More

Hollywood Sign Saved: Group Raises $12.5 Million Goal For Hollywood Sign Land

Hollywood Sign Saved

JEFF WILSON   04/26/10 09:58 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — The Hollywood sign, a beacon to stars and star-struck alike, has been saved from urban sprawl under a land conservation pact announced Monday after a donation by Playboy founder Hugh Hefner capped a multimillion-dollar fundraising drive.

"It's a symbol of dreams and a symbol of opportunity and hope," actor-turned Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger told a press conference below the towering letters. "The Hollywood sign will welcome dreamers, artists and Austrian bodybuilders for generations to come."

The huge sign overlooking the city was in danger of having its distinctive setting on the flanks of the Santa Monica Mountains crowded by construction of estate homes on nearby Cahuenga Peak.

But a $900,000 donation from Heffner, who helped save the sign itself 32 years ago, and a $500,000 matching grant completed a $12.5 million fundraising drive to protect 138 acres from development that would have altered the globally recognized symbol of the world's film and television capital.

"My childhood dreams and fantasies came from the movies, and the images created in Hollywood had a major influence on my life and Playboy," Hefner said.

Schwarzenegger praised the public and private partnership that raised the money to keep the property out of the hands of developers.

The Trust for Public Land conservation group raised $6.7 million in private funds, the state offered $3.1 million, and local funds totaled $2.7 million.

Schwarzenegger said private donations came from all 50 states, 10 foreign countries, The Tiffany & Co. and a number of individuals, including J. Paul Getty heir Aileen Getty, Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks.

Cahuenga Peak, just west of the sign's location on Mount Lee, features a 360-degree panorama of Los Angeles and the San Fernando Valley.

Moviemaker and aviation mogul Howard Hughes bought the property in 1940 to build a home for then-girlfriend Ginger Rogers. But that never came about, and the Hughes estate sold the property in 2002 for $1.7 million to the Chicago-based investment group Fox River Financial Resources Inc.

It was put on the market again two years ago for $22 million, but The Trust for Public Land negotiated a lower price.

Ironically, the sign was originally erected in 1923 to promote a real estate development, with its 30-foot-by-50-foot letters spelling "Hollywoodland."

But as Hollywood was entering its golden age, the sign already symbolized the allure of stardom. In the 1930s a young, struggling actress climbed the sign and leaped to her death.

By the late 1940s the sign was falling apart and the "land" portion was removed, giving it the appearance known today. It continued to decay even after the city made it a cultural monument in 1973.

Hefner came to the rescue in 1978 by organizing a fundraiser that enabled a complete rebuilding of the sign, which had to vanish from the skyline for several months.

Wildlife Conservation Board executive director John Donnelly said the permanent protection of Cahuenga Peak is a significant addition to the city's 4,210-acre Griffith Park and will enhance wildlife corridors throughout the region.

"Today, we have the Hollywood ending we hoped for," said William B. Rogers, president of The Trust for Public Land.

___

On the Net:

Save Cahuenga Peak: http://www.savehollywoodland.org

Eds: NEW APPROACH; ADDS background on sign's history, Hefner's previous role in saving sign; CORRECTS attribution of 'Hollywood ending' quote to trust president sted governor. Moving on general news, financial and entertainment services.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

Filed by Billy Silverman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 72
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:50 PM on 04/28/2010
So 12.5 million for a damn sign! What about the millions and millions of people who need help, desperately. 12.5 million would save a TONNE of people. Why would so many celebrities fork out hundreds of thousands of dollars to save it? What about cancer? I'll bet most of those who contributed hadn't even thought of giving that money to, say, cancer research, or anything that would really benifit the human race. A sign, a view, yeah sure that's nice but, what about life? A sign and a view matter not when you're dead.
10:56 PM on 04/27/2010
Why would a development company risk massive damage to their image and almost universal hatred by trying to tear down or mess with one of America's most iconic and recognisable landmarks?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bcgme
former entertaiment business professinal
02:05 AM on 04/27/2010
Its just incredible in this day and age, that something as iconic and identifiable with the City of Hollywood Ca., Los Angeles California, the movie industry, the arts, with American History, that it can just be sold and torn down in the middle of the night, as a real estate deal. Someone is in somebodies pocket!
This is a time when this piece of property and this sign needs to be returned to the state and protected as Historical, not to bee sold or moved because some rich person with money wants a better view. Sometimes things just can not be bought and sold!
When people come to Los Angeles one of the most famous things they see is the Hollywood sign, even though when it was put there the intention was different, that is what its purpose is today. Similar to other cities symbols, ie:St Louis The Arch, New York, Empire State Building, Paris, The Arc d, Triomphe.
Enough said_ NOT FOR SALE!
05:56 PM on 04/27/2010
What in the world are you talking about? They wanted to build homes and with the help of Hugh Hefner and many other people IT IS STAYING WHERE IT IS. He didn't want it to get torn down, so he helped YET AGAIN to save the sign.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
antaeus
Marriage Equality Is Here
09:40 PM on 04/27/2010
Only in L.A. could a 1920s real estate development advertisement be compared to legitimate works of architecture and art and at the same time come to be seen as a cultural obstacle to . . . real estate development.
01:38 AM on 04/27/2010
Well I thought this was good news until I read all the comments below. I will still choose to look at this as good news and breathe a sigh of relief that one of America's great icons will remain unbesmirched by a row of McMansions. Hurray!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:22 AM on 04/27/2010
Can't we just agree that we all suck?
09:51 PM on 04/26/2010
This is why we should vote for Robert C Newman for Governor,check out Newman4Governor.org
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
helenwheels
SEDAGIVE?!?
07:58 PM on 04/26/2010
So that's why all the news trucks on Beachwood this a.m. I kinda thought this was it.

Yay for no development on Cahuenga peak!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
boilinabag
Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est.
07:52 PM on 04/26/2010
here we have the hollywood elite having partys and spending millions to save the sign, and just below you have thousands of people waiting days in line for a few get health care for free. anyone else see how screwed up this is?
07:59 PM on 04/26/2010
Yes, quite a contrast.

Tells you where the city's priorities. LA is also downsizing fire stations and cutting back fire service -- Get this for irony? One of the downsized fire stations is FS 82 (2 acres to 1/2 acre) which is one of the stations to protect the Hollywood Hills -- yes, that's where the H Sign is . . . . until we have a huge fire .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Salty 2
10:13 PM on 04/26/2010
Well, thats Cali for ya !!!
05:00 PM on 04/26/2010
Does Heff know that $800,000 of his $900,000 will go to Trust For Public Land (TPL)? That's the rumored fee that TPL supposedly will get for raising the money.

Does Heff know that his money does not go to Save the Hollywood Sign from anything, but to add 138 acres to Griffith Park? That's a worthy cause, but does Heff know that he did not Save the H Sign?

Who designed this fraud? Goldman Sachs, AIG? The City of LA? or are we to believe that the fraud spontaneously generate itself from nothingness?
07:23 PM on 04/26/2010
I run to Cahuenga Peak several times a week, so I know exactly what it is and where it is. I donated money to the campaign to save the Peak because it is a gorgeous green mountaintop wilderness that should never be destroyed by rapacious developers. If I had to choose between saving Cahuenga Peak or saving the Hollywood sign, I wouldn't give it a single second of thought before choosing the Peak.

Hugh Hefner's money did not, indeed, go to "Save The Hollywood Sign" because there was no such campaign, his money went to "Save Cahuenga Peak."

I will consider this campaign a fraud if developers end up getting the Peak anyway.
07:56 PM on 04/26/2010
You may get your own fraud. It is too soon to know. However, the fact that people were deceived into giving money for a project you like does not erase the fraud -- unless you believe that the ends justifies the means. AIG and Goldman Sachs thought their frauds were OK as the money went to good use -- to make them happy -- just as the money raised under the fraud that Save the Peak was to save the H Sign went to good use -- to make you happy.

The second fraud? Time will tell. LaBonge wanted a corporate convention center in Griffith Park but the conditions in Griffith's gift prevented that. Now LaBonge has his level plateau which he let be approved for development. Don't be too surprised if in a few years, you heard how great it is the LA is building a world class corporate retreat on the top of Cahuenga Peak.
04:19 PM on 04/26/2010
The sign has had several major renovations and is as much a part of Americana as the Statue of Liberty. I hope that is doesn't come down in my lifetime.
04:50 PM on 04/26/2010
What's all this stuff abut the Sign?

Nobody save any Sign from anything.

The city is adding some acreage to Griffith Park. Rather than pay for the land, it scammed the world into thinking that the H Sign was in danger. It wasn't.
07:40 PM on 04/26/2010
You are correct, the Hollywood sign was not in danger. It was much worse; Cahuenga Peak was in danger.
01:43 PM on 04/27/2010
You're right. The sign wasn't in danger of being torn down. It's just all of the land surrounding the sign was in danger of being developed.

It becomes a bit less of a landmark when there's a 5 story hotel in the way.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
04:09 PM on 04/26/2010
What's disturbing is that the entertainment industry too so long to come up with the money when all it cost was tip change. I didn't see a lotta A listers and entertainment moguls line up to ante up the amount, it took too long. Jeez Hugh coulda donated more and asked his hollywood friends to ante up it would been long done by now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
04:13 PM on 04/26/2010
Sorry to belabor the point JScott. They couldn't raise the money faster as too many people in Hollywood knew it was scam. There was no danger to the H Sign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
03:38 PM on 04/26/2010
Fraud! Fraud!! Fraud!!!

You've all been punked. There never was any danger to the Hollywood Sign nor was there any chance that a developer was going to build around the sign or in any way obscure its view.

The back story is that people wanted to buy 138 acres on another ridge which was to the west and behind Mt. Lee, which is where the Hollywood Sign is located. The problem is that it was unlikely that people from around the world would donate millions of dollars if they knew that the land in question was some wilderness which LA wanted to add to Griffith Park. Thus, they simplied lied to the world and told people that the Hollywood Sign was in danger from a developer knowing that people worldwide would want to save the H Sign.

Is our Governor a crook or a fool? Either he knows that the Hollywood Sign is on Mt. Lee and not on the Cahunega Peak, in which case he is crook for using his position to deceive, or he does not know where the H Sign is located, in which case he is a fool.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
04:02 PM on 04/26/2010
Oh please they never said it is endangered they said the viewshed looking toward the north
to it would have been destroyed with palatial mansions cluttering it up.
05:08 PM on 04/26/2010
You are wrong again on both counts:

(1) They mislead millions to believe the Sign or the land under it was in danger.

(2) The city approved 5 mansion on the plateau to the west and behind Mount Lee where the sign is located. From Teles Property visual tour, it is doubtful that the mansions would be visible from below. How can palatial mansions 2000 feet away on an entirely different mountain peak clutter the view of the Hollywood Sign. They cannot. Haven't you see the massive tele-communications right above the H Sign.

Hollywood merely deceived the world into buying an additional 138 acres of Griffith Park.
04:03 PM on 04/26/2010
So this is just about buying land for Griffith Park?
I thought it didn't sound right that a developer would even want to get near the sign. Who would want to buy a house right next to such a public icon? No rich person I can think of.
05:09 PM on 04/26/2010
You've nailed it jozzie. Too bad more people don't have your instincts for BS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony Dodd
Screenplayhouse
03:31 PM on 04/26/2010
If you grew up in Los Angeles, the sign is a tradition you don't want touched. If you're from out of town it can come off as disappointing and kind of lame. You'd think that sign would be lit up and all sparkles at night... right? Think again. Like most thing in Los Angeles... lame.

Now we do need developers. Absolutely. But not to building housing likely to burn or slide down that hill. We need someone to upgrade the damn sign.

Next: we need developers to pour a fortune into Hollywood Boulevard. There is some life down there these days, but Hollywood should become our answer to Vegas. Big beautiful hotels, big shows, big-big-BIG! Make that street a REAL tourist destination instead of a disappointing drive-by.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
04:05 PM on 04/26/2010
I remember when it was way worse than it is. And if you want Vegas just go to Vegas.
Unless there's a native tribe federally recognized that can have clear ancestral claim to a Hollywood tract of land then they could establish a reservation and put up a casino.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neechie
This is my micro-bio
04:59 PM on 04/26/2010
While I agree that the sparkling town is more like trashy dump (don't get me wrong, I still go there often and love it), I don't think unnessary lights and sparkles are really the answer. Why? To waste more energy and cost the city more which in turn costs us more? Good thinking.

Instead, how about spending money on cleaning up the streets of LA and Hollywood.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
oceanofconsciousness
Dogs Against Romney (Cats, too)
03:24 PM on 04/26/2010
Now if they could just save Lindsay Lohan so she doesn't appear on HP any longer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louis Leo IV
Louis is a trial lawyer, blogger & activist
02:52 PM on 04/26/2010
I hear the air in LA is so polluted you can't even see the Hollywood sign..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:04 PM on 04/26/2010
i hear cliched insults about LA's air quality became passe decades ago -
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louis Leo IV
Louis is a trial lawyer, blogger & activist
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nomo555
03:05 PM on 04/26/2010
Maybe a handful of days a year. I look at that sign almost everyday from my deck 5 miles away. This is great news. Thanks to all who helped