iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Oil Spill: First Attempt With Oil Containment Box FAILS, Blobs Of Tar Reach Shore

Gulf Oil Spill

HARRY R. WEBER and SARAH LARIMER   05/ 8/10 11:02 PM ET   AP

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — A novel but risky attempt to use a 100-ton steel-and-concrete box to cover a deepwater oil well gushing toxic crude into the Gulf of Mexico was aborted Saturday after ice crystals encased it, an ominous development as thick blobs of tar began washing up on Alabama's white sand beaches.

The setback left the mission to cap the ruptured well in doubt. It had taken about two weeks to build the box and three days to cart it 50 miles out then slowly lower it to the well a mile below the surface, but the frozen depths were too much for it to handle.

Still, BP officials overseeing the cleanup efforts were not giving up just yet on hopes that a containment box – either the one brought there or a larger one being built – could cover the well and be used to capture the oil and funnel it to a tanker at the surface to be carted away. Officials said it would be at least Monday before a decision was made on what next step to take.

"I wouldn't say it's failed yet," BP chief operating officer Doug Suttles said. "What I would say is what we attempted to do ... didn't work."

There was a renewed sense of urgency as dime- to golfball-sized balls of tar began washing up on Dauphin Island, three miles off the Alabama mainland at the mouth of Mobile Bay and much farther east than the thin, rainbow sheens that had so far arrived sporadically in the Louisiana marshes.

"It almost looks like bark, but when you pick it up it definitely has a liquid consistency and it's definitely oil," said Kimberly Creel, 41, who was hanging out and swimming with hundreds of other beachgoers. "... I can only imagine what might be coming this way that might be larger."

About a half dozen tar balls had been collected by Saturday afternoon at Dauphin Island, Coast Guard chief warrant officer Adam Wine said in Mobile. Authorities planned to test the substance but strongly suspected it came from the oil spill.

A long line of materials that resembled a string of pompoms were positioned on a stretch of the shore. Crews walked along the beach in rubber boots, carrying trash bags to clear debris from the sand.

Brenda Prosser, of Mobile, said she wept when she saw the workers.

"I just started crying. I couldn't quit crying. I'm shaking now," Prosser said. "To know that our beach may be black or brown, or that we can't get in the water, it's so sad."

Prosser, 46, said she was afraid to let her 9-year-old son, Grant, get in the water, and she worried that the spill would rob her of precious moments with her own child.

"I've been coming here since I was my son's age, as far back as I can remember in my life," Prosser said.

In the three weeks since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded on April 20, killing 11 workers, about 210,000 gallons of crude a day has been flowing into the Gulf. Until Saturday none of the thick sludge – those iconic images of past spills – had reached Gulf shores.

It was a troubling turn of events, especially since the intrepid efforts to use the containment box had not yet succeeded. There has been a rabid fascination with the effort to use the peaked box the size of a four-story house to place over the ruptured well. It had taken more than 12 hours to slowly lower it to the seafloor, a task that required painstaking precision to accurately position it over the well or it could damage the leaking pipe and make the problem worse.

It was fraught with doubt and peril since nothing like it had been attempted at such depths with water pressure great enough to crush a submarine. It ended up encountering an icy crystals, familiar territory for deepwater drilling.

The icy buildup on the containment box made it too buoyant and clogged it up, BP's Suttles said. Workers who had carefully lowered the massive box over the leak nearly a mile below the surface had to lift it and move it some 600 feet to the side. If it had worked, authorities had said it would reduce the flow by about 85 percent, buying a bit more time as a three-month effort to drill a relief well goes on simultaneously.

Company and Coast Guard officials had cautioned that icelike hydrates, a slushy mixture of gas and water, would be one of the biggest challenges to the containment box plan, and their warnings proved accurate. The crystals clogged the opening in the top of the peaked box like sand in a funnel, only upside-down.

Options under consideration included raising the box high enough that warmer water would prevent the slush from forming, or using heated water or methanol to prevent the crystals from forming.

Steve Rinehart, a BP spokesman in Mobile, Ala., said late Saturday a second containment device was under construction by Wild Well Control, Inc., in Port Fourchon, La., the company that built the first one.

"It's the same general idea and approach. It may be a slightly different size and shape," he said.

Even as officials pondered their next move, Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry said she must continue to manage expectations of what the containment box can do.

"This dome is no silver bullet to stop the leak," she said.

The captain of the supply boat that carried the precious cargo for 11 hours from the Louisiana coast earlier last week wasn't giving up hope.

"Everybody knew this was a possibility well before we brought the dome out," Capt. Demi Shaffer, of Seward, Alaska, told an Associated Press reporter stationed in the Gulf in the heart of the containment zone with the 12-man crew of the Joe Griffin. "It's an everyday occurrence when you're drilling, with the pipeline trying to freeze up."

The spot where Deepwater Horizon rig once was positioned is now teeming with vessels working on containing the well. There are 15 boats and large ships at or near the site – some being used in an ongoing effort to drill a relief well, another with the crane that lowered the containment device to the seafloor.

There is even a vessel at the site called the Seacor Lee that is sending a live video feed from the undersea robots back to BP's operations center in Houston.

"Everyone was hoping that that would slow it down a bit if not stop it," said Shane Robichaux, of Chauvin, a 39-year-old registered nurse relaxing at his vacation camp in Cocodrie, La. "I'm sure they'll keep working on it `til it gets fixed, one way or another. But we were hopeful that would shut it down."

The original blowout was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP PLC's internal investigation.

Deep beneath the seafloor, methane is in a slushy, crystalline form. Deep sea oil drillers often encounter pockets of methane crystals as they dig into the earth.

As the bubble rose up the drill column from the high-pressure environs of the deep to the less pressurized shallows, it intensified and grew, breaking through various safety barriers, said Robert Bea, a University of California Berkley engineering professor and oil pipeline expert who detailed the interviews to an Associated Press reporter.

"A small bubble becomes a really big bubble," Bea said. "So the expanding bubble becomes like a cannon shooting the gas into your face."

___

Larimer reported from Mobile, Ala. Associated Press writers Ray Henry and John Curran in Louisiana, and Noaki Schwartz in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — A novel but risky attempt to use a 100-ton steel-and-concrete box to cover a deepwater oil well gushing toxic crude into the Gulf of Mexico was aborted Saturday after ice...
ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — A novel but risky attempt to use a 100-ton steel-and-concrete box to cover a deepwater oil well gushing toxic crude into the Gulf of Mexico was aborted Saturday after ice...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,735
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
10:55 PM on 05/13/2010
Compare just the financial damage to fishing and tourism industries, to the financial damage inflicted on 9-11.

Now, any objections to nationalizing Halliburton, Transocean and BP immediately?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:46 AM on 05/15/2010
Should have been done years ago!
photo
raphaelbonee
The snake was right "the gods lie"
12:06 AM on 05/12/2010
Some possibilities as to why BP has not been able to plug the hole.

1. BP did not set casing down to the zones it shot and the oil is seeping up around the cement plug not through the hole its suppose to.

2. The casing was set to the zones. The cement surrounding it did not seal and oil is still coming up past the cement and not through the hole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
09:41 PM on 05/15/2010
3. They're not trying to plug the hole, they're trying to mine the oil.
photo
raphaelbonee
The snake was right "the gods lie"
11:48 PM on 05/11/2010
Were I the President I would demand BP release the open hole logs as well as the drill logs for this well. There's something odd about them not being able to plug this well. Maybe a few of us old open hole engineers could puzzle it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
11:05 PM on 05/13/2010
Why not cave it in? I'm picturing twin explosions, on opposite sides of the pipe (below the ocean floor, so some more drilling would be necessary) at different depths, effectively "cutting" the well like taking out a section of hose, except that the space taken out will be filled by caving in rock, sand, silt and fragments of pipe and casing. Feasible? Why or why not?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
11:25 AM on 05/11/2010
Golf balls and rubber debris is their best guess for finally activating the blowout preventer. BP's wild guess work is unacceptable.

The data I really want are:
(1) exact diameters of the well
(2) materials and thicknesses of at each layer of the casing, including all strength of materials data, directly from manufacturer of steel, not from BP's jots on napkins or whatever they have
(3) pressure of this gusher, as a function of depth (if I recall correctly, pressure would vary in a vertical pipe, not just drop to zero as a step function at the height that P=mgh)
(4) materials naturally occurring at that depth (rock? what type?)

Then I can tell you how much mass needs to be dropped into that well, how fast, at what depth, and demolition experts can tell you whether they can do it. BP obviously does not have the right men for the job anywhere in their payroll. Nationalize the cleanup effort, hire any physicists, research geologists, mining engineers and other legitimate professionals to find the solution, direct the Army Corps of Engineers to implement it, and bill BP for the competent work it is obviously incapable of performing nor even contracting.

Leaving BP in charge is unacceptable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:51 PM on 05/11/2010
Right. Because BP, faced with the worst public relations nightmare of its storied history, isn't putting their absolute best people on this. Whether or not BP should be trusted is certainly up for debate, but your contention that BP "does not have the right men for the job anywhere in their payroll," and that you somehow know how to solve in their place the problem is utterly laughable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
06:24 PM on 05/11/2010
What's laughable is that you believe "public relations" count for anything to BP. That's a worry of players in competitive markets. Petroleum is an oligopoly, not a competitive market. Everybody knows it is not competitive.
photo
deepintheheartoftejas
Middle o/t Road = Yellow stripes & dead armadillos
09:08 AM on 05/10/2010
"About a half dozen tar balls had been collected by Saturday afternoon at Dauphin Island, Coast Guard chief warrant officer Adam Wine said in Mobile."

When officials examined the contents, they discovered the tar balls were leakage from the latest beta release of Ubuntu.
photo
WOODSTOCKER51
HAVE A NICE DAY!
07:17 AM on 05/10/2010
......TO SESSIONS AND SHELBY...."LEADERS OF UNREGULATED.FREEMARKET,CAPITALISM"

..........."HOW ALL THAT OIL SOAKED COASTLINE WORKIN' FOR YA NOW?"........

.REMINDER: DON'T ASK FOR ALL THAT NASTY GOVERNMENT HELP EITHER!
02:33 AM on 05/10/2010
How's that mother nature thing workin out for ya BP?
Dummies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:39 AM on 05/10/2010
BP's CEO's yearly salary= >$5 million

Cost of the back-up onsite containment device that would have adverted the spill= $500,000

Environmental and economic devastation of the Gulf region= priceless
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edva
Capitalism vs Humanity
11:11 PM on 05/09/2010
This thing won't stop until it is spent. That's probably hundreds of millions of gallons. Probably the largest environmental catastrophe in modern history.
11:20 PM on 05/09/2010
Not spent. Not by a damn sight. These oil and gas wells will produce for decades and that's how long this one will blow out wide open if they don't get it killed. And the only way British Petroleum can kill this blow out is to drill at least one and possibly two relief wells.

That means they will have to drill another well to the same depth. Then directional drill into the well bore that is blowing out. And then pump the well full of drilling mud heavy enough to force the oil and gas back into the formation. It took three months to drill the well blowing out and will take longer than that to drill the relief wells and get them tied in.

Until then this well is going to blow wide open at a lot more than 200,000 gallons a day which is a pretty laughable estimate of the oil and gas blowing out.

Notice they never mention "natural gas"? That's worth about $4.00 per million cubic feet to us royalty owners, and since the royalty is paid to the US government that would be us.
11:37 PM on 05/09/2010
Let me try to add some perspective on oil and gas wells even though most my experience is on gas wells. But like I said this is to give you an idea of the money that can be made.

I was on one natural gas project and it took us an average of 11 days to drill the wells to about 5,000 feet, case and cement it, perforate, frac, drill out plugs and have it going down the pipeline. The average costs were between $1 and $1.5 million per well. That was paid for in the first FOUR DAYS going into the pipeline, and the well would produce for 10 to 20 years.

The project I just came off of was deeper and way more expensive. Those wells cost between $10 and $15 million to drill, complete and frac. It takes 90 days to six months to pay for those wells and then they render MILLIONS a day in profits for the next 20 years.
12:29 AM on 05/10/2010
They have other solutions they well consider in the meantime.

They could attempt to cut off the top of the existing BOP and weld a new one on top of the old one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
12:47 PM on 05/10/2010
Thanks for the figures. It goes a long way to helping explain why the same companies aren't more rapidly transitioning to more responsible technologies.

http://www.grist.org/article/wind-still-enough-to-save-the-world/

Do you know any websites where similar figures are publicly available? Not necessarily the very wells where you've worked, but the industry's own estimates of up-front investment, payback time and total profit. Thank you in advance!
10:16 PM on 05/09/2010
Obama's Interior Dept, under Salazar, exempt BP's project from a required environmental impact study in April of 2009. If the study had been done, as required, the project would not have been approved.


Last Wednesday, on Keith Olbermann, environmentalists called for Int Dept Secy Salazar to step down:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/vp/36976376# 36976376
11:26 PM on 05/09/2010
How many times is this going to come up? First, because what happened on this rig and this well has nothing to do with Salazar, President Obama, President Bush, Oilfield Czar Dick Cheney, or anything else that has happened in the oilfield off shore or on dry land for the past 100 years.

That's how long its been inexcusable for blow out preventers not to work or not knowing you're taking a gas kick. And if a world of roughnecks that have to cheat to pass a UA know that, I wonder how that would escape British Petroleum and TransOceaninic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
01:10 PM on 05/10/2010
"And if (did you mean "in"?) a world of roughnecks that have to cheat to pass a UA know that, I wonder how that would escape British Petroleum and TransOceaninic."

Anyway, it's a great point, and consistent with my experience in manufacturing and even in software sales. Everybody gets high. Why would mining be any different?

And I have no experience to question what you say about blowout preventers and taking a gas kick, plus it stands to reason (otherwise I would have expected every oil rig in the past 100 years to blow up :-), but there is *something* that I think has to do with Cheney, and to a lesser extent, the present MMS, and that is the very possibility of a "general waiver" to environmental regulations.

http://www.truthout.org/slick-operator-the-bp-ive-known-too-well59178

SOP is to have a lot of rubber "boom" ON HAND on oil rigs, and without the "general waiver" that Cheney created, they would have been on the Deepwater Horizon and onshore at BP facilities in the Gulf, ready to deploy at a moment's notice, which would have contained this spill tens of miles offshore from any of the barrier islands, where oil is now being found.

Cheney created the option of corporations writing their own environmental impact assessments and so far nobody has reversed that INSANE practice.
09:56 PM on 05/09/2010
this story is very vague about what actually happened and you have to read into the details to figure out what is going on.

apparently they tried lowering a dome over the leak but abandoned the attempt because ice crystals formed around the nozzle at the peak of the object. how about you stop worrying about collecting the oil and just lower the cap so that the leak stops! i was annoyed that they didnt bother discussing that aspect in the story to see if it would have viably stopped the leak or slowed it down. they just glazed over it like the fact that ice blocking the place where the oil would be collected completely scraps the project. i mean... they had a methane bubble expand and break through the containment seals on the equipment that was designed to be placed there but they want to slap together a guinea-rigged pipe on top of a pyramid to collect the oil and they expect that to stay together?
10:00 PM on 05/09/2010
The dome was becoming buoyant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:03 PM on 05/09/2010
And they now they say they're going to make a SMALLER dome because they think that will keep the ice crystals from forming. Okay, it's been a while since I took physics, but that still just doesn't compute for me ...
11:23 PM on 05/09/2010
I guess less water may mean less crystal formation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
11:08 PM on 05/13/2010
They're going to pump warm water from the surface down to the smaller cap, but it still seems like bs to me. Just fyi, that's what they *claim* is the reason they *claim* they expect the "top hat" to work.

Why don't they try their best idea first?

Oh, right, they already did: "drill baby drill" and their only backup plan is "der-der-der." (Mencia)
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
09:54 PM on 05/09/2010
No more oil. Back to steam, horses and bicycles.
10:01 PM on 05/09/2010
My family were producers of Missouri mules. They were very rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seckhoff
Famous in the apple barns
12:14 AM on 05/10/2010
Hey, care to share any anecdotes on this? I'm writing a book on working animals in the U.S. No kidding.
12:11 AM on 05/10/2010
Don't forget trolleys!
01:54 AM on 05/10/2010
Love those things.
09:51 PM on 05/09/2010
I have to keep putting this up just so we know what we're really looking at here.

If British Petroleum could stop this flow they would have done it by now. (With the exception of "shear rams" which if they have them could have cut the drilling string (or casing) off weeks ago and stopped this blow out. But that might have cost them this well. Better the environmental damage than that.

So get this straight. Short of shear rams the best they can do is drill another well just like the one blowing out, directional drill into the well bore blowing out, and pump drilling mud or cement from there to kill the well. THERE IS VIRTUALLY NOTHING THEY CAN DO FROM THE SEA FLOOR.

So figure for all the noise and protests, for all the lies and misdirection British Petroleum is putting out, and for all the floundering of our federal government, this well is going to blow out wide open for the next 90 days at least.

And 200,000 gallons a day is a laughable amount that BP claims is blowing out of this well every day until then.
12:14 AM on 05/10/2010
I'm afraid you may be right. Bet you wish it was otherwise, huh?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:40 PM on 05/09/2010
Latest news from AP/Yahoo

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100510/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill

It says that BP is going to try again - this time with a smaller (!) box. I haven't finished reading the article yet, because I haven't recovered from the facepalm I gave myself on reading that.
09:58 PM on 05/09/2010
Thanks it will save me the time and trouble on my poor sore forehead.

BP is going to try a lot of make work BS solutions because its better than telling the truth that even there is no excuse for this blowout its going to keep blowing out wide open for at least 90 days and maybe more.

Better we find out just what those chemicals are BP is using to "disperse" the oil. I'm betting that's way worse than the oil is and will accomplish about the same thing as trying to spread your carrots all over your plate so it looks to mommy like you ate most of them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:01 PM on 05/09/2010
I agree.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
04:13 PM on 05/15/2010
I want the Army Corps of Engineers on the scene. If they say there's nothing they can do, fine, but I want their expertise brought to bear on the problem of just sealing the existing hole without any economic motive to keep it serviceable.
09:38 PM on 05/09/2010
Go to this link to see how the hay will clean up the oil very easily in the gulf http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5SxX2EntEo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:47 PM on 05/09/2010
Waste fibers like hair clippings also work well. These group is coordinating a massive effort in the Gulf coast. Everyone, please go to this link and find out what you can do to help. They take donations via Paypal,

http://www.matteroftrust.org/
10:21 PM on 05/09/2010
Look, nothing is going to work trying to pump down on that oil and gas well blowing out. The oil and gas blowing out of that well is blowing at more than 3,000 pounds per square inch of pressure because that's just what the column of sea water exerts at the sea floor.

The only thing they can do is drill a hole just as deep, directional drill into the well bore blowing out, and then try to fill both well bores with enough drilling mud or cement to hold the gas and oil back in the formation.;

Once they do that that they can pump new cement plugs if they have too.

But nothing can be done from the surface which in this case is actually the sea floor.