iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Oil Spill Containment Options: BP Mulls Choices After Initial Failure

HARRY R. WEBER and RAY HENRY   05/ 9/10 09:41 PM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill Containment
Thick black waves of oil and brown whitecaps are seen off the side of the supply vessel Joe Griffin at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill containment efforts in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, Sunday, May 9, 2010. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — A day after icy slush clogged the massive box they hoped would contain an out-of-control oil gusher in the Gulf of Mexico, BP officials on Sunday said they may try again – this time with a smaller box.

They also were considering several other options to stop the daily rush of at least 200,000 gallons of crude, which began washing up on beaches in thick blobs over the weekend.

With crippled equipment littering the ocean floor, oil company engineers scrambled to devise a fresh method to cap the ruptured well. Their previous best hope for containing the leak quickly, a four-story containment box, became encrusted with deep-sea crystals Saturday and had to be cast aside.

Among the plans under consideration:

_ Deploying a new, smaller containment box in the hope that it would be less likely to get clogged. Officials said the new box could be in place by midweek.

"We're going to pursue the first option that's available to us and we think it'll be the top hat," the smaller box, BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles said.

_ Cutting the riser pipe, which extends from the mile-deep well, undersea and using larger piping to bring the gushing oil to a drill ship on the surface, a tactic considered difficult and less desirable because it will increase the flow of oil.

_ Shooting mud and concrete directly into the well's blowout preventer, a device that was supposed to shut off the flow of oil after a deadly April 20 oil rig explosion but failed. The technique, known as a "top kill," is supposed to plug up the well and would take two to three weeks.

_ Try again using the containment box that failed to work Saturday after finding a way to keep the crystals from building up.

The engineers appear to be "trying anything people can think of" to stop the leak, said Ed Overton, a LSU professor of environmental studies.

"Hopefully these are low-risk type of operations," he said. "We don't want to do anything to make it flow more."

An estimated 3.5 million gallons of oil have spilled since the explosion. At that pace, the spill would surpass the 11 million gallons spilled in the Exxon Valdez disaster by next month. BP is drilling a relief well that is considered a permanent fix, but that will take several weeks to complete.

BP PLC spokesman Mark Proegler said no decisions have been made on what step the company will take next. A decision could come as early as Monday.

Philip Johnson, a petroleum engineering professor at the University of Alabama, said cutting the riser pipe and slipping a larger pipe over the cut end could conceivably divert the flow of oil to the surface.

"That's a very tempting option," he said. "The risk is when you cut the pipe, the flow is going to increase. ... That's a scary option, but there's still a reasonable chance they could pull this off."

Johnson was less optimistic that a smaller containment box would be less susceptible to being clogged by icelike crystals.

"My suspicion is that it's likely to freeze up anyway," he said. "But I think they should be trying everything they can."

There was a renewed sense of urgency as dime- to golfball-sized balls of tar washed up Saturday on Dauphin Island, three miles off the Alabama mainland at the mouth of Mobile Bay and much farther east than the thin, rainbow sheens that have arrived sporadically in the Louisiana marshes. Until Saturday none of the thick sludge – those indelible images from the Valdez and other spills – had reached shore.

Above the oil leak, waves of dark brown and black sludge crashed into the support ship Joe Griffin. The fumes there were so intense that a crewmember and an AP photographer on board had to wear respirators while on deck.

A white cattle egret landed on the ship, brownish-colored stains of oil on its face and along its chest, wings and tail.

The containment box plan, never before tried at such depths, had been designed to siphon up to 85 percent of the leaking oil to a tanker at the surface. It had taken about two weeks to build the box and three days to cart it 50 miles out and slowly lower it to the well.

Icelike hydrates, a slushy mixture of gas and water, clogged the opening in the top of the peaked box like sand in a funnel, only upside-down.

BP officials were not giving up hopes that a containment box – either the one brought there or another one being built – could cover the well. Crews planned Sunday to secure the box about 1,600 feet from the massive leak site, much farther away from where it was placed Saturday, according to a daily activity sheet reviewed by The Associated Press.

The April 20 blowout was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP's internal investigation. Deep sea oil drillers often encounter pockets of methane crystals as they dig into the earth.

As the bubble rose, it intensified and grew, breaking through various safety barriers, said Robert Bea, a University of California Berkley engineering professor and oil pipeline expert who detailed the interviews exclusively to an AP reporter.

___

Henry reported from Venice, La. Associated Press writers John Curran and Michael Kunzelman in Louisiana, Jay Reeves and Brent Kallestad in Florida, and Sarah Larimer and AP video journalist Rich Matthews in Alabama contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — A day after icy slush clogged the massive box they hoped would contain an out-of-control oil gusher in the Gulf of Mexico, BP officials on Sunday said they may try again ...
ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — A day after icy slush clogged the massive box they hoped would contain an out-of-control oil gusher in the Gulf of Mexico, BP officials on Sunday said they may try again ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 218
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
12:10 AM on 05/25/2010
The admin at wikipedia by the name of Vegaswikian has deleted my suggestion...don't know if anyone cares....
03:22 AM on 05/21/2010
BP can use the same idea that is used when repairing the flat tire or sometimes ship hull holes. Use the pressure from the oil pipe itself to block the shaft on the inside. Since a sort of a plug can be delivered via the shaft/pipe itself, the plug can be delivered inside the pipe let's say a few hundred feet or less and then inflated. Delivered via the shaft or pipe itself..Then inflated and the pressure will plug the exit on the inside. Best way, since they already accessed via submarine gadgets the pipe…INFLATABLE PLUG IS THE ANSWER!!!
To deliver the plug...it has to be a rigid or semi rigid some type of rod by which it will be both pushed inside the pipe the deeper the better, especially if the pipe is not totally straigth and same size. Then the liquid or whatever best should pumped under pressure. By expanding inside the pipe at some distance inside, it will block the pipe, of course the oil pressure will try to push it and it will work best if some type of wedge could be followed so that inflated plug could not get out...the idea has to be looked at by engineers, but I strongly believe it is feasible. if there is a narrowing in the pipe then no wedge or anything is necessary, the plug will work by itself.
07:41 PM on 05/24/2010
Now wiki thinks my own comments belong to huffington post, which is bogus
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:17 AM on 05/12/2010
There is a new idea going around, for a quickly deployable flexible water permeable membrane or mesh to reduce the surrounding pressure just enough so that the oil generally wants to flow up. The Oil Corral, or permeable cone flow restrictor, pic here: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1416/4598773860_80eaf12df4.jpg I say we should ask BP to try this. It's atleast as effective as a giant metal dumpster they kept claiming was some kind of safety dome.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
10:35 PM on 05/11/2010
...I think they need to get the First Chinese Brother to swallow the sea...then they could walk out on the sea floor and fix the wellhead...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPc8DUUKdR4
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
10:30 PM on 05/11/2010
here's a few back of the envelope calculations to indicate what they're dealing with on the bottom of the ocean:

Let's assume the leak is close to the amount they claim:

210,000 gallons per day = almost 10,000 gallons per hour = 167 gallons per minute escaping from a pipe (I assume) about 8 inches diameter (ca. 24 inch circumference). Seem like a very high flow rate to me, and probably a conservative estimate.
05:28 PM on 05/11/2010
One option (out of the box) that should have been acted on first would have been to drive containment piles next to the open pipe. In this manner you surround the open pipe with a larger ring of larger pipe and then close in on the open pipe; eventually the pipe is either sleeved over by the larger pipe or is bent over and crimped shut stopping the flow. It is not easy but it can be done. A floating raft of pile driving barges controlled by tug boats by GPS positioning could be positioned over the open pipe. Chances are that the wreckage is not over the site because things never fall straight down for 5,000 ft. under water. The special problems of driving pile at 5,000 ft. (2,227 lbs. per sq in. Hydrospheric Pressure) can be overcome by engineering. It would take 83 sections of welded 60’ pipe and 82 pressure valves (controls hydrostatic pressure in pipe) to get to that dept and as the pile is hammered into the sea floor it seals the end of the pile. Even if there is no well head pipe and an open crack in the sand is pouring out oil and gas on the sea floor; by surrounding it with piling, eventually the circle will be closed and then by pouring cement inside the containment, the open flow could be stopped.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
10:22 PM on 05/11/2010
...at least as good an idea as they are trying...
I've read the wreckage of the platform is about 1500 feet from the wellhead. It's not clear how much pipe and casing might be littering the wellhead; there could be miles of it in the vicinity (literally).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iyamchazz
Criticism is a form of autobiography.
12:22 PM on 05/11/2010
Here's a solution: plug the hole with Rush Limbaugh.
That blockage will last for eternity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amaycatbaker
07:34 AM on 05/11/2010
Does anybody know of footage of under a hurricane? I found storm serge? And I found out that the hurricane can reach nine miles into the air, how does this affect the water? And if this is settled on the bottom could it be stirred up by strong currents?
06:51 AM on 05/11/2010
So here we have it, this toxin (COREXIT) disperses the crude oil, so that it will settle in thick ugly globules on the bottom of the ocean, killing off marine life, but the shore line will remain pristine?

The fishing industry will be kaputzeed! Severe loss of jobs and loss of food for the supply chain, but the beaches will look pretty for the tourists!

http://just-me-in-t.blogspot.com/2010/05/corexit-dispersant-known-to-be-toxic.html
10:45 AM on 05/11/2010
The whole area will be toxic even if it looks pristine. Any smart tourist will stay away from this area. If we did this in the UK area they would expect all of our resources to clean it up and we would jump because that is what we do. They are treating us like their colony. Like children they are blaming the companies they subcontracted. There is no credibility or honor in these people.
10:46 AM on 05/11/2010
It's not just the beaches. A 1996 spill in Rhode Island waters wasn't crude, it was heating oil that amazingly dispurses and evaporates. Even in winter. The spill did a fraction of the damage initally feared. But the damage is done along the shore and in the marshes were the natural hatcheries are located. Trying to contain it offshore is only that, containing the damage. It's not an either-or, the oil won't all magically by-pass the ocean and ocean floor to land on the beaches, and it won't stay on the sand, it'll go into the marshes.

From a Rhode Island DEM press release ten years after the spill when the restoration was completed. Ten years.

"The 1996 North Cape oil spill occurred when the 340-foot North Cape oil barge ran aground off Moonstone Beach, after its tug caught fire during a severe winter storm. Over 828,000 gallons of home heating oil spilled into local waters, killing an estimated nine million lobsters, millions of surf clams, fish, birds, and other organisms"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wassilij
shamanlight
05:31 AM on 05/12/2010
Whats needed is a corporate death penalty.......If any corporation like BP or Halburton causes a disaster to occur.....The entire corporation including all assets are dismantled and all assets liquidated to pay for the cleanup and economic losses felt by those whose livelihoods they have destroyed.........making it RETROACTIVE!!!.......NO more Halburton...or BP or whatever CORPORATIONS were involved!!!
Not a single one of these Rat B@stards could man up and take responsibility for this disaster that has ruined the entire southern coast of the US...How much longer are WE the people going to allow these CORPORATIONS to destroy our life support system?.......DESTROY THESE CORPORATIONS....Starting NOW !!....No second chances....no 75 mile limit BS,,,,
If this was the policy from the beginning....Safety measures and plans ABC and D would be in place.....the only plan they had was called GREED
.......One coast down ......Two to Go.....Are you willing to take that risk? Make them pay...with a CORPORATE DEATH PENALTY!!!....RETROACTIVE!!
08:10 PM on 05/10/2010
We bailed them out in WW2 and this is how the British repay us by destroying our homeland. They are no good.
photo
Punisher703
Sad But True
05:33 PM on 05/10/2010
Maybe they could just seal the top of the containment dome and then cover it with concrete somehow, say by injecting concrete into a second, larger dome. Even if it leaks a little around the bottom of the dome it buys time...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mensch99
05:29 PM on 05/10/2010
Captain! The containment field is breakin’ down!
There's just too much pressure!

We have to try something else Scotty, and fast!

If we recalibrate the Heisenberg compensators, divert power from the warp-core to the collector dish we may be able use the tractor beam to collect the oil.

Make it so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
05:23 PM on 05/10/2010
Yikes, listening to them sure doesn't inspire any confidence. It's like having junior high school kids in charge of a nuclear power plant.
04:47 PM on 05/10/2010
Cool solution to clean up oil disaster. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQuk68SjyEY
04:23 PM on 05/10/2010
“Two solutions to the Funnel failure....Problem Cristaline formations plugged Exit Orfice.
Solution 1 Send submersible with heating element to wrap around orfice. once oil flows it can be shut off.
Solution 2. Attach the business end of the biggest concetre Vibratror near the the opening. The Vibrations will cause the Cristals (Ice) to break free and allow the oil to flow. Any body want to pass this forward? Half an Idea is better than none.”