More

Republicans Try To Make Their Mark On Financial Reform: Wall Street PAC Money Shifts To GOP

JIM KUHNHENN   04/28/10 10:43 PM ET   AP

Republicans Financial Reform
Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., center, walks with Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., left, and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, towards the Senate floor for a crucial test vote for the financial reform bill on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, April 26, 2010. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — Republicans abandoned their blockade against legislation to clamp tough new controls on Wall Street Wednesday, clearing a road to likely passage for the most sweeping rewrite of financial rules since the Great Depression.

Democrats and Republicans agree the Senate will ultimately pass landmark changes aimed at preventing a recurrence of the crisis that knocked the nation's financial system to its knees in 2008, but the battle now begins over crucial details. The House has already passed its version.

Democrats said the Republicans had given in after three days of votes to block debate, realizing they were on the losing end of a battle for public opinion. GOP lawmakers said they would now switch to trying to change the bill on the Senate floor.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., said, "There's been immense pressure bottled up inside the Republican caucus through these last three votes. A lot of their members have been very deeply unhappy with the direction their leadership has been taking them. Better heads prevailed."

Democrats had threatened to hold the Senate in session all night making their case that the Republicans were stalling legislation of importance to virtually every American. The Democrats also have been laying plans to make the legislation a major issue in midterm elections this summer and fall. The Republican retreat came one day after senior executives of Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs were denounced by lawmakers from both parties at a marathon Senate hearing.

President Barack Obama, winding up a Midwest tour promoting the legislation, told reporters he was pleased the debate would proceed and that he hoped to sign a final version "very soon." That was unlikely to occur for at least two weeks.

"We'll end up having a safer, more secure financial system," Obama said, "and I think banks and other financial institutions can get back to making money the old-fashioned way by lending it to companies to build business and create jobs and do all the things we want our financial system to do."

In the debate that now can proceed, both Democrats and Republicans will attempt to change the underlying bill. Republicans will take particular aim at the magnitude of consumer-protection provisions that Obama says are vital. Liberal Democrats are expected to seek to limit the size of banks.

The GOP decision to relent came after Sen. Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the Senate Banking committee, told his colleagues that he could win no further concessions from Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd in private talks. He said Dodd did agree to adjust some provisions that Republicans had complained would permit further bank bailouts.

But there were already signs that some Republicans were growing weary of continuing to block the bill after Obama and other Democrats accused them of siding with Wall Street, an institution that rivals Congress in its unpopularity.

"The point of all of this was to make sure that as long as those discussions could bear results that we would support that effort," Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine said of her party's objections. "Now we proceed to the floor for amendments on the remainder of the bill."

"It is not just Republicans who are going to offer amendments," said Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican who negotiated with Dodd on portions of the bill. "This may be a real debate, which would shock America."

How the debate unfolds will determine whether the legislation achieves significant bipartisan support. Democrats still need 60 votes to get past procedural obstacles, a number they can't reach without at least one Republican on their side.

The bill would establish a nine-member Financial Services Oversight Council, including the treasury secretary, Federal Reserve chairman and the heads of regulatory agencies to monitor markets for threats, such as the bubble in housing prices and mortgage-backed securities that preceded the financial near-collapse two years ago.

The Federal Reserve would begin policing large bank holding companies and interconnected nonbank institutions whose collapse might pose a threat to the economy. With approval of the council, the Fed could even break up complex companies that posed a grave threat.

Most investment derivatives – such as the hundreds of billions of dollars in complex instruments blamed for accelerating the crisis two years ago – would have to be traded on regulated exchanges.

Shelby said Wednesday he had received assurances that Democrats would adjust the bill to address GOP concerns that it would perpetuate bailouts of banks.

"Now that those bipartisan negotiations have ended, it is my hope that the majority's avowed interest in improving this legislation on the Senate floor is genuine and the partisan gamesmanship is over," said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.

Dodd said his talks with Shelby had been productive. "But I cannot agree to his desire to weaken consumer protections given the enormous abuses we have seen."

Republicans said they now expect Democrats to jettison a $50 billion fund that would have been financed by banks to help liquidate large failing institutions. The Republicans said they also expect Democrats to tighten language so the bill would mandate that shareholders' stakes in a failing firm be wiped out. The current bill says there would be that presumption.

Democrats tried three times to begin debate on the bill only to be thwarted by Republican opposition. Democrats branded the Republicans as Wall Street allies. But Republicans said they were merely trying to secure changes to make the bill more bipartisan.

Republicans have begun to focus their criticism on the consumer protection provision.

The Senate Democrats' bill would create a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau within the Federal Reserve that would have power to police transactions between institutions that provide financial services and their customers.

Republicans say the bill would have unintended consequences that could ensnare small business people for merely extending credit to their customers.

By a 56-42 vote Wednesday, Democrats failed for a third time to get the necessary 60 votes to move the legislation to the Senate floor for debate. Democrats had threatened to keep the Senate in session into the night and were preparing to hold more votes testing Republican unity.

___

Associated Press writers Laurie Kellman and Julie Pace contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Republicans abandoned their blockade against legislation to clamp tough new controls on Wall Street Wednesday, clearing a road to likely passage for the most sweeping rewrite of fin...
WASHINGTON — Republicans abandoned their blockade against legislation to clamp tough new controls on Wall Street Wednesday, clearing a road to likely passage for the most sweeping rewrite of fin...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter777
07:35 PM on 04/28/2010
Rope-a-Dope McConnell has something up his sleeve to stall legislation. GOP is not going to give in this easily. They see that not allowing debate at all is not such good strategy. They will try another tactic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dianhow
former Repub till W
06:15 PM on 04/28/2010
GOP' realized they are losing battle of public opinion " !! Wow what took them so long ?
are they deaf - blind dumb as well as greedy ? I guess a brick has to hit them
before they they wake up to reality People are sick of far right wing GOP- lies- smears-
toxic policies- long wars- tax cuts- while ourwages drop-
We are also sick to death of big banks-
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
04:55 PM on 04/28/2010
ol' mittmcconnnnelll's world is falling apart. First the coal mines, then the insurance industry and now the wallstreetbanks, his biggest supporters are all heading for the toilet if the Dems have any guts at all. It would serve the mousy ol' obsructionist right.
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
03:55 PM on 04/28/2010
Keep up the good work GOP. Your path to regional party is well on its way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dianhow
former Repub till W
07:36 PM on 04/28/2010
regional - extreme hateful party GOP
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:53 PM on 04/28/2010
Just another theatrical-perfomance, To calm us down.
Mid-while today 3rd-day of financial-regulatory voted-down. And Wall St. still out of control. Because the whole country is a fraud, and out of control.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dianhow
former Repub till W
07:42 PM on 04/28/2010
deregulation 1981 forward legalized fraud- dirty deals - liar loans - the Enron scandal- who manipulated energy prices in CA & wiped out Enron workers- 401 K - gone McCain close pal
/ advisor- crook former Sen Phil Gramm -cinched the dirty deal with his loop hole-
top it off Gramms lobbyist wife- MADE 900 K OFF THAT SLIMY DEAL tHATS
WHAT REGAN BUSH POLICES LED US TO DISASTER - WARS- FAT CAT CUTS- LIED INTO IRAQ- 1000'S KILLED- BUSH PAULSON GLOBAL MELDOWN 700 BILLION TARP
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 AM on 04/29/2010
Yeap. You got it right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joan Jacobs
02:28 PM on 04/28/2010
One way to judge how effective a bill will be is to take a look at who is opposing it. Since the banks appear to be united in their opposition to the Democrat's bill to reform Wall Street - I'd have to say that it sounds like we should pass it with all possible speed.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
04:56 PM on 04/28/2010
Agreed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dianhow
former Repub till W
07:45 PM on 04/28/2010
Yes Joan whatever GOP & big banks like MUST BE TOXIC FOR US
tell Obama now BREAK up the MONOLITHIC BANKS NOW
CHASE BANK O AMERICA CITI GROUP WELLS FARGO
THOSE 4 INC GOLDMAN SACHS HAVE BEEN ' ON THE TAKE ' FOR YEARS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
10:30 AM on 04/28/2010
The GOP are dutiful shills who will do "right" by the "successful and/or productive" they are well bribed to protect...the other 95% are chattel and are simply not worth helping.

Their entire philosophy can be summed up as -- 3 neighbors --- one with a huge Mansion , one has a regular size home and the third a small tar paper cottage.

Republicans feel that by giving money directly or indirectly (subsidies and tax cuts) to the Mansion owner ,that magically the Mansion owner will give to the other two neighbors, except instead what happens is the Mansion owner sets his vicious Rottweilers on the other 2 neighbors (if they ask for help) and simply expands his own house.

The other two neighbors homes are burned to ruins when the Rottweilers cause a fire but the Rottweilers are burned as well. The Mansion owner then blames the other two neighbors for not only the fires, but the severe injury of the Rotties ;and appeals to Republicans for help with his 'irresponsible' neighbors and to compensate for the injury to his Rottweilers. Republicans respond by forcing the other neighbors into involuntary servitude to the Mansion owners and to pay for the Vet bills they "caused" the Mansion owner to incur. When the other neighbors appeal for some type of aid, they are told "you are not worthy of our help directly, but we will help the Mansion owner, he promises to help you if we just give him...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:22 AM on 04/28/2010
A note to repubs: Now that your arrogance and greed has killed the horse, no amount of kicking is going to make it jump up and run the race.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dianhow
former Repub till W
07:47 PM on 04/28/2010
www.whitehouse.gov tell Obama
MUST BREAK UP THE MONOLITHIC CHASE BANK O AMERICA
CITIBANK WELLS FARGO........................NOW
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cmaurand
10:01 AM on 04/28/2010
Amazing how the republicans are against taxpayer bailouts when they initiated them in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dianhow
former Repub till W
07:49 PM on 04/28/2010
yep and how Bushs GOP congress 2000- 2006 gave Bush all he asked for
long wars - fat catcuts- lied into Iraq- killing 1000's - toxic policies that led to disaster
Not a peep from the gutless - no cajones - old wealthy white guys
10:00 AM on 04/28/2010
Does greed destroy a Nation creates more poverty for the Nation as a whole?
09:51 AM on 04/28/2010
the trouble with buying Democrats is that they don't stay bought. GOP dogs are loyal: give them a daily bone and they will growl and bite on command. Maybe its principle; more likely it's principal. Add in one Ben Nelson, million dollar lap dog to the Oracle of Omaha. Anyone reallyu believe that the southern GOP thickheads like Shelby, Cornyn, Sessions, Chambliss, deMint, and the ethically challenged Ensign and the Alzheimer's afflicted McCain, or the plain crazy like Inhofe and Bunning, really care about anything or anyone except themselves. This cadre of the corrupt and paid for are possibly the only people in the world more cynical that Fabulous Fab and his bosses--excepting, of course, the Kentucky turtle face boy minority leader of the Senate. Real transparency would start with open trading of the GOP votes; imagine the synthetic CDOs Blankfein's boys could build with that. Except no one would bet that the GOP will vote to benefit Americans.
09:49 AM on 04/28/2010
So, the Republicans are trying to loog good to both Wall St and Main St, whilst at the same time giving the impression that the democrats aren't being hard enough.
The sad part is that this tactic will probably work and the voting public will forget that they stalled for no reason other than to deny Democrats the rights to any reform.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
12:51 PM on 04/28/2010
That is how FIX will spin it, over and over and over again.
09:34 AM on 04/28/2010
Since the Obamites already got their payoff in the last election, the Wall Street scoundrels are simply hedging their bets and spreading the money around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rr52
09:20 AM on 04/28/2010
"Wall St. PAC money shifts toward GOP"

Ah, the party for the WEALTHY is clearly defined again. Can teabaggers or those "real" Americans as Palin likes to refer to them read and comprehend?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shockaslim
09:04 AM on 04/28/2010
Democrats are probably getting just as much cash.