Steven Rattner Caught Up In Pension Probe

DAVID B. CARUSO   04/16/10 07:41 PM ET   AP

Steven Rattner

NEW YORK — State and federal investigators probing a pay-to-play scandal at New York's giant government pension fund have turned up the heat in recent weeks on one of the saga's better-known figures, former Obama car czar Steven Rattner.

The one-time star of Wall Street and Washington has been dealing for more than a year with an investigation into allegations that he and other money managers paid kickbacks in exchange for lucrative state investment contracts.

The long-running probe drew attention again Thursday when Rattner's former firm, the Quadrangle Group, agreed to pay $12 million to settle its role in the matter. As part of the deal, Quadrangle made a statement condemning Rattner's role as "inappropriate, wrong, and unethical."

The Securities and Exchange Commission also filed legal papers Thursday that contained new details about Rattner's involvement.

The filing did not mention Rattner by name, but it singled out a senior executive at the Quadrangle Group for harsh criticism, saying he had secured a $100 million pension fund investment only after agreeing to distribute a DVD of a low-budget film produced by the brother of one of the fund's chief officials.

The SEC called the DVD deal "a clear conflict of interest."

Other investment bankers, lobbyists and financial firms accused of similar conduct have quickly agreed to pay millions of dollars in penalties and reform their business practices.

Rattner, however, has cut no such deal. He finished his stint on the auto industry task force in July, and since then has remained busy, but under a cloud.

He wrote a lengthy article for Fortune magazine about his experiences restructuring the auto industry. That article, published in November, is now being expanded into a book called "Overhaul," to be published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt this year.

The one-time New York Times reporter has also continued to pen commentary for newspapers, offering contributions to the op-ed pages of The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, and give occasional interviews about the economy and other matters.

He has reportedly been working behind the scenes, as usual, in New York politics, taking an interest in the coming U.S. senate election and briefly backing Harold Ford Jr. as a potential challenger to Kirsten Gillibrand before the former congressman decided not to run.

Rattner hasn't said much about his future, or his involvement in the pension fund, although he made brief reference to it in his Fortune article. In that piece, he acknowledged only that the probe had been an added burden as he worked on the auto bailout.

"I lived in a sterile sublet condo in Washington and would have to grapple simultaneously with the New York attorney general's investigation of my former firm, Quadrangle Group, and me about our actions in connection with an investment from the state pension fund. But we soldiered on," he wrote.

His lawyer issued a statement Thursday saying he disagreed with the characterizations of his conduct. Rattner's spokesman didn't respond to further inquiries Friday.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, whose office has led the investigation into the pension fund, has declined to comment on what actions he might take against Rattner – though authorities have previously said repeatedly that they didn't expect him to face criminal charges.

The Wall Street Journal reported in March that Rattner was in settlement talks, but no resolution has emerged.

Part of Rattner's troubles stem from his handling of a screwball comedy called "Chooch."

Federal investigators said that in a bid to curry favor with state officials, Rattner first used his connections in the entertainment industry to try to get "Chooch" distributed in theaters.

When that didn't pan out, he later set up a meeting between the film's producer, the brother of pension fund chief investment officer David Loglisci, and executives at GT Brands, a DVD distributor owned by one of Quadrangle's private equity funds.

GT Brands initially resisted the film.

The company's chief executive sent an e-mail calling Loglisci's brother "unrealistic and naive," and said he wanted to pass on "Chooch," according to the SEC.

Rattner, according to the SEC filing, kept the DVD talks going, eventually telling the GT Brands executive they needed to "dance along" until they figured out whether Quadrangle needed to do the DVD deal to get its pension fund investment.

"The DVD distribution deal proved to be important," the SEC wrote. "Despite GT Brands' avowed lack of interest in distributing the Chooch DVD, GT Brands reversed course and ultimately offered to manufacture and distribute the Chooch DVD in exchange for 12 percent of the net revenue generated by the distribution of the film." That was a discount from GT Brands' standard fee of 15 to 20 percent.

The deal was finalized in December. Around the same time, Quadrangle also agreed to pay more than $1 million in finders fees to a longtime political consultant to state Comptroller Alan Hevesi. Three weeks later, Loglisci told Rattner that the state would invest $100 million with Quadrangle.

Loglisci pleaded guilty to securities fraud in March. A string of other investment advisers, lobbyists and minor political figures have also pleaded guilty to a variety of charges, most carrying a relatively low risk of jail time.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

Filed by David Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:50 AM on 04/19/2010
It couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

I hope that when Rattso goes down, he takes his scuzzy proteges -- Harold Ford and Reshma Saujani -- with him.
10:34 AM on 04/19/2010
Another example of the P cozy relationship with Wallstreet barons. Looks like he again stepped into horse shit. No surprise there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeffp26
10:00 AM on 04/19/2010
Another powerful white man who had to cheat to get to where he is now.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
paganmist
Girl gamer geek armchair activist
09:16 AM on 04/19/2010
Okay. So Obama gets to Washington and basically has to choose who's going to work for him. There are a variety of people in Washington who appear competent, but turned out to be corrupt.

How exactly are we blaming Obama for these people's corruption? They were corrupt before he got there. How was he supposed to KNOW who, out of thousands of people who work in Washington, was corrupt and who wasn't? Especially when the past President was making use of these people.

He could've assumed that anyone who worked for Bush was corrupt. But that's just stupid. Not everyone under the Bush admin was corrupt. I say this as a liberal. Some were. Some weren't.

He could vet people. And considering that this guy was a FORMER member of Obama's admin, he probably vetted the guy and then kicked him to the curb.

Of all the stuff that everyone blames Obama for, you can't blame him because corrupt people exist in Washington. It's not like they're wearing, "I'm corrupt, don't hire me!" signs on their foreheads.
09:57 AM on 04/19/2010
For me the bigger problem is the administration is going to the same well of contaminated crooks that have been manipulating the system for years. When you are interviewing for these positions sometimes best to hire from the outside and not the same people that got us into this mess.
conservo
Tea Partier, Atheist, Libertarian, Objectivist
10:34 AM on 04/19/2010
This isn't the same well. This is very much a new breed. These are professorial Maoists and Communists (by their owm admissiions). No other admistration would have these crooks (with the exception of Clinton who has had a few).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
09:13 AM on 04/19/2010
Is there any evidence he did anything corrupt while actually in that office? Everything else is irrelevant to actual government corruption.
07:44 AM on 04/19/2010
The corruption permeating our Government has no bounds and no ends - it's all business as ususal. Then they wonder why 80% of Americans do not trust the Goverment!
07:12 AM on 04/19/2010
WOW. This is the first article I’ve read since finding this site…and what an article!!! I’m hooked.

http://www.bankruptcyattorneyincalifornia.com
07:11 AM on 04/19/2010
WOW. This is the first article I’ve read since finding this site…and what an article!!! I’m hooked.

Best Attorney
05:36 AM on 04/19/2010
Since the DVD deal was initiated by the state, it can be argued the buyer assumed it was part of the deal to win the bid.
02:09 AM on 04/19/2010
Biggest difference, "former" as opposed to current GOP position involved in scandal ie. Mikey Steele?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:31 AM on 04/19/2010
How is this news? Obama stacked his administration will corrupt Wall Street hacks. How is this a surprise?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:14 AM on 04/19/2010
Was surprised he kept Bush's people.
12:25 AM on 04/19/2010
For how long will Obama own GM? I would never think of buying from GM.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:34 AM on 04/19/2010
My favorite part of Obama's GM bailout is that Obama made sure GM could use the US taxpayer bailout to keep building factories in communist China.

It will only be a year or so before GM starts to import Chinese made cars into the US. So US taxpayers will be directly subsidizing layoffs of US workers.

The Democrats make the GOP look reasonable and patriotic.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
paganmist
Girl gamer geek armchair activist
09:13 AM on 04/19/2010
Oh, now that's just a load of BS.

Seriously. How is anyone supposed to take you seriously when you claim that the Dems are WORSE than the GOP?

The Dems have NEVER created a economic crisis like this. The Dems didn't start TWO wars. The Dems didn't deregulate the industry that led to the 31 dead miners. The Dems don't have fringe groups so insane that they're a threat to people's lives.

Prove to me that the Dems are "worse" than the GOP in any way. The GOP even spends more than the Dems, despite statements to the contrary.

PROVE it. Just 'cause you say it doesn't make it fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
09:15 AM on 04/19/2010
Nothing makes the GOP look reasonable OR patriotic.
12:17 AM on 04/19/2010
what it the WH needs to ponder is who among the inner circle of advisers has pushed for hire all those individuals with a checkered past who need to leave in a hurry when their past catches with them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:35 AM on 04/19/2010
I'm pretty sure these are all people Obama respects.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LittleRedHenSez
11:53 PM on 04/18/2010
Thought it wouldn't take long for the neocons to come pointing fingers. Better sweep you own doorstep clean. No president can personally vouch for every single thing someone in govt. does. The question would be if Obama knew it or partipcated in it. Same for any Repub.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cascot
"I don't want to live my life being a color." MJ
12:25 AM on 04/19/2010
But he knew about Geitner's unpaid taxes BEFORE he hired him as Sec. Treasury--disgusting!! He can't even obey the law and he gets a pass????

Rattner is just another one caught...how many does that make, NOW?
01:09 AM on 04/19/2010
True that. Obama could not have known that this guy was/is a cheney plant, bent on derailing the much needed transformation of our lame go t
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:20 PM on 04/18/2010
I wonder if it's even possible for any professional to move up the gov. ladder and NOT be dirty, to remain clean?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:35 AM on 04/19/2010
Not in the two major parties.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:13 AM on 04/19/2010
It was a rhetorical question but, yeah, of course, and it's a shame.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
01:00 PM on 04/19/2010
Probably not in ANY party, since they're human too. Third-party candidates seldom win, rarely hold positions of power, and haven't had much chance to get dirty. It's easy to stay "clean" when you aren't responsible for anything except criticism. Let's see where the dirt falls if and when enough Greens or Independents, e.g., hold office.