iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Paul Stevens On Supreme Court Retirement: 'I Have To Fish Or Cut Bait'

AP//The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/03/10 06:12 AM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 05:05 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says he "will surely" retire while President Barack Obama is still in office, giving the president the opportunity to maintain the high court's ideological balance.

Stevens said in newspaper interviews on the Web Saturday that he will decide soon on the timing of his retirement, whether it will be this year or next. Stevens, the leader of the court's liberals, turns 90 this month and is the oldest justice.

His departure would give Obama his second nomination to the court, enabling him to ensure there would continue to be at least four liberal-leaning justices. The high court is often split 5 to 4 on major cases, with the vote of moderate Justice Anthony Kennedy often deciding which side prevails.

"I will surely do it while he's still president," Stevens told The Washington Post.

But Stevens, who was named to the court by Republican President Gerald R. Ford in 1975, says he still loves the job, and says he continues to write the first draft of his own opinions.

Stevens says if it ever gets to point where he stopped doing that, it would be a sign he wasn't up to the job anymore.

Stevens is the second-oldest justice in the court's history, after Oliver Wendell Holmes. He is the seventh-longest-serving justice, with more than 34 years on the court.

Another liberal, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, had surgery last year for early-stage pancreatic cancer. While Ginsburg has been her usual energetic self, including frequent speaking engagements and a teaching stint in Europe, long-term survival rates for pancreatic cancer are low.

Ginsburg, 77, has said she intends to serve into her early 80s, and she has hired her clerks for the court term that begins in October 2010.

Justices are reluctant to retire in bunches, mainly because they want the nine-member court as close to full strength as possible.

Stevens also is nearing two longevity records. When he joined the court, he replaced the longest-serving justice, William O. Douglas, and would need to serve until mid-July 2012 to top that service record. He would surpass Holmes as the oldest sitting justice if he were to remain on the court until Feb. 24, 2011.

"I do have to fish or cut bait, just for my own personal peace of mind and also in fairness to the process," Stevens told The New York Times. "The president and the Senate need plenty of time to fill a vacancy."

The Huffington Post interviewed a host of constitutional law professors and other legal cognoscenti. Below is a look at the candidates that have emerged as leading contenders for Justice Stevens' seat on the bench -- click here (and scroll down) for much more reporting about each potential new Justice.

Elena Kagan
1 of 12
There appears to be a growing consensus that Solicitor General Elena Kagan is the front-runner for the position. Kagan comes armed with a formidable set of credentials: Associate White House Counsel during the Clinton Administration; Professor and then Dean of Harvard Law School; and now, Solicitor General of the United States, the appointee tasked with representing the U.S. Government in cases before the Supreme Court.

At Harvard, Kagan forged a reputation for herself as a savvy consensus-builder, uniting a factious faculty divided along ideological lines.

"She has a terrific political sense," says Charles Fried, Professor at Harvard Law School and Solicitor General in the Reagan administration. "She knows how to frame issues so that people see things her way."

Her interpersonal political prowess shone through in a law school then plagued by inertia.

"The faculty had been divided politically on left-right grounds and had difficulty making [faculty] appointments," explains Harvard Professor Mark Tushnet. "But she was able to break the logjam by explaining to people that the law school was stagnating and that it could move forward only if it overcame these issues."

On a fractured Court with an ascendant right wing, her capacity for persuasive diplomacy could prove pivotal.

Equally in Kagan's favor is the absence of a potentially compromising legal paper trail. In the wake of a bruising health care debate, it's likely that President Obama will want to minimize the amount of political capital he expends on a Supreme Court nominee.

"Kagan is unique in that, like Justice John Roberts, she's universally respected but hasn't written on divisive topics that could make confirmation difficult," says University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Theodore Ruger.

Kagan, 49, also has youth on her side. Opting for a young Supreme Court nominee has traditionally allowed a President to extend his influence beyond his term in office and cement his political legacy, a trend that arguably started with President Reagan's appointment of Antonin Scalia, who was 50 at the time of his nomination to the bench.
Total comments: 3121 | Post a Comment
1 of 12
This Potential Nominee
Unlikely
Very Likely

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Possible Justices
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says he "will surely" retire while President Barack Obama is still in office, giving the president the opportunity to maintain the high court's id...
WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says he "will surely" retire while President Barack Obama is still in office, giving the president the opportunity to maintain the high court's id...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,121
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
ajwriter
Healthy equilibrium, healthy democracy
02:57 PM on 04/07/2010
The Supreme Court hasn't been balanced for years. Replacing Stevens with a more liberal judge will not maintain or balance the court, it will keep it from going so far to the right it tunnels through the earth and ends up in China.

We'd have to clone Michael Moore and appoint three of him to balance the court as it is now.

Stop letting the extreme rightwingers redefine what left is. We would ALL benefit from balance, but we'll never get it if we let the delusional right define what left is, they have no idea.
07:42 PM on 04/08/2010
fanned.

the liberal founding fathers of the USA were fighting the conservative British monarchy.

and the battle continues to this day.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
graceland9
...and talk in the past and not the present tense.
09:37 PM on 04/05/2010
Good evening folks; I'm BAAAAAACKKKKKK!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReelBusy
I'm the Ghost of Hollywood Past
12:40 PM on 04/05/2010
Might be time for Anita Hill to join Clarence Thomas as a Justice on the Supreme Court.

Just to watch him squirm.
07:10 PM on 04/05/2010
Or more likely...her squirm.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim281
Just slightly to the left of John Lennon
11:31 AM on 04/05/2010
Justice Stevens is a true American Treasure! As is Justice Ginsburg! How skillfully they interpret the law, rather than use their postions as "bully pulpits" to push some misplaced personal ideological "morals" on the rest of us.
It is now inevitable that Justice Stevens will retire during the Obama Administration. Sad to see him go, but glad it will happen at a time when he is sure to be replaced with another who will strive to maintain sanity and balance.
If we're all extremely lucky, maybe Justice Ginsburg will enjoy a full and total recovery. And maybe another two or three Justice will also retire during the Obama years. Maybe during his second term!
11:10 AM on 04/05/2010
John Paul Stevens' retirement will be a great loss.

I hope Obama replaces him with a liberal. There is no need to appease the Republicans who will vote against anyone Obama nominates, no matter who they are.
09:18 AM on 04/05/2010
Wouldn't be surprised if Obama's next nominee is Ken Starr.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:22 PM on 04/05/2010
Really.
But Starr, comparatively speaking, may now be too much the pencil-neck college boy pinko libral treehugging terrorist - especially if the black clinton nominates him.
08:12 AM on 04/05/2010
I say lets give them something to talk about. The Pres should nominate his wife. I here she is a great lawyer in her own right. Talk about making history.
08:28 AM on 04/05/2010
She worked as a lawyer for a few years and then went in-house working for the city and onto nonprofit management.

That's not gonna cut it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaO8
You're gonna need a bigger boat.
08:49 AM on 04/05/2010
hey, if a guy that put pubic hair on coke cans can get in, maybe this wonderful lady has a shot!
09:04 AM on 04/05/2010
ya right........I'd love to see him try that one
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
08:08 AM on 04/05/2010
Oh my God! He thinks he's on vacation!

See if he knows who the president is.
07:19 AM on 04/05/2010
Better hurry John Paul.

He isn't going to be President much longer.

In fact, if his approval drops any lower, you might even start hearing calls for Impeachment...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:25 AM on 04/05/2010
You think the old boy can hang on until January 20, 2017? Because that's how long President Obama is going to be around, masked hombre.
07:31 AM on 04/05/2010
Ha.

Pretty hard to get re-elected in double digit unemployment.

And blaming it on Bush, is going to seem petty and childish by 2012.
01:08 PM on 04/05/2010
Dam Right and between now and Jan 20, 2017 he will be appointing a replacement for a conservative justice and with a little luck two .
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
IrisMozenter
08:16 AM on 04/05/2010
Impeachment has to be based on something, not just the fact that you personally don't like someone. And if Obama were impeached, then Biden would be President, not one of your Republican wannabes.
08:33 AM on 04/05/2010
I didn't say he would be impeached, I said people will be calling for it.

There were no grounds to Impeach President Bush, but that didn't stop the chorus from the Left.

Heck, Al Franken ran on it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
UpFromLiberalism
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.
02:57 AM on 04/05/2010
Supreme Court Retirement

the dear leader needs to pick a judge who is a liberal to fulfill his dream...his dream...

BHO: The Constitution Has A “fundamental flaw” Because It Did Not Demand the Redistribution of Wealth

and It is A “Tragedy” that the Courts Did Not Change That

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:39 AM on 04/05/2010
Wealth is ALWAYS being redistributed. Bush just oversaw the largest transfer of wealth in history, from the middle class to Wall Street
ajwriter
Healthy equilibrium, healthy democracy
03:01 PM on 04/07/2010
Bush also oversaw the greatest assault on the Constitution in history, witness his nearly 1,000 signing statements.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:43 AM on 04/05/2010
Oh and the question of the flaw in the Constitution he referred to was slavery. You have to listen to the entire interview.
08:30 AM on 04/05/2010
Some people don't consider that a flaw...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:32 AM on 04/05/2010
If Justice Stevens does retire this will give the Obama admin a chance to balance the power the Supreme Court before Torturegate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim281
Just slightly to the left of John Lennon
11:40 AM on 04/05/2010
Sort of....It will give President Obama a chance to MAINTAIN the delicate balance of power ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rictracee
02:24 AM on 04/05/2010
this man is 90 years old... why in the he// is he still working? really??

I mean come on, I feel these judges and politicians need to be forced in retirement at 70 years old.. It looks like to me being a politician is such a cushy job , I guess its not really work, so you can work your whole life and never retire..
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
02:52 AM on 04/05/2010
Why should they retire if they are still capable and interested? Not everyone is still capable at 90, but not everyone isn't, either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rictracee
06:13 PM on 04/05/2010
capable? i bet this man cant even drive a car... I feel they should take old people licence at a certain age.. well at least they need to be retested with sight and taking another driving test.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaO8
You're gonna need a bigger boat.
07:46 AM on 04/05/2010
Ric., I totally agree - there should be term limits for the court. It's ridiculous major decisions affecting the lives of Americans are made by people that can't even do the research and work themselves. Can they even hear what is going on? ha! Why should our country be held hostage by ideologues for 40 years or more?!! Scalia and Thomas would have been fired a long time ago...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
IrisMozenter
08:20 AM on 04/05/2010
Please show evidence that any of these people are incapable. "Use it or lose it" applies here – these people have been "using it" their entire lives and are probably a lot sharper than people in the corporate world at 50 who are phoning it in from the golf course.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rictracee
06:15 PM on 04/05/2010
your spot on... i feel the judgement they make are based on time period when they were living in the REAL world but once they are on the supreme court they lead such unnomral life they know nothing about real issues that affect ordinary people..

fanned ya
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rictracee
02:20 AM on 04/05/2010
he should put Hillary Clinton on the Supreme Court and just replace SOS / she would make a remarkable supreme court justice
08:32 AM on 04/05/2010
Why does everyone suggest this?

What in legal career justfies it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rictracee
06:17 PM on 04/05/2010
BECAUSE WE KNOW IT WILL MAKE YOUR HEAD EXPLODE !!
09:27 AM on 04/05/2010
yes a remarkable supreme court justice.......i would have a few remarks

laughing
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Pandaforum
02:02 AM on 04/05/2010
A marxist's who's who.
photo
iconoclast6
This is my BOOM stick!
11:39 AM on 04/05/2010
A conservativeretard's mental diar.rhea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim281
Just slightly to the left of John Lennon
11:44 AM on 04/05/2010
Groucho was MY favorite! LOVE them Marx Brothers!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
chitown8
Live each day like your last
01:42 AM on 04/05/2010
Judge Leah Ward Sears!