iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gov. Jan Brewer Signs Controversial Arizona Immigration Bill: Decision Not 'Made Lightly'

PAUL DAVENPORT and JONATHAN J. COOPER   04/24/10 12:32 AM ET   AP

Border

PHOENIX — Gov. Jan Brewer ignored criticism from President Barack Obama on Friday and signed into law a bill supporters said would take handcuffs off police in dealing with illegal immigration in Arizona, the nation's busiest gateway for human and drug smuggling from Mexico.

With hundreds of protesters outside the state Capitol shouting that the bill would lead to civil rights abuses, Brewer said critics were "overreacting" and that she wouldn't tolerate racial profiling.

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation."

Earlier Friday, Obama called the Arizona bill "misguided" and instructed the Justice Department to examine it to see if it's legal. He also said the federal government must enact immigration reform at the national level – or leave the door open to "irresponsibility by others."

"That includes, for example, the recent efforts in Arizona, which threaten to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe," Obama said.

The legislation, sent to the Republican governor by the GOP-led Legislature, makes it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally. It also requires local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal immigrants; allows lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws; and makes it illegal to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them.

The law sends "a clear message that Arizona is unfriendly to undocumented aliens," said Peter Spiro, a Temple University law professor and author of the book "Beyond Citizenship: American Identity After Globalization."

Brewer signed the bill in a state auditorium about a mile from the Capitol complex where some 2,000 demonstrators booed when county Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox announced that "the governor did not listen to our prayers."

"It's going to change our lives," said Emilio Almodovar, a 13-year-old American citizen from Phoenix. "We can't walk to school any more. We can't be in the streets anymore without the pigs thinking we're illegal immigrants."

Protesters gathered in Miami Friday evening at the Freedom Tower, where thousands of Cuban refugees were processed after fleeing the communist revolution.

"A thousand people a day are being deported. A thousand families being destroyed. And this comes at a very high moral and financial cost to this nation," said Maria Rodriguez, executive director of the Florida Immigration Coalition.

The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund said it plans a legal challenge to the law, arguing it "launches Arizona into a spiral of pervasive fear, community distrust, increased crime and costly litigation, with nationwide repercussions."

William Sanchez, president of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders Legal Defense Fund, said his group is preparing a federal lawsuit against Arizona to stop the law from being applied. The group represents 30,000 Evangelical churches nationwide, including 300 Latino pastors in Arizona.

"Millions of Latinos around the country are shocked," Sanchez said.

Mexican Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa said Friday that the passage of the law will affect relations between Mexico and Arizona and "it will force Mexico to consider whether the cooperation agreements that have been developed with Arizona are viable and useful."

Espinosa said Mexico regrets that Arizona did not take into account the "valuable contributions that migrants make to the economy, society and culture of Arizona and the United States of America."

She said the movement of illegal merchandise along the Mexico-U.S. border is far from being connected to illegal immigration.

Guatemalan Vice President Rafael Estrada said the law "is a step back for those migrants who have fought" for their rights. Guatemala's Foreign Relations Department decried the measure in a statement saying "it threatens basic notions of justice."

The law will take effect in late July or early August, and Brewer ordered the state's law enforcement licensing agency to develop a training course on how to implement it without violating civil rights.

"We must enforce the law evenly, and without regard to skin color, accent, or social status," she said. "We must prove the alarmists and the cynics wrong."

Brewer, who faces a tough election battle and growing anger in the state over illegal immigrants, said the law "protects every Arizona citizen."

Anti-immigrant anger has swelled in the past month, after rancher Rob Krentz was found dead on his land north of Douglas, near the Mexico border. Authorities believe he was fatally shot by an illegal immigrant possibly connected to a drug smuggling cartel.

Arizona has an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants, and its harsh, remote desert serves as the corridor for the majority of illegal immigrants and drugs moving north into the U.S. from Mexico.

U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva, a Democrat, said he closed his Arizona offices at noon Friday after his staff in Yuma and Tucson were flooded with calls, some from people threatening violent acts and shouting racial slurs. He called on businesses and groups looking for convention and meeting locations to boycott Arizona.

The bill's Republican sponsor, state Rep. Russell Pearce of Mesa, said Obama and other critics of the bill were "against law enforcement, our citizens and the rule of law."

Pearce said the legislation would remove "political handcuffs" from police and help drive illegal immigrants from the state.

"Illegal is illegal," said Pearce, a driving force on the issue in Arizona. "We'll have less crime. We'll have lower taxes. We'll have safer neighborhoods. We'll have shorter lines in the emergency rooms. We'll have smaller classrooms."

__

Associated Press writers Julie Pace in Washington, Olga R. Rodriguez in Mexico City, Christine Armario in Miami and Angel Sas in Guatemala City contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
PHOENIX — Gov. Jan Brewer ignored criticism from President Barack Obama on Friday and signed into law a bill supporters said would take handcuffs off police in dealing with illegal immigration i...
PHOENIX — Gov. Jan Brewer ignored criticism from President Barack Obama on Friday and signed into law a bill supporters said would take handcuffs off police in dealing with illegal immigration i...
Filed by Michael Falcone  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34,708
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (519 total)
11:00 AM on 06/21/2010
Here is a paper which shows the original intent of the US Constitution and demonstrates why the Arizona Law is constitutional:
http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/the-arizona-immigration-law-the-supremacy-clause-of-the-u-s-constitution-exclusive-concurrent-jurisdiction-explained/
04:47 AM on 05/16/2010
Go Arizona If you have entered this Great state illegally don't expect your stay to be pleasant or long!
11:04 PM on 05/15/2010
I am excited to see the other states that are currently drafting bills similar to AZ, they need to finish the wall along the Mexican border and post guards along it.
10:27 PM on 05/15/2010
The root of the problem is not the people who hire the ILLEGALS yes the are ILLEGAL they are not undocumented citizens, that asinine statement is only half true, while they are undocumented they are not U.S. citizens therefore they cannot be "undocumented citizens". They are undocumented and illegally in this country. This would make then undocumented illegals.
05:57 AM on 05/02/2010
PS: If you read the Arizona Law, it emphasis Federal Immigration Laws already on the books and makes many references to them. Legal Immigrants are always welcome in the US, not the fence jumping, fake name and fake stolen ss # using illegal folks who shouldnt be here. This addresses that. If you are legally in the US, you have nothing to fear from this bill. Obviously Illegal people, and those who have something to gain from illegals, seem to be the ones protesting this bill. I can't believe the people who break our laws, believe they have a right to be here.
05:50 AM on 05/02/2010
I just read this entire bill and if the mouth flapping opponents would read it too, they would realize it has nothing to do with any racist nonsense. In The USA, citizens are asked to show an ID and prove you have a liscence and insurance, if your stopped by a cop. Immigrants will also need to show the same thing. Show your card, your fine. Whats the big deal? If you have no liscence, you broke the law and deserve futher scrutiny...This also requires employers to use everify, etc.. I am Hispanic and would expect to give my ID to a cop if stopped.
03:14 AM on 04/29/2010
My father was an immigrant that came to this country legal and followed all the laws. He agrees with the Arizona law and says nobody is trying to read the actual law. Nobody can be pulled over for the way the look. When they get pulled over for anything, they will be subject to the same questions as anyone else. When you break the law, expect to go to jail in any country. I'm also not sure why this is specifically a problem unless you are living in the US illegally.
10:03 AM on 04/29/2010
I agree - there are a lot here who are apparently quick to jump to conclusions.
09:33 AM on 04/28/2010
Hello Nazi Germany!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OscarthePug
01:41 AM on 04/28/2010
Why is it always the Republicans in government who enact the most extreme, anti-American and illegal statutes at both the state and national level?

Is it biological, hereditary or mental retardation that provokes them to disregard history, to deny proven science, to promote unsupported facts, to practice hypocrisy and to spread hate and fear?

From Virginia, where a Republican Governor declares a statewide celebration of the Confederacy while denying that the Civil War had anything to do with the slavery issue, to Oklahoma where the state legislature passes laws that make it almost impossible for a woman to receive reproductive healthcare in violation of long established federal law, to Texas and Colorado where state legislatures are intent on expanding 2nd Amendment rights to college students while attending classes on campus, to Arizona and likely Georgia where anti-immigration statutes will deny 4th and 14th Amendment rights to anyone suspected of being in this country illegally, without probably cause, in violation of the "Supremacy Clause" of the Constitution.

They never consider the adverse effects of their legislative acts, are only concerned with advancing their extreme social ideologies at the expense of everyone else who doesn't fall within the narrow definition of "true" American and rejoices in dividing the country.

When will the insanity subside. We need to focus on the big issues that require national attention and a concerted effort from all of us to have any chance of being solved.
09:22 AM on 04/29/2010
*facepalm*

This is from a leftist who no doubt supports the federal gov't forcing citizens to buy good/services from private companies or else they pay a fine... Apparently simply because you're alive you significantly affect interstate commerce so much as to justify such a law.

You're misguided on citing the Supremacy Clause - the AZ law doesn't contradict federal law. It reinforces it and even cites federal law as bounding the state law. It's kind of like federal and state substance laws. For example, feds say a substance is illegal, and a state law also says its illegal - the state enforces their own substance law bounded within the federal substance law.
09:51 AM on 04/29/2010
"They never consider the adverse effects of their legislative acts, are only concerned with advancing their extreme social ideologies at the expense of everyone else"

Actually, that describes leftists perfectly. Healthcare reform was intended to righteously help so many people, but none of the leftists wanted to talk about how it would harm our budget 30 years down the road (and now people are considering amnesty for illegals to add more load). It was passed based entirely on social ideology while ignoring fiscal responsibility. You can point to press releases saying it'll reduce spending over 10 years, but a 10 year decrease is precisely what the law was designed to show, not because it's inherently a good law. It was all about political propaganda:
http://reason.com/blog/2010/03/03/were-so-screwed

Notice the ten year dip. The recent jump was due to the massive stimulus. I think it's terribIe that you and millions more were misled by a handful of devious legislators into thinking healthcare reform was a responsible law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OscarthePug
11:06 AM on 04/29/2010
I wonder if you're even old enough to have attended college because it's obvious that you have limited life experience that lend any support to your comments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EricEFNY
02:48 PM on 04/27/2010
The race card comes up...over and over again. In the Mid-West and North East (not exclusively) there are plenty of Caucasian undocumented workers. This is not a "race" thing except if you would like to make it one. Simplify it to race and make yourself feel comfortable.

In the minds of some here it is just easier to simplify it to a "BROWN" skin issue. Accurately stated in by some that those (undocumented workers) are very hard workers leave out they are also subject to abuse by their employers because of their status. They seem to say as long as they work "three jobs" to provide a need for cheap labor....and watch the prices of everything go up here. Strange justification.

The immigration system is broken here....however that needs reform. The argument states exactly why enforcement is required. Because when the lack of "cheap" labor increases prices...then based on what some state..prices will go up and trigger the reform.

This wonderful system hurts those who went through the long, convoluted and expensive process to permanent residency or citizenship here in the US endangers their opportunity here. They and citizens born here have to compete against the undocumented worker.

Some of those Americans are civil rights activists like this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FFjPLy6dnI&feature=related

Keep dreaming it is all about race...because it is not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
01:06 AM on 04/27/2010
I had a trip planned to Arizona - but given this I cancelled it. I will be avoiding AZ.
10:37 PM on 05/15/2010
Good I am sure they don't want you there anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
11:01 PM on 04/26/2010
Axel, why would a law that protects US citizens from criminals be unconstitutional? The amount of ignorant people in this country is astounding. This is not about race, or ethnic heritage; In case anyone hadn't noticed, the good and hard working people of Arizona are having a real problem with illegal immigrants. It's costing them 4 billion dollars a year, and 30% of the entire crime in their state is being inflicted on them by people who aren't even supposed to be there in the first place! They are going broke! This is about a federal government that refuses to enforce the law and refuses to adhere to the Constitution and refuses to listen to the People anymore. What you're seeing is an assertion of States' Rights, nothing more. If the immigrants in question were simply here to work and better their lives, and weren't ripping off the American taxpayers, drug smuggling, committing murders and kidnappings in the process, you wouldn't be seeing any such thing, and you wouldn't be seeing a federal government that's falling down on the job because of cheap corporate labor.
02:32 AM on 04/28/2010
It's unconstitutional because it gives law enforcement officials the power to request documentation if they have "reasonable suspiscion" someone is in AZ illegally. No one- not the Governor, the legislation, the officials who will have to carry out this law-has provided an objective, criteria-baed, logical explanation of what that "reasonable suspiscion" might be. It boils down to stereotyping and racial profiling. If they provisions set into place previously were actually enforced, maybe the negative effects you speak of would be lessened. (Legal Arizona Workers Act (LAWA)/Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program) However, they are not enforced-because those laws target corporations and businesses--and the corporatized hand of corruption that we recognize as the US government just looooves all that cheap labor.
10:49 PM on 05/15/2010
Wrong again, you libs are so narrow minded. As a natural born citizen of this great country, I have to show I.D. and someone who entered the country illegally doesn't? How much sense does that make? Not all Mexican people are illegals, not all illegals are Mexican. It is you and people like you who keep bringing up the race issue. To be honest with you I personally have no problem with singling someone out because of their looks, you have to admit that all of the terrorist attacks with the exception of one because I know you will bring up McVeigh, have been Muslims. Therefore I have no problem with racial profiling Muslims to protect our national security. It is up to the other Muslims to take a stand and condemn the radical Muslims who are doing all this, do you see that happening? One other thing, I have to show two forms of I.D. a birth certificate, be finger printed and have an FBI background check every time I renew my drivers license because I carry a CDL with a HAZMAT endorsement. I am also 100% for a picture ID to be able to vote. I bet you are against that too.