More

Health Insurance Companies Shifting Costs To Protect Profits From New Law

First Posted: 06/15/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:10 PM ET

Health Insurance

Health insurance companies are already starting to game a key element of health care reform months before it even takes effect, according to a new report from the Senate Commerce Committee.

As in past years, the largest for-profit health insurers are still spending a phenomenal chunk of each premium dollar not on health care but on administrative costs -- and profits. The report found that in the individual health care market, for example, the largest health insurers spent on average more than 26 cents out of every premium dollar on administrative costs and profits, with some spending as much as 32 cents. That's on average; some state-based subsidiaries spent considerably more.

Enter the health care bill. Effective January 1, 2011, health insurers will be required to spend at least 80 cents out of every premium dollar in the individual and small group markets, and at least 85 cents in the large group market -- or refund the difference to consumers in the form of rebates.

So what's a health insurance company to do? Reclassify non-medical expenses as medical, of course.

I predicted as much in my March 31 story, "Insurance Industry Already Finding Ways To Game New System". (There are lots of other predictions there, too.)

The Senate report now identifies specific "questionable changes" in some companies' accounting practices. For instance:

At least one company, WellPoint, has already "reclassified" more than half a billion dollars of administrative expenses as medical expenses, and a leading industry analyst recently released a report explaining how the new law gives for-profit insurers a powerful new incentive to "MLR shift" their previously identified administrative expenses.

What's the MLR? It's an acronym that really tells the whole story of for-profit health insurance. It's the "medical loss ratio" -- which for insurance company means the percentage of the premium dollar "lost" to actual medical care.

You can actually see Wellpoint bragging about reclassifying "clinical health policy" and other expenses in a PowerPoint presentation right here.

"Making sure health insurance companies spend more of the money they collect from premiums on actual medical care was a key component of health care reform," Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.), the chairman of the committee, said in a statement.

"We've been pressing on this issue in the Commerce Committee for over a year, tracking and analyzing previously overlooked data, to make sure Americans know just how their hard-earned money is being spent by health insurance companies.

"We wanted to know: were health insurance companies using consumers' premium dollars to pay for actual health care - or were they pumping up corporate profits and executive salaries and implementing the ugly business practices that denied people care when they needed it most?"

Yeah, that would be the latter.

The reports also urges the two entities charged with writing the specific regulations for the new law -- Health and Human Services Department (HHS) and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) -- to make sure "creative accounting" isn't rewarded.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Health insurance companies are already starting to game a key element of health care reform months before it even takes effect, according to a new report from the Senate Commerce Committee. As in pas...
Health insurance companies are already starting to game a key element of health care reform months before it even takes effect, according to a new report from the Senate Commerce Committee. As in pas...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 385
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
FoonTheElder 12:38 PM on 04/16/2010
Health insurance companies serve no useful purpose. They are nothing more than an expensive method to fund health care costs.

One of the things they claim to do is to use their buying power to lower costs. In reality that doesn't happen any more as the hospitals and producers hold the pricing power. Health insurance companies and care networks are under pressure to get all hospitals in  Read More...
04:05 AM on 04/23/2010
We can hope that the health-insurance industry is just shooting itself in the foot: By pulling dirty (but obvious) tricks like raising premiums so much that their total profits don't go down despite the 85%/80% cap, and aggressively targeting patients newly diagnosed with cancer or other high-cost illnesses for specious charges of fraud intended to weasel the company out of paying for their care, insurance companies are only going to contribute to public perception that reform didn't go far enough and that a public option really is needed.
09:47 PM on 04/22/2010
Dear Americans
If you ever want health care , get rid of American style for profit " health" insurance.
You need to speak with one voice and demand nothing less than a National Health care System.
Nothing scary about socialized medicine.
Its better than Medicare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aliksa
01:22 AM on 04/20/2010
We just plain need to forget all this nonsense and get a single payer system in place. Insurance companies are indeed showing their true colors---hope enough of us decide we've had enough of their nonsense soon!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debby6669
12:34 PM on 04/20/2010
I don't agree. I never did become convinced that a single payer system would work here in the US, given our pesticide and steroid riddled food and our unhealthy lifestyles. I actually design corporate insurance plans, so I know a lot about this. I write about this on my blog (with actual numbers from my clients) here:

http://bitchypundit.com/

Just look under the "healthcare" category.
04:36 PM on 04/22/2010
If it works in Norway and Cuba, it can work here, if we wanted it to work, that is.
03:53 AM on 04/23/2010
You design corporate insurance plans, and you're against a single payer system under which your job would be in danger of becoming obsolete. Wow, that's amazing.
12:47 AM on 04/19/2010
Isn't it logical that an Insurance Industry that is told that they will only get to actually keep 15-20% of what they take in, react by predictably raising their premiums proportionally? If 80% of premiums must be devoted to actual medical care (at least on paper) then aren't they just going to raise the overall cost of the plans to increase their 20% cut?

...And don't forget that another critical ongoing aspect of reform is calling for the Senate to move on passage of the repeal of the "monopolistic" health insurance antitrust exemption. Again this exemption still is in effect and legally allows health insurance companies to price fix, collude and use other monopolistic practices. Further, this outdated law allows health insurers to legally avoid competition laws that apply to every other American business with the exception of Major League Baseball. The House voted overwhelmingly 406-19 on February 24th to repeal the exemption. This was a startling show of bipartisan support for this critical effort. Now it’s the Senate’s turn to act responsibly. Please strongly encourage the Senate to repeal this indefensible exemption as well.

(see link below)
http://ga3.org/campaign/hcr_antitrust
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HappyBalance
People BEFORE Profits
12:54 AM on 04/18/2010
Yup, could have had Single Payer or the Public Option but noooo we had to get more profits for the insurance industry. Would be nice if some of the Dems had the power of their convictions instead of being able to bought and sold so easily by AHIP lobbyists. Would also be nice if Obama fought for the PO instead of Big Pharma, the health care industry and the hospital industry. Maybe one day we will have a Congress that actually cares what the people want. Hey, a guy can dream.
05:19 PM on 04/16/2010
Oh yeah, didn't this new legislation allow for quite an amount of tinkering via the DHHS?!?!?!?!?!?!
05:19 PM on 04/16/2010
So, can we have a public insurance option now?
11:48 PM on 04/16/2010
With each "trick", we get a little closer. Let's all sign the Single Payer petition, make sure Grayson gets the vote on his bill, soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debby6669
12:36 PM on 04/20/2010
I never did become convinced that a single payer system would work here in the US, given our pesticide and steroid riddled food and our unhealthy lifestyles. I actually design corporate insurance plans, so I know a lot about this. I write about this on my blog (with actual numbers from my clients) here:

http://bitchypundit.com/

Just look under the "healthcare" category.
05:18 PM on 04/16/2010
It's like the multinational and national companies that simply count their LOSSES in the USA, and then count their PROFITS OFFSHORE! And best of all, it is totally LEGAL! I am beginning to think that it doesn't really matter what is done because these immoral, greedy bastards will DO ANYTHING to make some serious money! I guess it is true that MONEY IS THE ROOT CAUSE OF EVIL! But what to do?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mjeffn
Freedom's just another word 4 nothing left to lose
01:52 PM on 04/16/2010
Yeah.....and my Wellpoint BC/BS of California premium increase went into effect this month. It only went up 25% instead of some less fortunate people who have seen much higher increases. Terds
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Atlanta
Active Citizen 54
01:31 PM on 04/16/2010
I'll happily buy into Medicare for all but there is no way on God's Green Earth that I am paying any Corporate Communist a profit for the privilege of spending my money.
As it stands the Corporate Communists on Wall Street and in Banking have socialized the loss and privatized the profits for far too long.
12:59 PM on 04/16/2010
Maybe we need a law to limit the amount of "profit" all insurances are allowed to make?
And before you start screaming socialist, some times you have to give up some freedoms and stay free.
Think about it!!
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
03:02 PM on 04/16/2010
Most freedoms were already given up to the Bush/Cheney Empire.
12:49 PM on 04/16/2010
The only way the health insurance reform legislation is going to work is if there is a strong independent regulator to police insurance company accounting gimmicks and compliance with the law and the insurers are subject to strong civil and criminal penalties for violations. There are a number of general similarities between health insurer and Wall St malpractice stemming from the fact that they both operate in the financial sector of the economy which contains some of the weakest ethical standards in all of American private enterprise. The insurers will not self-police or willingly comply with the law, they will defraud the government and premium-holders unless put on a tight regulatory leash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaiJi2
12:43 PM on 04/16/2010
This is EXACTLY why the public option is essential. Only if the corporations are FORCED to compete on a level playing field against an entity that is law-bound to MAXIMIZE the value to the CLIENT will this country have as system that can be called HEALTH CARE.
12:41 PM on 04/16/2010
Unfortunately it is health care costs that are going up. Even eliminating the insurance companies (and that might not be such a good idea given that it is estimated that spending an additional dollar in medicare and medicaid administration would reduce fraud and waste by well over a dollar) would not bring costs in line. We will need to reduce the use of medical care and payments for actual care given to keep increases below inflation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HappyBalance
People BEFORE Profits
12:56 AM on 04/18/2010
Actually the health insurance companies charge much more for services in this country due to the high level of marketing and of course protecting their profit margins. Frequently they hide some of their profits and marketing in "costs". Drugs sell much more cheaply in other countries than here.
photo
FoonTheElder
Always choosing between the lesser of two evils
12:38 PM on 04/16/2010
Health insurance companies serve no useful purpose. They are nothing more than an expensive method to fund health care costs.

One of the things they claim to do is to use their buying power to lower costs. In reality that doesn't happen any more as the hospitals and producers hold the pricing power. Health insurance companies and care networks are under pressure to get all hospitals in their networks in order to be a dominant insurer in their state. All insurance companies do is pass the costs onto their customers.

A recent study by the Massachusetts Attorney General showed that some hospitals charge, and insurers accept billings that are twice as much as other providers. While the right wing complains that Massachusetts won't allow the poor insurers to increase rates again, what is it that they are really providing other than an overpriced money funnel.

http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/04/08/failed-private-insurance-middlemen-like-tumors-you%e2%80%99ve-got-to-shrink-them-or-cut-them-out/

http://www.boston.com/news/health/articles/2010/01/29/attorney_general_says_clout_drives_up_health_costs/