The following story comes courtesy of California Watch)
In last night's Republican gubernatorial debate, the topic of front runner Meg Whitman's ties to the Goldman Sachs investment bank - as corporate director, investor and beneficiary of campaign donations and insider stock deals - came up three times in 60 minutes.
Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, who is trailing badly in the polls, hit Whitman on Goldman twice during the debate - a measure of the traction he thinks the issue can give. (On Friday, a Poizner attack ad accusing Whitman of investing in Goldman "vulture funds" began airing.)
In addition, the San Francisco Chronicle's Carla Marinucci, who teamed with me last month on a joint California Watch-Chronicle investigation of Whitman and Goldman, asked Whitman about Goldman midway through the debate.
The SEC last month accused Goldman of defrauding investors in the sale of financial instruments based on toxic mortgage portfolios. The FBI is now investigating the bank as well, according to press reports. Whitman served on the Goldman board in 2001 and 2002, when she was CEO at eBay. Goldman executives have given her more than $110,000 in donations for her campaign.
Poizner first brought up the investment bank two minutes into the debate, in response to a question about how either of the two wealthy Republican candidates could possibly understand the problems of ordinary Californians (Whitman is worth $1.2 billion, while Poizner is merely a multimillionaire.)
"That's why this Goldman Sachs issue is a big issue," Poizner said at one point in a rambling response. "She has massive investments in Goldman Sachs ... made huge amounts of money from the collapse of the real estate market ... Did she inform people that she had a massive conflict of interest? ... Lots of people got damaged by Goldman Sachs and Meg Whitman is right in the middle of it."
Whitman didn't return fire.
Then, at about the 20-minute mark, Marinucci asked Whitman about the so-called "spinning" scandal. In 2002 Whitman was accused by a GOP Congressman and in an eBay shareholders' lawsuit of steering eBay's investment banking business to Goldman in exchange for access to initial public offerings of hot stocks.
Whitman says she flipped the IPOs for $1.8 million in profits. Spinning now is banned - Marinucci asked in Whitman thinks she did something unethical.
No, Whitman said: "I am a Main Street executive not a Wall Street executive ... I did not do anything wrong - it was a legal and standard practice."
She also said she got the IPOs because she was a private client of Goldman, not because of her executive role at eBay. She also took a couple of shots at Goldman, which manages a portion of her $1.2 billion fortune and the money in her family foundation as well.
She said she left the Goldman board after 15 months (and two months after the spinning scandal erupted) "because, as Donald Trump says, I fired them. I didn't like the culture, I didn't like the management." She also noted that in the end she had given her profits on the IPO deals "back to eBay and to charities."
But Delaware court records show Whitman returned the money as part of an out-of-court settlement of the shareholders' lawsuit; and the incomplete reply gave Poizner an opening.
"You really don't get this, Meg," Poizner said, and noted that the chair of a congressional committee that investigated the "spinning" scandal called the practice corrupt.
"It was a huge conflict of interest ... the only reason you paid the money is because they sued you," he also said, as well as, "Your judgment was terrible."
Poizner hit the issue one last time in his closing remarks, referring to Whitman offhandedly as "a rookie (politician) with close ties to Goldman Sachs and Wall Street - I don't think people are ready for that."
The debate ended, so Whitman had no chance to reply.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.