iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

ArcelorMittal Orbit (PHOTOS): Plan For Massive 2012 London Olympic Tower Is Unveiled


First Posted: 06/01/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:00 PM ET

The ArcelorMittal Orbit, a teetering tower planned for the 2012 Olympic Games, is set to become the largest work of public art in the United Kingdom.

The tower, almost 400 ft tall, will give guests a wide view of London's landscape. It will be taller than both Big Ben and the Statue of Liberty.

British mayor Boris Johnson said of the architect behind the tower, Anish Kapoor: "He has taken the idea of a tower and transformed it into a piece of modern British art. It would have boggled the minds of the Romans. It would have boggled Gustave Eiffel."

The tower, named after steel magnate and the richest man in London, Lakshmi Mittal, consists of almost 1,000 tonnes of steel which visitors will be able to climb.

The Tower of Babel was apparently a reference, according to Kapoor; "There is a kind of medieval sense to it of reaching up to the sky, building the impossible. A procession, if you like. It's a long winding spiral: a folly that aspires to go even above the clouds and has something mythic about it."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

The ArcelorMittal Orbit, a teetering tower planned for the 2012 Olympic Games, is set to become the largest work of public art in the United Kingdom. The tower, almost 400 ft tall, will give guests a...
The ArcelorMittal Orbit, a teetering tower planned for the 2012 Olympic Games, is set to become the largest work of public art in the United Kingdom. The tower, almost 400 ft tall, will give guests a...
Filed by Adam Taylor  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 173
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
GrogInOhio
In 2010 AND 2011 I paid more taxes than General El
08:43 AM on 05/04/2010
Okay... that's just ugly.
09:12 AM on 04/09/2010
That's supposed to be art??? wth???
09:45 AM on 05/27/2010
Everyone who has a belly button is an art critic - what get's me is they are referring to Anish Kapoor as an "architect".....This publication might get it facts correct or fire those checking them!! British mayor Boris Johnson said of the architect behind the tower, Anish Kapoor...HELLO
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dogma
A sense of humor is no laughing matter.
02:16 AM on 04/09/2010
What came in 2nd place, I'm afraid to ask (?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
12:05 AM on 04/09/2010
That is one fugly looking thing. ;-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
12:04 AM on 04/09/2010
CBC radio had an article on this, and it mentioned that the nickname hadn't been settled on yet.

Might I suggest the 'Trumpet'
06:29 PM on 04/08/2010
When you have a major piece of architechture like this the setting is as important as the structure. The setting, which looks baren, is vastly under-designed to support this monster structure. Maybe that might help it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ColoradoCool
Proud Liberal, Graduate Degree, Mother, Grandmothe
05:28 PM on 04/08/2010
That's just bad and wrong! REALLY fugly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ColoradoCool
Proud Liberal, Graduate Degree, Mother, Grandmothe
05:33 PM on 04/08/2010
Looks like this was modeled on an earthworm's house.
02:48 PM on 04/08/2010
it looks like a really cool tower...that just collapsed.
02:42 PM on 04/08/2010
First impression? Revulsion and utter disbelief. It may grow on me! NOT!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:22 PM on 04/08/2010
Just plain ugly!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
3M Rocker
02:17 PM on 04/08/2010
cool rollercoaster!
01:24 PM on 04/08/2010
Louis Black already did material about this. It's his "Big f'n thing" bit here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6eh9R8F260
01:16 PM on 04/08/2010
Hideous. Maybe they'll put it next to that ridiculous "London Eye."
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
02:08 AM on 04/08/2010
The structure seems entirely appropriate. A pointless,prohibitively expensive grotesquery to honor the pointless, prohibitively expensive grotesquery that is the modern olympics.
11:08 PM on 04/07/2010
That thing is ugly. The brits can do better than that!