More

U.S. Contractors Failed To Train Afghans To Adjust Gun Sights


First Posted: 06/16/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:10 PM ET

$6 billion later, Afghan policemen don't know how to shoot properly. After doling out more than $6 billion to train Afghan policemen, we may now know why the Afghan National Police isn't too well trained: somebody forgot to tell them how to adjust the sights on their AK-47s before shooting. U.S. government contractors are largely responsible for training police forces, but Senate hearings and assessments by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have found that these contracts are plagued with mismanagement, according to McClatchy Newspapers. Senator McCaskill (D-MO) described the revelations as "an unbelievable, incompetent story of contracts." DynCorp, the current contractor for police training, faced a slew of criticisms from the Senate's Contracting Oversight panel, but will receive an extension on its contract until August of this year, reports HuffPost's Christine Spolar.

From McClatchy Newspapers:

Investigations by the Government Accounting Office and the inspector generals from the Departments of State and Defense have sharply criticized both the contractors and the government oversight. They detailed a lack of supervision and controls over spending, among other failures.

Meanwhile, the GAO has impeded Xe Services (formerly Blackwater) from receiving the contract, which it had initially received but had put on hold after Senators and the GAO intervened. On a related note, we reported last month that Senator Levin (D-MI) had asked the Justice Department to inquire if Blackwater had created a shell corporation in order to compete for the Afghan police training contract.

Why counterinsurgency isn't that easy. Time's Joe Klein tells the story of how Captain Jeremiah Ellis--a commander of Dog Company, based in Senjaray, outside of Kandahar city--struggled to get local and NATO approval to open up a school in one of Afghanistan's most dangerous districts. The challenges Captain Ellis faced in trying to build a school are a metaphor for the broader challenges the new American-led counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan confronts. We learn that the locals don't trust U.S. troops and continue to work with the Taliban, both out of fear and sympathy. Money for a canal project, Ellis finds out, would eventually end up in the hands of the Taliban. Ellis also complains of the bureaucracy that impedes the troops' attempts to build projects--they must seek the approval of the locals, NATO command, and any other authorities in control of the area. At one point, the project for the new school seems like it's about to fall apart. In the end, though, Ellis succeeds, and the locals get their school. But the larger question--will General McChyrstal's counterinsurgency succeed?--remains unanswered.

A detailed look at what happened to Bhutto. In Foreign Policy, Huma Imtiaz takes a detailed look at the new U.N. report on Benazir Bhutto's assassination in 2007. The report says nothing new, notes Imtiaz, but points to various interesting details from it. For instance, Osama bin Laden had put out a hit on Bhutto, Musharraf, and Maulana Fazal ur Rahman, a leader of a Pakistani Islamic party on December 20, 2007. Even in light of the new intelligence, the U.N. commission found that no new security directives to protect Ms. Bhutto were issued. Most damningly, it found that a black Mercedes-Benz, which was part of Bhutto's convoy, quickly sped off after the blast, failing to help Bhutto. The occupants of that car? Drum rolls please: present members of the cabinet, Interior Minister Rehman Malik and Minister for Law Babar Awan.

No foreigners died in Kandahar. Reuters reports that no foreigners died in an attack yesterday on a compound housing foreign workers in Kandahar. However, three Afghans died and 26 Afghans and foreigners were injured as a result. Taliban militants have recently stepped up attacks on foreigners and coalition troops in the area. NATO and Afghan forces are planning a major military campaign this June to clear Kandahar of Taliban insurgents. But, according to an AP story we cited earlier, many Afghans are skeptical of the offensive and believe that it will only exacerbate tensions in Kandahar. Yesterday's attack is perhaps a precursor to violence in the coming months.

Kandahar frustrated with everyone. As U.S. and Afghan troops try to shore up support for their planned offensive in Kandahar province this June, the residents of Kandahar city--once the capital of the Taliban, and now a key battleground--expressed frustration with both the Taliban and the NATO and Afghan coalition forces in the area. The Associated Press interviewed several residents, who worried that the upcoming offensive would only increase insecurity.

From the AP:

"The Americans are responsible for the insecurity and the Taliban are responsible too," said Janan, a mobile phone salesman. "The Americans are bombing innocent civilians and the Taliban are killing Afghan civilians with their suicide attacks."

Residents complained that the new offensive would lead the Taliban to plant more bombs and to more violence. Some also expressed a yearning for the rule of the Taliban. One resident told the AP that "[w]hen the Taliban were here, I could get a job. Now I can get a job, but the difference is today there is no security. We are not politicians, we are not soldiers. We just want peace."

Day after attack on German troops, Merkel reaffirms commitment to Afghan war. Despite a new poll revealing that 62 percent of Germans want their country to withdraw from Afghanistan, and a day after Germany lost four soldiers in a rocket attack, German Chancellor Angela Merkel reaffirmed her commitment to the war in Afghanistan, calling it "a mission that guarantees our freedom and security," reports The Associated Press. Speaking at Stanford University, Merkel said that she understood that many in her country opposed the war, but she told those gathered, "I support this mission."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

$6 billion later, Afghan policemen don't know how to shoot properly. After doling out more than $6 billion to train Afghan policemen, we may now know why the Afghan National Police isn't too well trai...
$6 billion later, Afghan policemen don't know how to shoot properly. After doling out more than $6 billion to train Afghan policemen, we may now know why the Afghan National Police isn't too well trai...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:02 AM on 04/19/2010
Contractors were too busy counting their payroll.
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
01:59 AM on 04/19/2010
America always pays top dollar for the bottom of the barrel. Contractors, mercenaries, you name it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:49 PM on 04/18/2010
This sure sounds familiar. Why is it that the enemies we're up against are born fighters, wary as a two-headed dog and meaner than a constipated alligator; but the allies we draw from the same population couldn't find their rear end with both hands? The martial qualities, the skill with firearms, even the ability of Afghanis to produce improved copies of aquired weapons have been touted for many, many years, and suddenly we've got to hire the only ones who can't sight in an AK-47. I think I've heard that one before.
I gather that the point of the article is to highlight the fraud and waste involved in contracts for training police in Afghanistan. That sure sounds familiar, too, but I think inadequate instruction in how to adjust the sights on a rifle may not be the best example to use to illustrate that point.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
10:24 PM on 04/18/2010
I recall reading/hearing several years ago that the reason why the U.S. Army carrys the M4 carbine while the Marines carry the full-length M16 rifle is the Marines actually train to shoot accurately from a distance. The Army doesn't much bother with distance firing so the increased range of the M16 is largely wasted on them.
05:51 PM on 04/19/2010
There isn't much difference in the maximum effective range in the M4 Carbine and the M16A2 Rifle either at a point target, or area target. Most modern warfare does not involve the range limitations of these weapon systems. And the current atmosphere of warfare (CQB, MOUT etc) encountered over the years is in part why the M4 Carbine has been widely adopted and implemented throughout the United States Armed Forces in favor of the older A2. Either way, both of the mentioned weapons systems have a distinct range capability far above that of the AK-47 or typical Kalashnikov variants.
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
12:58 AM on 04/19/2010
"Why is it that the enemies we're up against are born fighters..."

They're not. They die like flies. But the one thing that they have that we do not is an abundance of persons who are willing to die for the achievement of little success. However, this is how rock is worn away by water.

The insurgents don't know how to use their sights either. But their numbers more than make up the for such deficiencies.

Illiteracy in Afghanistan is around 75%. Worse in rural areas. So it is hardly surprising that they were not, or perhaps more correctly unable to be taught how to use the sights.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:39 AM on 04/19/2010
Never mind two-headed dogs and constipated alligators, then? My point is that we can count on people to tell us what suits them and maybe every so often it'll coincide with the truth, but most likely it'll just be what suits them. Sometimes I feel like we're expected to believe the world's a big action movie, and I'm pretty sure that there are those who would be happy to have us think such a thing.
I don't believe in supermen of any kind, but I'm not quite so ready to undersell those insurgents, wholesale.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hoosierbrad
I know it when I see it.
04:39 PM on 04/17/2010
They just figured they would be hired to fix the mess they caused; typical capitalistic thugs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chuck prebys
04:11 PM on 04/17/2010
Let's try a new headline:

U.S. Contractors Failed to Train Afghans How to Breathe and Blink Eyes.

Strange how these recruits could probably adjust the sights on their M-1 Garrand and pick off a GI from 400 meters no problem but have no idea how to adjust the sights on a Kalashnikov.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
10:28 AM on 04/18/2010
What you own stock in war profiteering corporations?
02:39 PM on 04/17/2010
These headlines are manufactured for clueless partisan hacks.

The broad claim that a weapons training consulting company failed to instruct recruits on how to adjust sights is ridiculous.

There are certainly cases of corruption.

There are certainly cases of poor performance.

But this claim is highy dubious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
belyeu
03:32 PM on 04/17/2010
How do you know?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
02:25 PM on 04/17/2010
Yet more tabloid rubbish. If Afghans couldn't shoot straight or understand how to adjust gun sights they wouldn't have driven out the British, Soviet, and (inevitably) the US invaders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
12:43 PM on 04/17/2010
Contractors and the corporations they work for are crap.
10:18 AM on 04/17/2010
How were the contractors expected to train them without hardly any interpreters and with a likely 75% spread of the trainees not knowing how to read or write? It was an anticipated rip-off of taxpayers' hundreds of millions of dollars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
09:55 AM on 04/17/2010
You are kidding me... this is a news story.. ? this is akin to selling someone a watch and not telling them how to wind it!! Duhhhhh

I guess they also didn't tell them which end of the weapon to point at the enemy??
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:30 AM on 04/19/2010
That finally explains the 50% rate of gunshot wounds to the shoulder amongst recruits on the first day.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:08 AM on 04/17/2010
I doubt if Mikhail Kalashnikov knows more about an AK 47 than an average 10 yr old Afghan boy. It may be genetic. Afghans have been fighting for perpetuity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
03:47 AM on 04/17/2010
It's not like a rear sight marked in 100 meter increments is such a big mystery.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
belyeu
03:53 PM on 04/17/2010
The markings on the rear sight of a AK 47 are only as accurate as the elevation of the front sight and the right to left adjustment on the rear.

BTW, those meter markings on the rear are not at all accurate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
05:12 PM on 04/17/2010
Yes, I know there is a tool used to screw the front sight up or down for elevation and push it either left or right for windage. I just don't see Afghan police going out on a 300 meter range and individually sighting in their own weapons.
02:43 AM on 04/17/2010
Is there anything that private companies can't screw up? Ya, let's privatize everything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paula Ann
11:14 AM on 04/17/2010
it's akin to planned obsolescence. why would contractors who make 100k yearly want to get the afghan army up and running? unlike in the real world where if your work (training afghans) is unsatisfactory you are canned, the contractors are rewarded for screwing up.
02:49 PM on 04/17/2010
Just so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elan4444
01:59 AM on 04/17/2010
I am extremely worried when I see our troops paired with Afghans. I don't think it is at all fair to send our servicemen over to fight and then handicap them by pretending that the Afghans are their equal in the ability to perform combat duties. Lives are at stake here.
02:44 AM on 04/17/2010
The Afghans have defeated every invading arm since Alexander the Great. Patronize much?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
Send the kids off to die, bleed their country dry.
09:03 AM on 04/17/2010
the lives were put in harms way by bo0sh admin liars. Obama needs to end this and walk away. we have committed over a trilluon dollars and 7,000 dead and 60,000 injured to feed the MIC. and we send people over to those countries who won't do a good job because they can't.

the worst thing about this is that a significant number of Iraqi and afghan deaths are from 'mischief' fire. 'collateral damage' is a ruse. these contractors are from organizations drawing from states where you find tho most poverty and the most pure amurKKKan bigotry. the 'assumed presence' of one terrrrrrist is the excuse to kill dozens of people. mcKKKrystal thinks it's OK. I have no sympathy for pathological contractors.

I do have sympathy for the real soldiers. no one should be sent to the far corners of the world to kill and die for the lies of the richest people in the USA. No one should be made to kill and lie for Halliburton profits and exxon/connoco.