More

Oregon Has Lowest Rate Of Childhood Obesity

CARLA K. JOHNSON   05/ 3/10 05:24 PM ET   AP

Childhood Obesity

CHICAGO — What's the magic in Oregon that keeps kids lean? It's a mystery health officials would like to solve as they admit all states are failing – by a mile – to meet federal goals for childhood obesity.

Oregon has the nation's lowest rate of hefty kids, according to a new government study, which found big gaps between regions and ballooning obesity rates in many states from 2003 to 2007.

More than 16 percent of American children ages 10 to 17 years were not just overweight, but obese, in 2007. That's a 10 percent rise from 2003. Mississippi topped the nation with more than a fifth of its kids obese.

Oregon was the star, with the lowest rate of obesity – defined as body mass index in the 95th percentile or above – at just under 10 percent. And Oregon was the only state whose childhood obesity fell significantly from 2003 to 2007.

Even the best states fell short. The federal Healthy People 2010 initiative set a childhood obesity goal of 5 percent. Only Wyoming girls came close to that, according to the study appearing in May's Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.

"You've got such wide differences at the geographic level, which means there is potential to further reduce obesity," said lead author Gopal Singh, an epidemiologist with the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration.

What works? It's unclear how much states can overcome the effects of poverty, race and family history – all of which have complex links to obesity.

Black and Hispanic young people in the study were twice as likely as whites to be overweight or obese, even when the researchers took into account other risk factors like inactivity and poverty.

Oregon is 90 percent white. It also has a high rate of breast-feeding, and some research suggests that protects against obesity.

Oregon law sets nutrition standards in schools and requires chain restaurants to provide nutritional information on request. Those steps, taken recently, wouldn't have shown up in the new study's results, but may reflect Oregon's inherent interest in health.

The figures for this analysis came from a representative telephone survey of parents who gave information about their children. Figures for about 47,000 children were analyzed for 2003 and about 44,000 children for 2007. That's not as accurate as a government survey that weighs and measures children. Data from that suggest childhood obesity rates nationwide may be starting to stabilize.

In a separate paper based on the same data, Singh found that a child living in a neighborhood with unsafe surroundings, poor housing and no access to sidewalks, parks and recreation centers had 20 to 60 percent higher odds of being obese or overweight.

Experts blame the rise in childhood obesity on fast food, neighborhoods without sidewalks, television, video games, schools neglecting physical education and a host of other societal changes, said Dr. Joe Thompson, director of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center to Prevent Childhood Obesity.

Now, lawmakers must move the obesity numbers in the right direction to save future medical costs, if for no other reason, Thompson said.

___

On the Net:

Archives: http://www.archpediatrics.com

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: http://www.reversechildhoodobesity.org

National Physical Activity Plan: http://www.physicalactivityplan.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

CHICAGO — What's the magic in Oregon that keeps kids lean? It's a mystery health officials would like to solve as they admit all states are failing – by a mile – to meet federal goal...
CHICAGO — What's the magic in Oregon that keeps kids lean? It's a mystery health officials would like to solve as they admit all states are failing – by a mile – to meet federal goal...
Filed by Koa Beck  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:42 PM on 05/06/2010
I live in Wilsonville, about 20 miles southwest of Portland. The reason children here are less obese is because they are always running around all day long, screaming and yelling. When I first moved here I seriously thought they were being beaten or kidnapped, but no, that's just how kids up here roll. When I lived in the southeast, I never saw kids playing around like that. Whenever I would go for a walk, I would be alone, even during the middle of the day and on weekends.
06:05 PM on 05/05/2010
I forgot to mention (and others should take note of this), the book in the article claims to help people lose weight "without dieting or strenuous physical activity".

The fact that the author is offering people "an easy way out" is a strong indication that it is a gimmick. The path to good health is not an easy one. There is no subsitute for hard work and dedication. The benefits of exercise are undeniable, as are the benefits of a healthy diet.

The author should be ashamed for misleading an already troubled population for the sake of a buck.
04:36 PM on 05/05/2010
I can solve the "Oregon mystery." Oregon has one of the highest hunger rates in the US, with one in six families on food stamps and one in five children who experience hunger on a regular basis. I'm sure our active lifestyles and the popularity of farmers markets and locally grown foods plays a factor, but realistically, it's probably Oregon's hunger rate that accounts for lower rates of childhood obesity. Furthermore, weight and health do not go hand in hand; it's a more complex issue. This high rate of hunger is shameful in what is regularly touted in the MSM as the richest nation on earth.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
11:21 PM on 05/04/2010
Portland, here I come!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
07:24 PM on 05/04/2010
We do have a tremendous outdoor life, and we never let weather stop us. However, I don't think this figure is matched by adults in Oregon. There are some real hefties here, and my friend made up a species called Oregonius maximus.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
11:21 PM on 05/04/2010
and funny clever friends? sign me up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CamJam
10:16 AM on 05/05/2010
Haha good one! Oregnius Maximus!

I've lived in Oregon all my life, 98 % in Portland, Oregon. I don't see over weight kids very much in my neighborhood which as a HUGE variety of different nationalities. I also do not see very many over weight kids at our twin boys school (a 30 min drive from our home)

And yes, I do see some over weight adults here and there much more often. Sad to see someone in their 20's or 30's on up over weight.. but figure it just might be hereditary.

I am 5'7" and 118 pounds. My husband is 6 feet and 150 pounds.. maybe we're not over weight because we're constantly on the run with our 6 yr old twin boys of which one has regressive Autism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
organicconnect
06:40 PM on 05/04/2010
Obviously this state has some right actions going on. It would be interesting to see what recommendations from professionals who understand the obesity problem are already in place in this state. http://organicconnectmag.com/wp/2010/05/david-s-ludwig-md-phd-ending-the-childhood-obesity-epidemic/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LukeTunyich
Biomechanics and Health
04:03 PM on 05/04/2010
It is enough to take look on obesity map of USA and is clear that prevalence of obesity in flat land (Southeast) are higher than in Midwest or Northeast and far more than in the West of the USA.
One more fact is that if we take look anywhere in the world we can see that people living in the flat area tend to be more overweight compared to people living on the hilly and mountains area.
Here is one interesting study from Oregon ( 2007)
Quote “Overweight? Blame your ZIP code”:
Quote “The strongest predictor of obesity rates wasn't income or education but property values, the study found”
http://www.seattlepi.com/health/331292_obesezip12.html

The biggest obstacle to understand the real reason for obesity is the fact that the basic biology is polluted with dubious theories related to weight gain-weight loss. The “energy balance model” is one of them. http://www.biomechanicsandhealth.com/energybalance.htm

A little bit more is on my website: http://www.biomechanicsandhealth.com/
Luke Tunyich
05:57 PM on 05/05/2010
The article you posted is just awful. It is clearly written by someone with no understanding of metabolism whatsoever. Let me try to explain the "energy balance model" to you.

Each person has a unique base metabolic rate, meaning that their bodies burn a specific amount of calories every day (not including additional exercise). This is a number that can be quantified exactly, but is most often estimated with techniques that permit a reasonably low margin of error.

Food also has a quantifiable amount of food energy stored in it, which is usually posted on the nutrition label. If there is no label, you can find the caloric value from websites such as FitDay.com.

The article seems to describe "energy balance" as some kind of woo-woo magical term, like something you'd hear about in a discussion of Chakras, but it is a very simple concept. Let's say your base metabolic rate is 1500 calories/day, and adding your normal daily activities, you burn an additional 1000 calories. That's 2500 calories burned. If on that day you've only consumed 2000 calories, then your net total for that day is -500 calories. The 500 calories that you burned over and above what you ate would have come from, firstly, body fat. When someone becomes emaciated, like an anorexic, they begin to use muscle tissue (protein) as an energy source, which is why they waste away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LukeTunyich
Biomechanics and Health
09:03 PM on 05/07/2010
You could post arguments against my statement without using insulting words.
On my website is clearly explained that the “Counting Calories Model” and the “Energy Balance Equitation” is wrong.

Quote from HorseChowda: “The article seems to describe "energy balance" as some kind of woo-woo magical term, like something you'd hear about in a discussion of Chakras, but it is a very simple concept.”

A Very Simple Concept is created by scientists who didn’t know that a significant amount of energy in food intake, leave the body as metabolic waste. It is unbelievable but it is true.
The scientists involved in prevention and treatment of obesity have to confront with the fact the basic understanding about weight gain/weight loss is based on huge misconception.


Quote from HorseChowda: “Let's say your base metabolic rate is 1500 calories/day, and adding your normal daily activities, you burn an additional 1000 calories. That's 2500 calories burned. If on that day you've only consumed 2000 calories, then your net total for that day is -500 calories. The 500 calories that you burned over and above what you ate would have come from, firstly, body fat.”

That is what they are teaching in medical schools and universities but it is wrong.
On my website I have explained why it is wrong whit the “Counting Calorie Method” and with the “Energy Balance Equitation”.

Luke Tunyich
06:06 PM on 05/05/2010
I forgot to mention (and others should take note of this), the book in the article claims to help people lose weight "without dieting or strenuous physical activity".

The fact that the author is offering people "an easy way out" is a strong indication that it is a gimmick. The path to good health is not an easy one. There is no subsitute for hard work and dedication. The benefits of exercise are undeniable, as are the benefits of a healthy diet.

The author should be ashamed for misleading an already troubled population for the sake of a buck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LukeTunyich
Biomechanics and Health
09:15 PM on 05/07/2010
I didn’t post on this forum anything about my Book. Discussion about my Book will be out of topic. The main topic is “Oregon Has Lowest Rate of Childhood Obesity”.

However, if you refrain from using insulting words, we can discuss issues related to the main topic.

Lukle Tunyich
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalOrgonian
03:41 PM on 05/04/2010
As an Oregonian I am happy to read this,
BUT let it be known Oregon has the highest Autism rate in the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LukeTunyich
Biomechanics and Health
04:28 PM on 05/04/2010
The fact is that the autism prevalence are lower in the Southern States than in Northern States, and at the same time the prevalence of obesity are higher in the Southern States than in the Northern States shows that understanding the cause for obesity and how to cure obesity will give more insight about cause for autism and how to cure autism.http://autismspeaksnetwork.ning.com/profiles/blog/list?user=3lp34b8wnx0yq

Luke Tunyich
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CamJam
10:20 AM on 05/05/2010
Yes it most certainly does. Based on EIGHT year olds per 2008-2009 (our one twin son NOT yet included in recent data) Oregon has now MOVED up a notch from 3rd place up to 2nd place now:

http://www.fightingautism.org/idea/autism-state-rankings-prevalence.php