iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

White House Launches Push For Workplace Flexibility

First Posted: 05/31/2010 5:12 am EDT Updated: 05/25/2011 4:00 pm EDT

Two out of three American families are so-called "juggler families," in which parents are forever trying to balance the needs of their job with the needs of their children.

But many workplaces -- and government policies -- are still stuck in the distant past, operating as if most families still had a single breadwinner, and someone else to mind the kids when they're out of school, or the grandparents when they need care.

Once you realize that, there are a bunch of employer practices and policy proposals that suddenly make a lot of sense: Encouraging telecommuting, giving people time off for family emergencies, enabling flexible schedules, allowing employees to swap shifts, and so on.

At the White House on Wednesday, Michelle and Barack Obama held a summit meeting to discuss, as the president put it, "what we can do -- as business leaders and advocates, as employees and as government officials -- to modernize our workplaces to meet the needs of our workforce and our families."

As part of his push, Obama cited a new White House report which concludes that flexible workplace rules could increase productivity.

But he also cast the need for more humane workplaces in moral terms.

"[U]ltimately, it reflects our priorities as a society -- our belief that no matter what each of us does for a living, caring for our loved ones and raising the next generation is the single most important job that we have. I think it's time we started making that job a little easier for folks," he said.

The invited guests split into working groups to share stories of best practices currently in use. Several companies reported great success in giving their employees more flexibility.

Dow Corning HR chief Alan Hubbard described a scene of enlightened self interest; where his company offers workers a dazzling array of ways to address their domestic needs, in a quest to "eliminate the noise in their lives" and "allow them to focus on the very things we need them to do."

Advocates of greater workplace flexibility consistently said their biggest obstacle is managers who can't let go of the need to exercise authority over employees -- in person. "Sometimes flexibility requires sharing control," said Peter Berg, a Michigan State University professor who tracks workplace issue. "Sometimes there's a sense [among managers] that we don't necessarily want to share control."

Donna Klein, who heads the advocacy group Corporate Voices for Working Families, said that when she worked for Marriott Hotels, she discovered just how attached some managers are to face time. "We surveyed the managers, and with respect to flexibility and people not being there, the managers were more comfortable seeing -- being able to see -- an employee not working than they were not seeing an employee and wondering if they weren't working."

Michelle Clements, HR chief for outdoor outfitter REI, said "the greatest obstacles are leaders who don't embrace it, don't support it, and employees live in fear."

There were few explicit policy proposals --- at least not yet.

Linda Meric, of the 9to5 advocacy group, was one of the few to make the point that government has a role in establishing some minimum standards for such things as paid sick days, and paid family and medical leave.

Both the president and the first lady discussed how, not so long ago, they had their own problems balancing work and family obligations.

"I remember those days," Michele Obama said. "And as all the parents in this room know, it's never perfect -- ever. But here's the thing: As we all know here today, it just doesn't have to be that way, doesn't have to be that hard."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,352
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
04:52 PM on 04/03/2010
woooooooo?!?!
what is this????
http://zxcvnm.webs.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katieandtom
06:06 PM on 04/02/2010
who cares about flexibility at this point?

we just want the jobs.

how about that obama? think you could work on stabilizing the economy so that businesses can hire again and the consumers will start buying again? how about working on that first?

thanks.
10:46 AM on 04/02/2010
Finally people are realizing that 'one size' does not fit all. Either you work the corporate hours or not at all, this setup only benefits the employer and puts stress on the worker when the worker can't fit into the strict requirements.

It is past time for scheduling that benefits the employer and the employee. Companies will benefit by having a more stress free employee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katieandtom
06:08 PM on 04/02/2010
youre joking right?

with the kids that are coming up into the workforce, you couldnt stress them if you tried. they call in 3 days a month, think that they shouldnt have to report to anyone and think that they deserve what the owner is making without any of the liability.

obama is an idiot.
04:59 AM on 04/02/2010
I love people here who are shilling for the current system where your employer basically owns you if you don't run your own business. If you do run a business you just enjoy the fact that you have your workers scared to death. Face it our current system is not too far removed from Feudalism for workers. All the power is in employers hands.
11:11 PM on 04/01/2010
I did wonder what else they would try to control. Curious how that will work. Do people with families get a flexible schedule and those without get to cover for them? How about the size of the family? Does the flex time increase depending on size?
01:22 AM on 04/02/2010
Your first question is pretty much the status quo where I work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:20 PM on 04/05/2010
They should not require you to do "more" work just because you do not have a family. That is not fair. But providing flexibility is really important. For instance, even if you have no children, what would you do if your spouse, sister/brother, mom/dad, etc. became ill and needed someone to take them to the doctor and whatnot? You would ask your employer for some flexibility. You would not want to quit your job, nor should you have to.
08:07 AM on 04/02/2010
It's not just families. There are many jobs where a good number of the employees are part-time students, etc. Companies that implement a successful flex-time program do not base it on what occurs during off hours.

This seems like it was a brainstorming session to address concerns within today's workplace. I think at this time when so many are unemployed, if there are people that are working that may want fewer hours and more flexibility, job sharing which allows this flexibility, may really take off. Share the job and you share the wealth.
10:31 PM on 04/01/2010
Maybe Obama is smarter than I thought – he’s distracted you again and has most of you all pumped up to rail “against da man”.

More European style national socialist theory…… has anyone held out their open hands yet to demand 4-6 weeks paid vacation. European Nations are trying to dig out from these failed governmental dictates and Obama is trying to push it here. Par for the course.

Maybe he should stay in his office for awhile and work with people who know what their doing to invigorate the employment picture. Instead, he comes up with another inane idea that would place yet another burden on American businesses.

It’s not a difficult concept to grasp. Let business conduct business with as little interference as possible and you just might have more people working again.

If you Leftists want a utopian workplace, why don’t you invest your capital and build one. Awwwww, that wouldn’t be fair. First you’d have to earn the money, then you’d have to risk the money, then you’d have to sacrifice your time and effort 24/7/365 to make it a success. That wouldn’t be fair.

Flex time, job sharing, and telecommuting are nothing new. Most positions don’t fit the model. Telecommuting, work from home, is extremely difficult for most people to do effectively. It takes a high degree of discipline and focus to make it work. I did it for most of my career. Most people can’t handle the lack of structure.
07:50 AM on 04/02/2010
--Let business conduct business with as little interference as possible and you just might have more people working again--

----------------------------

Right. Lack of interference over big business is what got us into this mess! Continue down that road and you will likely be waving bye-bye to whatever tiny scrap of labor remains here in the US.

Many successful businesses are run by what you refer to as, "Leftists." Especially, small businesses, which is crucial to our recovery. If you truly want what's best for this country you might want to do what successful people do -- start offering solutions. We'll get much further with those rather than your insulting rants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombie fairy
10:06 AM on 04/02/2010
" European Nations are trying to dig out from these failed governmental dictates"

Please cite your source.
08:11 PM on 04/01/2010
Isn't there a line in James Joyce's(sic?) work which reads, "...Jug, jug, jug...:? It may relate to Moll Bloom watching dogs copulate.
08:10 PM on 04/01/2010
Flextime; it's about time. It would help attitudes, productivity, families, cut down on traffic and greenhouse gasses. It would be our nations first step into the 21st century
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Jaxy
Bah! My micro-bio didn't meet your guidelines
06:13 PM on 04/01/2010
Can't we all just act like Rethugs in Congress and just petlantly refuse to work after 2:00 p.m.? That would certainly return the 'bloom' to my 'rose'!
11:08 PM on 04/01/2010
You are absolutely free to work until 2:00 and your employer is free to not pay you beyond 2:00pm or better yet replace you with someone who will be willing to work beyond 2:00pm. Isn't it wonderful to live in a free country?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeAnn Cammack
born-again liberal
12:11 AM on 04/02/2010
that may be, but the Congressmen didn't lose pay when they stopped working at 2:00 pm. I think that was Jaxy's point.
07:41 AM on 04/02/2010
Disdain, I think you're absolutely right. This is a free country and we have the power to replace those republicans who not only refuse to work past 2:00 but continually obstruct and complain when they are there.

Remember, Democrats need to Stand United and VOTE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
05:32 PM on 04/01/2010
Diversification is a good thing, be it investments, or not supporting conglomorates like Walmart. If they fail, we will ahve very few options for a myriad of items we are used to gettign with ease.

Walmart =Too big To Fail.
05:11 PM on 04/01/2010
Obama, what are You - nuts?

Get real here. You can not tow the minds of free marketeers into the twentyfirst century right after they reinstated slavery. That is too much of a stretch for anyone.

The guys who could improve their workplaces can and will also let children in Africa and people in poverty in Asia work for them. They have for the last fifty years destroyed every economy on the planet they could get their hands on for profit and You want to make them improve workplaces when they don't make a profit from that?

YOU are the one who thinks those parasites EARN what they get. So stop jabbering this nonsense about them having to do ANYTHING to make things better while telling them making money by making things worse is a legal form of income that justifies them making billions.
04:30 PM on 04/01/2010
I agree with the concept of greater flexibility for those with family obligations but there has to be some mechanism for accountability. As a single person, my workplace experience has been that there is an unstated assumption that I am available 24/7 to pick up the slack for those people and that I have no other obligations besides work, while co-workers with families pretty much come and go as they please. My similarly-situated co-workers have voiced the same complaint.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombie fairy
10:08 AM on 04/02/2010
Same here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:24 PM on 04/01/2010
Admirable indeed, but first, you must HAVE a workplace.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Godweiser
The eyes have it.
03:16 PM on 04/01/2010
As an aside, I think we need a one-hour lunch, instead of the current mandate of thirty minutes. I think it'd be better for productivity as well as the surrounding businesses if employees had time to go out and eat. Thirty minutes isn't enough time to really pack up, get out, wait around in line to get food if you're buying, or find a place to eat if you aren't and wolf the food down. It's less healthy to eat that fast anyway.

An hour would benefit everyone involved more. And before some Republican starts ranting me out for laziness, I'm not saying this because I want an hour lunch or because I'm rushed when I get a meal; I'm a chef, when I get thirty minutes, I have plenty of time to eat my food because I've been cooking it the whole time. But I think just about every other business could use the hour, and it certainly wouldn't hurt the bottom line for decent restaurants either.

Flex time doesn't apply to me either, as I am in a job where the schedule is dictated by other people's convenience, not my own. I still think it's a good idea in general; happier workers work harder. Flex time and the overall happiness of workers at work can only increase productivity...as it has in European nations. By contrast, America works too hard for too little and is miserable doing it.
03:44 PM on 04/01/2010
I think it is great if you want a 30 min lunch or a two hour lunch. If your business can handle it and is willing to work with you more power to you both. I think there are benefits to short lunches for people who don't need them and long ones for people who do. When one is choosing an industry to work in they should also be cognizant of those distinctions.

Shorter worker weeks and strict break/work standards actually hurt the restaurant market on the employee end in many European countries. A lot of workers got shorted on wages and hours due to socially oriented labour legislation. It is a part of why they are scaling hours up in some European countries now.

I think the issue was that they tried to force people and businesses to operate a way that was not optimal for either party. This conversation by Obama is good, I just hope he doesn't follow the example that France is trying to escape right now. If we can have happier workers through choice or incentive, that would be much better than legislative pigeonholing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timetocookdinner
Angry housewife
03:00 PM on 04/01/2010
YES! workplace flexibility! YES!

http://www.momsrising.org/

Parents unite! Liberal, Conservative, Tea Bagger, Radical, Libertarian
We are all looking for a way to support our families and be good parents!