iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Martha Coakley Running Unopposed For Reelection As Massachusetts Attorney General

Martha Coakley Reelection

GLEN JOHNSON   04/25/10 01:27 PM ET   AP

BOSTON — The January weekend after Democrat Martha Coakley lost a supposedly can't-miss election for U.S. Senate, "Saturday Night Live" underscored the graveness of her political future with a skit where a Barack Obama impersonator labeled her "the single most incompetent candidate ever to seek public office in this nation's history."

Three months later, Coakley faces the very real prospect of being re-elected as Massachusetts attorney general this fall without a Republican opponent.

The shift reflects lingering weakness within the state GOP, despite its success in staging Scott Brown's upset win.

It also highlights Coakley's work to rehabilitate her image, as well as the satisfaction some voters feel for her in her current role.

"There is some irony in that," said Paul Watanabe, a political science professor at UMass-Boston. "In some ways, it's as though the January election didn't take place, or that at least it did not have the consequences for her own political future – or opportunity for the Republicans – that virtually everyone was talking about on Jan. 20."

Coakley acknowledges she's monitoring the progress of a potential Republican challenger, but says she won't let her guard down until May 4 – if then. Prospective candidates have until that day to submit the signatures of 10,000 registered voters for review by city and town clerks.

"I have always assumed I would have a Republican opponent, and until May 4, I'm still working on that assumption," Coakley said. Then, in a telling moment, she added: "And after May 4, I'm going to campaign and work as if I do have an opponent."

Until January, the 56-year-old Coakley had been something of the golden girl of Massachusetts politics. She was elected district attorney in high-profile Middlesex County, then succeeded her mentor, Thomas Reilly, as attorney general. When Sen. John Kerry ran for president in 2004, and then Sen. Edward M. Kennedy was diagnosed with brain cancer in May 2008, Coakley laid the groundwork to run for each of their seats.

Kennedy succumbed to his disease last August, and Coakley was the first candidate in either party to declare her candidacy in January's special election. She handily won the Democrats' December primary, and seemed on cruise-control to win the seat her party had held for more than a half-century.

Then Brown, a little-known state senator, rode a wave of anti-government, anti-Obama administration sentiment to victory.

Where Coakley disappeared from public views for days, and took a mini-vacation on Cape Cod, Brown relentlessly campaigned across the state. He ended up winning, costing the president the 60th Democratic vote he needed to avoid filibusters in the Senate, forcing him to overhaul his tactics for passing a national health care overhaul.

Coakley herself later conceded the depth of her failure, telling one interviewer, "I'll always be the woman who lost Ted Kennedy's seat."

She told The Associated Press she considered not seeking re-election, but only momentarily.

"It kind of energized me," she said of her loss, "because I care so much about the work and the job, that I do a better job campaigning and getting my message out. Running for office is the way you get to do a job for the public."

Coakley has already submitted the necessary signatures for re-election. She's also been out stumping at Democratic caucuses, and has re-engaged her attorney general's media apparatus.

The chairwoman of the state GOP says she's trying to lure two unnamed businessmen to run.

"Everyone who is considering it is a professional who has a career and a family," Chairwoman Jennifer Nassour said.

The absence of an attorney general candidate was notable at the Republican's otherwise raucous nominating convention on April 17, where Brown was the keynote speaker and celebrity attendee.

Nonetheless, Nassour is focusing on the relative heft of her candidates for the state's other five constitutional offices.

"I don't want just any name on the ballot; I want it to be someone who is a phenomenal candidate," she said. "If we don't end up having a candidate, then I don't think it reflects poorly on the party; I think it shows thoughtfulness by the party that we didn't just throw anyone up there."

Coakley said she has been heartened by the response she's getting on the campaign trail.

"I found out shaking hands and getting signatures, people said to me, `I voted for your opponent, but I think you did a great job as attorney general and I'll sign your papers,'" she said. "That makes me feel pretty good."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 235
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
10:34 AM on 04/27/2010
It was the fault of Martha and to some extend the Democrats in choosing the wrong person, to hand over the Senete seat to Scott Brown. She was lazy, standoffish and self rightous.
She can do whatever she please to do now , no one cares !
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
11:58 AM on 04/27/2010
I heard that that many Dems felt Martha was forced down their throat- she wasn't their choice.
07:20 AM on 04/27/2010
The spin I hear is that she is an inept at campaigner. That is made up. Scott Brown won due to Obamacare. We will see more upsets this fall.
10:37 AM on 04/27/2010
Wrong.
Martha was inept and Brown was a good campaigner. If any upset in fall that would be temporary. No good deed goes unpusished. But, Dems will come back stronger as ever.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
11:56 AM on 04/27/2010
That's true- people were angry that the Public Option was missing, and it didn't go far enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgateman
06:43 AM on 04/27/2010
aid - Martha it's time to get up and go campaigning

Martha - go away! It's cold out and I'm sleepy and don't feel like talking to 'the people' today or next week either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NomadicView
03:56 AM on 04/27/2010
All very well but.... Does this mean Scott will be available for next year's Chippendale Calendar? Let's get our priorities in order here!
photo
RickyPoo
In Brightest Day, In Blackest Night...
11:20 PM on 04/26/2010
This also underscores the weakness of the Democratic Party in MA.

They can't find ANYONE to primary this empty pantsuit?
07:21 AM on 04/27/2010
She is the attorney general. It makes Dems feel good to think they loss due to her. It was because of Obama
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
10:10 AM on 04/27/2010
Um, no. It was not because of Obama.
10:40 AM on 04/27/2010
Why ?
The small minded folks are not ready for Obama, he is way ahead of his time.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cynth
[Your ad here.]
11:14 PM on 04/26/2010
Coakley ran a sorry campaign for the Senate seat, but she has been a very good A.G. I hope she's learned her lesson losing to Brown and I'm hopeful she will step up this time. If she keeps her seat, it should help redeem her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProfGiles
09:38 PM on 04/26/2010
Where can I contribute to Unopposed's campaign?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
08:32 PM on 04/26/2010
She'll probably go on vacation, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Appleblossom
04:45 PM on 04/26/2010
People want boring Attorney Generals.

They want interesting Senators.
04:39 PM on 04/26/2010
I've seen her run for office. She CAN lose this election. She is a real loser!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
GOPers taste like chicken and smell like......
02:49 PM on 04/26/2010
I wouldn't vote for this woman for dog catcher. The most inept candidate I've ever seen and I've been following politics for a while. Massachusetts, even though you really blew it and were suckered by an air-headed pretty-boy, I've got to give you a pass on this one, because Coakley-the-robot was so wretched. I expect that you'll correct your mistake in 2012, but you really should send Martha out to pasture.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Appleblossom
04:45 PM on 04/26/2010
Does she do a bad job while in office?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
10:10 AM on 04/27/2010
She was a horrible candidate, that is true. But she's been a pretty good attorney general.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
12:06 PM on 04/27/2010
I don't live there- so I can only read the local papers. According to Murdoch's rag, they claim she dragged her feet in some high profile prosecutions. One was a pedophile.
photo
hrc04
put on your pants and go home.
01:57 PM on 04/26/2010
Um, don't speak too soon...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChumpChicken
01:54 PM on 04/26/2010
RUN SOMEONE AGAINST HER. I want someone to oppose her for running such a terrible campaign and losing to Scott Brown!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPQR1775
12:59 PM on 04/26/2010
The entire Brown episode was stage by his wife who had insiders knowledge of the MSM, she used her connections to push feeds into the MSM, they shape the message and that's how brown, (small b for emphasis) won. There will be NO brownee in Nov 2012, he is good as done! Coakley and the Democrats set up brown in 2012, she will take him on and she will WIN. Also in MA, she will be a powerrful force in the next two years going against the BIG Business of the GOP and their crooked and corrupt ways. Yes, I am sure the GOP will crumble in 2010 and the few like MA, VA, NJ in 2012 two GOV and the 1 senator will also smoke out when the voters vote NO! NO! NO!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChumpChicken
01:56 PM on 04/26/2010
LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
GOPers taste like chicken and smell like......
03:01 PM on 04/26/2010
Heck no, I would not give her another chance. She really screwed up. Pick someone with a pulse to run against Brown in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
12:08 PM on 04/27/2010
Exactly. She is an embarrassment to Senator Kennedy. He never took it for granted.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
wyldthings
as a young man I said I'd never get old an didn'
12:56 PM on 04/26/2010
Many politicians lose a race here and there. Blame her for the lose but it was Health Care!