iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Arizona Speed Cameras Will Be Eliminated

PAUL DAVENPORT   05/ 6/10 09:35 PM ET   AP

Arizona Speed Cameras
FIEL - In this July 18, 2008 file photo, an Arizona Department of Public Safety photo radar enforcement van's strobe lights up a speeding car while recording its license plate number in Phoenix. More than a year after Arizona became the first state in the country to deploy dozens of speed cameras on highways statewide, threats to the groundbreaking program abound. Profits are far below expectations, a citizen effort to ban the cameras continues to gain steam, the governor has said she does not l

PHOENIX — Arizona is ending a groundbreaking and contentious program that put speed cameras along Phoenix-area freeways and in vans deployed across the state.

Opponents have argued the cameras open the door for wider "Big Brother" surveillance and are more about making money than safety. The program has been the target of an initiative measure proposed for the November ballot.

Even Gov. Jan Brewer has said she doesn't like the cameras, and her intention to end the program was first disclosed in her January budget proposal. That was followed by a non-renewal letter sent by the Arizona Department of Public Safety this week to the private company that runs the program.

Scottsdale-based Redflex said Thursday that the 36 fixed cameras will be turned off and the 40 vans taken off highways on July 16, the day after its state contract expires.

The non-renewal letter was first reported by The Arizona Republic.

The camera program was instituted by Brewer's predecessor, Janet Napolitano, now the Homeland Security secretary. Cameras were introduced in September 2008 and were added until all 76 were up and running by January 2009.

Lawmakers considered repeal proposals within months, but set the issue aside and appealed for calmer debate when a passing motorist fatally shot a camera-van operator doing paperwork in his marked vehicle in April 2009.

The mobile and fixed cameras snap the photos of speeders going 11 mph or over the speed limit, and violators get tickets in the mail. Supporters said the cameras slow down drivers, reduce accidents, and free up law-enforcement officers for serious criminals.

Napolitano estimated that the program would bring in $90 million revenue in its first year, but actual revenue fell far short as many motorists ignored notices received in the mail.

While hundreds of jurisdictions across the country use speed cameras and some states have limited programs using cameras in certain areas, Arizona's statewide deployment remained the widest state use of the technology.

The state's decision is a setback for supporters of speed-enforcement cameras, said Jonathan Adkins, a spokesman for the Washington-based Governors Highway Safety Association.

"We need to look and see what happened in Arizona why didn't it work," he said.

Shawn Dow, a leader of the initiative campaign, welcomed the decision to end the program but said the drive's organizers still plan to file petition signatures on the July 1 deadline to qualify it for the November ballot.

The end of the state program does not affect local governments' use of cameras for speed enforcement, but the proposed ballot measure would prohibit state and local governments from using cameras for both speed violations and red-light running.

Redflex, a unit of Australia-based Redflex Holdings Ltd., said in a disclosure to the Australian Securities Exchange that it could write off $5 million of assets because of the program's end. Under the state's contract, Redflex supplies cameras, vans and other equipment.

Department of Public Safety officials declined to comment on the contract or to immediately release the letter. Redflex quoted the letter as saying the non-renewal reflected "a change in the agency's focus."

The end of the program will be a disappointment, Redflex spokeswoman Shoba Vaitheeswaran said. She said it comes as the program continued to mature, with improvements being made in court processing procedures and other areas.

Arizona lawmakers approved legislation this year that imposes new signage requirements and other changes for the program.

Joanna Peters, a Phoenix traffic-safety activist, called the Brewer administration's decision irresponsible.

"They're ignoring a silent majority of folks who actually support the program," Peters said. "This is something we could fix, not just throw out the baby."

___

On the Net:

Photo-enforcement program: http://www.azdps.gov/Services/Photo_Enforcement/

Redflex: http://www.redflex.com/

CameraFRAUD: http://camerafraud.wordpress.com/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

PHOENIX — Arizona is ending a groundbreaking and contentious program that put speed cameras along Phoenix-area freeways and in vans deployed across the state. Opponents have argued the cameras ...
PHOENIX — Arizona is ending a groundbreaking and contentious program that put speed cameras along Phoenix-area freeways and in vans deployed across the state. Opponents have argued the cameras ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 284
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
12:22 AM on 06/04/2010
The speed camera are nothing but ways to get quick revenue for a bandrupt state government. Case in point, I went to AZ for business in April, 2010, drive a rental car in front one of these contraptions following flowing traffic at 10 pm and was clocked at 66MPH on I-17 (which is a interstate), the ticket came in stated the speed limit was 55 MPH.
Two points strike me as strange: everywhere on I-17 the speed limit is 65 MPH, except the stretech right where the camera is from the video recorded, there're at least 3 or 4 cars caught along with my vehicle that night. Note 11 MPH over limit is fined, but 10MPH is not, it just happens I am exactly 11 MPH over the 55 MPH limit eventhough I was paying attention to stay at 65MPH on the interstate! If this does not smell like a trap for state revenue, I don't know what does!
The PD reduces the speed limit right around where the speed camera is from 65 MPH to 55 MPH eventhough the camera is rght in the middle of a long stretch of highway with no exit or merging lanes then wait for people to cruise through at the speed of 65MPH. Slap you with a fine with no method of contest, no contact information and no chance to attend driving school. Nothing but cash for the state!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
pene
critical thinker
07:13 PM on 06/02/2010
It is interesting that Arizonans, a great number of whom easily say such things as "what part of illegal don't you understand?" and " illegal aliens are breaking the law, plain and simple" find these speed cameras a problem. Yeah, they dont' like speed cameras catching them breaking the law by speeding.

The hypocracy of this is so blatant, it is like an anti-gay christian fundamentalist gay legislator. It would be laughable except for the fact that Arizona is broke and needs the money these camera's can generate and the illegals are humans and they are treated like dogs.

Maybe we should all get guns, shoot ourselves, and let some other species try it for a while.
06:01 AM on 05/12/2010
Speeding motorists will be ticketed if it is done excessively, repeatedly, and in dangerous contexts. Occasional and safe speeding behaviors should not be persecuted. Speed laws are arbitrary boundary lines which, when enforced vigorously, are simple revenue enhancers. Under normal conditions, without special attention, the agregeous speeders are put to justice.
photo
CCee
All Equal Under God.
10:56 AM on 05/10/2010
To those who think that laws that encourage citizens to report to law enforcement based on racial profiling is a good thing. And to those Who say this type of Law won't radicalize the winger types within the populace...

http://www.azfamily.com/news/Two-men-impersonate-officers-at-ASU-and-demand-id-from-students-93164989.html

Kids acting out today - Racist Manics with license to carry concealed firearms come the enactment of the law at the end of July.

Arizona .... Good Luck
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
03:04 PM on 05/10/2010
It is a "prank" after they get arrested.
02:15 AM on 05/08/2010
Drivers in California need to know about Snitch Tickets, which are fake/phishing red light camera tickets sent out by some CA police departments to bluff the registered owner into ID'ing the actual driver of the car. (There are about 40 cities using them.) Snitch Tickets haven't been filed with the court so they don't say "Notice to Appear," don't have the court's address, and say (on the back, in small letters), "Do not contact the court." Since they have NOT been filed with the court, they have no legal weight. You can ignore a Snitch Ticket. If in doubt, Google the term.
02:34 PM on 05/07/2010
Maybe Assazonia needs to get rid of Assazonians while they're at it.
photo
CCee
All Equal Under God.
02:39 PM on 05/07/2010
Run us through a filter first dude...
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
02:29 PM on 05/07/2010
Were the cameras clocking too many non-brown law breakers?
02:00 PM on 05/07/2010
awesome!
anarchists were involved in this movement and fight against these extortion rackets:
http://firesneverextinguished.blogspot.com/2009/11/when-border-is-everywhere-examining.html
02:31 PM on 05/07/2010
lockheed runs these systems
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:53 PM on 05/07/2010
Wow!

They're actually getting rid of cameras somewhere??

As badly behaved as AZ has been lately, this is terrific news.

I don't know how I'm gonna get by without being watched as much by my own government...How can I feel safe??

But then again, I went without the watchful eye taking care of me for many years before 9/11....And come to think of it, those were much better years.
photo
CCee
All Equal Under God.
02:02 PM on 05/07/2010
If you are in Arizona you don't have to worry about your safety... If you have that Classic Hispanic profile, or exercise a little imagination with a sombrero and sunglasses, the cops will keep checking on you often enough :o)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
01:01 PM on 05/10/2010
B/c law enforcement is just for non-whites in AZ?
photo
blukazoo
I support your right to disagree.
01:45 PM on 05/07/2010
So they didn't make as much money because people "ignored" the tickets they received? I guess the citizens of AZ aren't really interested in legalities after all. Here in CA, they put those things on your record and force you to pay them before they will let you register your car each year.
photo
CCee
All Equal Under God.
02:06 PM on 05/07/2010
Janet Brewer - Arnold Schwarzenegger - Janet Brewer.... Arnold Schwarzenegger.. One a joke... the other a Terminator ...

In CA I would pay into a public use fund just in Case a ticket got lost in the mail.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
02:31 PM on 05/07/2010
In Colorado, people contested the tickets, so a judge said that if someone showed up in court and he was convinced by their argument (almost always, because of the laws), he would dismiss the ticket AND court costs; but it could take several hours to get through the docket. Most people just pay. Otherwise, it goes to collections.
photo
tinri
Republican women suffer from Stockholm Syndrome
01:25 PM on 05/07/2010
It would be my guess if those cameras were intended to catch illegal brown skinned people, they'd be doubling down on the number of them.

Funny how they are all about law and order except when they are the law breakers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlinesavant
01:13 PM on 05/07/2010
Translation: No money was actually going into the pockets of any elected officials, and they also like speeding. Would'nt want to abide by the laws the commoners have to now, would we?
12:45 PM on 05/07/2010
Replace them with color cameras to catch illegals!
photo
CCee
All Equal Under God.
01:02 PM on 05/07/2010
I like your thinking... But They already tried that Minnesota, to catch all those day laborin' Canadian Types over here stealin' our jobs, and our wimmin, and bein' the drain on the economy that they are etc..

But "apparently" white isn't a color.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
02:32 PM on 05/07/2010
I can't remember this verbatim, but it's pretty good:

You are pink when you're born
Blue when you're cold
Green when you're sick
Brown when you tan
Red when you tan too much
Gray when you grow old
Yellow when you're jaundiced

And you call ME colored?
theepoxyman
Reaching point of diminishing returns in 3,2,1
12:40 PM on 05/07/2010
Our little city bought the lies from Rediflex and installed a few of these devices. The state has told them to take down half of them as they are of state roads and that is a no-no.
They sold the program as a safety enhancement. What they did not say is that the yellow light was reduced by half at these intersections. That makes for more revenue, but can be very dangerous as people slam on the binders at the first glance of yellow, others slow down to 25 mph and cause congestion and road rage. The cameras are not for safety, they are strictly revenue enhancement. Every city that has them can not point to any data that shows that they improve safety. The first half of the fine goes to rediflex, the other half is split between the state and city, so the revenue is not all they expected. So shorten the yellow light even more.
01:04 PM on 05/07/2010
If Rediflex did that and you can prove it. Check your state traffic laws for requirements of the length of the time of the Yellow light. If your state doesn't have it, your county or city will. Then take suit on them, that is what the law is for. If they didn't lower it under what the law said, then the city was just being nice to ya this whole time letting the other ones go longer. If the city is upset with them and claim they are doing this, ask why they aren't fining them if the yellow is shorter than the law states.

Safety data doesn't change when people are still breaking the law. That is an odd argument. A few cameras aren't going to stop people from breaking the law, but if they get stopped and fined enough they will start to think twice. I could say that the any punishment doesn't stop murder, does that mean you take away the punishments completely? Of course not, you would say make the punishment worse till people learn.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:53 PM on 05/07/2010
It's purely a matter of safety. All traffic laws should focus on one thing and one thing only. Safety.

Shortening yellow lights, whether legal or not, is a very unsafe idea. People get used to how a light behaves and they behave accordingly. Switch the timing of the yellow light and people will be slamming on their brakes when the light goes red before it did last week. This can obviously cause serious accidents.

Sure people can learn the new length of the light, but in the meantime people are hurt or killed because of a change that is made STRICTLY FOR FINANCIAL REASONS.

Now please remember, traffic laws exist for safety, not revenue purposes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:39 PM on 05/07/2010
They're actually going to replace them with "Meskins" deployed at strategic locations to calculate speed. They've got plenty of them.