More

Roman Polanski SPEAKS: Breaks Silence On Legal Woes

ANGELA DOLAND   05/ 2/10 06:00 PM ET   AP

Roman Polanski

PARIS — Filmmaker Roman Polanski, breaking a months-long silence, said Sunday that the U.S. is demanding his extradition from Switzerland on a 33-year-old sex case largely to serve him "on a platter to the media."

Polanski, who is under house arrest in his Alpine Swiss chalet, laid out his case against extradition on an online magazine run by one of his staunchest supporters, French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy.

"I have had my share of dramas and joys, as we all have, and I am not going to try to ask you to pity my lot in life," he wrote. "I ask only to be treated fairly like anyone else."

Polanski suggests the case against him is unjust and riddled with problems. Each argument begins with the phrase: "I can remain silent no longer."

One of Polanski's complaints is that Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley, "who is handling this case and has requested (the) extradition, is himself campaigning for election and needs media publicity!" Cooley is running for California attorney general.

The district attorney's spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons said the office "will withhold comment until the Swiss make a decision on his fugitive status."

Swiss authorities are trying to decide whether to extradite Polanski to Los Angeles for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

Polanski was arrested seven months ago as he arrived in Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award at a film festival.

The Oscar-winning director of "Rosemary's Baby," "Chinatown" and "The Pianist" was put behind bars for more than two months before being transferred on $4.5 million bail to house arrest in the luxury resort of Gstaad. Polanski wrote in the online magazine, La Regle du Jeu, that he had mortgaged his apartment to pay the bail.

Three decades ago, Polanski was accused of plying his victim with champagne and part of a Quaalude during a modeling shoot and raping her. He was initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, child molesting and sodomy. He later pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse.

What happened after that is a subject of dispute. The defense says the now deceased judge, Laurence J. Rittenband, had agreed in meetings with attorneys to sentence Polanski to a 90-day diagnostic study and nothing more.

But the judge later changed his mind and summoned Polanski for further sentencing – at which time he fled to his native France, attorneys said.

Polanski claimed the judge "betrayed" him and wanted "to gain himself some publicity at my expense." He said the request for his extradition is "founded on a lie."

Polanski said retired Deputy District Attorney Roger Gunson, who worked on the case three decades ago, has confirmed his take on events under oath. The director's lawyers have argued that unsealing transcripts of Gunson's secret testimony would show the extradition request is based on false and incomplete statements by the Los Angeles district attorney's office.

Polanski added: "I can no longer remain silent because the United States continues to demand my extradition more to serve me on a platter to the media of the world than to pronounce a judgment concerning which an agreement was reached 33 years ago."

The filmmaker has kept largely silent under house arrest. In December, he released a message thanking his supporters for their letters.

___

Associated Press writer Christopher Weber in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

PARIS — Filmmaker Roman Polanski, breaking a months-long silence, said Sunday that the U.S. is demanding his extradition from Switzerland on a 33-year-old sex case largely to serve him "on a pla...
PARIS — Filmmaker Roman Polanski, breaking a months-long silence, said Sunday that the U.S. is demanding his extradition from Switzerland on a 33-year-old sex case largely to serve him "on a pla...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,503
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luluu
11:17 PM on 05/17/2010
I agree with Roman. I do believe they are just going to abuse the system once again. I wouldn't trust a court system that pulled what it did the first time. This was one case that was severely screwed up!.I don't believe he was treated fairly by the courts. I do believe they will do him wrong again. It's a pathetic system that needs a serious overhaul. And anyone who did believe he got a fair trial is ignorant and half witted. It was the most disgusting display of corruption within the system and everyone wants to ignore that fact. I hope Switzerland doesn't let Roman be extradited. I hope they understand no good will come of it. MOVE ON The victim has.
04:07 AM on 05/15/2010
Geeze this guy is like the all-time King Kong of crybabies! Dude suck it up and do your year or two and at least you can check out without this pathetic cloud over your head! Even Martha Stewart had the nuts to pay her debt to society without complaining once as far as I can remember and shes nothing but smiles now...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ellawensmom
03:58 PM on 05/14/2010
This article was almost unreadable. Mr. Polanski, it doesn't matter what the motives are in this case. You pled guilty to the crime, and what the original judge settled for was ridiculous, if he did settle for it. You committed a crime, and there are consequences for that crime. It doesn't matter that you are famous.
07:16 AM on 05/08/2010
ALL ABOUT STEVE

At these links the Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley is linked to corruption and retaliation.

http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Programs/515.php

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/03/judge-cooleys-retaliation-...

According to www.fulldisclosure.net Los Angeles DA Steve Cooley has refused to prosecute pedophiles and child molesters who work in the Catholic Church.

So here's a BIG question - why is the DA Steve Cooley chasing across the world after Roman Polanski now, but yet will not go after the local California Church's sexual molesting predator Priests and those Officials that cover up the sexual molestation crimes at California's institutions?

Continued below
10:16 PM on 05/06/2010
For more on Double Standard in Roman Polanski's case as far as Los Angeles Prosecutors.

See links below:

http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Programs/515.php
http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Programs/515-4.php
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bright Creature
Crawling toward the light
01:34 PM on 05/05/2010
and still he says nothing of the victim or any sort of remorse for what he did so many years ago. Now he's complaining that the sentencing he successfully skipped out on years ago is still dogging him. The logic goes: "I cheated and got away with it fair and square, it's unfair that people still want to put me into jail."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cocoricot
08:26 PM on 05/04/2010
I wonder if people would feel differently about this case if Polanski had drugged and sod o mized a thirteen yr old boy? I have a thirteen yr old and I remember being a thirteen yr old. This was not statuatory rape. This is another case of a powerful man getting away with a crime against a minor.
04:03 AM on 05/04/2010
i don't know how anyone can read this and want to let him go.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskicover1.html
04:49 AM on 05/04/2010
Cross examination is a right for all criminal defendants and this has never been tested in a court of law and so is not evidence. In Polanski's case there was no trial.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ellawensmom
03:59 PM on 05/14/2010
It said he pled guiltyl.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
12:40 PM on 05/04/2010
While you were on smokinggun.com, why did you not read the probation investigator's report? Or were you just looking for material that would reinforce your existing preconceptions?
04:10 PM on 05/04/2010
The probation investigator has publicly expressed his breathtaking admiration for Polanski and that he is a huge fan of his on more than one occasion. He should have been thrown out for bias a long time ago.
03:33 AM on 05/04/2010
I lived close to Gstaad where this paedo is 'imprisoned'. If Polanski is suffering in his prison then I am close to starvation in a concentration camp!
04:51 AM on 05/04/2010
Roman Polanski is not a pedophile.

I am not sure why you are comparing your living quarters with his?
02:22 PM on 05/04/2010
So drugging and sodomizing children is not pedophilia?
02:06 AM on 05/04/2010
The DA had no case. The victim and her family stopped cooperating with the DA. They decided a trial would be only another injustice as photographers were following her to school, etc. So the DA could drop the case or make a deal. They made a deal. Then a member of the DAs office discussed the case with the judge and the judge decided to go back on the deal. This was illegal and unethical. Maybe all these fools here want to live in a world where plea deals are broken and the word of a judge isn't worth the handshake that follows it. I don't. This is America, and this is a show trial that has no business continuing. The LA DA's office has always been a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
World Citizen
02:29 AM on 05/04/2010
"Then a member of the DAs office discussed the case with the judge and the judge decided to go back on the deal."

That member of the DAs office recanted his story. Polanski ran on a rumor or even PERHAPS someone on his side set it up to give him an excuse to run.

The victim and her family stopped cooperating with the DA. She is not needed as she already gave her testimony years ago. Many people do not realize that this is a case between the State of California vs. Polanski.
04:55 AM on 05/04/2010
Many people that I believe include you, as you have not had the experience, do not realize that this is a case of Judicial corruption in the State of California vs. Individuals that include Roman Polanski
05:51 AM on 05/07/2010
Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley seems to feel that the taxpayer’s dollars are his personal monies, and that he can use celebrities to seek higher office to be Attorney General of California

See Also link below for more information:

http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Programs/515.php
04:52 AM on 05/04/2010
I have exactly the same sentiment. Very well written.
01:32 AM on 05/04/2010
There are priests and the suchlike that need this level of attention more so than Mr Polanski - what is the statue of limitations here and how does it apply to the pope?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
09:58 AM on 05/07/2010
I believe the limitation refer to a period of time between the date of commission of the crime and the day the accused was arrested. That was less than day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cocoricot
01:17 AM on 05/04/2010
Polanski has never been treated fairly. If he were, he would have already served time. He did not have sex with a 13 yr old girl. He drugged a 13 yr old child with Quaaludes then gave her alcohol then sod o mized her. That is rape not " having sex with". He is simply afraid that the same thing will happen to him if convicted.
04:56 AM on 05/04/2010
First point is wrong. He served time at Chino in 1977 and 8 for this crime.

And the rest you are making up.
04:12 PM on 05/04/2010
Your first point wrong/made up. His time was never counted as time served.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
10:01 AM on 05/07/2010
The charges other than lawful sex were derived from the uncorroborated testimony of the girl. The DA couldn't independently verify it. So, he didn't prosecute Polanski for those allegations.
EvieEve
An injustice to one is an injustice to all
10:33 PM on 05/03/2010
Cry me a frikin' river. He's a pedo. End of story.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
picott
05:45 AM on 05/04/2010
freaking
05:52 AM on 05/07/2010
Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley seems to feel that the taxpayer’s dollars are his personal monies, and that he can use celebrities to seek higher office to be Attorney General of California

See Also link below for more information:

http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Programs/515.php
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam Mantium
08:05 PM on 05/03/2010
A wise man learns from the mistakes of others...
11:55 PM on 05/03/2010
Yep...best to use the entire quaalude...must get the woodchipper fixed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
World Citizen
02:30 AM on 05/04/2010
Yes. I can see many criminals fleeing and using the excuse of judicial misconduct (perhaps even fabricating it).
04:57 AM on 05/04/2010
Polanski cannot be fabricating if 3 lawyers including the Los Angeles Prosecutor Roger Gunson is saying there is judicial misconduct, and even the Los Angeles Court and appeal court have admitted the Judicial corruption.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
12:47 PM on 05/04/2010
It's been over three decades. Any data to suggest you're right? Or is this coming out of the same place the rest of your stuff comes from.
photo
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:46 PM on 05/03/2010
Delusional fool along the lines of Phil Spector.