of support among independants at least, and maybe even some pubs. add to that obama set a new record for getting congress to vote his way. something like 94% in 2009. add to that over 30 senators signed a letter asking for it to be included. we could have done it.

we were never given that option. it was killed in a secret backroom deal by obama. cya in 2012 mr.president.
07:24 PM on 03/26/2010
Public Option....Yes! The young ones of today are not patient...this is something they must learn. Also, to understand the facts before they open their mouth. They ARE the future of this Nation...but they just have a lot of learning to do just as we did back in the 60's. We were impatient, too! But we did stop the war...finally!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
03:24 PM on 03/22/2010
If Senator Reid doesn't get the vote on public option, I would say his career is over and I am a Progressive Democrat !
03:10 PM on 03/22/2010
The new message by Congressional Democrats: "we promise to have a vote on issue .... in a few months"....just have patience. Then even IF they have a vote on said issue, it often fails and the excuse is "but, but...the Republicans voted NO and we couldn't get it passed". Some people fall for this and continue the "but just have patience meme" because that is exactly where the politicians want you to be. Reality... both parties have been corrupted and no longer do what is best for "we the people".
01:01 PM on 03/22/2010
Harry - don't let us down - the PO will be the icing on the cake !
11:52 AM on 03/22/2010
Oh, I'll believe this when I see it.

Sanders gives up a vote on the public option now for a possible vote later? How naive do you have to be to buy that?

If insurers aren't going to allow government competition now, they won't allow it when they have 30 million new forced customers and their billions in premiums with which to fight future reforms.
01:07 PM on 03/22/2010
Just be patient ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grf67
11:48 AM on 03/22/2010
The public option is the only plan that makes complete sense. Along with a single payer system, it could put the health insurance companies out of business and really help the health care for Americans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
killerqueen84
11:10 AM on 03/22/2010
H*ll Yeah! Don't back down until the PO is passed!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Irmanator
CARRIED INTEREST should be taxed as income
10:27 AM on 03/22/2010
1. Recess appointments - all those being blocked. Clean that up over Easter break.
2. Public option through reconcilliation. Make it a medicare buy-in at cost plus 15%. It would still be cheaper than private insurance and would help keep medicare funded and you could raise the re-imbursement rate for doctors a little.
Go Democrats! Keep them on the run!
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
08:44 AM on 03/22/2010
Reid: "As you know, I am a strong supporter of a public option,..."

Do we really know that? Probably not.

The only votes that might reflect a representatives position are the ones that win and not even all of those.

Legislators have been know to vote against bills they worked behind the scenes to craft.

Support is cheap. Pass it and then talk about it.
08:34 AM on 03/22/2010
I love the smell of budget reconciliation in the morning.... It smells like...victory.
06:37 AM on 03/22/2010
After yesterday, I'm beginning to think Democrats just might have the balls to pass the PO.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:59 PM on 03/22/2010
Agreed, I have a lot more respect for Reid now than I did and would have even more if he actually does bring the PO to a vote.
04:26 AM on 03/22/2010
trying to save his hyde !! Hypocrite he is !!!
03:37 AM on 03/22/2010
I live in Las Vegas. I have no reason to re-elect him.. He is a disgrace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElBruce
12:48 AM on 03/22/2010
Do it through reconciliation. Period.
Sloane7
Proud Liberal
01:07 AM on 03/22/2010
I agree!!!!!!
03:43 AM on 03/22/2010
Their is a good reason why the Senate has a 60 vote rule.. Its part of the protections in the constitution put in place to protect you. You should read up on it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Jamie Kowalski
Composer
03:31 PM on 03/22/2010
60 vote majority to break a filibuster most certainly IS NOT part of the constitution. Please don't instruct others to "read up" on something you haven't read yourself.
04:37 PM on 03/22/2010
Which is exactly why the Republicans were doing such an un-Consitutional thing by passing the Bush tax cuts, Medicare part D and other nefarious legislation using reconcilia -- oh, wait, you probably weren't thinking of that when you posted this, huh?