iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Israel: Settlement Construction Will Continue In East Jerusalem, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Says

Benjamin Netanyahu Israel Settlements Jerusalem

MARK LAVIE   03/21/10 07:55 PM ET   AP

JERUSALEM — Israel will not restrict construction in east Jerusalem, Israel's prime minister said Sunday hours before he left for Washington, despite a clear U.S. demand that building there must stop and a crisis in relations between the two longtime allies.

Benjamin Netanyahu's meeting with President Barack Obama Tuesday will be the first high-level meeting since the crisis erupted 10 days ago, when Israel embarrassed visiting Vice President Joe Biden by announcing a plan for construction in a Jewish neighborhood in east Jerusalem, which is claimed by the Palestinians.

"As far as we are concerned, building in Jerusalem is like building in Tel Aviv" and there would be no restrictions, Netanyahu told his Cabinet.

This tough stance on Jerusalem has run into stiff opposition in Washington, but there were signs that Israel was working to ease the crisis. Cabinet ministers said that while there would be no formal freeze, construction in Jewish neighborhoods in east Jerusalem would be restricted, like Netanyahu's partial 10-month West Bank construction freeze.

At stake are the first peace contacts between Israel and the Palestinian government in more than a year.

The Palestinians agreed to mediated talks, but the Jerusalem construction flap has given them second thoughts. Israel said it prefers direct negotiations but would go along with the indirect format.

On Sunday, Netanyahu met with Obama's special Mideast envoy, George Mitchell, who is set to mediate. He delivered the White House invitation to the prime minister.

At the meeting with Netanyahu, Mitchell said, "Our shared goal ... is the resumption of negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians in an environment that can result in an agreement that ends the conflict and resolves all permanent status issues."

U.S. officials have been dialing back the crisis rhetoric in recent days. The fact that a such a meeting was scheduled – even though the original purpose of Netanyahu's trip was not to meet Obama but to address a convention of AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby – is a likely indication that the U.S. and Israel are succeeding in ironing out their differences.

The diplomatic package Netanyahu is offering the U.S. to ease the bilateral crisis has not been made public, but officials say one element is agreement to discuss all the outstanding issues with the Palestinians in indirect peace talks Mitchell is set to mediate. Those would include the future of Jerusalem, as well as borders, Jewish settlements and Palestinian refugees.

Netanyahu has always opposed compromise over Jerusalem. Israel captured the city's eastern sector from Jordan during the 1967 Middle East war and annexed it, a move not recognized by any other country. Over four decades, Israel has built a string of Jewish neighborhoods around the Arab section of the city.

Most Israelis consider them part of the Jewish state, but Palestinians equate them to West Bank settlements, considered illegal under international law.

Previous rounds of unsuccessful peace talks have included a formula for Israel retaining the Jewish neighborhoods while Palestinians got sovereignty over the Arab sections, but Netanyahu pointedly took that off the table when he took office a year ago.

In Gaza Sunday, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called on Israel to end its blockade on Gaza, imposed after Palestinian militants captured an Israeli soldier in 2006 and tightened when the Islamic militant Hamas overran the territory the following year. Israel allows only basic humanitarian supplies into Gaza.

The blockade causes "unacceptable suffering" and "undercuts moderates and encourages extremists," Ban said after visiting a housing project in the Khan Younis refugee camp. "My message to the people of Gaza is this: The United Nations will stand with you, through this ordeal."

Most of the 15,000 homes destroyed or damaged during Israel's war in Gaza last winter have not been repaired because of the ban on importation of most building supplies. Israel launched the war after years of militant rocket fire from Gaza.

In West Bank violence Sunday, the Israeli military said troops in the West Bank shot dead two Palestinians carrying pitchforks and an ax who tried to attack a soldier.

Another Palestinian died of a head wound from a clash with Israeli soldier the day before. His brother was killed in the same protest.

Also Sunday, the Israeli military said it would build a checkpoint on lands of the Palestinian West Bank village of Betunia to search vehicles before they cross onto a major highway that links Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

Israel's Supreme Court ordered the military to allow Palestinians to travel on parts of the road that were closed to them in 2002, after Palestinian militants shot at Israeli vehicles and killed several motorists.

>___

Associated Press Writer Karin Laub contributed to this report from Gaza City, Gaza Strip.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

JERUSALEM — Israel will not restrict construction in east Jerusalem, Israel's prime minister said Sunday hours before he left for Washington, despite a clear U.S. demand that building there must...
JERUSALEM — Israel will not restrict construction in east Jerusalem, Israel's prime minister said Sunday hours before he left for Washington, despite a clear U.S. demand that building there must...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,614
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
11:49 PM on 03/23/2010
Sorry to break the news to some of you, all of this tit-for-tat between the Obama Admin. and Netanyahu has nothing to do with the settlements, or Jerusalem, but everything to do with Iran. Obama is furious because he needed the silence of Israel long enough to gather his coalition for imposing illegal sanctions on Iran. That's it. However, with Israel's blunder and public display of total disregard to international law, this has made Obama's job against Iran that more difficult. Why would anyone side with the U.S. against another Muslim country, when Israel defies all agreements.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
08:46 PM on 03/24/2010
I hate to break this to you, but the Obama administration has already accepted a nuclear armed Iran.
10:19 PM on 03/24/2010
Better rational Iran than irrational Israel - I'm completely serious when I say that. Israel is the *last* nation I'd want to have nuclear arms, because they are a religious state.
10:26 PM on 03/24/2010
I hate to break this to you, but most of the US is sick of Israel, and we don't mind Iran waving a nuclear weapon under your nose. It has become necessary, because Israel does not abide by laws.
10:17 PM on 03/24/2010
Foxy, you are smarter than that. Israel screwed up big time, and they are enjoying the fruits of their labor.
07:40 PM on 03/23/2010
Disarming the mercenary state we created is going to cost us. We know it, and we aren't afraid of doing so.
11:08 AM on 03/23/2010
If the Palestinians are concerned about Israeli building in Jerusalem, perhaps they should come to the negotiating table before more building is started. Since Obama & Co. are not predisposed to take any bull from Bibi & Co., this would be the time to strike a deal. Of course that logic assumes that the Palestinians actually want to negotiate a peaceful end to the conflict. They never have before, but there is always a first time.
07:37 PM on 03/23/2010
Israel is going to have to pick their battles. Jerusalem might seem a fine place to start, but the atrocities Israel has committed in taking it has bought it nothing. Israel is seen as a mercenary state, is that the desired outcome?
08:17 PM on 03/23/2010
In the middle east it is important to be feared by your enemies. If not you end up like the Kurds, or the Lebanese Christians, or the Copts, or Shiites in every country except Iran and Iraq. I know that you might like the Israelis more if they would just roll over and die so that the entire mid-east could be ruled by Arab dictatorships, but that isn't going to happen.

As for the "taking" of Jerusalem, the city was liberated in 1967 after the King of Jordan was warned by the Israelis to stay out of the fight. He responded with artillery. The Arabs now want to regain at the bargaining table what they lost in wars they started. They can have most of it back, but not all and not until they can prove their peaceful intentions.

Tell your Arab friends friends that they are going to have to survive with "only" 99+% of the land in the middle east and that sovereignty of Jerusalem will be shared when sovereignty of Mecca is.
09:57 PM on 03/22/2010
"Can you Americans even spell the word "hypocrisy". You have zero credibility when criticizing other nations for following the book, chapter by chapter, you yourselves wrote."

You are right about the gross blindness of Americans to the reality of the evil perpetrated by our government. However many of us are quite conscious of that evil. And we see support of Israel as a significant cog in the axis of that evil. So there is reason to try to alter the cog.

By the way, it is facile and false to conclude that every intervention in your long list of U.S. interventions was a bad or corrupted action. Show me any other geopolitical power in the world that has a good and morally shining record of action. How about Kosovo, for instance? The great politically sophisticated Europeans did not have the cajones to put a stop to genocide against the Muslims there. They let it go on and on for years. This pretty much proved that Europeans are self-interested degenerates just like the rest of the world.
06:44 PM on 03/23/2010
Apparently, you can't spell it, either.
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
09:54 PM on 03/22/2010
And sharing weapons of destruction with Israel will Not continue

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/me_israel0217_03_18.asp
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew
03:52 PM on 03/22/2010
The attempt to annex all Palestinian land in the name of reconstructing an ancient tribal/theocratic state, the allowance of special rights to specifically Orthodox groups (who ironically won't fight for, but politically demand the annexation of Palestinian land) prove that Israel is a Democratic Theocracy, just like Iran. (At least Iranian's don't actually vote for the crazy fascist that run their country.)
12:15 PM on 03/22/2010
Stop the flow of money to them.
12:40 PM on 03/22/2010
Geez....did you think of that all on your own?
02:50 PM on 03/22/2010
LOL SppokyOPS, Fanned. Someone with a sense of humor, finally.
photo
Readbetweentheelevens
You can't turn the wind so turn the sail.
04:29 PM on 03/22/2010
Israel -- the handout king. It hurts, doesn't it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew
03:57 PM on 03/22/2010
There was a law passed in the late 70s under Carter that said no state in the Middle East with nuclear weapons was entitled to any American military aid. This is why Israel as a state will not admit to be nuclear armed, despite that everyone knows they are. End funding for Israel now. Jail APAC for spying.
04:34 PM on 03/22/2010
Do you know anything about Israel's nuclear program or are you just talking? Isreal's nuclear program was started by France, the US got inolved a short time after France completed the first reactor. The US bult an additional reactor, and provided the Israel much of the technology, uranium, and other stocks to see that program through to fruition. Some of this was done DURING Carter's tenure, with his awareness and complicity. Why do you think Israel signed the Camp David Accords? Get real my friend and take off those rose colored ideology spectacles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Zonie
Right & Left are part of a whole. Divided we die.
06:49 PM on 03/23/2010
Symmington.

Yep.
12:01 PM on 03/22/2010
Israel occupied the disputed territories beginning in 1967. Since 1967 the US has intervened, invaded, occupied, and ki//ed more innocents on foreign sovereign soil than Israel will ever do.

The war in Viet Nam until 1975
GUATEMALA 1966-67
CAMBODIA 1969-1975
OMAN 1970
LAOS 1971-73
SOUTH DAKOTA l973 Command operation-Army directs Wounded Knee siege of Lakota Indians.
CHILE 1973 Command operation- CIA-backed coup ousts elected marxist president.
ANGOLA l976-92
CAMBODIA l975 Troops, bombing
IRAN l980
LIBYA 1981
EL SALVADOR l981-92
NICARAGUA l981-90
LEBANON l982-84
GRENADA l983-84
HONDURAS l983-89
IRAN l984
LIBYA l986
BOLIVIA 1986
IRAN l987-88
LIBYA 1989
PHILIPPINES 1989
PANAMA 1989
IRAQ 1990-91
KUWAIT 1991
IRAQ 1991-2003
SOMALIA 1992-94
YUGOSLAVIA 1992-94
BOSNIA 1993
HAITI 1994
ZAIRE (CONGO) 1996-97
SUDAN 1998
AFGHANISTAN 1998
IRAQ 1998
YUGOSLAVIA 1999
MACEDONIA 2001
AFGHANISTAN 2001-?
YEMEN 2002
PHILIPPINES 2002-?
COLOMBIA 2003
IRAQ 2003-?
PAKISTAN 2005-?
SOMALIA 2006-?
SYRIA 2008
YEMEN 2009
Can you Americans even spell the word "hypocrisy". You have zero credibility when criticizing other nations for following the book, chapter by chapter, you yourselves wrote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 PM on 03/22/2010
Maybe the US needs to make right a few wrongs and Israel will be one of them. As for the double talk credibility point, The US hasn't exactly been too stern with Israel. It just happens that there are US citizens who have an oppinion. It is laughable that you would discredit them.
01:14 PM on 03/22/2010
Nah, there is nothing you can or will do to Israel. I think it is important you admit the truth to yourselves. Laughable? Yeah, as I said, hypocrisy at his finest. You find it laughable you have dispatched, and continue to dispatch from this earth literally millions of innocents in your insatiable quest for land, oil, and money? A few wrongs? Is that really your analysis of your terrible intervening history. No wonder much of the world despises you, no wonder much of the world will cheer when China comes calling on you with a deed of trust. Your level of consciousness is as bankrupt as your country is financially.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
01:27 PM on 03/22/2010
Spooky,,,you really struck a nerve with that one. And it is true if one researches US history. there is actually much more than you posted without getting into the kxllings of the American Indians(my wife is l/4 so I read alot) in addition to the link I will post later....America bought the Phillipines around 1900 from Spain...the Filipinos did not like that and the US sent in the Marines to "QUELL THE DISTURBANCE. well the rioting got out of hand and the word came down from the WH to KxLL everone over the age of 11(this is true) so the Marines could not tell a 10 year old from a ll year old so EVERYONE WAS MASSA CURED 600.000 worth...as a American I am not proud of that . and there is like you say much more...
http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.html
01:56 PM on 03/22/2010
Thank you. Most on this thread interpret my comments as defending the status-quo in Israel. I do not defend the aggression against the Palestinians nor do I defend the rocket attacks into Israel. But, the American people, those that criticise Israel, some even advocating American military intervention against Israel, have no credibility given the history and current activities of the American military machine.
In fact, when I see these kinds of comments, this kind of h8te on display, let's call it for what is is, it only serves to harden the position of those that perpetuate violence against innocents. It also gives pause to the moderates who otherwise are working hard inside Israel to achieve a lasting and enduring peace in the region. There are lines in the sand so to speak, that will cause even the moderates to take up arms, if those lines are crossed.

This is one of the lines I am speaking about;

Lalalandboy I'm a Fan of Lalalandboy I'm a fan of this user 18 fans permalink The U.S. needs to teach Israel a hard lesson. let's put them on notice that we will bomb each new settlement immediately after it is built.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 3/21/2010
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:57 AM on 03/22/2010
Maybe the Palestinians and the world have it all wrong.
Maybe we should instead ask Israel,
"What will it take to turn that frown into a smile?"
photo
Yank in France
Rien se cree tout se transforme
03:04 PM on 03/22/2010
Nothing can take the frown off a person's face who will never been happy unless he is unhappy!
photo
Readbetweentheelevens
You can't turn the wind so turn the sail.
04:43 PM on 03/22/2010
Just like always, Papa -- money.
11:35 AM on 03/22/2010
“Human Rights Watch report
"Armed groups in Gaza have fired approximately 147 rockets into Israel since the end of major Israeli military operations in Gaza on January 18, 2009..
The rockets are invariably indiscriminate when fired at populated areas because they lack any guidance mechanism and cannot be aimed accurately at military targets. "

Building houses in one's capital undermines peace efforts, but non-ending rockets attacks on Israeli civilians ... shhhh, who cares, this must be ignored ...

This is some kind of new definition of "rationality" no one was previously aware of.
Thanks. Mr. Obama. All those years of college reading of works Al Husseini come in handy now.ROFL...
11:41 AM on 03/22/2010
By duplicating the efforts, Israel becomes a mercenary state.
11:53 AM on 03/22/2010
Duplicating efforts?
You're irrational, to say the least.
Why, I haven';t heard of much building Palestinains spend the billions they get annually.
Most ends up in graft,. maintaining private militias and servants in W. Bank and buying up any weapons they can get past the israelis.

It would be great if Palestinain learn to build instead of lobbing missles willy nilly at their enemies and contantly whining .
But then again, this is the M.O. of the most states in the Middle East mired in poverty, prejudice and intolerance for other perspectives.

oops, reality.
11:58 AM on 03/22/2010
I don't condone the rocket attacks, or the suicide bombings, or any other attack on any civilian, for that matter. They are barbaric acts and inexcusable. But, it must be recognized that the rocket attacks and suicide bombings did not arise spontaneously out of a vacuum. They arose in the context of Israel's illegal expulsion of 700,000+ Palestinians in 1948, Israel's illegal attack and seizure of Arab lands in 1967, Israel's illegal settlement and attempted annexation of the Occupied Territories thereafter and Israel's continuing brutality, dispossession and repression towards the Palestinians and its Arab neighbors. So, Israel itself bears ultimate responsibility for the rocket attacks and suicide bombings. If Israel merely complied with international law, we'd have peace in the Middle East quicker than you can say "treaty".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
01:36 PM on 03/22/2010
Stan...good inciteful post...IF Israel only complied with Res. 242 and allowed the right of return of Palestinians and Syrians the ME would be a quiet area.....EXCEPT they already have us inbroiled in a war that will never end....Iraq is a mess, the only people that are doing well are the large OIL corporations that are sucking Iraq dry. We should have learned about Afgan/Pakistan from the Russians who could not win and we won't either . my .02
02:48 PM on 03/22/2010
"I don't condone the rocket attacks, or the suicide bombings... But... but... but... but..."
YES YOU DO condone and support it .
As long as it is directed against people you personally dislike., obviously.
next...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
10:43 AM on 03/22/2010
Grossly unacceptable behavior or insane policies doesn’t matter and Israel knows it, If they can get away with killing 600 civilians then why should they worry about a few houses or land grabbing. It is painfully clear the US has niether the will nor the courage to cut off funds from Israel. They are, overall, our only ally in the ME, like it or not.
10:51 AM on 03/22/2010
The US ki//s non-combatants by the dozens in a single dr0ne attack on weddings, funerals, and private homes in AFPAK while attempting to target a single individual. Can you spell hypocrisy?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Downtown
11:27 AM on 03/22/2010
can you spell strawman?
04:43 PM on 03/23/2010
Logical Fallacy - False Dilemma; you can actually be against the war in Afghanistan and against Israeli settlements.

You do know that a little more than half of Americans are against that war, right? That means omobob has at least a 50/50 chance of being against the war, too.

On top of that, asking that kind of question on Huffington Post? Are you new here? I would bet the vast majority of posters are against the war.
11:15 AM on 03/22/2010
They are not our ally, and ceased being our ally the moment they fired on a US ship and killed US military members - intentionally, as a way to provoke us into war via deception. With their latest acts, they have insulted our Vice President and our country.

They are a hostile foreign nation, and need to be regarded as just that - a hostile foreign nation. We need to cut off not just foreign aid handouts, but military assistance, as well.
lastpost
see biography
10:39 AM on 03/22/2010
“Israel will not restrict construction in east Jerusalem”
Since that would run counter to, and tend to contradict, Adolf’s much cherished evaluation of our national character. With regard to unbridled avariciousness. Which we would obviously not want to prove fallacious. And anyway, where is the profit in peace?


“Most of the 15,000 homes destroyed or damaged during Israel's war in Gaza last winter have not been repaired because of the ban on importation of most building supplies.”
Fortunately however, such materials are in great demand for the construction of buildings elsewhere in the region.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
01:43 PM on 03/22/2010
Lastpost.....you say:
And anyway, where is the profit in peace?

I think the USA Defense Industry would agree with you and that is why they bribe our legislators into war with everyone....gotta use up all that white phosporus ya know
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
10:35 AM on 03/22/2010
That the new building threatens the peace plan is no skin off Bibi’s nose. He’s not interested in anything but a one state solution. If the US and UN haven’t censured Israel over the killing of 600 civilians, brought about larger in view of the IDF changing the rules of engagement regarding the use of deadly force, why should a few houses matter to Israel?
11:20 AM on 03/22/2010
Bibi has shown time and again that he is interested in nothing less that complete dominion over the entire area. Israel needs water, and Palestinian territories have it. That's how it is framed as an issue of survival for them, but the key part is that Israel, and Israelis do NOT want to share. They intend to drive out the Palestinians by any means necessary.

They accuse the entire world of wanting to drive Israel into the sea, but that is because as a nation, that criticism is just as fair and harsh when used against themselves - they want to drive another people into it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
01:46 PM on 03/22/2010
Aerows....and in addition Israel has it in THEIR BLOOD to own the Litani River....the only problem....its in LEBANON......look for an attempt in So. Lebanon soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
woody7
Always a Dem, but..............
10:24 AM on 03/22/2010
Why are we propping them up? oh wait I know why.Just cut t heir funding.
10:48 AM on 03/22/2010
That would be fine with me, in fact I wish the US would indeed cease all aid to Israel. But your view of the relationship is short-sighted, shallow, and demonstrative of your lack of understanding and comprehension of the dynamics of the relationship between the two countries. Israel will survive w/o US funding and she will continue to build the settlements you are so opposed to.
The US can pull the funding on any Sunday afternoon it wishes to but it won't. Israel owns your Congress and much of your financial sector. The reprucussions from what you advocate will ripple through your already frail economy. The US will be forced to take on the covert actions you currently farm out to countries like Egypt and Israel. Do you really believe the billions the US provides each year to both countries is provided w/o strings, indeed ropes, attached? Take a deep breath and think about it for a few minutes. Both countries will feel the pain of a rupture in the relationship between the them. For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction, surely you learned that in elementary school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
01:48 PM on 03/22/2010
Spooky...you are now fanned
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
woody7
Always a Dem, but..............
09:21 AM on 03/23/2010
No you are over complicating the issue,
10:19 AM on 03/22/2010
Disgraceful that American children die for their greed.