iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran Nuclear Summit: Iran Says U.S. Nukes Tool Of Terror, Intimidation

04/17/10 12:42 PM ET   AP

Iran Nuclear Summit
A general view of the participants at the International Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, April 17, 2010. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Saturday said any revision of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty "must be done by independent countries who do not own nuclear weapons". The five-year review of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, the cornerstone of global efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, will be held in May. (AP Photo/Vahi

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's supreme leader told a nuclear disarmament conference in Tehran on Saturday that the United States' atomic weapons are a tool of terror and intimidation.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said America deceptively calls for non-proliferation while holding on to its own weapons and failing to confront Israel, which is widely believed to have nuclear bombs.

The two-day conference appeared timed as a counterweight to President Barack Obama's 47-nation summit in Washington last week to discuss nuclear security. Obama did not invite Iran, which the U.S. fears is using a civilian nuclear program as cover to develop a weapons capability. Iran denies that and says its nuclear work is only for peaceful purposes such as power generation.

"The deceptive policy by the sole nuclear offender, which falsely claims to be advocating the non-proliferation of nuclear arms while doing nothing substantive for this cause, will never succeed," Khamenei said.

Iran's conference brought together representatives from 60 countries, including China, Russia, Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey and France, as well as delegates from international bodies and non-governmental organizations, according to Iranian media.

The supreme leader, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and several other senior Iranian officials took turns at the podium to warn that America's nuclear policy was endangering the world and encouraging nations to consider withdrawing from the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty.

If the U.S. meant what it said about stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, Israel would not have been able to "turn the occupied land of Palestine into an arsenal with huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons," Khamenei said.

At last week's gathering in Washington, world leaders endorsed a call from Obama to secure all nuclear materials around the globe within four years to keep them out of the grasp of terrorists.

Several countries, including Ukraine, Mexico and Canada, declared their intention to give up highly enriched uranium as a step toward making it harder for terrorist groups or criminal gangs to steal or acquire a key ingredient in the making of atomic weapons.

Russia and the U.S. also signed a deal to dispose of tons of weapons-grade plutonium, although that won't start for eight years.

Three sets of U.N. sanctions have failed to pressure Iran to stop its own uranium enrichment work, which it says is only to produce fuel for power stations. The technology is of international concern because it could give Iran a pathway to warhead production.

Russia's deputy foreign minister, Sergei Rybakov, called for more confidence building measures from Tehran to allay international concerns over its nuclear program.

"We need to reinforce, reinstall full confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear program," Rybakov said Saturday on Iran's English-language Press TV.

Tehran was angered by Obama's announcement this month of a new U.S. nuclear policy in which he pledged America would not use atomic weapons against nations that do not have them. Iran and North Korea were pointedly excluded from the non-use pledge, and Iranian leaders took that as an implicit threat.

"The insistence of these governments on holding and increasing the destructive powers of these weapons ... serves as a tool of collective intimidation and terror," Khamenei said of the U.S. and other nuclear-armed nations.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's supreme leader told a nuclear disarmament conference in Tehran on Saturday that the United States' atomic weapons are a tool of terror and intimidation. Ayatollah Ali Kham...
TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's supreme leader told a nuclear disarmament conference in Tehran on Saturday that the United States' atomic weapons are a tool of terror and intimidation. Ayatollah Ali Kham...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 172
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
09:11 AM on 04/20/2010
We all around the people are under heavy threats of Nuclear weapons, (not only Iran)

Israel the first one who should obey UN instructions (maybe more than 500)
08:31 PM on 04/20/2010
Fanned!!!!!!!!!!! You are right!
09:05 AM on 04/20/2010
We are fully agree with Iran's Administration that :

America's nuclear policy was endangering the world and encouraging nations to consider withdrawing from the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty. If the U.S. meant what it said about stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, Israel would not have been able to "turn the occupied land of Palestine into an arsenal with huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons,

Nobody (in UN) is regarding Israel's nuclear weapons and their threat to peace in mid-east ??

It is ceratinly double - standard and showing dishonesty of Obama's policies
photo
Puller58
Man of Mystery
08:49 AM on 04/19/2010
The Iranian government such as it is can't seem to understand that bellicose statements only give Israel more reasons to press for bombing them. But then Iran's hardliners may feel they won't be harmed enough to worry about it.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
09:13 AM on 04/19/2010
Read the article. What "bellicose"?
03:01 AM on 04/20/2010
I do not think Iran's hardliners including Ahamadinejad mind Israel to attack Iran for several reasons.

1. It will put 99% of the populations behind them.

2. Once Iran downed half of the Israelis aircrafts with her home made S-300(I-300) then US generals will count their blessings!
http://www.iranmilitaryforum.net/index.php?topic=3431.msg23929#msg23929

3. With half of the Israelis' aircrafts downed, then Hizbullah and Syria can finish Israel for ever.

4. Arab street will be a fan of Iran and Arab governments will stop confrontation with Iran.
07:05 AM on 04/19/2010
one the one hand i know that it is completely hypocritical for the us, russia, china, etc. to have nuclear weapons, and then tell everyone else they can't, particularly as the usa is the only country to ever use one. so our moral authority is pretty much out the window. on the other hand i know that the wolrd is a much safer place the less amount of people can actually create one, its a simple law of probability. therefore i believe we should do everything we can to stop proliferation.
06:56 AM on 04/19/2010
iran is just using obama's anti-American rhetoric against us. all they have to do is read zinn and then construct their narrative making us the bad guys.
02:47 AM on 04/19/2010
Well, congratulations to Iran for having the smarts to take the issue out of the hands of the U.S. and put it squarely where it belongs - in an international forum, not in a NATIONAL forum as was the U.S. Version. Further, what entitly authorized the U.S. to call any kind of meeting at all? And why should any other country pay attention? The entire episode in Washington was window dressing, but perhaps dangerous window dressing, because the Obama government may try to claim some sort of mandate as a result.

To re-iterate, the only reason non-nuclear powers agreed NOT to develop nuclear weapons was because the then nuclear powers (U.S. U.K. U.S.S.R., China, France) agreed that they would expeditously and diligently seek to disarm themselves of Nuclear weapons. They have obviously not done so, so what makes them think they have a right to try to enforce the Non-Proliferation side of the treaty? It's hypocritical and total B.S. As a legal contract it is unenforceable because of breach by the nuclear powers!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
01:40 AM on 04/19/2010
earlier, I posted a link to the opening statement made by the host nation.

Here's a link to the final statement, made by all those attending.

http://tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=217782
03:07 AM on 04/19/2010
The final statement sounds reasonable.

Which country did not ratify it?
08:24 PM on 04/18/2010
Actually, the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the second and third shots, respectively, of the cold war. Dresden was probably the first. All three of these crimes against humanity were carried out to impress as well as warn the then ally, "Uncle Joe" Stalin, of the overwhelming superiority of the British and American Air Forces and the unanswered and total devastation they could wreak.
Yes, as unpalatable as it is to agree with the Ayatollah Khamenei, the U.S. IS (so far, thank God) the "sole nuclear offender." May God grant that it always be so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zanubiyah
06:38 PM on 04/18/2010
Contrary to western media reports...

This is not a conferance or a summit, it is a discussion forum. Nothing is expected from it, except the exchange of ideas. There are not only national representitives there, but NGO's interested in ending the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Regardless of who says it...

The United States is the only nation to use nuclear weapons on a civilian population. Regardless of the justification, the statement is true.

If stopping the spread of nuclear weapons is done by regulation, then ALL NATIONS must co operate with and agree to abide by the rules of any regulatory agent the world chooses. We can not hold one nation to the rules, or change the rules for one nation. In other words, Israel must also be called to account for thier policy of 'ambiguity'. If they have them, they must sign the NPT.

.
04:09 PM on 04/18/2010
we want a dialogue with iran now? where were we for the un meeting in ny last year? once again we prove our arrogance to the world !!!
03:26 PM on 04/18/2010
So, what kind of representatives attended this circus. Well Iran was represented by a head Bozo, but I doubt other countries send anybody officially, or did they find some minor Bozos?
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
08:02 PM on 04/18/2010
http://www.france24.com/en/20100412-top-iran-official-spurns-us-nuclear-summit

At the bottom of the article:

"Iran, meanwhile, will hold its own two-day nuclear disarmament conference on April 17 and 18.

Iran is yet to unveil the list of participants attending its conference but officials say delegations from the UN nuclear watchdog and the UN would be attending."

Iran, like any child, ensured there were more attendees (NGOs) so as to portray a superior image to its own base. Same crap, different day.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
02:53 PM on 04/18/2010
Western countries support cartoons insulting Islam, Iran holds a Holocaust cartoon competition.

Western countries go to a nuclear summit, Iran holds a nuclear summit.

Dammit Ahmadinejad, stop being a copycat!
06:09 PM on 04/18/2010
Islam = fiction

Shoah = reality

Not comparable occurrences.
08:39 PM on 04/18/2010
Actually, the Iranian leadership is showing evidence of being very cunning and shrewd in its propaganda wars with the US and its Israeli protege. Rather than engage in the ham handed propaganda of the likes of Saddam Hussein, "Mother of all battles" and the hapless Baghdad Bob, Iran is using, judo like, the platitudinous, increasingly manifestly hypocritical rhetoric of the U.S. and Israel-which boils down to, "We can have nukes, you can't-damn all notions of international law and equity"-against both regimes, as well as their camp followers in NATO.
Saner heads in Washington, D.C. absolutely must deal with the reality that preaching by example, despite all cynical realpolitik to the contrary, can be very effective, especially with a bully on the loose.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
09:18 AM on 04/19/2010
My thoughts, also.
The U.S. is behaving toward Iran, like the Teabaggers are behaving toward Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Progressive: Like Ike and Clinton!
02:45 PM on 04/18/2010
IRAN....A FORUM NOT A SUMMIT

IRAN...REPRESENTATIVES NOT HEADS OF STATE

The article is confusing.

Google "Iran Nuclear Forum" and you a few thousand articles. Reading through a half dozen or so (especially the foreign press) and it is clear that the nation's attending the Iran meeting understood it to be a forum (an exchange of ideas) that did not result in any agreements of a binding nature, attended by low ranking representatives from virtually every nation.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
02:20 PM on 04/18/2010
Wow... they had more attendees? They must be better.

Jeez. Pretty lame. Why didn't they just show up to the meeting put on by the president?

Probably for the same reason Bibi didn't... they'd have to cooperate and thereby further diminish the power over and control of their own people.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
02:23 PM on 04/18/2010
Why didn't you just read the article?

They were not invited.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
02:46 PM on 04/18/2010
Do you mean to say they don't actually have a unilateral will of their own? I'm sure that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was asked, or could have attended had he accepted the back-channel invitations that were invariably presented. Imagine him attending without an official invitation. It would have disarmed the whole situation, wouldn't it?
02:18 PM on 04/18/2010
Why did Russia and China attend the 47 Nation summit and also the Bizarro summit? They are currently major capitalist countries and need to decide whether they can successfully do this whilst maintaining their old automatic antagonism towards the West. Their actions undermines Obama's peaceful pressure on Iran and makes more likely military intervention to eradicate the risk of any offensive nuclear capability Iran might have.
Iran, like Iraq under Saddam, wants to tell the world they are peaceful whilst maintaining the swagger of someone still dangerous.
War would be bad for business.