iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Facebook Changes Raise Privacy Concerns Among US Senators

MICHAEL LIEDTKE   04/27/10 06:52 PM ET   AP

Facebook

SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook's plan to spread its online social network to other websites could be detoured by regulators looking into privacy concerns that have raised the ire of federal lawmakers.

Four senators said Tuesday that Facebook needs to make it easier for its 400 million users to protect their privacy as the site opens more avenues for them to share their interests and other personal information.

The Federal Trade Commission already had been examining the privacy and data collection practices of Facebook and other social networks, the agency confirmed Tuesday.

Then last week, Facebook announced a proposed expansion that irked Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and, he says, many Web surfers who called his office to complain.

Having built one of the Web's most popular hangouts, Facebook is trying to extend its reach through new tools called "social plug-ins." These enable Facebook's users to share their interests in such products as clothes, movies and music on other websites. For instance, you might hit a button on Levis.com indicating you like a certain style of jeans, and then recommend a movie on another site. That information about the jeans and the movie might be passed along to other people in your Facebook network, depending on your privacy settings.

Facebook says all this will help personalize the Web for people. It stresses that no personal information is being given to the dozens of websites using the new plug-ins.

Still, it means that information that hadn't been previously communicated could get broadcast to your friends and family on Facebook.

And Facebook is indeed sharing some personal information with three websites that Facebook hopes will demonstrate how online services can be more helpful when they know more about their users. The sites with greater access to Facebook's data are business review service Yelp, music service Pandora and Microsoft Corp.'s Docs.com for word processing and spreadsheets.

Facebook users who don't want to be part of the company's expansion have to go through their privacy settings and change their preferences.

Schumer thinks the onus instead should be on Facebook to get users' explicit consent, a process known as "opting in."

"They have sort of assumed all their users want their information to be given far and wide, which is a false assumption," Schumer said in an interview.

Schumer sent a letter calling for simpler privacy controls to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. The concerns were echoed by Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo; Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska; and Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn.

Facebook tried to assure Schumer that its latest idea won't invade users' privacy.

"We welcome a continued dialogue with you and others because we agree that scrutiny over the handling of personal data is needed as Internet users seek a more social and interactive experience," a Facebook vice president, Elliot Schrage, wrote in a letter to Schumer.

Schumer called Facebook's response inadequate and said his staff planned to meet with the company Wednesday.

Meanwhile, the FTC indicated it will weigh into the debate at some point.

"Our plan is to develop a framework that social networks and others will use to guide their data collection, use, and sharing practices," said Jessica Rich, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.

Schumer pledged to introduce legislation that would expand the FTC's powers over Facebook and other Internet social networks if the regulatory agency doesn't feel it has the authority to require more straightforward privacy controls.

The political pressure could undermine Facebook's ambition to create a more social, open Web that could make it easier to aim online advertising at consumers based on their presumed interests. Facebook would probably thrive in a more communal Internet because it has amassed a huge database of personal information since Zuckerberg set up its website in a Harvard dorm room six years ago.

If Facebook's plans pan out, it could change the way people think of social networking. Instead of communicating on a closed website, Facebook's users could interact with one another over the entire Web. More sharing could spawn more customized websites that look different to each person visiting, depending on their friends and preferences.

While Zuckerberg has likened his vision to an online nirvana, critics see another hole in the crumbling walls of online privacy.

Facebook is moving from being a social network about sharing with friends "to a service that is about collecting and sharing information about you with advertisers so they can more closely tailor ads to you," said Ginger McCall, staff counsel at the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center.

___

AP Technology Writers Barbara Ortutay in New York and Joelle Tessler in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook's plan to spread its online social network to other websites could be detoured by regulators looking into privacy concerns that have raised the ire of federal lawmakers.
SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook's plan to spread its online social network to other websites could be detoured by regulators looking into privacy concerns that have raised the ire of federal lawmakers.
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thirdcloud
05:47 AM on 04/30/2010
Privacy – Mr. Zuckerberg lacks an appreciation of the sacrifices endured by his, as well as all of our ancestors, for the “reasonable expectation of privacy.” Facebook has become, and is now; a defacto “public space,” where the dimension of privacy and reasonable expectation exceeds the great outdoors times 10 by logic. Just because someone can capture our social interactions in this space doesn’t mean we’ve consented or surrendered that reasonable expectation regardless of the boilerplate.
The public’s expectations should be the true Justice in the legal decisions which must come. In short, most of our families struggled from their home countries to this day, here and now. Shouldn’t these discussions about “our privacy” be decided by factoring those hardships and importance to our ancestors? What of the public’s best interest? These issues are not about money. They strike at fundamental liberties across the board. That gives a constitutional dimension to the decisions Facebook might create and our government charged to safeguard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arevolutionofone
Badges??? We don't need no stinkin' badges.
08:49 AM on 04/29/2010
Facebook is turning into Microsoft and eventually they could go the way of Friendster and MySpace. Because they're on top now, doesn't mean it will always be that way. People here talking about gov't regulation being intrusive are missing the point. You can't protect yourself from a company that doesn't tell you it's making your info available to the world. No more than you can protect yourself against a food manufacturer that doesn't tell you what they put in your food. Or an investment firm that doesn't tell you their stock is junk and they are betting against it. When your identity is stolen, or job or reputation is lost because of someone having access to your info then talk to me about intrusive gov't regulation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 AM on 04/28/2010
Two wars, an economy in the toilet, banks who act like 19th century Robber barons and the fing Senate waste time on a site that going to end up like MySpace in six months anyway!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lore Splitt
08:31 AM on 04/28/2010
It definitely should have an "opt-in" button rather than having to hunt down and find the fairly hidden settings, and- if they don't do the "opt-in", being able to change it should be easy to do. Obvious to do. You have children with profiles, and while parent's should be keeping an eye on things, the ones that do can't be expected to know every time a change in privacy settings has been made unless they have an account as well, and many parents just don't.

It's not up to facebook to decide that how I browse other websites can make shopping easier on mine. To think that's the reason is just naive. Those sites are willing to pay for what facebook provides. Targeted advertisements. If you can send ads straight to the people who have shown an interest in your product, and only to them, you save money.

It's not about making anything easier, it's about making money, and not just money that other sites are happy with... you know they must be charging far more for the info they provide.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:14 AM on 04/28/2010
Two points on this:

1. Facebook is currently privately run and operated. If Facebook amends it's policy and the masses don't like it, dont use it.

2. How many people did Schumer knock over to get to the microphone to stand on his soapbox this time?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddiestardust
06:34 PM on 04/29/2010
You must be a Republican and a kid. Sorry, no cigar, twinkies or ice cream for you today!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrizzlyBowman
Undergrad Psych Student
05:27 AM on 04/28/2010
I can understand why the government is getting involved.

Once, I went to a speed dating place. Other participants kept asking me personal questions, and I kept wishing the government was there to help.

At bars, it's the worst. It's like people expect that you won't wear a snuggie to hide your favorite brand of jeans, and that you won't run away and hide in the bathroom when someone tries to "be sociable".

I don't want anyone to know I watched Happy Feet. They might come murder me and my family.

People are so prying. All a guy wants to do is put up a picture of himself, his family and friends; all of his blurbs, his age and interests, songs he favorites on YouTube, his comments posted to his other friends, and his "Which New Moon Character Are You?" and "How gud r yuo @ speling?" test results.

All of this information being leaked out about me from a profile I created on a Web site that's become a household name around the world needs to be controlled somehow. Gagged. Covered up. Zipped up in a body bag. Finally, the government is getting involved and something can be done about all of this socializing.
02:35 AM on 04/28/2010
Nice article, but I just discovered an even more insidious "bug" or deliberately fraud in my Facebook privacy settings that make you think that your profile and pics are available to *friends only*, while FB is still making your info available to *everyone*!
I have been following all the suggestions to secure my privacy with my friends, and immediately set my profile and pics to "friends only" when they had it all over the news about the new privacy default settings. I changed them then, and I tweaked them last week when the msg. was going around about privacy settings and apps. My controls are set to Friends Only, but after discovering some odd activity associated with my account, I wanted to check it out, and had a real-life friend, who's was not a FB friend, but has a FB account, sign in and go to my account. Despite all my privacy settings for FRIENDS ONLY, all my info and pics can still be accessed by EVERYONE!
I don't know if my account is the only one effed up like that, but if you have alternate accounts or RL friends with FB accounts that are not connected to yours, please check your account and make sure that your *privacy settings* match what information is actually available to general FB users.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 PM on 04/27/2010
Facebook is an IQ test -

first for the guy who created it, and second for those who use it as intended.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:02 PM on 04/27/2010
Good to have some oversight on this.

"Schumer thinks the onus instead should be on Facebook to get users' explicit consent, a process known as "opting in.""

Absolutely. There should be informed consent. With Facebook being used for so many different purposes, and the sites increasingly partnering with each other and sharing information, disclosure should be clear.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
General Public
Microbiologists have found my microbio contagious.
05:44 PM on 04/27/2010
You can actually disable this new "feature" of Facebook sharing your personal information with any website on the entire Internet that wants it, if you go into your advanced privacy settings. Of course, when this "feature" was introduced, it automatically set every user to have their data shared with any other website that wants it by default. But hey, you could still use MySpace, owned by Rupert Murdoch. I'm sure he cares about your privacy concerns just as much as he cares about "fair and balanced" news.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:59 PM on 04/27/2010
Oh good more regulations to come in an area where none are needed. If someone doesn't like the lack of privacy offered by FB then don't put that info on there or don't use FB at all.

We would all be better off if Congress stopped trying to protect us from ourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arevolutionofone
Badges??? We don't need no stinkin' badges.
09:09 AM on 04/29/2010
How do you protect yourself from a company that doesn't tell you it's sharing your info upfront? Fortunately someone was paying attention and warned the rest of us. Facebook never told it's users. Just like companies who sell junk stock, rated A because they paid for the rating, which they don't tell you. And they also don't tell you they're betting against the stock. You have to be informed to make an informed decision. Companies that mislead their customers deserve to be regulated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddiestardust
06:02 PM on 04/29/2010
You are pretty naive here. You have to ask yourself WHY any company wants to do the things that facebook wants...then you have an answer.

Government exists soley to do those things that individually we cannot.

And there are quite a few companies and individuals who are NOT honest out there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddiestardust
04:00 PM on 04/27/2010
Zuckerberg doesn't even believe in Customer Service. Now what kind of company doesn't have real help?
02:21 PM on 04/27/2010
"Oh Boy! Something else we can regulate!"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yogandclimber
03:33 PM on 04/27/2010
it's just fine unregulated and just knowing your information is readily available just like the rest of the 350 million people on FB to the advertisers. If you're on there and any ONE of you friends runs one of the million apps (farmville or whatever questionare) then YOUR information goes to the application and advertisers. Just know that and you'll be fine or quit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yogandclimber
03:35 PM on 04/27/2010
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/22/facebook-changes-the-ulti_n_548356.html

here from last week. There are at least a million more warnings like this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yogandclimber
01:47 PM on 04/27/2010
Now all these advertisers are going to know I'm interested in yoga and climbing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yogandclimber
01:45 PM on 04/27/2010
WTH! That's it I'm quitting Facebook. I said at the 1 millionth story warning about my privacy being violated that I'd quit FACEbook because I expect privacy there.