iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Climate Bill Would Allow States To Veto Offshore Oil Drilling Up To 75 Miles From Coast

MATTHEW DALY and FREDERIC J. FROMMER   05/11/10 07:47 PM ET   AP

Oil Spill Protest

WASHINGTON — A long-awaited energy and climate bill to be made public on Wednesday would allow states directly affected by offshore drilling to veto drilling plans of nearby states if they can show significant negative impacts from an accident.

The bill, sponsored by Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., also would allow coastal states to opt out of drilling being allowed up to 75 miles from their shores – a concession to lawmakers concerned about offshore drilling in the wake of the Gulf Coast oil spill.

Kerry and Lieberman have closely guarded the bill's details before Wednesday's announcement. The Associated Press obtained a copy of a summary being circulated Tuesday on Capitol Hill.

In a break from current policy, states that allow offshore drilling will receive a share of federal revenue, the summary shows. That provision is likely to spark debate from interior senators, mostly in the West, who object to revenue sharing for offshore drilling.

Kerry and Lieberman have said they will press ahead with the climate bill despite losing the support of their only Republican partner, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Graham, who had been negotiating with Kerry and Lieberman for months, said last week he believes it is impossible to pass the legislation now because of partisan disagreements over offshore drilling and whether to take up immigration reform.

Kerry disagreed, saying in a statement late Tuesday that the Gulf oil spill underscores how desperately the nation needs to break its dependence on fossil fuels.

"For climate, it's the bottom of the ninth inning and the bases are loaded if we can just push these runs across the plate," he said.

The bill, to be called the American Power Act, is a chance for Congress to show it can still address major issues, while also creating American jobs, strengthening national security and protecting the environment, Kerry said.

He cited an "unprecedented" coalition of bill supporters, ranging from environmentalists to business leaders and military officials. Tom Kuhn, president of the Edison Electric Institute, which represents U.S. shareholder-owned electric companies, is expected to join Kerry and Lieberman for Wednesday's announcement, suggesting the industry group's support.

"People from across the ideological spectrum are standing by us, ready to line up in support of this plan. Any time you see me and T. Boone Pickens urging the Senate to pass something, you know it's a genuine effort to bridge the old divides," Kerry said.

Pickens, a well-known Texas oilman, paid millions in support of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, a group that attacked Kerry's Vietnam War record in the 2004 presidential campaign. Pickens now supports huge increases in wind power and natural gas that would benefit from the climate bill.

The legislation aims to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and more than 80 percent by 2050.

For the first time it would set a price on carbon emissions for large polluters such as coal-fired power plants. Rates initially would range from $12 per ton of carbon emissions to $25 per ton, depending on market prices. Restrictions would not take effect until 2013 for power plants and transportation fuels, and 2016 for manufacturers.

Allowances would be granted to local electricity companies, which would be required to use them to help rate payers. In addition, a separate consumer relief provision would provide rebates to eligible families.

Kerry and Lieberman said the bill would exempt farms and most small and medium-sized businesses, concentrating efforts on the largest polluters.

The bill would offer incentives of up to $2 billion per year for companies that develop so-called clean coal technologies, including methods to capture and store carbon emissions.

The legislation has several provisions aimed at boosting nuclear power. It increases funding for nuclear loan guarantees to $54 billion, the same amount President Barack Obama has proposed, and calls on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to speed the licensing process for new plants.

The bill also would provide a 10 percent tax credit for certain nuclear power construction expenses, allow tax-exempt bonds for public-private partnerships for advanced nuclear power facilities, and provide grants in place of tax credits for some nuclear expenses.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — A long-awaited energy and climate bill to be made public on Wednesday would allow states directly affected by offshore drilling to veto drilling plans of nearby states if they can s...
WASHINGTON — A long-awaited energy and climate bill to be made public on Wednesday would allow states directly affected by offshore drilling to veto drilling plans of nearby states if they can s...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 343
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
08:55 AM on 05/15/2010
"I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth."
— Pres. Kennedy, May 25, 1961

Today our government believes their goal is achieved when a new tax is past, not when the not when the vision becomes a reality.
photo
sassafra
I yam what I yam and tha's all what I yam
11:19 PM on 05/14/2010
neither ethanol nor nuclear (fission) reactors will ever be the answer to the u.s. energy equation.

in ethanol's case, it's extremely corrosive on engines, storage, and transport equipment, relatively low in energy return as to production costs compared to other fuels, and raises ethical concerns as in the u.s. the bulk of ethanol comes from corn which drives up feed costs.

fission plants simply produce far too potent long-lived toxins with hideous storage problems.


a better energy policy would be to develop petroleum fuel cells of varying sizes, for cars, homes, buildings, power plants, that would utilize our existing reserves more efficiently. for example an automobile internal combustion engine's efficiency is 20% a PEM fuel cell with a gasoline-to-hydrogen reformer on board. (PEM = proton exchange membrane fuel cell, the fuel cell type that has been getting most of the attention for auto and home use.) is 31%, a saving of 11%.
ergo, by eliminating internal combustion engines and replacing oil burning furnaces in homes with electricity generating fuel cells the u.s. could become at least 11% more foreign oil independent merely by using it's supplies more efficiently utilizing existing technology, an incredible boost to the nation's economic well-being. as a plus fuel cell powered cars emit 110 g/m co2 emissions as opposed to internal combustion engines now at 220 g/km, a cut of 50% emissions of greenhouse gasses, a gift to mother earth
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Perceiver
12:26 AM on 05/15/2010
A carbon tax is the solution, not cap & trade. http://www.carbontax.org/
http://science.howstuffworks.com/carbon-tax.htm
12:32 AM on 05/25/2010
Wait, what? Spent fuel has storage problems? It doesn't exactly take up much room or do anything. It just sits there.
01:44 PM on 05/14/2010
"American Power Act"? Is that what they're calling Cap & Trade now ? Why can't Washington just tell the truth and call it the "Wealth Re-distribution on a larger scale than ever imagined" bill ???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Perceiver
12:25 AM on 05/15/2010
Margaret Thatcher speech on the environment & science: http://www.margaretthatcher.org/speeches/displaydocument.asp?docid=107346

A carbon tax is the solution, not cap & trade. http://www.carbontax.org/
http://science.howstuffworks.com/carbon-tax.htm
07:13 PM on 05/13/2010
It's a Lieberman bill! what more do you need to know to reject it!

Stop supporting fossil and nukes and start supporting green energy.

rooftop pv, offshore wind and Waste Bio char can supply the worlds energy needs, within 12 years, clean, safe, cheap and forever.

solar and wind a 3-6 cents, and waste bio char is cheaper than dumping and the most carbon negative technology known.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Perceiver
12:25 AM on 05/15/2010
Call on those politicians to get a carbon tax going, not cap & trade. http://www.carbontax.org/
http://science.howstuffworks.com/carbon-tax.htm
02:19 AM on 05/15/2010
agreed. do you know of any petitions, auto email sites?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:02 PM on 05/13/2010
This bill, just like it's namesakes, is a joke.

The climate hysteria is ebbing and rightfully so, time to move on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TankGirlz
Lyrical Combat
04:26 PM on 05/13/2010
So DISTANCE is going to save anything if it happens again??? God what's wrong with these politicians???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:45 PM on 05/13/2010
If you only need to go 3 miles off shore to be in 'international waters', should not the 'international community' get a say in this?

Is the American mindset REALLY so cemented in this 'it's OUR WORLD' concept that we think oil spills only affect AMERICAN properties, livelihoods and commerce?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rangergirl
Needs of many outweigh needs of few or one
02:23 PM on 05/13/2010
Congress needs to really be tuff on the industry... They need to practice stringent saftey procedures... Halliburton shouldn't get any contracts they can't do much of anything right except steal taxpayer money and screw up their work......
02:00 PM on 05/13/2010
I would have liked the bill to be more stringent, especially in the short term, but at least this is a step in the right direction. At least there are emissions reduction targets not vague goals and meaningless words. We will see if this bill can actually be implemented with so much opposition from conservatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
01:49 PM on 05/13/2010
Here's the gist - prices go up, costs go up, profits go up, bank profits go up. taxes go up. the environment remains the same as anyone with a brain understands already and you get the shaft - This is another branch of Obamanomics - right along with free healthcare, economy stimulus, giving bankers bailouts and bonuses. Make a difference in 2010 and vote out all incumbents of every party. If you want change quit complaining - reshuffle the deck big time.
12:31 PM on 05/13/2010
We don't need 'cap and trade' what needs to be implemented is some sort of "fee and dividend" system perhaps similar to the one they are using in British Columbia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:46 PM on 05/13/2010
We need 'Cap'. Trade is the BS part.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Perceiver
12:24 AM on 05/15/2010
A carbon tax is the solution. http://www.carbontax.org/
http://science.howstuffworks.com/carbon-tax.htm
11:37 AM on 05/13/2010
Nothing whatsoever unusual has happened to climate, and there is no sign of anything unusual happening to our weather. We have a variable system which is never in equilibrium. Alarmists have merely taken advantage of that to give themselves the heady joy of saving the planet. Seductive though that is, it is also fatuous. We should drill offshore and onshore, we should seek the most efficient energy sources, including coal-fired power stations and nuclear. We should then concentrate with less distraction on more important problems.
11:38 AM on 05/13/2010
You are a f00l.
11:58 AM on 05/13/2010
Your spelling is like your charm: atrocious.
12:29 PM on 05/13/2010
You really have no idea what your talking about do you?
03:20 PM on 05/13/2010
Not correct. I have engaged in deep study of these matters, and I choose my words with care.
11:37 AM on 05/13/2010
With exception to the areas of the gulf around west Louisiana and east Texas, a 75 mile restriction consistently allows drilling in VERY DEEP WATER, as most of these areas in the eastern gulf are considered to be DEEP WATER CANYONS.

So...what exactly is smart about such a limitation? Don't get me wrong, with the exception of near shore, already densely populated oil patches off of Texas & Louisiana [states who sold their souls for oil long ago], I'm for banning drilling off of the US coastline altogether. But with the scenario defined in this bill states wishing to limit or exclude drilling off of their shoreline are only setting themselves up for more disasters like the one currently unfolding in the GoM.
10:35 AM on 05/13/2010
It's Bush's fault.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bbrecht
"pray for the dead, fight like hell for the liv
08:39 AM on 05/13/2010
Wow, is this the best you can do? I am outraged by this bill, "America Power Grab." Only someone as sleazy as Kerry and Lieberman would try to pass a bill that allows for an expansion of off shore drilling while our coast lies in peril. This bill is a bonanza for big oil big coal and other polluters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:47 PM on 05/13/2010
PRECISELY. Smelled a rat the minute I saw those 2 vermin attached to this bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Perceiver
12:22 AM on 05/15/2010
A carbon tax is the solution, not cap & trade. http://www.carbontax.org/