iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Vatican Lashes Out At The New York Times Over Sex Abuse Coverage

VICTOR L. SIMPSON   04/ 2/10 12:15 AM ET   AP

Pope Nyt

VATICAN CITY — Cardinals across Europe used their Holy Thursday sermons to defend Pope Benedict XVI from accusations he played a role in covering up sex abuse scandals, and an increasingly angry Vatican sought to deflect any criticism in the Western media.

The relationship between the church and the media has become increasingly bitter as the scandal buffeting the 1 billion-member church has touched the pontiff himself. On Wednesday, the church singled out The New York Times for criticism in an unusually harsh attack.

Western news organizations, including The Associated Press, have reported extensively on the burgeoning scandal, and new details have emerged on an almost daily basis.

On Holy Thursday, Benedict first celebrated a Mass in St. Peter's Basilica dedicated to the union between the pope and the world's priests. In the late afternoon, he washed the feet of 12 priests in a ceremony symbolizing humility and commemorating Christ's Last Supper with his 12 apostles on the evening before his Good Friday crucifixion.

Although there were expectations by some that the pope would address the crisis, Benedict made no reference to the scandal at either ceremony.

Venice's Cardinal Angelo Scola expressed solidarity with Benedict in his Holy Thursday homily in the lagoon city, describing him as a victim of "deceitful accusations." He praised the pope as seeking to remove all "dirt" from the priesthood.

Warsaw Archbishop Kazimierz Nycz said the church should take notice of individual tragedies and treat sex abuse cases very seriously, but at the same time, he criticized the media for "targeting the whole church, targeting the pope, and to that we must say `no' in the name of truth and in the name of justice."

And Vienna's Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, speaking of Benedict's long years as head of a Vatican office that investigates abuse, said the future pope "had a very clear line of not covering up but clearing up."

He had also reflected on the issue at a Wednesday evening service:

"I admit that I often feel a sense of injustice these days. Why is the church being excoriated? Isn't there also abuse elsewhere? ... And then I'm tempted to say: 'Yes, the media just don't like the church! Maybe there's even a conspiracy against the church?' But then I feel in my heart that no, that's not it."

The church on Wednesday presented its highest-level official response yet to one of the most explosive recent revelations regarding sex abuse – a story in the Times on the church's decision in the 1990s not to defrock a Wisconsin priest accused of molesting deaf boys.

It was the latest in a series of attacks on the press. Last week, L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican's daily newspaperdenounced what it said was a "clear and despicable intention" by the media to strike at Benedict "at any cost."

On Thursday, the newspaper carried a story on its front page on German Chancellor Angela Merkel welcoming efforts to stem sex abuse, headlining "German chancellor praises the Catholic church."

In the article posted Wednesday on the Vatican's Web site, Cardinal William Levada, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, wrote: "I am not proud of America's newspaper of record, The New York Times, as a paragon of fairness."

Levada, an American, said the newspaper wrongly used the case of the Rev. Lawrence Murphy to find fault in Benedict's handling of abuse cases.

A Times spokeswoman defended the articles and said no one has cast doubt on the reported facts.

"The allegations of abuse within the Catholic church are a serious subject, as the Vatican has acknowledged on many occasions," said Diane McNulty. "Any role the current pope may have played in responding to those allegations over the years is a significant aspect of this story."

The Vatican newspaper also carried a front-page commentary to mark the fifth anniversary of the death of Benedict's predecessor, the much beloved Pope John Paul II.

The article said John Paul wanted Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger to work by his side from the early years of his papacy. John Paul brought the archbishop of Munich to Rome to head the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the powerful office that among other things investigates clerical sex abuse.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

VATICAN CITY — Cardinals across Europe used their Holy Thursday sermons to defend Pope Benedict XVI from accusations he played a role in covering up sex abuse scandals, and an increasingly angry...
VATICAN CITY — Cardinals across Europe used their Holy Thursday sermons to defend Pope Benedict XVI from accusations he played a role in covering up sex abuse scandals, and an increasingly angry...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,161
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (104 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raul Garcia
Documentary Filmmaker
01:38 AM on 04/04/2010
If anyone is interested in the good things Catholic Priests do you can watch my IFC Short Film of the Month Winner:

http://ramblincoyote.com/films.htm
photo
F4Phantom
Freelance Writer
12:40 AM on 04/03/2010
(paraphrased)

The Vatican's top attorney tonight made the announcement that the Pope enjoys Diplomatic Immunity from US lawsuits. Link not included.

This is known as an affirmative defense; the Pope is sued as a named defendant, then his legal counsel moves for dismissal on the basis of immunity. Apparently these dismissals get a lot of press coverage that keeps bringing up the subject of sexual abuse, which he's trying to get everyone to forget about. The Vatican wants US attorneys NOT TO EVEN NAME HIM AS A DEFENDANT

This was covered in the Canadian press, which covers Canadian lawsuits against Catholic abuse in the residential school system; currently about 12,000 cases (linked in previous post)

The poopster was granted Diplomatic Immunity, which he promptly used to excuse himself from the 2005 TX cases
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
05:09 PM on 04/02/2010
Moderators, please post; prior attempts have either been scrubbed or have disappeared.

BREAKING NEWS (RIGHT NOW!!) FROM VATICAN'S TOP LEGAL ADVISOR

To drive home the point to American victims and their attorneys, the top Vatican attorney made a blanket announcement that BXVI now enjoys Diplomatic Immunity from US lawsuits. http://www.ecanadanow.com/world/2010/04/02/the-vatican-declares-that-the-pope-has-diplomatic-immunity/

In courts, this is known as an affirmative defense; BXVI is sued as a named defendant, then his legal counsel has to move for dismissal on the basis of immunity. Apparently these dismissals get a lot of press coverage that keeps bringing up the pesky subject of sexual abuse, which he's trying to get everyone to forget about. Vatican wants US attorneys NOT TO EVEN NAME HIM AS A DEFENDANT since he has a defense. Proper legal form can't be disregarded; the Vatican knows it.

This was picked up in Canadian press, which covers Canadian lawsuits against Catholic systemic abuse in the residential school system; currently about 12,000 cases (linked in previous post)

BXVI was granted Diplomatic Immunity, which he promptly used to excuse himself from the 2005 TX cases http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=35651 and KY cases http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2005-10-07-vatican-protected_x.htm
photo
lunarsnare
♫♪♫ ♪♫♪
08:27 AM on 04/03/2010
Isn’t that similar to what Goering thought he had?
Immunity from war crimes persecution because he was a high ranking officer.
Pathetic.
This pope belongs in an orange suit and in front of international court since he abetted the torture and rape of children internationally.
04:34 AM on 04/05/2010
right along with the Bush Cheney crowd!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
05:01 PM on 04/02/2010
BREAKING NEWS (RIGHT NOW!!) FROM VATICAN'S TOP LEGAL ADVISOR (NO JOKE!!)

In order to drive home the point to American victims and their attorneys, the top legal advisor to the Vatican made a blanket announcement that the Pope now enjoys Diplomatic Immunity from US lawsuits. http://www.ecanadanow.com/world/2010/04/02/the-vatican-declares-that-the-pope-has-diplomatic-immunity/

In courts, this is known as an affirmative defense; BXVI is sued as a named defendant, then his legal counsel has to move for dismissal on the basis of immunity. Apparently these dismissals get a lot of press coverage that keeps bringing up the pesky subject of sexual abuse, which he's trying to get everyone to forget about; hence, the Vatican legal office is trying to convince US attorneys NOT TO EVEN NAME HIM AS A DEFENDANT. It won't work, and the Vatican knows it; legal form has to be followed, but maybe some newbie counsel will fall for it.

This was picked up in Canadian press, which has been focusing on the Canadian lawsuits against Catholic systemic abuse in the residential school system; currently about 12,000 cases (linked in previous post)

BXVI has already used DI; in 2005, Benedict applied for and was granted Diplomatic Immunity, which he promptly used to excuse himself from the TX cases http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=35651 and KY cases http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2005-10-07-vatican-protected_x.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
04:43 PM on 04/02/2010
BREAKING NEWS (RIGHT NOW!!) FROM VATICAN'S TOP LEGAL ADVISOR (NO JOKE!!)

In order to drive home the point to American victims and their attorneys, the top legal advisor to the Vatican made a blanket announcement that the Pope now enjoys Diplomatic Immunity from US lawsuits. http://www.ecanadanow.com/world/2010/04/02/the-vatican-declares-that-the-pope-has-diplomatic-immunity/

In courts, this is known as an affirmative defense; BXVI is sued as a named defendant, then his legal counsel has to move for dismissal on the basis of immunity. Apparently these dismissals get a lot of press coverage that keeps bringing up the pesky subject of sexual abuse, which he's trying to get everyone to forget about; hence, the Vatican legal office is trying to convince US attorneys NOT TO EVEN NAME HIM AS A DEFENDANT. It won't work, and the Vatican knows it; legal form has to be followed, but maybe some newbie counsel will fall for it.

This was picked up in Canadian press, which has been focusing on the Canadian lawsuits against Catholic systemic abuse in the residential school system; currently about 12,000 cases (linked in previous post)

BXVI has already used DI; in 2005, Benedict applied for and was granted Diplomatic Immunity, which he promptly used to excuse himself from the TX cases http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=35651 and KY cases http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2005-10-07-vatican-protected_x.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:33 PM on 04/02/2010
Sexual abusers and their knowing protectors should be given the max.

But let's be realistic. The evanescent, catchall "pedophile" is an intentional misnomer. Between 1963 and 2003, it's been estimated that 55.3 - to 81 percent of ordained Catholics were homosexuals and their victims were 81% teenage males.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conceptor
05:02 PM on 04/02/2010
Who is estimating?
What is the basis for this "estimation"?
Where do you get these numbers?
In my estimation, these are nonsense numbers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
03:47 PM on 04/02/2010
Learning how to use media, and especially how to properly express yourself to advance your message, isn't easy at all, as the Vatican mistakes clearly show.

I was going to link some sites that show clear 'how-tos' so that commenters could look at the techniques used by the Church, but they are very dry and dull.

So here's a great link, which discusses 6 fundamental ways the media slants coverage in a very funny way. http://www.cracked.com/article_18458_6-subtle-ways-news-media-disguises-bullshit-as-fact_p2.html
12:50 PM on 04/02/2010
"...Why is the church being excoriated? Isn't there also abuse elsewhere? ..." - Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn


ummmm, let's see, which institution is always intruding in peoples bedrooms and preaching about the s e xual mores of others and if one doesn't abide by their rule they are accused as sinners destined to burn forever??

what institution has deemed s e x taboo unless is only for reproduction??

what institution excoriates others for their s e xual gender (women as second class citizens) ??

what institution excoriates others for their s e xual preferences (gays)??

what institution is always intruding in the reproductive rights others??

which institution sells itself as the pious antithesis of what child r a p e would be??


heh
02:27 PM on 04/02/2010
Oh, I don't know... Evangelicals? C-Street?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:35 PM on 04/02/2010
All corrupt. All have this delusion that they have the right to dictate morality to me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:55 AM on 04/02/2010
- regular joes raping children ==> jail time (anyone who knows and not telling the law ==> jail time)
- catholic priests raping children ==> no jail (people who cover them up - pope - nothing happens)!
conclusion: the catholics are ABOVE THE LAW in our country! Let's change that! make them accountable to our laws FIRST - before vatican's law! They can believe in the Vatican all they want, but they live HERE and should abide by our laws. If they do not report a rape - what crime is that ==> lock them up! Just like we would any other citizens.

Even beyond these crimes - Vatican - the "organ" that propagates destructive beliefs. Take birth control for example: Pls see this short clip and think about the church's contraception method ... Education may be one solution - not faith!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeVmCiStOwU&feature=PlayList&p=472888D70E21ADCF&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=104
photo
Babele
your micro-bio is empty
11:47 AM on 04/02/2010
Shhhhh! Be quiet new york times! The Vatican is busy r.ap.ing children! How will they ever be able to get away with it when you let the cat out of the bag!
11:35 AM on 04/02/2010
The unmitigated focus and effort in the Catholic church needs to be towards eradication of this despicable behavior once and for all and not in mounting a defense towards the exposure of it.
11:07 AM on 04/02/2010
It is widely understood that human beings use less than 5 percent of their brain power . this is directly related to the fear based reptilian brain thinking that forms the basis of our spiritual beliefs!
The Catholic religion was born and its so-called truths formed from an amalgam of primitive women hating philosophies of the homosexual based cultures of Rome and Greece two thousand years ago.

To see just how primitive is this " infallible " organization just look at the history of opposition to new knowledge and the repression and murder used by this Trojan horse over the centuries to keep humanity
living in this 2000 year old mind bubble we call the Nicene creed .

For humanity to grow and overcome our primitive conditioning we need to start using our frontal lobes and
looking and interacting with life through our higher emotions of love, empathy reason.
In such a world there is no room for this dinosaur with its primitive rituals and beliefs .

Nothing good can come from murder and repression and the blood of progressive people for centuries has been shed in the name of this woman hating and regressive organization.
The information is readily available now to unmask this spiritual vampire but you have to use your frontal lobes to find the truth !
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/darkness.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bega
09:47 AM on 04/02/2010
It is time for rulers of the Vatican State to confess. The poor had done enough confession.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 04/02/2010
Sure, kill the messenger instead of fixing the problem. Way to go.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
08:43 AM on 04/02/2010
W T F does it mean that "...Benedict..."had a very clear line of not covering up but clearing up."

Does it mean he moved a priest or defrocked a priest?

Why didn't he report these priests to the local authorities to be investigated, charged and prosecuted?!?

STOP WITH THE BS EXCUSES AND PROTECTION OF DEVIANT GROWN MEN!
10:03 AM on 04/02/2010
Article says:

"Levada, an American, said the newspaper wrongly used the case of the Rev. Lawrence Murphy to find fault in Benedict's handling of abuse cases.

"A Times spokeswoman defended the articles and said no one has cast doubt on the reported facts."

How about THESE facts?:

Rev. Murphy died in 1998. Hearings of cases involving sexual abuse of minors shifted from the Roman Rota to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith headed by Cardinal Ratzinger in 2001.