iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Oil Response Aggressive As Crisis Unfolded: AP

H. JOSEF HEBERT and ERICA WERNER   05/ 8/10 06:38 PM ET   AP

Obama Oil Spill

WASHINGTON — It was a two-day trip to the Midwest to talk about jobs and clean energy. President Barack Obama didn't mention the drama unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, where oil was gushing from a broken well pipe a mile beneath the sea.

The situation hadn't become a priority. Soon it would.

On the return to Washington aboard Air Force One, Obama learned the spill had become more worrisome. A third break was discovered at the destroyed well pipe on the ocean floor 40 miles from Louisiana's precious coastal marshes. Federal scientists believed at least 5,000 barrels of oil a day were being released – five times more than original estimates.

And there was no way to stop the flow.

The Gulf region, ravaged five years earlier by Hurricane Katrina, was on the verge of a second ecological disaster. Would there be a repeat of the bureaucratic bungling that marked President George W. Bush's response to the hurricane?

While the Obama administration has faced second-guessing about the speed and effectiveness of some of its actions, a narrative pieced together by The Associated Press, based on documents, interviews and public statements, shows little resemblance to Katrina in either the characterization of the threat or the federal government's response.

On April 20, an explosion engulfed the floating BP oil rig in fire, toppling it into the sea and sending 126 workers fleeing. Eleven never made it and are presumed dead.

Eight days later, from Air Force One, Obama told advisers he wanted stepped-up action to what had suddenly become a more menacing threat to the ecology and economy of the Gulf Coast. The president, who had activated a national response team on April 22, made no mention of the new developments when he strolled to the back of the plane to chat with the traveling press pool.

The fresh concerns would be outlined by the Coast Guard at a news conference that evening. It was not until the next day – nine days after the explosion and five days after first word the well was spewing oil – that the government would declare it a "spill of national significance."

Critics have asked why the administration did not move more quickly on that declaration, even though the real-world impact is viewed by many as largely symbolic.

This came from Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind.: "The American people deserve to know why the administration was slow to respond, why necessary equipment was not immediately on hand in the area and why the president did not fully deploy Cabinet-level federal officials" to the Gulf Coast until April 30.

The AP review found that the administration – aware of the political scars left on the Bush White House over Katrina – moved early with rescue efforts. Also, the government knew within days that while no leak had been found, the potential for environmental harm existed.

From day to day, as the situation evolved from devastating fire and dramatic rescue to a possible environmental hazard, the response activities changed, too, according to documents and interviews.

___

Word reached Washington at 10:30 on the night of Tuesday, April 20, that the floating drilling rig Deepwater Horizon was on fire. Its workers scrambled to be rescued. The Coast Guard sent a pair of ships and four helicopters.

For a time, it was a rescue operation, and nothing more. The president was alerted because of the potential for great loss of life.

Before noon the next day at the Interior Department, which oversees offshore drilling projects, the department's No. 2 official, Deputy Secretary David Hayes, raced to grab a commercial jet for New Orleans without even time to pack a bag. He sets up shop at a government command center already monitoring events.

"We obviously knew this was a bad situation," Hayes said in a recent interview. "But we were not in a mindset where we thought we were dealing with a major oil spill."

Underwater surveillance showed no active leak from the wellhead. Oil on the water surface was determined to be residual from the pipe and the burned out rig, now floating precariously.

Hayes and other officials were confident the blowout preventer would keep any spill to a minimum. But it failed catastrophically, allowing 3 million gallons of oil into the Gulf so far.

Asked why he flew to Louisiana so soon after the explosion, Hayes said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar was concerned about potential deaths of 11 workers, especially so soon after the April 5 mine collapse in West Virginia that killed 29 workers.

Two days after the fire erupted, Obama convened an Oval Office meeting to get the latest on what still was viewed largely as a major accident and rescue effort – 11 workers could not be found.

He asked departments to respond aggressively to help in the rescue and assess the environmental fallout. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs in a statement called the response "the No. 1 priority."

A team representing 16 agencies and offices that included the Pentagon, the Environmental Protection Agency and the departments of Interior and Homeland Security was formed. As a precaution, 100,000 gallons of chemicals to break up oil on the waster was sent to three Gulf Coast locations.

By Friday, the rig toppled to the sea floor. Efforts to rescue the 11 missing workers ended. BP, which leased the rig for exploratory drilling, insisted that based on remote monitoring, there was no leak from the well pipe. Officials believed they may have dodged a bullet.

But that changed abruptly the following day when Rear Adm. Mary Landry, commander of the Coast Guard's Gulf region, called Hayes, back in Washington, with some bad news. "We found a leak," she told him.

A new centralized command was set up in Robert, La. While the possibility of a major spill never was dismissed, it now became a much greater worry.

Obama had yet to speak publicly about the issue.

For Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, later named as overall head of the response effort, the tipping point from rescue to potentially major environmental crisis came Thursday, April 22. That's when the rig, with 700,000 gallons of diesel fuel, sank to the sea bottom, raising the potential for more damage to the pipe and a worse release of oil.

"At that point we knew this could go very, very bad. We were moving into a much more vulnerable potentially catastrophic situation," he said in a recent interview.

___

Come Saturday, April 24, with the spill estimated at 1,000 barrels a day, containment efforts were stepped up. The number of vessels sent to the scene tripled to 30 and more chemicals were dumped on the growing oil slick.

By Tuesday, April 27, 20 more vessels had been added to skim oil and help out. In Washington, BP's chief executive, Tony Hayward, and other company officials were asked to the White House to describe their latest efforts to plug the leak and their plans to mitigate the spill's impact. Officials were told a relief well to stop the oil could take three months to drill.

Obama was briefed, although he did not meet with the oil company executives.

At the same time, an internal report at Homeland Security brought more ominous news. It concluded that marine ecology along the Gulf "may be significantly more impacted than originally estimated" by the volume of oil now believed being released with a high risk of environmental contamination in the Gulf.

The next day Interior Secretary Ken Salazar flew to the BP command center in Houston to review BP's plans to deal with the leak and response efforts.

The news got worse on Wednesday, April 28.

In Washington, senior advisers and department officials were holding their daily meeting in the White House Situation Room when word came in from the Gulf of a third leak found in the submerged pipeline. Separately, government scientists monitoring by air the oil plume already on the water concluded BP's estimate of release was far too low and revised the estimate to 5,000 barrels a day instead of 1,000.

That's when the call was made to Air Force One.

On Thursday, the administration's team participated in a news conference at the White House, followed by Obama in an appearance in the Rose Garden, where he commented publicly for the first time on what he characterized as "the worsening oil spill."

The next day, Friday, April 30, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Salazar and other administration officials flew to the Gulf Coast. The Pentagon made available two C-130 aircraft to drop chemicals on the oil. A quarter-million feet of boom was on site, but in the coming days it grew to 1 million feet, and the number of vessels increased from 75 to 200.

Into the weekend, the weather turned rainy and the wind picked up, bringing the forward fingers of the oil slick within 9 miles Louisiana's eastern wetlands.

On the rainy wind-swept Sunday, 12 days after the $350 million Deepwater Horizon was consumed by flames, Obama flew to the Gulf to get a firsthand look. He took a helicopter flight over the ecologically precious wetlands that may be tarnished by the oil.

As Air Force One returned to Washington, press secretary Gibbs got the question he knew was coming.

Was the president mindful of some people wanting to make comparisons to the Bush administration's Katrina response?

Other than geography, Gibbs insists there is no connection: "We've done everything that we could."

___

Associated Press writers Eileen Sullivan, Matthew Daly and Fred Frommer contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — It was a two-day trip to the Midwest to talk about jobs and clean energy. President Barack Obama didn't mention the drama unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, where oil was gushing from...
WASHINGTON — It was a two-day trip to the Midwest to talk about jobs and clean energy. President Barack Obama didn't mention the drama unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, where oil was gushing from...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 894
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
12:08 PM on 06/21/2010
How much did the WH pay you for this tale, AP?
01:46 AM on 05/11/2010
The only thing President Obama can do to impress me, is to go on national television, and state that Off Shore Oil Drilling will be Prohibited in the US! He should declare that like the California Governor did. The rest is just for show.
10:18 PM on 05/09/2010
Obama's Interior Dept, under Salazar, exempted BP's project from a required environmental impact study in April of 2009. If the study had been done, as required, the project would not have been approved.


Last Wednesday, on Keith Olbermann, environmentalists called for Int Dept Secy Salazar to step down:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/vp/36976376# 36976376
11:19 AM on 05/10/2010
Look this is absolute BS and really ignorant at that. The waiver of environmental impact statements for drilling at this depth has been routinely waived because previous environmental studies have already been done.

But what is just outrageous is the idea that had British Petroleum been required to do an environmental impact statement they would not have permitted drilling in the Gulf of Mexico with thousands of wells all around it.

And while I'm not supremely confident of Secretary Salazar I know he is considered an enemy of the oilfield by the people who work in it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:37 PM on 05/10/2010
They were not required to do a blowout plan, and that's the most egregious error. This is due to a regulation implemented in 2008.

http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/05/06/469490/bp-got-a-pass-on-disaster-plan.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:52 PM on 05/09/2010
If Obama really wanted to prevent oil spills in the future he would get us off oil and give us that clean renewable energy future he promised us. Where is that? Instead, he is mucking up the climate bill with allowances for coal and big oil. He is not even considering how to get us off fossil fuels because he's so busy protecting the fossil fuels industries. It's absolute nonsense to think Obama wants us off fossil fuels when he is doing everything possible to make sure those industries thrive and not doing NEARLY enough to stimulate renewable energy growth. This is a 180 from his campaign promises on an "Apollo program" to fight climate change. That was just to get us suckers to vote for him.

This website does little but defend Obama but we should all be telling him to uphold his campaign promises and actually fight climate change.
11:27 AM on 05/10/2010
The conversion to alternative fuels especially ethanol and natural gas is already taking place and is actually at its most critical juncture, winning the hearts and minds of the American people and getting them to support the conversion.

The proof of this is the number and kind of TV commercials running that promote ethanol and natural gas on line of thinking, and in addition ads explaining how our dependence on foreign oil provides more money for our enemies to buy more and better weapons to kill our troops with.

Those are very savvy moves because the American public is actually brainwashed to support oil and oil companies and its going to take some persuading to get them to willingly change.

And as far as President Obama, all I can say is he's the hardest working president I've ever seen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:40 PM on 05/10/2010
They are working very hard on the green energy. We can't switch to it overnight. We are stuck with coal and oil for awhile.

Your comments about Obama are simply wrong. I suggest you do some reading.

http://www.energy.gov/
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
03:57 PM on 05/09/2010
Obama is not Bush, neither he nor Biden own an interest in oil. What they may have in common is allowing the powerful and monied$ oil and gas lobby to control the offshore drilling debate.

Where irony resides is with the Republican politicians of Louisiana (and the liberal media tsk tsk) demanding a faster more aggressive response from this President, while during Katrina the Republicans in Louisiana and around the country (and the liberal media tsk tsk) excused Bush at every turn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goldiggerrr
Dem Chicago Boyz did it again!!!
03:09 PM on 05/09/2010
**EYKIS** commented --- "Universe,

I have POSTED continuously on any thread that POTUS and his Administration have been EXCELLENT in their response to the Nashville Flood.

I live between Nashville and Clarksville (Hills of Tennessee) and EVERY RESPONDER, TEMA, FEMA, VOLUNTEER STATE and OTHERS have been excellent and we will recover.

The only COMPLAINT IS LACK OF MEDIA COVERAGE.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We'll, EYKIS and others sane folk on HP,

The lack of MEDIA coverage is (I see now) to be expected. You see, they are covering the "oh so hated" Obama Administration".

They can't let them get GOOD press. They will only show up if and only if, it appears the Obama administration appears to be bungling things up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mr Universe
Shiny, let's be bad guys
11:52 AM on 05/09/2010
Okay all you armchair critics. Just HOW should the President have handled this? What steps should have been taken that the administration didn't take? And be honest, this is the first event of it's kind to happen (yes there have been other oil fires but this is the first one resulting in a giant hole in the crust of the planet).

What should have Obama done differently that would have changed the circumstances as they are now?

And somebody posted yesterday asking how many people did Obama kill in Nashville. Is every natural or man made disaster President Obama's fault from now on?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Eykis
Odd realm of Purgatory I reside in with HPo~
12:08 PM on 05/09/2010
Universe,

I have POSTED continuously on any thread that POTUS and his Administration have been EXCELLENT in their response to the Nashville Flood.

I live between Nashville and Clarksville (Hills of Tennessee) and EVERY RESPONDER, TEMA, FEMA, VOLUNTEER STATE and OTHERS have been excellent and we will recover.


The only COMPLAINT IS LACK OF MEDIA COVERAGE.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Eykis
Odd realm of Purgatory I reside in with HPo~
12:08 PM on 05/09/2010
btw. FANNED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sooperbohl
Cant we all just get along?
11:33 AM on 05/09/2010
Lets pull out of Iraq and launch an attack against BP. Shock and awe all over again. We can let the fabulous Congressman Pence lead the charge since he seems to know what he is doing. NOT!!.... Pence is nothing more than a typical point and blame DC type that is deft of any real ideas or anything going on in this country except for getting himself and his like elected. Time to go home Pence come election time. The good people of Indiana needs someone working for them and not just yourself. Go be Becks sidekick. BP should have responded to this disaster promptly instead of trying to figure out how they were going downplay their involvement and limit their liability.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Eykis
Odd realm of Purgatory I reside in with HPo~
12:35 PM on 05/09/2010
Sooper,

EXCELLENT POST on Spence - he thinks he is gonna be prez - he is WRONG.

Fanned and Faved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sooperbohl
Cant we all just get along?
01:15 PM on 05/09/2010
Thanks Eykis. I call them as I see em. Enough of the phony concern and outrage from our the DC power grabbers. Time for use to elect people who can make us respectable again. All the crazies in office can go be commentators on Faux news. There fair and balanced ya know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garymc8
We got OBL- not gop
11:20 AM on 05/09/2010
FUNNY, the trolls still think Obama is playing golf.
11:31 AM on 05/09/2010
He's not playing golf, he's out with Michelle on a "Date."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mr Universe
Shiny, let's be bad guys
11:45 AM on 05/09/2010
And, of course, he is denied the right to spend time with his family once he became President. Let me guess. If Malia starts behaving badly you'll be the first to say well he's a bad father for never spending time with his kids. Why don't you guys admit it. The man could cure cancer and it will NEVER be enough for you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KeysDan
11:08 AM on 05/09/2010
This is Bull. The administration sat on its rear, relying on the spiller to take care of it, with "oversight" by the Coast Guard that consisted on Admiral Mary Landry becoming the Dana Perino of the oil spill. The Minerals Management, the supposed regulator, was preparing to host its annual "Safety Awards" luncheon at the oil industry conference being held for 65,000 at Houston. It was not until ten days after that the awards were "postponed", so we do not know who the winner is, but we do know that BP was one of three finalists. One month before the spill, Obama announced that offshore drilling was very safe and presented his very own drill baby drill program It was all to be kept on the down low, since it would be so very embarrassing to be shown wrong with the Gulf becoming the Black Sea. Oh sure, BP is responsible for clean up costs, repeatedly stated by Obama, but if you believe that I have a bridge to sell you. No volunteers should be deployed to clean up, they do not know how to do it safely for themselves, and run the risk of respiratory and other diseases not unllike the fall out from the 9/ll volunteers. Good thing for BP, Transocean, and Haliburton that they are not foreign nations (Haliburton is for Haliburton) or we would declare war on them for the vast damage they have done and will continue to do to our country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:59 PM on 05/09/2010
Sadly, true. Obama is a big supporter of the fossil fuel industry, and future generations will not view him kindly at all. He is doing nothing to stop climate change and doesn't intend to do anything to stop the use of fossil fuels. Oil spills and coal mine disasters and extreme weather will continue unabated into infinity until we change our priorities in the U.S. Making the oil giants richer and protecting Massey Energy should not be a priority of the U.S. government, but that is what they are doing. Obama is right in there supporting Big Oil and the myth of "clean coal".

BP is an enemy of the United States and they need to be kicked out of the Gulf of Mexico completely. Watch that not happen.
11:08 AM on 05/09/2010
To "lead" you must be a visionary, not a reactionary.

In respect to the oil spill we are catching 'up,' (and are therefore 'behind') not preventing the damage (or assuming its potential damage before) before it happened.

"Assume the worse, hope for the best." As soon as this well blew one must assume there was the potential for a massive oil leak ... and even more so when the rig melted down and sank ... did the Administration do that? No. Now we get to play catch-up and hope newer technology saves our buns.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Eykis
Odd realm of Purgatory I reside in with HPo~
12:11 PM on 05/09/2010
Where are all of the FREE MARKET people SHOUTING IT IS THE FAULT OF LACK OF REGULATION by the Reagan/Bush/Bush Cabals and BP for LYING?


CAPITALISTS PIGS - show some guts - TAKE RESPONSIBILITY.
11:04 AM on 05/09/2010
It's a good thing the media always has Obama's back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mthespian
12:22 PM on 05/09/2010
Absolutely. By repeating endlessly baseless Right-Wing attacks, the media is clearly attempting to point out the lack of substantive policy ideas or even consistent application of principles evidenced by the Republican party and their Christianist cohorts in the Tea Party.
12:34 PM on 05/09/2010
Once you understand the left and the media are the same thing, all of the double standards make sense. So it took Obama nine days to talk about the gulf oil rig crisis. I don't think he has yet acknowledged the 30 deaths in Nashville due to the flooding, their worst disaster ever. But the aren't Obama's constituents, so why should he worry about them?

Has he visited either place yet? Whatever, Obama will not ever face the scrutiny Bush did for literally everything he did. The difference? The MSM. No wonder Fox News has 10 times the viewers as MSNBC and CNN.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Eykis
Odd realm of Purgatory I reside in with HPo~
12:54 PM on 05/09/2010
Fanned and faved, mthespian.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oopsiedaisy
10:37 AM on 05/09/2010
Dick Cheney hasn't been "weighing in" on this issue. He probably doesn't want to answer any questions about the decisions made during the Bush Administration. How did the closed door energy meetings affect the way deep ocean oil drilling occurs?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Eykis
Odd realm of Purgatory I reside in with HPo~
12:13 PM on 05/09/2010
FANNED - great post.

DarthDick cannot come and play - HALLIBURTON is the PROBLEM AGAIN and Dick makes tons off of them - so much money LizzieC can get on teevee shows and LIE for Daddy and call her Hatesite Against America a job.
12:41 PM on 05/09/2010
Dick Cheney was the adult in the room. Now we have kids running our govt. They don't know how to do it, but the all want power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transcendentobserver
10:32 AM on 05/09/2010
Wow Huffpo! This article was a classic example of journalism at its best. That it was reported and edited by AP is as surprising as it was objective, AP's penchant for right-of-center reportorial orientation being more characteristic. This sequence of events spotlights governmental responsibility and ensuing action likewise at its best.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oopsiedaisy
10:25 AM on 05/09/2010
Kudos to the US Coast Guard. They responded to this disaster immediately and continue to work diligently. Americans can be proud of these men and women and be assured that their tax dollars are well spent on the US Coast Guard.