iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Suburbs Losing Young Whites To Cities, Brookings Institution Finds

Suburbs

AP / Huffington Post   First Posted: 07/09/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:25 PM ET

WASHINGTON - White flight? In a reversal, America's suburbs are now more likely to be home to minorities, the poor and a rapidly growing older population as many younger, educated whites move to cities for jobs and shorter commutes.

An analysis of 2000-2008 census data by the Brookings Institution highlights the demographic "tipping points" seen in the past decade and the looming problems in the 100 largest metropolitan areas, which represent two-thirds of the U.S. population.

The findings could offer an important road map as political parties, including the tea party movement, seek to win support in suburban battlegrounds in the fall elections and beyond. In 2008, Barack Obama carried a substantial share of the suburbs, partly with the help of minorities and immigrants.

The analysis being released Sunday provides the freshest detail on the nation's growing race and age divide, which is now feeding tensions in Arizona over its new immigration law.

Ten states, led by Arizona, surpass the nation in a "cultural generation gap" in which the senior populations are disproportionately white and children are mostly minority.

This gap is pronounced in suburbs of fast-growing areas in the Southwest, including those in Florida, California, Nevada, and Texas.

"A new metro map is emerging in the U.S. that challenges conventional thinking about where we live and work," said Alan Berube, research director with the Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings, a nonpartisan think-tank based in Washington. "The old concepts of suburbia, Sun Belt and Rust Belt are outdated and at odds with effective governance."

Suburbs still tilt white. But, for the first time, a majority of all racial and ethnic groups in large metro areas live outside the city. Suburban Asians and Hispanics already had topped 50 percent in 2000, and blacks joined them by 2008, rising from 43 percent in those eight years.

Suburbs are home to the vast majority of baby boomers age 55 to 64, a fast-growing group that will strain social services after the first wave of boomers turns 65 next year.

Analysts attribute the racial shift to suburbs in many cases to substantial shares of minorities leaving cities, such as blacks from New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Whites, too, are driving the trend by returning or staying put in larger cities.

Washington, D.C., and Atlanta posted the largest increases in white share since 2000, each up 5 percentage points to 44 percent and 36 percent, respectively. Other white gains were seen in New York, San Francisco, Boston and cities in another seven of the nation's 100 largest metro areas.

"A new image of urban America is in the making," said William H. Frey, a demographer at Brookings who co-wrote the report. "What used to be white flight to the suburbs is turning into 'bright flight' to cities that have become magnets for aspiring young adults who see access to knowledge-based jobs, public transportation and a new city ambiance as an attraction."

"This will not be the future for all cities, but this pattern in front runners like Atlanta, Portland, Ore., Raleigh, N.C., and Austin, Texas, shows that the old urban stereotypes no longer apply," he said.

The suburbs now have the largest poor population in the country. According to the analysis, between 1999 and 2008, the suburban poor grew by 25 percent; five times the growth rate of the poor in cities. During that same time period, the median household income in the U.S. declined by $2,241.

Of the top 100 metro areas, 42 experienced a drop in the size of their middle class, according to the Brookings analysis. Of those 42 cities, 10 saw the middle class decline by at least 5 percentage points.

The size of the middle class (households earning between 80 and 150 percent of median income) dropped almost 30 percent between 1999 and 2008.

The findings are part of Brookings' broad demographic portrait of America since 2000, when the country experienced the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, a historic boom in housing prices and the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

Calling 2010 the "decade of reckoning," the report urges policymakers to shed outdated notions of America's cities and suburbs and work quickly to address the coming problems caused by the dramatic shifts in population.

Among its recommendations: affordable housing and social services for older people in the suburbs; better transit systems to link cities and suburbs; and a new federal Office of New Americans to serve the education and citizenship needs of the rapidly growing immigrant community.

Other findings:

_About 83 percent of the U.S. population growth since 2000 was minority, part of a trend that will see minorities become the majority by midcentury. Across all large metro areas, the majority of the child population is now nonwhite.

_ City residents are more likely to live in "deep" poverty, while a higher share of suburban residents have incomes just below the poverty line.

_For the first time in several decades, the population is growing at a faster rate than households, due to delays in marriage, divorce and births as well as longer life spans. People living alone and nonmarried couple families are among the fastest-growing in suburbs.

___

On the Net:

Brookings Institution report: http://www.brookings.edu/metroamerica

Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON - White flight? In a reversal, America's suburbs are now more likely to be home to minorities, the poor and a rapidly growing older population as many younger, educated whites move to citie...
WASHINGTON - White flight? In a reversal, America's suburbs are now more likely to be home to minorities, the poor and a rapidly growing older population as many younger, educated whites move to citie...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,912
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (72 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:32 AM on 05/11/2010
Suburbs were suppose to be more sustainable during a depression than the cities. Cities have become expensive, crowded, and piled people on top of one another! If you are not retired though, gas and taxes are making it impossible for working folks to stay employed and commute. I prefer wide open spaces!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
09:51 PM on 05/10/2010
Suburbs are actually the failure of urban planning in America. It's a real world example of "It seemed like a good idea at the time." Now as we are planning for liveability, sustainability and a green future, we realize that one of the stumbling blocks for that is suburbs and urban sprawl. Suburbs seemed great in the 50's. There was cheap gas, powerful cars, and uncongested roadways. The suburbs are designed in a way that makes it hardest to get from point A to point B, and they are designed for the automobile. Elderly suburb dwellers will not give up their cars because there is low walkability. Too bad because walking would be good exercise.

http://www.walkscore.com/

All the cars moving from suburb to city and back on congested highways increases air pollution. Young white are moving back to the cities because of unbearable commute times.
08:02 PM on 05/10/2010
Young Whites might be moving more in to cities, but they definitely aren't reproducing themselves - urban Whites in the USA and Europe have the lowest fertility levels on Earth, very far below replacement level. Many urban Whites (the majority?) have no children at all. When in American and European cities you see few if any White children unless it is around a private school of some kind.

Meanwhile, the non-Whites in the suburbs (and cities) are having huge families - thus, the future is going to belong to them. A good article on this: http://www.sappho.dk/interview-a-continent-of-losers.htm
07:12 PM on 05/10/2010
There is something funny going on in modern cities in America and elsewhere: while a certain demographic of Whites may indeed be moving back in to cities (while many poor non-Whites are moving out in to the suburbs or have been forced out by White gentrification), nearly all of the people you see doing all of the actual hard work in the cities are (usually) the non-Whites.

While the urban Whites get paid a comfortable middle-class salary to sit in a cubicle, shuffle some paper, and surf the internet, the non-Whites are very often the ones doing construction, unloading the shipped-in food from the trucks, stocking shelves, running the registers, fixing the cars, and of course making the lattes for the White urban yuppies.

Strange set-up, isn't it? Reminiscent of a thing they used to call 'serfdom.' Only in another few decades childless urban Whites are going to become such a numerical minority in the USA as a whole that I'm not so sure the aforementioned 'serfish' system is going to last.
06:44 PM on 05/10/2010
"What makes the man of the world-cities incapable of living on any but this artificial footing is that the cosmic beat in his being is every decreasing, while the tensions of his waking-consciousness become more and more dangerous. ... This then, is the conclusion of the city's history; growing from primitive barter-centre to Culture-city and at last to world-city, it sacrifices first the blood and soul of its creators to the needs of its majestic evolution, and then the last flower of that growth to the spirit of civilization--and so, doomed, moves on to final self-destruction." - http://www.duke.edu/~aparks/SPENGO.html

"All cultures come to a Civilization phase, an autumn when this breaks down. Mega-cities are characteristic of this time. Politics is motivated by money, and move through Imperialism and the Period of Contending States to Caesarism, a period of despots. Science no longer reaches certainties. People no longer accept common principles or goals, they fight all rules from the past. The arts, rather than working in ways that seem obvious to the artists and the people, follow fashions with constant changes of style. Later in this culture after a period of atheism, people turn to a religious renewal based on the religion developed in the spring of the culture." - http://www.duke.edu/~aparks/Spengler.html
06:42 PM on 05/10/2010
With the convergence of major environmental problems, future energy crises, social instability, and so on, the last place most good people would want to raise a healthy family would be in a major city, in a place where you are hyper-dependent on the increasingly disjointed and chaotic 'system' for basic survival.

A noted writer and thinker, J. M. Greer, recently wrote:

"We – meaning here those of us who live in the world’s industrial nations – have allowed our societies to become more complex than any collection of human minds can effectively manage, and our only response to the problems this causes is to add additional layers of complexity. The result, of course, is that our societies become even more unmanageable, and the problems they generate even more extreme and intractable. Once again, rinse and repeat until something comes unglued." - http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2010/05/principle-of-subsidiary-function.html

As mass-industrial society becomes increasingly unstable in the coming years and decades, the first places that will become "unglued" as referenced in the above quote are going to be the big cities. Order will be restored in them, but at a hefty price: likely under some kind of Soviet-esque and/or totalitarian/fascist type of police-state. Tread carefully, urbanites.

"Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty." - Plato
06:41 PM on 05/10/2010
"Suburbs losing young whites to cities"...until those young Whites finally settle down, get married, and start having kids at which point they'll move back out to the 'burbs once they realize cities are very often not a healthy place to raise well-adjusted children.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
King Cashaw
04:07 PM on 05/10/2010
This trend for Atlanta started just before the Olympics, and has continued to today. It is interesting to see how Cabbage Patch Town, L5p, Innman Park, East Atlanta(off Moreland Ave too 285), The Ga. Tech Area, Decatur City, and the Lindeberg Area, known as "inside the Perimeter", have changed since I moved to Atlanta in 1984. Most of these areas, if Whites were living in them, they were poor, and the Middle Class Whites/Blacks lived "outside the Perimeter" in Sandy Springs, Rosewell, Clayton County, Douglas County, ect.. It has changed so much living outside the Perimeter is almost a stigma. Half of the places in mentioned inside the Perimeter burgites would not enter unless under heavy arm.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniela Smith
05:42 PM on 05/10/2010
That is so true! I know so many ITPers that look at me like I'm crazy since I live way outside of the perimeter. These days it's cool to live ITP, even my BF (who lived in the city of Decatur) give me grief for moving OTP. Living OTP is truly frowned upon by many. :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
03:48 PM on 05/10/2010
Just curious. Those people who knock suburban tract homes for all looking alike, don't seem to notice that an apartment building or a condo complex has units that all look alike and maybe have the same floor plans. The only difference is that the variety is more closely spaced than in suburbia when you might have to go a few blocks to see a different tract and style of architecture.

I live in a suburb of Los Angeles which grew from a small town to about 150,000 since the late 80s and what I do like is that the newer homes are more energy efficient and up to date with earthquake codes and improvement in the last 20 years. While old homes have their charm, they also have old electrical wiring, plumbing, maybe old or even no insulation etc. I also like underground utilities, something I don't notice until I go to an older city and see all the visual pollution from overhead wires. The newer retail and commercial buildings are also efficient and well designed
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
02:53 PM on 05/10/2010
So, the poor now live in the suburbs. Is that a bad thing? That's what the article seems to imply. So, where should the poor live? In expensive downtown real estate? On beach-front property? On hillsides with view lots? Come on. Let's hear the answer.

It always seems that the focus is on how to accommodate the poor and not on how to support them in moving out of poverty, in which case, these kinds of articles wouldn't appear.

In Santa Cruz, CA where I grew up, they built low income housing in an area called the 'beach flats' which is a block from the ocean and probably an unwise use of expensive real estate. Then, there's the drugs and the gangs and whatnot to deal with. Brilliant move.

When you look around at all the stupidity by those in government and business, it seems pretty hopeless that anything really smart will ever happen.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
12:54 PM on 05/10/2010
As one of these "young whites" still stuck in the 'burbs, I can tell you that I would much prefer an apartment downtown! It is much cheaper to rent out a room in a house in a cr@ppy suburb though!
12:30 PM on 05/10/2010
Cities are becoming more Metropolitan, more entertaining, and are growing, which is attracting people in need of jobs.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
johnqpublik
12:09 PM on 05/10/2010
Suburbs are good for families, cities aren't.

Minorities are reproducing, whites aren't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
12:01 PM on 05/10/2010
I have said for a long time that the answer to many of our problems lie in livable cities. Inner city rapid transit, more parks and walking villages within major matropolitan centers can make for a very nice lifestyle. People who live in New York City have a 75% smaller carbon footprint than someone in a detached single family home in the suburbs. Cities have a far more artistic and cultural opportunities. Too bad it's so expensive to live in a major city. Another problem that has not been addressed in major cities is the access to inexpensive fresh food.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:08 PM on 05/10/2010
The food issue won't be a problem. As the yuppies and hipsters move in the whole foods and harris teeters will go up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
urnumbersix
"I am not a Number. I am a Free Man!"
01:54 PM on 05/10/2010
Actually - I visit NYC often. My cousin lives in mid-town Manhattan.
I am always shocked at the high quality of fresh fruits, vegetables and flowers available on most every corner each day! Reasonably priced too (for NYC).

My cousin reminds me that New York City is one of the biggest port towns. Stuff from all over the world arrives by 3am. The city has evolved a network of vendors to get fresh produce into most every part of the city, ready to be sold, by daybreak. They've been doing this for centuries....

Very high quality-of-life in Manhattan.
Agree - that you'd better be rich to live there!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
02:59 PM on 05/10/2010
In Boston you have to go a few miles out of downtown to find a supermarket and who wants to do grocery shoping in a cab or public transit?
11:32 AM on 05/10/2010
"Apparently whites have increasing fears about living near high concentrations of meth, MILFs and former professional athletes. Many have reported that a move to the city also means they have no obligation to know anyone around them, water anything or give out candy to children on Halloween."

TheWeekinRebuke.com