iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EPA Launching Major Investigation Into BPA

Epa Investigates Bpa

MATTHEW PERRONE   03/29/10 07:22 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency said Monday it will investigate the impact of the chemical Bisphenol-A on the U.S. water supply and other parts of the environment.

Federal regulators have been ramping up their scrutiny of the controversial plastic-hardener at the behest of scientists and activists who say it can interfere with infant growth and development.

The EPA said in a statement it will begin measuring levels of BPA in drinking and ground water. More than 1 million pounds of BPA are released into the environment each year, according to the agency.

The EPA will also "look for ways to reduce unnecessary exposures, including assessing substitutes."

BPA is found in canned food linings, water bottles, CDs and hundreds of other household items.

In January the Food and Drug Administration changed its position on the chemical's safety, voicing "some concern" about its effects on children and infants. The agency previously concluded in 2008 that the trace amounts of the chemical that leach out of food containers are safe.

"We share FDA's concern about the potential health impacts from BPA," said Steve Owens, an assistant administrator with EPA.

The EPA's action did not come without some prodding. Earlier this month Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer of New York urged the EPA to develop an action plan for BPA. He noted that BPA was left off a list of four chemicals subject to tighter regulation, despite EPA director Lisa Jackson publicly voicing concern about the chemical.

The federal government has been grappling with the safety of BPA for almost three years.

Dozens of animal studies have linked the chemical to abnormal growths and cancerous tumors, but those results have never been confirmed in humans.

The FDA and has set aside $30 million to study BPA's safety over the next 18 to 24 months.

While the FDA gathers more information, consumer safety advocates have urged the EPA to push ahead with tighter regulation of the chemical.

The EPA has authority to restrict the use of chemicals that pose risks to the environment and public health. The FDA regulates ingredients and packaging of processed foods and drugs.

The American Chemistry Council, an industry trade group, has argued that BPA is safe and has been used widely since the 1950s.

"It is important to recognize that EPA is not proposing any regulatory action regarding human health," the group said in a statement late Monday.

The council represents BPA producers including Dow Chemical Co., Bayer AG and Hexion Specialty Chemicals.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency said Monday it will investigate the impact of the chemical Bisphenol-A on the U.S. water supply and other parts of the environment. Federal regu...
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency said Monday it will investigate the impact of the chemical Bisphenol-A on the U.S. water supply and other parts of the environment. Federal regu...
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:52 PM on 03/31/2010
If you're politically liberal and want to lose 10-30 pounds without dieting visit: http://www.kleinerlink.de/loseweightnow
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
05:53 AM on 03/30/2010
Well the corporately owned and operated FDA is not going to do anything about it.
10:51 AM on 03/30/2010
we'll see. could you list any documentation that proves the fda is corporately funded?
01:13 PM on 03/31/2010
Quite sad that you don't get the corporate influence in the FDA. Do a little research for yourself.
Also Pres. Obama has just released legislation to drill for more oil.
OIL!!! now therein lies the problem, all of these harmfull chemicals come from some sort of oil by product. Even if we reduce our need for fossil fuels for transport these companies will continue to use them for more and more byproducts to keep the cash flowing. Get the picture yet?? Use more oil for other than transportation and we have more need to DRILL. And as always the real cost of doing this type of buisiness is easily passed onto the consumer in the form of cleanup on and in the earth and not the least of our personal health.
09:36 PM on 03/29/2010
at least 18 months before any action can be taken? The EU has already studied this. Why wait. How many disabled kids will be born in the next two years.
07:17 AM on 03/30/2010
But BPA is not banned here in Europe. As a matter of fact, the German government did a re-evaluation a couple of years ago by looking at research done by the chemical industry. It then raised the daily maximum limit fivefold, deeming BPA to be harmless. Nowadays, the German agency in charge, the Bundesamt fuer Risikobewertung, argues that Germany cannot impose a limit or ban on BPA since it no longer has the authority to do so. Only the EU can do that - and hasn't done anything in that regard as of now. The BPA lobby is very much alive and kicking in the EU.
A recent German research showed that BPA is in almost all German mineral water sold in plastic bottles, so unfortunately we are consuming that stuff just like you Americans do.
08:01 PM on 03/29/2010
For those interested in self education I recommend this:

http://www.rachel.org/en/newsletters/archive/rachels_news

http://www.ewg.org/kidsafe
10 Americans and the chemicals in their blood; excellent video!
07:59 PM on 03/29/2010
The "new BPA" are the "harmless" pesticides that they are proposing to spray all over Californians to eliminate invasive moths and bugs that have been here for decades:

http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/content?oid=870890

"Pamela G. Marrone founded Agraquest in 1995. She had previously worked for Monsanto in the Insect Control Group. Her focus was developing new products in genetically engineered microbial pesticides and transgenic crops for insect control. This new venture capital and agribusiness-backed firm that she launched was able to raise over $50 million.

The company’s first product was an application directed at mosquito control through the use of mosquito larvae. She also became co-founder of the Davis Area Technology Association, was on the board of trustees of the Sutter Hospital Health Central Division and was co-chair of the University of California President's Advisory Commission On Agriculture and Natural Resources. She was the Sacramento Chamber's 2001 Business Woman of the Year and even received a Presidential Green Chemistry Award. Agraquest's commercially successful products include Serenade (QST 713) (Bacillus subtilis bacteria) and Ballad, both widely used in organic agriculture. Some are even sold in Wal-Mart around the country. In fact, she and other Agraquest scientists have bragged in numerous newspaper articles and interviews that the company scoured the world for the discovery of "novel" microorganisms as possible candidates for bio-pesticides, insecticides, fungicides and microcides.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
07:47 PM on 03/29/2010
Glass.

And it recycles easier.
05:51 PM on 03/29/2010
BPA and pthalates are already banned in Europe.

And they have universal health care.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:27 PM on 03/29/2010
So move to Europe. Bye!
07:52 PM on 03/29/2010
Looking for attention little newbie puppy?

Here's a nice cookie for you.

Now, you may go.
07:29 AM on 03/30/2010
Wrong, it is not banned here in Europe! The German government actually increased the daily max amount fivefold a couple of years ago.
05:33 PM on 03/29/2010
Health insurance reform includes programs promoting better health and disease prevention. What about our unknowing daily exposures to hundreds (actually, thousands) of synthetic chemicals developed since WWII, most untested or tested under outmoded safety standards.
What about the fact that breast cancer rates have more than doubled during that time? Well, the list of new "epidemics" just goes on and on.... thyroid dysfunction, autism, ADHD, asthma, diabetes II, infertility, etc etc.
Point being, you can't really talk about disease prevention without also talking about -- better yet, without thoroughly and rigorously investigating -- the role that's likely being played by this stew of stealth toxics. It's not just about eating right and exercise.....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mensch99
06:11 PM on 03/29/2010
Well put.
Our government has failed us miserably.
The list of real poisons in our food and environment is truly staggering.
Highly informed people like you will try as best they can to protect themselves.
I feel empathy for those less-informed people who assume that restaurant and grocery store food must be safe.
Read the back label of an “air freshener”- it is poison. But it’s ok if you only breathe it?! HA!
Obviously we need real regulation including a ban on all deceptive advertising.
Wake up America!
My last beef:
http://www.grist.org/article/2010-01-05-cheap-food-ammonia-burgers
09:00 PM on 03/29/2010
Fluoride is a big one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Lauria
05:19 PM on 03/29/2010
Hi. Tom Lauria from the International Bottled Water Association. The photo illustrating this article on the EPA's investigation in Bisphenol A (BPA) shows a photograph of plastic PET resin bottles, which do not contain BPA. Because polycarbonate plastic (hardened with BPA) is in so many everyday products, it is wise to remain as accurate as possible when discussing this issue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:30 PM on 03/29/2010
Accuracy and photo illustration don't mix well here on HP...
05:24 AM on 03/30/2010
Yeah, cans of tomatoes would be the better photo for this story.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mensch99
04:52 PM on 03/29/2010
The investigation of Bisphenol-A is long overdue.
Hopefully this signals a departure from the Bush administration’s hands-off approach to regulation.
Let’s move on to investigate GMOs, hormones and antibiotic use in livestock.
Let’s check pesticide levels in food and act accordingly.
I have one last beef: read this and I hope it doesn’t make you sick!-

http://www.grist.org/article/2010-01-05-cheap-food-ammonia-burgers
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stiv Wilson
04:48 PM on 03/29/2010
You might want to switch which picture you have associated with this post. You have PET #1 featured in the water bottle picture and PET does not leach BPA (though other harmful chemicals can leach from it) Polycarbonate #7 does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AllexxisF1
04:35 PM on 03/29/2010
I have switched to pyrex for everything (their lids are BPA free) and SIGG bottles for water and protein shakes.

I buy my food from a butcher wrapped in paper and my veggies from a local market.

Between steroids in the food and BPA from plastic you have to be mindful of your food!
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
07:48 PM on 03/29/2010
Check your SIGG. Some are lined with BPA just like canned food.
11:23 AM on 03/30/2010
Check your food from a butcher.
04:28 PM on 03/29/2010
Just staret using glass again.
04:18 PM on 03/29/2010
Read industry shakedown and whitewash. There are no uncorrupted government officials. None.
04:08 PM on 03/29/2010
This is gross, and we need to get fluoride out of the tap water, too, because it's in all the food. Look into it.
04:22 PM on 03/29/2010
Unfortunately, they dont want to admit wrong doing... It will never happen...
04:26 PM on 03/29/2010
How many Nobel Prize winners in medicine will it take? The reason they won't admit they were wrong is because building the atomic bombs made mountains of this garbage, and they had to push it somehow. The science isn't even up for debate anymore, fluoride is clearly carcinogenic. I don't want to see the country get bankrupted by Federal tort claims, but just get it out of the water supply, it's downright inhuman.
photo
Unrepentant
lex parsimoniae
07:11 PM on 03/29/2010
I don't know where you live but that would be a local issue. There is no fluoride in the drinking water in my town. What makes you think there is fluoride in yours?

Our town does add chlorine at a level of .35 parts per million and gives a yearly analysis to all the water consumers of exactly what is in the water. Of course, I live in one of the blue "socialist" states, YMMV.
08:42 PM on 03/29/2010
I have the pleasure of living in Fluorida, at least for another 40 some days. I can avoid the the tap water -- it has some chick's Yaz and some dude's Paxil in it anyway. It's the fluoride in the food that's the problem. I like to eat spaghetti, and the pasta itself is like 75% water. I like fruits and vegetables -- can't be made without water.

I shouldn't be drinking American soda anyway, that HFCS is poison, but even if I wanted to have one, it would have HUGE doses of fluoridated, carbonated water. Just please get it out of the water supply. if people want it in their toothpaste, that's fine, they can buy toothpaste. Thousands of doctors and nurses and scientists and lawyers are against this practice, INCLUDING Nobel Prize winners, it's totally outdated. If we want to make preventative medicine work to bring health care costs down, the fed has to make it a little bit easier for us.