iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Offshore Drilling Announcement: Everything You Need To Know

Offshore Drilling

BEN FELLER   04/ 1/10 03:30 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Shaking up years of energy policy and his own environmental backers, President Barack Obama threw open a huge swath of East Coast waters and other protected areas in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico to drilling Wednesday, widening the politically explosive hunt for more homegrown oil and gas.

Obama's move allows drilling from Delaware to central Florida, plus the northern waters of Alaska, and exploration could begin 50 miles off the coast of Virginia by 2012. He also wants Congress to lift a drilling ban in the oil-rich eastern Gulf of Mexico, 125 miles from Florida beaches.

Still off limits: the entire Pacific seaboard. And in a nod to conservation, Obama canceled oil exploration in Alaska's Bristol Bay, deeming the area a national treasure.

For this oil-dependent nation, the decision could start to reshape far-reaching economic and national security policies, affecting where the U.S. gets the fuel for its cars, heating and energy-gulping industry.

For a president on a roll following a big health care win, Wednesday's drilling declaration was both aggressive and pragmatic. Even with a push for cleaner energy sources and efficient cars – and with promises of protection for ecosystems and coastal tourism – the nation still needs more oil, Obama said.

"The answer is not drilling everywhere all the time," Obama said in an event at Andrews Air Force Base. "But the answer is not, also, for us to ignore the fact that we are going to need vital energy sources to maintain our economic growth and our security."

Inside politically conscious Washington, Obama's announcement was viewed, too, as a play to win Republican support for a comprehensive climate change bill. Obama needs GOP help to move legislation through the Senate that would limit carbon emissions, a key priority, and his decision on drilling drew at least a bit of Republican applause.

Republican George W. Bush pushed for years to expand offshore drilling. He and Congress lifted bans on some drilling in 2008, when gasoline prices hit record levels. But Obama's plan is narrower than Bush's, which also would have opened up oil and gas leasing areas off California and in the North Atlantic.

Obama got a predictable pummeling Wednesday from environmentalists, who sarcastically compared him to Sarah Palin, the former vice presidential candidate whose oil-promoting speech at the Republican National Convention in 2008 famously drew chants of "Drill, Baby, Drill!"

Any big changes to environmental policy – particularly oil drilling – tend to touch off the bitter debate that Obama says he wants the country to end.

His support for exploratory drilling in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas north of Alaska, for example, drew outrage from the Center for Biological Diversity as a threat to polar bears. "Short of sending Sarah Palin back to Alaska to personally club polar bears to death, the Obama administration could not have come up with a more efficient extinction plan for the polar bear," said Brendan Cummings, the center's senior counsel.

More broadly, the conservation group Oceana declared Obama was "unleashing a wholesale assault on the oceans."

Obama has been a supporter of drilling as part of a broader energy agenda, and the White House played down any talk of wooing Republicans.

But it is clear the president wants to show the opposition party that he is willing to come toward them with hopes the GOP will do the same in return. He has already done so on nuclear energy. However, winning a broad climate and energy bill remains an enormous lift for Obama in this election year.

"He could certainly point to this: `Look, I've moved away from where we were even a year ago, so let's work something out,'" said Guy Caruso, an energy expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former Department of Energy administrator. "Whether it's enough? I doubt it. But it's a step."

Indeed, the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said it was a step in the right direction. But he chided Obama for leaving too many exploratory areas off limits and questioned whether the administration would actually follow through and open areas for oil production. GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a key negotiator with the White House on the energy bill, said he listened to Obama with "great interest."

As for the fallout from environmental activists, White House spokesman Bill Burton said, "None of this should have been a surprise to anybody. We've been talking about all these different elements for a very long time and the president is following through on promises."

While the first lease sale for an area 50 miles off the Virginia coast could come as early as 2012, development in other areas of the South Atlantic would still be years away, according to the Interior Department's leasing plans released Wednesday. The department said it plans seismic studies, environmental reviews and public meetings in the regions involved to determine if leases should be offered in those areas between 2012 and 2017.

Obama's plan to open more of the eastern Gulf of Mexico would require Congress to lift a drilling moratorium it imposed several years ago. An energy bill before the Senate would open an even wider area of the eastern Gulf than Obama is proposing, allowing drilling within 45 miles of some of Florida's coast.

Access to oil and gas in South Atlantic waters also would probably meet stiff resistance from the coastal states unless Congress first enacts a plan to share the billions of dollars in potential revenue from lease sales and oil and gas development. And that's not easy.

Lawmakers from coastal states that would benefit have been pushing for that, but some other senators argue that proceeds from oil and gas resources in federal waters should go to the U.S. Treasury.

Obama is trying to push several levers at once.

As part of his oil announcement, Obama said his government would release new requirements Thursday requiring automakers to build more fuel-efficient cars and trucks. The standards include first-ever rules on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions, which have been blamed for global warming.

For a bit of imagery, Obama stood in front of a Navy F-18 fighter scheduled to fly on Earth Day with a half-biomass fuel mix.

He implored people to accept a middle ground between viewing drilling as a cure-all or claiming it has no place in an energy portfolio.

Said the president: "This issue is just too important to allow our progress to languish while we fight the same old battles."

___

Associated Press writers Frederic J. Frommer, Ken Thomas and H. Josef Hebert contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Shaking up years of energy policy and his own environmental backers, President Barack Obama threw open a huge swath of East Coast waters and other protected areas in Alaska and the ...
WASHINGTON — Shaking up years of energy policy and his own environmental backers, President Barack Obama threw open a huge swath of East Coast waters and other protected areas in Alaska and the ...
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChloeW
12:58 AM on 04/23/2010
When you drill you spill. The govt and private industry needs to get their butts in gear and come up with some real, economical green options to keep this country running. PRONTO! I'd rather buy oil from Saudi Arabia than continue to drill in our oceans. The oceans are sick and dying, it's a limited resource. It doesn't bode well for the future of the human race if we don't start treating our planet like it's the precious resource it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlackYowe
I am a classical- liberal woman and a Jeweler.
12:53 AM on 04/23/2010
Yipeeee fireworks. Thanks Obama now we know what we have to look forward on the east coast now you opened it up for drilling. I would never have voted for you if I had known!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RitaS
12:00 AM on 04/23/2010
Ok, if all this drilling along the east coast is allowed, WHAT safeguards have been put in place to protect the east coast of the US?
photo
BigHound1
Above all, seek wisdom and understanding
11:52 PM on 04/22/2010
It is tactical to not place all of your eggs into one basket. By allowing some off-shore drilling while working hard on alternative energy is a great tactical maneuver to make.

I'm sure that we will learn a lot more about off-shore drilling in the days to come since it will become a passion for the media now. We'll find out that our gulf coast may be filled with black oil for months to come.
11:26 PM on 04/22/2010
people relax, its inevitable he has to make the choice is either continue buying oil from overseas or drilling here. we all want more clean energy but that won't happen overnight, it will take time to change the system we have here. i rather drill here than buy oil from overseas where our money goes into supporting terrorist.

I'm 100% sure the president didn't do this in order to get Republican votes, it will never happen if i know that i'm sure he knows these people are against everything he does.
A strong leader has to make tough decision at times, i'm sure no one vote for him thinking he will never change his mind on some issues, we all do..
11:11 PM on 04/22/2010
Obama OK'd the oil drilling in states where they were screaming "Drill, Baby, Drill!". Although I would appreciate an approach that takes into consideration the effects on the environment as a whole, I appreciate that those who whine so much will be the ones dealing with the worst of the problems associated with more drilling. He was smart to leave the Pacific Coast off of the list, as this would lose him CA, and quite probably his next term. Until California catches up with the rest of the world, and starts taxing oil companies for taking our oil, we will not accept any further drilling. The sweetheart deals to the oil companies in CA need to end now!
10:50 PM on 04/22/2010
Actually if you read the current legistlation Obama really did nothing. But, he did give a real good read from his telprompter and that is what really counts. Obama measures success like this; if you can say one thing and do the exact opposite of what you promised, that is a success. If it wasn't so sad and true, it would be funny.
09:21 PM on 04/22/2010
Actually since 1985 land based pipelines have encountered more spills than off shore rigs. There are several reasons for this.
A) More secure and less corrosive pipes used in the drilling
B) More secure and less corrosive storage tanks and barge shipment.
C) New technology in drill bits used in underwater drilling.

While America needs to wean itself off of crude the smart move is finding the ares in and around the United States to drill for petroleum until the drilling or production of these energy sources become reality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
shryock
It never is what it is anymore
08:49 PM on 04/22/2010
so, 72 percent of americans favor allowing off shore drilling.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/offshore_drilling/72_support_offshore_drilling_59_favor_it_off_california_and_new_england

so the president does what the majority wants............ 72 percent being a majority.
now we have a tragedy on an offshore rig, and suddenly everybody wants to blame obama?

so, last month he did what the news tells us the majority did not want, which was to pass health care reform, and everybody was all anti-obama.
now he does what the majority does want, which is to drill offshore, and everybody is all anti-obama.

seeing a common thread here? the most vocal among us are anti-obama and anything he did would be seen as negative, even if it is what they wanted him to do in the first place.
09:00 PM on 04/22/2010
You are mistaking teabaggers for people, like me, who are angry with the President for betraying his campaign promises. If he now has oil all over his slippery lying hands then it serves him right.
photo
wonketteRAWKS
Hypocrisy is prevalent in BOTH parties!
09:12 PM on 04/22/2010
Where were you when the majority of people wanted a single payer/public option?
Where were you when the majority of people didn't want the Romney/Obamacare passed?
08:17 PM on 04/22/2010
Obama sure does make some stupid decisions. Whats next, "America enters the Steam Age".
08:29 PM on 04/22/2010
DF: Ha, I liked that one. I'm interested in Solar, Wind, etc., but let's see what is next on the agenda. I notice my gas and food prices skyrocketing, along with my health care costs...$3,000.00 increase from the thieves at BC BS . I just got back from a trip and was ticked off at paying 40.00 for my luggage. Where are the advocates for the American people? Answer...No where to be found.
08:01 PM on 04/22/2010
I fear for the people of oil rich nations such as Saudi Arabia. Their populations are expanding based on the success of a single resource. What will happen to them when the oil runs out?

But that is a digression..

I'm all for drilling offshore provided that:

!.Our treasury gets to "wet it's beak". A 20% cut will do.
2. Every well must have a valve that will shut down the valve that shuts down the shut-off valve after the first shut-off valve activates.
07:49 PM on 04/22/2010
Obama is just another fascist. He seems to have no core and will sell out any issue for political reason that benefit him and not the people. I sick of the Awhole.
07:28 PM on 04/22/2010
I have supported Obama on a majority of his moves since he took office BUT THIS MOVES SUCKS THE BIG ONE.The oils gonna be gone some day why not move forward on energy?Stop whoring our foreign policy for fuel.NO MAS DUDE!
07:20 PM on 04/22/2010
goodbye coastline. hello sandy oil blobs.
photo
AndyB62
Immune to Romnesia & Romonomics
07:59 PM on 04/22/2010
Seems kind of hard to ignore the drilling rig explosion and oil spill. It's a good time to reconsider ramping up the potential for environmental catastrophy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:08 PM on 04/08/2010
Obama is delusional at this point if he thinks the Republicans would support him if it meant giving them all blame-free bjs for the rest of their lives.
08:19 PM on 04/22/2010
Right on !!!!!!!!!!!!!