More

Political Patience Washing Away Fast For BP Execs As Gulf Oil Spill Grows Worse

H. JOSEF HEBERT and FREDERIC J. FROMMER   05/13/10 12:40 AM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill

WASHINGTON — Bad wiring and a leak in what's supposed to be a "blowout preventer." Sealing problems that may have allowed a methane eruption. Even a dead battery, of all things.

New disclosures Wednesday revealed a complex cascade of deep-sea equipment failures and procedural problems in the oil rig explosion and massive spill that is still fouling the waters of the Gulf of Mexico and threatening industries and wildlife near the coast and on shore.

The public also got its first look on Wednesday of oil gushing from the broken pipe that rests nearly a mile under water as BP PLC, the well's operator, released a video taken by a remotely controlled camera. Oil flowing from a break in the yellowish pipe becomes lighter in color as it mixes with natural gas. Over the past 21 days more than 4 million gallons of oil have been released.

A litany of worrisome events and findings that were at play on the night of the well explosion and pipe rupture was described in internal corporate documents, marked confidential but provided to a House committee by BP and by the manufacturer of the safety device. Lawmakers released them at a House hearing.

A senior BP executive, Lamar McKay, cautioned, "It's inappropriate to draw any conclusions before all the facts are known." But the documents established the firmest evidence to date of the sequence of catastrophic events that led to the explosion and worsening spill, a series of failures more reminiscent of the loss of the space shuttle Challenger than the wreck of the Exxon Valdez.

Like the 1986 Challenger disaster, the investigation into the Gulf spill may well show that complex and seemingly failproof technical systems went wrong because of overlooked problems that interacted with each other in unexpected ways. In the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster, a captain simply ran his ship onto a reef in Alaska's Prince William Sound, spilling nearly 11 million gallons of oil.

The April 20 BP rig explosion 40 miles off the Louisiana coast killed 11 people. Oil continuing to flow into Gulf waters threatens sensitive ecological marshes and wetlands and the region's fishing industry.

Congressional investigators revealed Wednesday that a key safety system, known as the blowout preventer, used in BP's oil-drilling rig in the Gulf had a hydraulic leak and a failed battery that probably prevented it from working as designed.

They said that BP documents and others also indicated conflicting pipe pressure tests should have warned those on the rig that poor pipe integrity may have been allowing explosive methane gas to leak into the well.

"Significant pressure discrepancies were observed in at least two of these tests, which were conducted just hours before the explosion," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., at a House hearing on the rig fire and oil leak, citing documents his committee had received from BP.

Asked about the tests, Steven Newman, president of Transocean, which owned the drilling rig, and Lamar McKay, president of BP America told the committee the pressure readings were worrisome.

They indicated "that there was something happening in the well bore that shouldn't be happening," said Newman. McKay said the issue "is critical in the investigation" into the cause of the accident.

The well explosion unleashed a massive oil spill that after three weeks remains uncontained.

But Waxman said important elements of what went wrong were beginning to surface.

While "we have far more questions than answers," it appears clear that there were problems with the blowout preventers before the accident and confusion almost right up to the time of the explosion over the success of a process in which cement is injected into the well to temporarily close it in anticipation of future production.

In other developments Wednesday:

_ The White House asked Congress to raise the limits on BP's liability to cover damage from the spill beyond the $75 million cap now in law. It also wants oil companies to pay more into a federal oil spill cleanup fund.

BP president Lamar McKay said the company will pay any legitimate claim of damages beyond cleanup costs despite the federal cap.

_ On the Gulf Coast, a new containment box – a cylinder called a "top hat" – was placed on the sea floor near the well leak. Engineers hope to work out ways to avoid the problem that scuttled an earlier effort with a much bigger box before they move the cylinder over the end of the 5,000-foot-long pipe from the well.

_ The Minerals Management Service told a government panel of investigators in Kenner, La., that inspections of deepwater drilling rigs has turned up only "a couple of minor issues."

The House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing into the spill was the third this week at which executives of BP and two other companies were questioned by lawmakers.

The committee produced one document from BP that provided the most detailed information to date on what led up to and may have caused the explosion and spill at the Deepwater Horizon rig, floating in mile-deep waters 40 miles off the coast of Louisiana, and why equipment designed to stop a spill failed to do the job.

Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said there were at least "four significant problems with the blowout preventer" – or BOP – including evidence that it had a significant hydraulic leak and a dead battery that was supposed to activate a so-called "deadman" trigger.

In Kenner, La., where a separate hearing is being held as part of a U.S. Coast Guard and Interior Department investigation, Michael Saucier of the Minerals Management Service testified the government isn't required to inspect the BOPs as they are built and when installed. Operators are required to test the devices every two weeks, and Saucier said the MMS monitors those tests. He said the agency relies on drillers to ensure the device is working properly.

A 2001 report by Transocean, which bought the BOP from Cameron, indicated there can be as many as 260 failure possibilities in the equipment, which is supposed to be the final safeguard against a well blowout by clamping down and sealing a gushing oil well, said Stupak, chairman of the panel's investigation's subcommittee.

"How can a device that has 260 failure modes be considered fail-safe?" asked Stupak.

Stupak said when an underwater remote vehicle tried to activate the blowout protector's devices designed to ram through the pipe and seal it, a loss of hydraulic pressure was discovered in the device's emergency power component.

When dye was injected "it showed a large leak coming from a loose fitting," said Stupak, citing BP documents. He said officials at Cameron, the company that made the preventer, had told the committee the leak was not believed to have been caused by the blowout because other fittings in the system were tight.

Stupak also questioned why the BOP had been modified.

Newman, the Transocean executive told the committee that, indeed, the BOP had been modified in 2005 at the request of BP and with approval of the Minerals Management Service.

Stupak said the committee had been told that one of the BOP's ram drivers had been changed so it could be used for routine testing and was no longer designed to activate in an emergency. He said after the spill BP "spent a day trying to use this ... useless test ram" which no longer was configured for emergency use.

Executives of the companies involved have sought to shift blame on one another at Senate and House hearings this week on the spill.

BP has cited the failure of the blowout preventer owned by Transocean, which in turn has raised questions about the cementing process conducted by Halliburton, a BP subcontractor.

At Senate hearings Tuesday and again before the House panel, Timothy Probert, an executive of Halliburton, said that its work had been completed except for the installation of a final cement cap and that it was done according to the BP drilling plan.

___

Associated Press writers Jeffrey Collins in Robert, La., and Michael Kunzelman in Kenner, La., contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS to gallons, not barrels, in figures for Gulf and Exxon Valdez spills.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Bad wiring and a leak in what's supposed to be a "blowout preventer." Sealing problems that may have allowed a methane eruption. Even a dead battery, of all things. New disclosures...
WASHINGTON — Bad wiring and a leak in what's supposed to be a "blowout preventer." Sealing problems that may have allowed a methane eruption. Even a dead battery, of all things. New disclosures...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Scoppertop
Sunny Side
08:36 AM on 05/14/2010
People should be screaming "TOP-KILL" until the wellhead is shut down permanently. Last week they announced it as an option -- it could be nearly finished if they had started plugging it on April 22.
02:12 AM on 05/14/2010
The head of BP, neatly dressed in a most fascinating Chicago-style quasi-pen stripped suit, tells us that the total volume of oil and dispersants discharged ["it ain't over til it's over"] is rather "tiny" compared to the total volume of water in the Gulf of Mexico's ocean. Well, pardon me Mr. BP CEO, but it only takes a tiny amount of some toxins to kill millions of humans, or at least that's what the government tells us about chemical terrorism. And I know from common knowledge that a little cyanide isn't good for me even in "tiny" quantities. Would you like to re-think this, sir, and perhaps tilt your message a "tiny" bit towards some contrition?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nurseattorney
11:32 PM on 05/13/2010
Florida, Louisiana, ALabama, Mississippi, Texas, the states most likely to be devastated by this spill, are largely represented by pro-oil senators and congressmen who love the industry.

You'd think the citizens of those states, seeing their shorelines and economies ruined, might want some new representatives who would act to protect them in the future. But I'm not holding my breath.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
10:24 PM on 05/13/2010
This entire world is balanced by temperature, pressure and gravity. The oil coming out of the ground is hot compared to the tepmperature of the water 5,000 feet down. Is this oil heating this area of the ocean and if so what happenss now that hurricane season is here. The warmer the water the more energy a hurricane recieves from it. This is going to be bad.
02:03 AM on 05/14/2010
My exact fear. I live on the MS Gulf Coast. You can smell the oil in the air. What happens if we have a bad hurricane and all of this mess gets blown inland. It could completely ruin the water supply.

This is a gigantic mess.
02:21 AM on 05/14/2010
This is a very, very sad situation that I suspect will become catostrophic on every level of human existence around the Gulf and extending inland for many miles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:23 AM on 05/14/2010
Dosadi -- The Ixtoc I oil spill happened to take place right at the beginning of the 1979 hurricane season. Two hurricanes appear to have traveled right through the middle of the spill and never reached greater than Category One strength. But 1979 was a pretty average hurricane season in terms of volume, although it did produce one legend: Tropical Storm Claudette. I fear that this is all apples and oranges, though, because the BP spill is a different beast and there is a lot of talk among Gulf Coast interests about the reports of the current El Nino being replaced by a fast building La Nina. Even if the lingering effects of the El Nino suppresses the hurricane season the Gulf is always prone to stirring up nasty, non-tropical systems. All bets are off in these parts. Anno Domini (AD) may be replaced by AS (After Spill).

If anyone from The Weather Channel is reading this, a lot of people would like to hear a special report dealing with all of the oil-related concerns and the upcoming hurricane season.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
04:55 PM on 05/14/2010
Thanks.
06:04 PM on 05/13/2010
This oil spill is harming America!
This spill has caused job loss, and irreversible ecological damage.
People are going to great lengths to protect the coastline now. Great! But all efforts will be in vain when the next hurricane hits.
And they still OKed drilling off Alaska's coast.
Why is the gov't standing by watching this happen? Did the big oil buy you out?
05:47 PM on 05/13/2010
The name of the oil zar is Salazar. He is the boss of this dysfunctional Minerals Management(??) team. Why don't they interview Salazar, who received large funds from BP when he was a senator from CO. How could Obama select such a friend of Big Oil? That is the real scandal. The last I heard Salazar is still Secretary of the Interior.
photo
mannapat
Truthiness shines a light.
03:46 PM on 05/13/2010
Where's the Queen of Hearts when you really need her? "Off with their heads!"
photo
sven1olaf
Liberty and Justice for all!
03:01 PM on 05/13/2010
i do not care if a "complex and seemingly failproof technical systems went wrong because of overlooked problems that interacted with each other in unexpected ways".

this is nothing more than scapegoating!!!

we must INSIST on nothing less than 100% accountability. BP is the owner of the operation and as such should foot the bill, in its entirety. If BP seeks to recoup losses from Transocean and/or Haliburton, they will have to sue them as individual contractors.
02:01 AM on 05/14/2010
Well, Amen! and Amen! and Amen! a fave indeed
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
11:23 AM on 05/13/2010
"BP president Lamar McKay said the company will pay any legitimate claim of damages beyond cleanup costs despite the federal cap."
___________________

However, BP will ultimately conclude that most damages claims are not "legitimate" ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
artist-53
Wordy opinionated poor spelling Liberal
11:52 AM on 05/13/2010
When McKay of BP answered " We're going to pay out legitimate claims" He was quick to answer with above statement for areas concerning Commerce/Fishing Industry as a whole, but answered " I can't quantify or speculate on long term...I don't know how to define it" , when asked about Louisiana's Fishing Indust.as a brand. Many of which are indiv. owned. He seemed to answer with , " Question Mark" for those dealing with reimbursement to people and State and Local tax revenue. But is willing to pay "legit claims" for lost tourism revenue. But what do I expect from a Corporate Caste System.

Shipping Impacts: BP stated , "We're going to pay all leg. claims."

People don't matter. Large Corporations depend on Commerce for generating profits. But the Brand of LA fish co.'s or LA indep. fishing co.'s, McKay stated he couldn't define it? They seem willing to pay out in a very selective manner.

I think they should payout claims to all involved and effected. And the true severity and impact may not be known for years to come.
edva
Capitalism vs Humanity
09:10 AM on 05/13/2010
All money flows from the bottom up in our capitalist society. It is our money that pays oil company CEO's, bank CEO's, the cleanup, the bailout, you name it. We pay for everything. Which begs the question: why do we allow them to get filthy rich off of us, when they've proven they are irresponsible, destructive, incompetent, and greedy? Why do we support such an arrangement?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
11:27 AM on 05/13/2010
Aside from Bush/Cheney, who championed such policies, all the undereducated nincompoops waving signs equating the current administration with N@ziism, socialism, etc. are fighting mightily to keep those at the top from ever having to contribute anything to society ...
edva
Capitalism vs Humanity
09:04 AM on 05/13/2010
The Valdez, the Challenger, and I daresay even 9/11 will pale next to the eventual magnitude of this catastrophe.
iridium species
Jamba Island
09:48 AM on 05/14/2010
I absolutely agree, though it is taboo to suggest -- or, invoke the fact -- that this event compromises national, and global, security far more than some clown named Faisal Shahzad! News coverage should reflect this reality, yet seemingly equal time is given to much more trivial stories, as if somehow to suggest each are of equal importance. It's funny (in the tragic/ironic way), because the day I heard "three months" as a viable time frame to stop the leak (and this was back in April), I knew that this would be THE oil spill to end all oil spills. I understand why many would be cynical of this claim, but only for lack of imagination of what the Gulf Coast will look like after 200 Million gallons of oil -- plus bonus dispersants -- have seeped into the water.

You can quote me, this is the end of off shore drilling. This is a paradigm shift, and a historic moment. Anyone who disagrees may gladly respond in three months. Heaven help us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
05:19 AM on 05/13/2010
i kept looking for more about the patience wearing away..was hoping it was true..all it seemed was a long list of things that went wrong.. i hope the long list will plug the leak
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noupsell
01:13 AM on 05/13/2010
Compare these videos: They are claiming this one is the main leak of the remaining two: http://www.youtube.com/user/DeepwaterHorizonJIC#p/u/1/WYFYVNvgg-A

But look at this just released vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JTM2QyAfCI look at the volume seen pluming around and enguling the first failed 100 ton, 40foot coffer dam... it sure doesn't look like it's coming from that tame pipe vid they are claiming represents the largest leak... how about they release unedited footage?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
12:02 AM on 05/13/2010
Crucify them
04:38 PM on 05/12/2010
Last week, the chair of the Environmental Toxicity Dept. at UC-Davis said on an NPR interview that the chemical dispersants BP is using on the oil spill are toxic to wildlife. Just how toxic is unclear because the ingredients are trade secrets. There are environmentally-friendly alternatives; however, oil companies like BP prefer to use their own chemically based dispersants as a means of offsetting their losses and expenses. Some remediation companies who perform the clean-ups prefer materials that are less efficient, so as to extend their time for work. Could the business climate get any more cynical?