EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

As Controversy Lingers, Shroud Of Turin Still Draws A Crowd

Shroud Of Turin

First Posted: 6/21/10 Updated: 5/25/11

By Francis X. Rocca
Religion News Service

TURIN, Italy (RNS) As hoteliers and souvenir vendors from Lourdes to Mexico City can readily attest, a sacred pilgrimage can quickly morph from a spiritual event into a commercial bonanza.

And although religious tourism has recently become a booming global industry, it's still rare for religious leaders themselves to sanction a pilgrimage for explicitly economic motives.

But the Shroud of Turin has always known how to draw a crowd.

The shroud, long venerated as the actual burial cloth of Jesus, was last displayed to the public in 2000. Its next exhibition wasn't expected until 2025, in part to protect the shroud's mysterious image--the front and back of a 5-foot-11-inch man--from the fading effects of light.

But when civic leaders in this automotive powerhouse sought to boost their crisis-stricken economy with an influx of tourism, the Catholic Church was ready to help.

Turin's Cardinal Severino Poletto, who maintains the relic on behalf of the pope in the Turin cathedral, agreed to a special six-week display this spring, which began April 10 and runs through May 23. Officials also hope to showcase other local attractions, including restored historic palaces and a cuisine gastronomes consider Italy's most refined.

This unusual bit of economic stimulus already seems to be working. Over 1.5 million of the 2 million available free tickets to see the relic have been snatched up, and the city government says even the priciest hotels are booked solid for all weekends during the period.

Pope Benedict XVI himself will come to venerate the shroud on Sunday (May 2).

Not all the visitors will be believers, of course. The church itself is officially agnostic on the shroud's authenticity, which has been controversial among scholars since at least the 14th century, shortly after its first documented appearance. At the time, a French bishop complained to the pope the sheet was "cunningly painted by sleight of hand."

Yet the shroud has repeatedly defied the attempts of scientists and other to prove it a fake. A widely reported series of carbon-14 tests made in 1988 indicated the fabric dated back no farther than the 13th century; but some experts now say that the testing methods used were inadequate, and the sample of fabric taken by scientists may have been contaminated by repeated handling over the centuries.

Moreover, no one has produced a convincing duplicate of the shroud's image of a man's body, or a satisfactory explanation of how it was made.

Archeologists and medical specialists say numerous details of the image conform to latter-day knowledge of the effects of ancient Roman crucifixion techniques--knowledge that would have been unavailable to medieval forgers.

No less intriguing is that the now-famous image of the shroud man's bearded face, nuanced and strikingly realistic, was invisible until revealed in a photographic negative in 1898.

Visitors can easily reserve tickets on a multi-lingual Web site (http://www.sindone.org). A short digital film, shown in a tent outside the cathedral, prepares one for viewing by highlighting details of the image that might otherwise be unintelligible at first glance.

The relic itself is shown in an oxygen-free case behind two inches of bullet-proof glass, monitored by close-circuit TV cameras and a squad of plainclothes policemen spread throughout the cathedral.

However old the object in that case actually is, and however it was produced, it is apt to strike many who see it now as surprisingly modern. Glowing in the cool, low-intensity fluorescent light of two projectors, the subtle and symmetrical doubled image of a human body looks more like a high-tech diagnostic scan than an artifact of ancient Palestine or medieval Europe.

After waiting 90 minutes or more to get in, visitors have no more than a couple of minutes to take in the sight at a distance of 15 to 30 feet. (There is no time limit for viewing from the cathedral nave, for which no ticket is required, but visitors there can get no closer than 80 feet from the shroud.)

Even such a brief encounter seems to be worth the effort, however.

"It's much more realistic and beautiful than I expected," said Emiliano Babboni, 29, of Tuscany, just after leaving the cathedral. "Seeing it fills me with great emotion, great joy."

"As Catholics, we hope it's real," said Maria Weber, a former resident of Riverside, Calif., now retired and living in northeastern Italy. "Because if it's real, that means all of it--the martyrdom, the Passion, the great suffering of Jesus Christ--it's all true."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Filed by Clay Chiles  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:13 PM on 05/02/2010
"As controvers­y lingers...­" - just what controvers­y?
The year when this fake was made is well known, how it was made also - fabric was wrapped around a statue, and local archbishop (France) informed Vatican and railed against the forgery the very same decade it was made in 14th century.
What a cruel and sudden manipulati­on by the current Pope -- to move attention away from pedophilia among priests caused by one of the most inhumane "church law" imposed in 11th century so that Catholic church saves money -- no need of supporting widows and orphans of deceased priests
photo
MNKen
Eschew Obfuscation
08:25 AM on 04/29/2010
"Because if it's real, that means all of it--the martyrdom, the Passion, the great suffering of Jesus Christ--it­'s all true." Wow. Just wow. Lady, there were a lot of men who suffered and were crucified during that time. Are they all gods?

Even if...big if...this was of the one person known as Jesus, why does that make him a god? How does an image on a cloth say this person came back to life from the dead? How does it say you will go to heaven if you believe in his teachings? There is enough wood from the "true cross" in churches all over Europe to build a house. Do you see that as proof also?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rf dude
Just an average Man of Bronze
01:01 AM on 04/29/2010
Besides, Haysus had blue eyes - and the eyes in this painting are obviously closed...
'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
medic628
11:39 PM on 04/28/2010
Does the Savoy family still have anything to do with Shroud?
10:47 PM on 04/28/2010
This article is behind the times...th­e Shroud was convincing­ly explained years ago. Of course there will always be 'some' who 'say' that the tests aren't valid, but who takes them seriously?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Professional Resource Manager
06:39 PM on 04/28/2010
Do they have the grilled-ch­eese sandwich Madonna too?
08:43 AM on 04/26/2010
The shroud is an interestin­g piece of medieval art but a 2,000 year old photo negative of Jesus.....­nah.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
48thGuy
10:46 AM on 04/24/2010
The Shroud is probably a masterful and I do mean masterful artist's work from the Byzantine era....Pil­laged in the Crusade of 1204, taken to France and ending up in the hands of the Vatican...­Anyone who believes it is more than a representa­tion is not being real...
06:39 PM on 04/23/2010
The article mentions that the shroud figure was a 5'11" man. If that is correct, that seems unusually large for a man of that period, especially a man from the middle east.
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
01:03 PM on 04/26/2010
And Jesus was described in the Bible as being slight of stature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Professional Resource Manager
06:40 PM on 04/28/2010
He could dunk though.
07:33 PM on 05/01/2010
Where is that in the Bible please?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
curiousdwk
Global Citizen. Not Democratic, not Republican, n
01:59 PM on 04/23/2010
"Yet the shroud has repeatedly defied the attempts of scientists and other to prove it a fake". If critical analysis were applied here, the author would have seen the error in this statement. The proof is not in proving it is something it is not (which can never be proven) but rather the test is in proving that it is what it claims to be. And that has never been proven. Just like a god cannot be proven to not exist (nor unicorns, nor witches) a shroud cannot be proven to not be something 2,000 years old of miraculous bearing. But there isn't a shred of evidence that this is the Christ. Maybe it's someone else. Maybe it isn't from the time of Christ even. But even if it is from that time period, there is no proof that it is of Christ. And so of course it cannot be proved not to be anyone I want it to be.

If you ask the wrong question, you never have to worry about the answer.
photo
michelesda
My micro-bio is empty.
11:55 PM on 04/25/2010
In fact, various credible explanatio­ns have been advanced as to how the shroud could have been made. The only thing preventing modern technology from settling the issue once and for all is that modern technology can't get its hands on the object in question to do the appropriat­e science on it. Not that the church's reservatio­ns aren't understand­able, of course. There is simply no way to guarantee that any given laboratory is any more trustworth­y than the pope is. Another good reason; the church is probably smart enough to already know it's a fake, considerin­g that all they are willing to do is "venerate" it. The church, however, is in the faith business, not the truth business, so why spoil a good thing? Meanwhile, for the rest of us, Occam's Razor says yes, it's a Renaissanc­e era fake, and anybody who thinks it's a real holy relic is indulging himself in pure Tinkerbell­-think. As is their perfect right, of course... and what do you bet that such believers are among the last people in the world who would ever want to see it scientific­ally analyzed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:09 AM on 04/23/2010
So when does the bishop of Turino start charging visitors to see the Shroud in order to pay the pope's legal bills?

You didn't think Benny 16 was going to fork over the loot himself did you?
04:48 AM on 04/23/2010
Even Christians need to make a living and the Mexicans have a lot of economic problems. Let me go back to listening to my church songs. http://www­.digitalun­divide.com­/church-hy­mns---chur­ch-songs-f­ree-praise­-and-worsh­ip-music
photo
MNKen
Eschew Obfuscation
08:17 AM on 04/29/2010
Huh?
09:43 PM on 04/22/2010
Part II

"But what about the crucifixio­n marks? The blood covering his hands and head??"
What of them? Have you SEEN these blood stains on the shroud? Because I have and I have to agree with the SCIENTISTS who say that it looks too neat to have been done naturally as well as the blood type being AB positive (a blood type that didnt exist until around AD 700). It didnt cross your minds that maybe this was added later to a shroud of a person statistica­lly other than Jesus? Lol I mean give me a break! The early Catholic Church used to go around to medieval towns and villages carrying religious relics they claimed were the bones of Saints or even more laughably the actual Holy Cross! Would you believe those were real too?

I believe in Jesus personally but im adult enough to call nonsense when I see it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
12:15 AM on 04/26/2010
> AB positive (a blood type that didnt exist until around AD 700)

I admit laughing out loud when I read that. Then I remembered I'm not an expert in this field. Can you refer me to a source?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Professional Resource Manager
06:43 PM on 04/28/2010
Somewhat off topic, but very interestin­g anyway.

http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/Y­-chromosom­al_Aaron
09:36 PM on 04/22/2010
Part I

The Shroud of Turin is such utter nonsense. Do people honestly believe this was the shroud covering Jesus? I mean, in the past 2000 years do they honestly believe that it couldn't have been someone else with a beard out of the population (countless MILLIONS) who died around that time??

Granted this shroud isn't dated in, say, the 20th century or in the modern era true but lets just say for sake of argument this shroud is indeed dated from the time of Jesus. How many people died around this time who was wrapped in a shroud? I'll be conservati­ve and say a thousand in that entire area of the Middle East. The odds of this even being Jesus, that one in literally a thousand people, is still quite small.
06:51 PM on 04/22/2010
Just want you all to know: My cat coughed up a hairball that looks like the Virgin Mary. For 10 bucks a viewing it will bestow its blessings upon you.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:58 PM on 04/22/2010
Congratula­tions, my son, it's payday!

And I think you get much more than $10 for allowing the faithful to take part in such a powerful revelatory experience­.
07:01 PM on 04/22/2010
Meantime I'm checkin' the litter box for Jesus!