More

Donor Strike: Rich Progressives Pledge To Withhold Cash

First Posted: 05/12/10 09:40 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:25 PM ET

Money

A group of 27 major donors is vowing to withhold campaign cash from lawmakers who stand in the way of legislation that would allow for public funding of congressional campaigns. Over their careers, the donors have contributed millions to Democratic candidates -- and, on limited occasions, Republicans or independents -- but they say they've had it. And they don't mind if it means a lack of access.

Steve Kirsch kicked in roughly $10 million to try to elect Al Gore in 2000. "It is a trade off, because there are a lot of good things you can talk to them about, but most of the time they don't do anything about it anyway. Given the choice, I'd rather have campaign finance reform than access," said Kirsch, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur and founder of Infoseek, among other companies.

The millions that the donors have given is just the beginning, and doesn't include the millions more they've funneled by organizing fundraisers or otherwise corralling contributions.

The 27 donors plan to lobby other rich folks to sign on, with a plan of passing the Fair Elections Now Act, which has 149 cosponsors, this year. The campaign's being run by Change Congress, co-founded by Lawrence Lessig and Joe Trippi, along with Common Cause and the Public Campaign Action Fund.

ChangeCongress, now that the effort is public, will be encouraging donors to pledge. Read the letter here.

It was kicked off by donors Alan Hassenfeld, the former chairman of Hasbro, and Arnold Hiatt, the former head of the Stride Rite Corporation. The pair wrote to friends and colleagues, urging them to stop giving. (Wealthy donors have politely asked

"We're writing with a very unusual request -- that you pledge not to give any campaign contributions to any candidate for Congress until they have committed to support public funding for congressional elections," they wrote. "Once we have a critical mass of large contributors who have signed this pledge, the partner organizations will then launch an Internet-based campaign to get others to join as well. A pilot of this program was initiated last year. Very quickly, tens of thousands committed to the pledge. ChangeCongress.org's technology will enable us to estimate the value of their pledges, and whom it hits directly. The site will also make it easy for pledgers to lobby Senators and Representatives to join the bill."

The pair said they were sad to have to take the step. "If, 15 months into the Obama Administration, we were looking at a long list of accomplishments, with a long list of probable victories coming -- as many of us dreamed last November -- then we would not be asking you to take this step. But the picture is not nearly so promising because of the power of private money in the political system. We have all been part of that system. It is time for us to take the lead to change it," they wrote.

The list of the donors who have signed on so far would be familiar to any Democratic fundraiser: Besides Kirsch, Hassenfeld and Hiatt, there's JJ Abrams, Edgar Bronfman, Nancy Bagley, Ben Cohen, Peter Copen, Rosemary Faulkner, George Hatch, John S. Johnson, Joe Keefe, Steven Ko, John Luongo, Rhonda Luongo, Katie McGrath, Arnie Miller, Dan Nova, Dave Orton, Lisa Orton, William Polk, Greg Price, Vin Ryan, Paul Sack, Jonathan Soros, Christopher Vargas and Sophia Yen.

In February, a similar group banded together and asked nicely for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to move on the Fair Elections Now Act. So much for that.

Kirsch said that the access his money buys -- and the access he could lose -- is overrated. With so many donors with so many opinions, the best they can do is nod, offer to look into it, and put a donor in touch with a staff member. "In the meeting, they say they agree completely," said Kirsch. "'Let me do more research and thinking. Thanks for bringing to my attention.' There tends not to be a lot of follow through."

Take Gore, for instance, said Kirsch, using him as an example of the way the system works for major donors who are pushing progressive politics rather than looking for a loophole, an earmark or some other legislative favor. "I gave Al Gore, through various means, over 10 million dollars. Al Gore has never sought my advice on anything. So to think that any large amount will cause them to pay attention to you is not true," said Kirsch.

Murray Galinson, a big giver and former president of the United Jewish Federation, said he's not certain the effort will work, but it's worth a shot. "If you don't give it a try, nothing's going to help," he said.

Galinson said he was finally pushed to make the pledge by the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, which allowed limitless corporate funds to pour into campaigns.

Without the strike, the donors are doing little more than furthering a flawed system, said Kirsch. "It's silly, because I'm just helping perpetuate the system. The more money I give, the more I allow them to maintain the status quo. My money's working against me," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
A group of 27 major donors is vowing to withhold campaign cash from lawmakers who stand in the way of legislation that would allow for public funding of congressional campaigns. Over their careers, th...
A group of 27 major donors is vowing to withhold campaign cash from lawmakers who stand in the way of legislation that would allow for public funding of congressional campaigns. Over their careers, th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 412
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
FoonTheElder 12:15 PM on 05/12/2010
Real public funding of campaigns will never occur as long as big corporations own Congress and the Supreme Court. It really doesn't matter whether the candidates support public funding or not, the big corporations won't give up their control of government that easily.

The mass media has too much money to lose with free or reduced price advertising, which is another reason why free  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tierce
We need less government, that empowers the ppl
01:32 PM on 05/13/2010
Just goes to show , it's all about money, however, I do sense a bit of merging ethics in this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nelson Jacobsen
been online for a long, long time
11:37 AM on 05/13/2010
It's a start., however, anyone that thinks there's a huge difference between the DNC & RNC are not paying attention to the donor list. For this to work large donors from all parties agree to get their money out of politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onenvrnos
Hope for a better world.
10:38 AM on 05/13/2010
Good good good good good good...it's all starting to be very good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
judesedit
09:54 AM on 05/13/2010
I must say. That doesn't sound very progressive to me. I was always under the impression that wealthy people were intelligent. They must not want to keep their money very much, if they are going to help the country tank again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:44 AM on 05/13/2010
Rethink that position.

Try to think like a wealthy person.

Then see if you can figure out why it doesn't matter....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2lib4oh
09:50 AM on 05/13/2010
Kirsch is right.This is the way to get Congress to listen to you.This is real citizen action.
I still can't understand how we ended up with a crappy health care bill or a weak credit card bill when Americans clearly need good health care and better consumer protection.

Why feed the beast? You can still vote for who you feel is right and donate to individuals you think are doing the right thing.Look at Alan Grayson.He gets "money boombs" when he goes after worthwhile causes.Why use a sledge hammer when a scalpel will do?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
judesedit
10:06 AM on 05/13/2010
Okay. I agree we need strong members of Congress that will do the right things for the MAJORITY of Americans. One little thing though. Right now, we've had to work with what we have right now. After all, many of the so-called Conservative Dems or Blue Dogs are really Republicans that were talked into being Democrats. Trying to get something done with the Party of No willing to screw the people at every turn, isn't an easy task. They're majorly sore losers acting like spoiled brats throwing tantrums getting ready to take their last breath of air . Considering that fact, I think the dems are doing pretty well. Not great, but well. Get too impatient and see what you wind up with. I say, search for good candidates with integrity and back bone. Not big dollar signs in their eyes. Just like Grayson got his money bomb, so can they. These new bills are not perfect, but we can build from there. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
judesedit
09:50 AM on 05/13/2010
Hold it too long and the Republicans MAY get back the majority. After all, they have been doing nothing but misleading the drugged up American people even more since Obama was elected. Let them get in and no one, not just progressives, will have ANY of their money left to do anything with. People thought they lost alot last time. Just watch if the altenative voters get lazy and don't vote or donate. And if you think there will be some government agency to help you, think again. The GOP is dying to kill any and all social programs. You'd better wake up, citizens of the U.S. We are just starting to crawl up out of the abyss the GOP threw us into. Stop listening to their bs. NOW!!!! Pay attention. More and more of the truth is coming out every day.
ThePeacemakers
Concerned Citizen
12:28 PM on 05/13/2010
"The GOP is dying to kill any and all social programs."

And the Obama Admin. has put together a deficit commission designed to help them do it.
Paulo1
Thanks for reading, (even if you disagree)
08:51 AM on 05/13/2010
Ad it to the pile.

I get lambasted for saying that the base is going to stay home come November but this is a sure sign I am correct. We will each do so for our own reasons. Gay rights, Anti War, Environment, war crimes ect. These rich dudes are doing it for campaign reform. Add it all together and you begin to see that Obama and Co. has alienated the base of the Party with both the ground forces and the money bailing out on him fast. We are in deep trouble come November.

This is what you get when you squander your time searching for the mythical bipartazanship and don't deliver to your base.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:57 AM on 05/13/2010
I think that the try for bipartisanship was a ruse to cover the fact that O has a DINO agenda. If he had been able to unite the parties, he would have been hailed as a hero and might even have been seen as worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize while all of the legislation would have been conservative in nature.
photo
pasc
Willfully Ignorant: The New Normal.
07:11 AM on 05/13/2010
People are saying "Just vote Republican."

Y'know, no matter what else you critique, isn't it really, really important to ask yourself how wise it would be to vote IN a political platform willing to exaggerate, mislead and downright blatantly lie to the electorate to get what they want? And, please, don't say they don't lie: dealth panels, anyone?

You know what kind of leaders lie to the people? What kind take advantage of the gullibility of low-information voters? What kind exaggerate to intentionally cause people to be afraid?

I know some folks are unwilling to be honest, even with themselves, but for those who ARE, do some homes work: list all the Democratic lies you've heard in the past 18 months, then list the Republican ones.

Go ahead. Try it. Real, obvious lies only now, OK? DEATH PANEL-like lies. See which party propagates the whoppers. Is that the kind of government you want? The kind you find in the third world where people don't have the means to check on whether what their government is telling them is true? Is that what you want to REWARD by voting for in this country?????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:00 AM on 05/13/2010
Don't we already have a third world government, one in which the government decisions are based on the amount of money the governing officials receive from parties interested in the decision?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
structurequity
structurequity not oppression
12:31 AM on 05/13/2010
The treat of withholding is beholden by the poor but just your threat is enough to make the pols look for their bags carpet in hand. the rug will be pulled for they know what the need like junkies in heat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Don't settle for less evil, demand good
11:25 PM on 05/12/2010
That is a very good thing. And if they can't get the support, maybe they would support a Peoples party so the bifurcated Corporation Party could unite as the Dempublicans they truly are, and voters once again would get a choice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:01 AM on 05/13/2010
Good point.
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
09:37 PM on 05/12/2010
Iam an avid advocate for public finance, but that alone is not enough. The system has to change. Under the Senate's archaic rules, for instance, anonymous holds and especially the filibuster, allows the minority to over-ride majority rule and stop the majority from governing. Together these changes might have been enough, but the SCOTUS ruling for Citizen's United changed everything. It opened the floodgates to devious mischief, corruption and blackmail.

Anyone anywhere, including foreign countries, can inject billions of dollars into our elections. They can promise to use obscene amounts of money to defeat a candidate's opponent in exchange for favourable votes and legislation otherwise that money will be used to help his/her challenger.

Perhaps Iam too pessimistic to see the forest for the tress. But it is difficult to see how making necessary changes are possible when no one seems to have the political will to do so. And since our elections are now a free-for-all where anything and everything goes, I don't see how withholding cash will do much good either. Even with public financing that money can still buy ads and whatever else it takes to get someone elected.

As of now I would say our elections may never be the same, but things do change. Nothing is encased in stone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joyce2
10:16 PM on 05/12/2010
Not to mention whisper campaigns on blogs
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
09:04 PM on 05/12/2010
FOLKS, PLEASE READ THE BILLS IF YOU ARE INTERESTED!!

Download the Senate bill S752 PDF at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:s752is.txt.pdf

Download the House version H1826 PDF at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1826:

I'm downloading both, and I'll post my opinion when I'm done, if anyone's interested.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChloeW
08:18 PM on 05/12/2010
This is great! Seems the only thing that the Dems understand is money and votes. Hopefully this will be a wake-up call for Dems and the WH. They've been quite disgraceful in their behaviour towards their base, and the country in general. Giving us a crappy HCR bill with no P.O., and generally behaving like greedy brats in Congress, and GOP lite in the WH. It would be awful if the GOP took over again, and yet, somehow we've got to get through to the Congress/WH that this countries whole system is based on "we the people".....not we the corporations. Our vote is what is supposed to put people in office, and determine legislative priorities....not corporations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
07:53 PM on 05/12/2010
This policy will insure the return to power of the Sunday fundie neanderthal can'tservative
RepubliK-K-Kants, since they will continue to have their funds. You don't get everything you want. And your posturing indicates it was not a "contribution" rather that you were "buying a vote in congress," or assuring a liberal/progressive President who looks on your cash as a down payment for services rendered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadger
07:25 PM on 05/12/2010
"Given the choice, I'd rather have campaign finance reform than access," said Kirsch"

Hey, this is great! Help comes from unexpected places. Many here have commented that money in politics is the root of all evil - and here the one supplying that money (or at least some of them) are going to bat to change the system. Now we "little guys" need to get together and push hard on this. Pushed from two directions it has a chance of going somewhere.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:04 AM on 05/13/2010
Good point.