iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Refried Bean Swastikas Smeared On Arizona Capitol

First Posted: 06/26/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:15 PM ET

Arizona Swastika

PHOENIX (AP) - The conflict over a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration in Arizona intensified Monday as vandals smeared refried beans in the shape of swastikas on the state Capitol's windows.

More protests were planned Monday after thousands gathered this weekend to demonstrate against a bill that will make it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant in Arizona.

Opponents say the law will lead to rampant racial profiling and turn Arizona into a police state with provisions that require police to question people about their immigrant status if they suspect they are here illegally. Day laborers can be arrested for soliciting work if they are in the U.S. illegally, and police departments can be sued if they don't carry out the law.

But supporters of the law, set to take effect in late July or August, say it is necessary to protect Arizonans from a litany of crimes committed by illegal immigrants. Arizona is home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants.

Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the bill on Friday, argues Arizona must act because the federal government has failed to stop the steady stream of illegal immigrants and drugs that move through Arizona from Mexico. She is scheduled to speak about the issue Monday at a Tucson hotel.

The law has revved up the national debate, drawing the attention of the Obama administration and Congress. Obama has called the new law "misguided" and instructed the Justice Department to examine it to see if it's legal.


The new law makes it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally. Immigrants unable to produce documents showing they are allowed to be in the U.S. could be arrested, jailed for up to six months and fined $2,500.

Arizona officers would arrest people found to be undocumented and turn them over to federal immigration officers. Opponents said the federal government can block the law by refusing to accept them.

Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva asked the federal government not to cooperate when illegal immigrants are picked up by local police.

State Sen. Russell Pearce, the Republican who sponsored the legislation, said it's "pretty disappointing" that opponents would call on the federal government to refuse to cooperate with Arizona authorities.

"It's outrageous that these people continue to support law breakers over law keepers," Pearce said Sunday.

Grijalva and civil rights activists promised to march in the streets and invite arrest by refusing to comply with the law. Police said the protests Sunday were peaceful and there were no clashes.

"We're going to overturn this unjust and racist law, and then we're going to overturn the power structure that created this unjust, racist law," Grijalva said.

U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., called on Obama to live up to a campaign promise to pass immigration reform. Gutierrez is one of the nation's loudest voices calling for comprehensive immigration reform that would create a pathway to citizenship for the millions of illegal immigrants now in the United States.

"Our message today is: 'Mr. President we listened, and we came out in record massive numbers to support you,'" he said. "We need you to support us today."

The law has drawn support from many in Arizona who are fed up with the many problems brought on by illegal immigration.

"If I go to another foreign country, if I go to Mexico, I have to have papers," said Bill Baker, 60, who took time off work at a downtown Phoenix restaurant to sell umbrellas and Mexican and American flags to the largely Hispanic crowd of protesters. "So I don't feel there's anything particularly harsh about the law."

Supporters have dismissed concerns about profiling, saying the law prohibits the use of race or nationality as the sole basis for an immigration check. Brewer has ordered state officials to develop a training course for officers to learn what constitutes reasonable suspicion that someone is in the U.S. illegally.

Current law in Arizona and most states doesn't require police to ask about the immigration status of those they encounter, and many police departments prohibit officers from inquiring out of fear immigrants won't cooperate in other investigations.

The March 27 shooting death of rancher Rob Krentz on his property in southeastern Arizona brought illegal immigration and border security into greater focus in the state. Authorities believe Krentz was killed by an illegal border crosser.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
PHOENIX (AP) - The conflict over a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration in Arizona intensified Monday as vandals smeared refried beans in the shape of swastikas on the state Capitol's windows. ...
PHOENIX (AP) - The conflict over a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration in Arizona intensified Monday as vandals smeared refried beans in the shape of swastikas on the state Capitol's windows. ...
Filed by Nico Pitney  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,983
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (88 total)
12:55 PM on 05/27/2010
As a citizen of AZ - I'm glad we are doing something about this problem. Sorry to be racist. Maybe you folks should actually read the law. I love all the fear-mongering of "police state". I guess you guys are taking a lesson from the Bush administration.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firefly echo
sister outsider
09:41 AM on 05/05/2010
This seriously made my day.
07:51 PM on 04/30/2010
Didn't Ariz. actually belong to Mexico a long time ago....are we the interlopers? And before that native 'american's', so can't illegal immigrants just buy their way out of this like we did?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firefly echo
sister outsider
09:56 AM on 05/05/2010
Who would pay to live in Arizona at this point?
12:56 PM on 05/27/2010
Check out http://www.buycottarizona.com/
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
05:07 PM on 04/28/2010
The Preamble to the US Bill of Rights clearly states:

"THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added:"

These additions to the Constitution took effect when 3/4 of the State legislatures ratified them.

As stated, their purpose was: "in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its [the Constitution's] powers",

The Bill of Rights impedes the rights of states to do what AZ's new law says it's police can now do.

Many of us respond by saying: Before you mess with MY rights, hagalo mejor con tu madre.

See you in Court.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
04:13 PM on 04/28/2010
I've figured it out why the left and the Democrats are against this law!!!! It impacts the illegals from voting and if this law is passed in other states the Democrats will be severally impacted in the elections!!!!
01:27 PM on 04/28/2010
Pinheads, the 4th amendment to the Constitution applies to United States Citizens, not illegal aliens.
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
04:15 PM on 04/28/2010
Blabbermouth, you don't have to be an illegal anything to be stopped, interrogated and detained, based on the discretional powers this "law" gives to any cop on the beat.

Article Four of the United States Constitution relates to the states. The article outlines the duties states have to each other, as well as those the federal government has to the states.

The AZ legislature overstepped the limits the constitution sets on state goverments.

This is not about being in the USA legally or not; this is about not passing laws that infringe on the rights of ANYONE the police decide MIGHT have committed a crime.

Things don't work that way in a democracy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
04:23 PM on 04/28/2010
This law does not change the Federal Statute it just allows Police to ask the status of law breakers!
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
04:55 PM on 04/28/2010
The Fourth Amendment specifies "The right of the PEOPLE"

Mexicans are People.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
05:48 PM on 04/28/2010
Since you have to read the whole constitution which was designed for the citizens of the United States and Not for the citizens of Canada or Mexico or Australia!!!! This is the United States Constitution not the World Constitution!!! When they talk about the People they are talking about the citizens of the U.S.!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
davcrock
04:05 AM on 04/28/2010
There sure are a lot of armchair lawyers around here. Obama shouldn't have much trouble filling that vacancy on the Supreme Court.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
04:24 PM on 04/28/2010
That is where he gets his picks on the street!
11:01 PM on 04/27/2010
The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbat
08:27 PM on 04/27/2010
Now there is a waste of perfectly good beans. LOL.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 AM on 04/28/2010
Seems fair, historically the govt has wasted perfectly good buildings.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eltruthador
07:59 PM on 04/27/2010
Pretty soon we'll have vigilante superheros cleaning up the alien problem. Sickening..
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
04:05 AM on 04/28/2010
Then the Mara Salva Trucha would arrive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:43 PM on 04/27/2010
Everyone who lives here knows just how dire this situation has become. Our law enforcement is straight out overwhelmed with the problems of a broken immigration system.
The monsters that treat human beings as cargo, routinely have gun fights on the same stretch of local highways that carry our children to and from schools where lock downs are now commonplace.
These extremely violent gangs have been allowed to become so comfortable across our borders that they are now moving into quiet neighborhoods.
Packing empty foreclosed homes with drugs, automatic weapons and immigrants they unspeakably abuse and terrorize.
So yes, this state has a Monumental problem on it's hands...
But it is a problem that MUST be dealt with by Federal government. Starting with the elimination of these violent criminals that are preying on all of us. If the Feds have to call in the troops so be it... Let these traffickers feel a Marine boot up their ass.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
03:38 PM on 04/27/2010
Isn't it funny that the Extreme Left does not know what illegal means!!!! No it does not mean a sick bird! All this law will do is allow the Law enforcement to call ICE to see if a person is here legally after he has been arrested or detained for another crime or suspected crime!!!!!
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
04:20 PM on 04/27/2010
I know that an illegal act must be described as such by a law that in turn must be created by a legislature within the limits of it's powers, and i know that this did not happen in this case.

Even a right wing reactionary regressive should be able to understand that.
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
05:42 PM on 04/27/2010
"All this law will do is allow the Law enforcement to call ICE to see if a person is here legally after he has been arrested or detained for another crime or suspected crime!!!!! "

That's the whole point: People (ANYONE not carrying proof of citizenship or legal residence) can be arrested WITHOUT proof that a crime had even been committed.

That's not the way a democracy works.

SUSPECTED crime. You're throwing habeus corpus out the window.

"the writ of habeas corpus has historically been an important legal instrument safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary state action...

The right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus has long been celebrated as the most efficient safeguard of the liberty of the subject."

Either this despotic law will be struck down by the Supreme Court or the USA will become a pariah and mark the decline of a once great power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
07:44 PM on 04/27/2010
Bull!!! They won't arrest somebody because they are waiting for a bus or buying a hamburger!!!
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
09:45 PM on 04/27/2010
The law will never be implemented.

And Jan Brewer will be defeated.
01:33 PM on 04/27/2010
I wonder how these supporters of this legislation would feel if we had a terrible CANADIAN illegal immigration problem, and cops were allowed to pull anyone over if they looked suspiciously Canadian.
03:17 PM on 04/27/2010
Under this law, Canadian illegals WILL be deported too. "Illegal" isn't a race.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
07:45 PM on 04/27/2010
Your right and the left don't understand the word illegal! They still think it is a sick bird!
10:57 PM on 04/27/2010
You completely missed my point/joke.

And by the way, this law has nothing to do with deportation laws. It's about giving police the authority to pull over anyone they view as "looking illegal." Quite a dangerous power.

Allow me to explain...Arizona has passed a law making it legal for police officers to discriminate against people who "look Mexican." If you bothered to go to Mexico, you would realize that Mexico has a pretty diverse population. This is an over-reaction to an illegal immigration problem that essentially legalizes discrimination. How many legal Mexicans live in Arizona? A LOT. How many "Mexican-looking" people live in Arizona? A LOT. So to give the police the unwielding authority to simply look at someone and determine whether or not they are illegal is ABSOLUTELY ABSURD.

The point of my joke should be obvious...if we had a problem with Canadian immigration, and Minnesota decided to pass a law that allowed their police force to pull people over for "looking Canadian," I would imagine that every white person in that state would be pretty pis sed about a law that sh#$s all over the 4th amendment.

Get it?

Jeez you people are dense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eltruthador
07:56 PM on 04/27/2010
Hey there buddy, that a moose you're riding there? just about as ridiculous as the law they've passed here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danielboone
04:11 PM on 04/28/2010
This law mirrors the Federal Statute!!!!
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
12:28 PM on 04/27/2010
This is not about legal vs illegal immigration; it's about competent and incompetent legislation.

Arizona's Congress delegated powers to itself (and lesser authorities) that it doesn't even possess, since responsibility for regulating the entrance of foreigners into (and remaining in) the USA has been granted to the Federal (rather than any State) Government by the US Constitution.

Regardless of whether a Federal Law was or wasn't complied with by the person "suspected" of having entered or being inside the USA illegally by a state, county or local policeman, the authority to intervene (stop, interrogate and possibly detain) a person (of whatever nationality) regarding his or her immigration status is reserved for the Federal Government, since only the Federal Government has been designated as an authority competent to intervene in matters related to Immigration.

In some cases ICE (the Federal Angeny responsible for Immigration and Customs Enforcement) will solicit state, country or local police forces to detain a specific person (but never an unidentified person who may or may not be breaking a federal law), but the legislation approved in Arizona doesn't wait for that.

No: The Arizona Legislature BREAKS Constitutional Law by delegating powers not granted to states to themselves and lesser authorities; and in the process;

Writes a blank check for any cop anwhere in the state to detain ANYONE SUSPECTED breaking of a Federal Law.
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
12:28 PM on 04/27/2010
This legislative absurity calls into the question of the competence of the AZ State Legislature and it's Governor to perform their duties.

They should all be impeached.
01:36 PM on 04/27/2010
Why worry about the constitution now? Where does the Constitution give the Federal Government the right to sieze private industry. Where does the Constitution give the Federal Government the power to force anyone to buy a stick of gum, light bulb, car (no doubt, for GM and Chrysler, coming) or health insurance plan.

What if a foreign military invasion came across the Mexican-Arizonan border, threatening life and property, and the Federal government chose not to defend. I am certain the people of Arizona would choose, to the best of their ability, to defend themselves. I am certain, that if I were from Arizona, this is exactly how I would view current circumstances. The invasion of ILLEGAL, not legal, immigrants absolutely threatens life and treasure. To deny this would be as disingenuous as, say, the HHS burying the Medicare actuarial report regarding health care expenditures prior to the House of Reps. vote on the Senate reform bill, or GM claiming they have paid back using their own, not other public funded, money.

Keep up the lies, guys. Less and less people are buying into it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:02 PM on 04/27/2010
The vast majority of illegals are peaceful people who don't threaten anybody, although they scare the crap out of racist whites.
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
03:09 PM on 04/27/2010
"What if a foreign military invasion came across the Mexican-Arizonan border, threatening life and property, and the Federal government chose not to defend. I am certain the people of Arizona would choose, to the best of their ability, to defend themselves. I am certain, that if I were from Arizona, this is exactly how I would view current circumstances".

That does not describe the current situation. Get Real.

I lived in AZ 11 years and I am telling you that the law is illegal and will be thrown out of court.

One illegal act can not resolve another.

Furthermore, a bilateral problem will never be resolved unilaterally, and the rights of states do not include dealing with immigrants unless the feds solicit it on a case by case basis - which they have not.

What you suggest will do no more than start yet another needless war.

Without a Constitution there would be no USA.

If there were no USA there would be no State of Arizona.

BTW - I have no intention of purchasing health insurance and have no fear of being forced to do so.
photo
calltoaction
Keep your silly mirco-bio.
11:47 AM on 04/27/2010
rise up Tequila Party!

(not a real "tequila party", which are lots of fun, but a Tequila Party a la Tea Party.)