iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Two Dems Help Defeat Senate Cloture Vote On Wall Street Reform

First Posted: 05/19/10 07:14 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:30 PM ET

Health Care Wash

Two Democrats voted against ending debate on Wall Street reform in the Senate on Wednesday, helping defeat a motion for cloture that could have cleared the way for a final vote before the end of the week and capping off a day of stubborn opposition from all sides.

Democrats Maria Cantwell (Wash.) and Russ Feingold (Wisc.) joined all but two Republicans to defeat the cloture motion filed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), 57-42. A successful cloture motion would prevent rank-and-file Democrats from continuing to offer amendments to strengthen the bill.

Harry Reid had made the vote a leadership test, making the Democratic defections that much more meaningful. Reid vented his frustration.

"I know how to count votes," Reid said. "A Senator broke his word with me. Broke it."

Though Reid didn't specify which senator broke his word, the Majority Leader did have a tense discussion with Scott Brown on the chamber floor and Brown had previously told reporters he was a "yes" vote. Reminded of that after the presser, Reid said: "I'm not referring to anyone about anything."

Due to a procedural necessity, Harry Reid had to switch his vote to a "no." Maine GOP Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe voted "yes." Alaska Senator Mark Begich barely made it in time to vote, telling reporters afterward he had "something with my family." Arlen Specter was a no-show.

There were some unusually Johnsonian moments of wrangling on the floor during the nearly hour-long vote. Reid pressed his case hard on Snowe, the lone holdout vote present, with Bob Corker and Mitch McConnell at her side. After finding Brown, he put his arm around him and shook his head, then found Cantwell seated alone at the opposite end of the floor. He and New York's Chuck Schumer encircled her, Reid leaning over her with his right arm on the back of her chair and Schumer leaning in with his left hand on her desk. Cantwell stared straight ahead, not looking at the men even as she spoke. Schumer called in Chris Dodd, who was unable to sway her. Feingold hadn't stuck around. Cantwell, according to a spokesman, wanted a guarantee on an amendment that would fix a gaping hole in the derivatives section of the bill, which requires the trades to be cleared, but applies no penalty to trades that aren't, making Blanche Lincoln's reform package little better than a list of suggestions.

"Basically, they blocked their own members from being able to bring up amendments, and I think that led to the chaos you just saw on the floor," said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) after the vote, who described the Democrats as looking "cranky."

Republicans began objecting to and successfully blocking consumer-friendly amendments on Tuesday. The amendment process until then had proceeded remarkably smoothly.

"I don't think it's a good idea to cut off good consumer amendments because of cloture," said Cantwell on Tuesday night.

Other amendments offered by Democrats would ban banks from proprietary trading, cap ATM fees at 50 cents, impose new limits on the payday lending industry, prohibit naked credit default swaps and reinstate Glass-Steagall regulations that prohibit banks from owning investment firms.

"We need to eliminate the risk posed to our economy by 'too big to fail' financial firms and to reinstate the protective firewalls between Main Street banks and Wall Street firms," said Feingold in a statement after the vote. Feingold supported the amendment to reinstate Glass-Steagall, among others.

"Unfortunately, these key reforms are not included in the bill," he said. "The test for this legislation is a simple one -- whether it will prevent another financial crisis. As the bill stands, it fails that test. Ending debate on the bill is finishing before the job is done."

The prop trading amendment, sponsored by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Carl Levin (D-Mich.), will likely get a second chance as a post-cloture attachment to Kansas Republican Sam Brownback's amendment to exempt auto dealers from the oversight of the proposed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

UPDATE: Here is the amendment that Cantwell is fighting to have attached. "Senators Cantwell and John McCain (R-AZ) have filed another amendment not yet debated that would reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act's separation of commercial and investment banking. In her floor speech, Cantwell said she would like a vote on this measure, but that her primary concern was the derivatives issue," said a statement from her office.

UPDATE II: Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) confessed to reporters that he was the one who told Reid he'd support cloture, but then changed his mind. He said that he had assumed progress would be made in the bill on behalf of Massachusetts financial services companies, but the changes weren't made and Reid's staff didn't return his staff's phone calls.

UPDATE III: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) managed to get a vote Wednesday night on his amendment to allow states to set interest-rate caps on out-of-state credit cards. Sounds straight forward? Only 35 senators voted for it, with 60 opposed. Here's how each voted.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Two Democrats voted against ending debate on Wall Street reform in the Senate on Wednesday, helping defeat a motion for cloture that could have cleared the way for a final vote before the end of the w...
Two Democrats voted against ending debate on Wall Street reform in the Senate on Wednesday, helping defeat a motion for cloture that could have cleared the way for a final vote before the end of the w...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,792
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (80 total)
11:48 AM on 05/22/2010
Have verified that Scott Brown is planning an Arlen Specter type jump to Democratic Party before 2012 elections and will run as a Democrat.
05:34 PM on 05/21/2010
These two renegades will be taken care of at the next polls.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hopalongpoppyseed
May you reap what you sow.
10:26 PM on 05/21/2010
They are both people of integrity. I expect them both to be re-elected.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
03:09 PM on 05/21/2010
Rich people run the country, and they don't want any kind of legislation being passed that might turn their various cash cows into cheeseburgers. But, in this case, maybe they need to step back, so that the dark, seamy underpinnings of exotic and questionable practices in the realm of high finance can be better observed, understood, and corrected, because this level of checkbook-juggling just isn't cutting the mustard, for the majority of Americans. No one wants their ox to get gored, but this is something BIG, apparently, and thus affects all our futures. We all have to live here, when the price of a gallon of gas hits $16, and you have to put $200k down to move into a million-dollar home, when the gas might honestly be worth a buck, and the house might be worth 100k on a GOOD day, if the sun's right, we've entered the realm of unsustainable B.S., de facto currency inflation, and lofty but decidedly false expectations of the economy itself, and of taxpayers and citizens in general. When basic livability goes to hell, and all fingers are pointing in one common direction, it's time to listen, evaluate, and develop and institute reforms. Otherwise there's going to be a lot more 'homeless' people, and 'let them eat derivatives' just isn't going to cut the mustard.
12:48 PM on 05/21/2010
It's a shame when you only have 2 to how many senators that felt this bill wasn't good enough. Just goes to show the power of the lobbyists and the deep pockets of the banks.

The fed reserve should lost more power and instead they were given more 'discretion' over the financial system--- the bill instead should have regulated the banks so they can't 'innovate' so that regulation is more clear and transparent. This discretion clause creates more murkiness around an already suspect industry. There is too cozy of a relationship between the regulators and banks. This discretion creates more of a suspect relationship-- the fed, banks, and lobbyists: 1 the American people: 0
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mafdet
10:12 AM on 05/21/2010
The 2 dems held out because the bill wasn't perfect in their minds.

Translation: We got straight cash payoffs and a set of steak knives. What were we supposed to do?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hopalongpoppyseed
May you reap what you sow.
10:30 PM on 05/21/2010
Better translation: Maria Cantwell is one of the few senators who understands the potential of derivatives trading to bring our economy down again, because they were not adequately dealt with in this bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcd8822
11:44 PM on 05/20/2010
"Arlen Specter was a no-show" (On the vote.)

There will probably be a lot of that for the rest of his term. I guess he will be out doing job interviews.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
09:04 PM on 05/20/2010
Glass-Steagall MUST BE restored. Anything less will keep us in the quagmire we're in.

I know that when I write this many younger HuffPo contributors have no idea what we're talking about. Wikipedia has a good explanation of Glass-Steagall, from 1930.

It meant that banks either worked for us, providing checking/savings and mortgage/auto loans, at reasonable rates that we all agreed on, or took our money/monies and gambled with that to make money for their stakeholders, which were not us.

Glass-Steagall mean we the little investors in banks were treated fairly. We are not treated fairly any more, and that is why we need Glass-Steagall restored.
05:31 PM on 05/20/2010
Way to go Maria and Russ. That's the power of 2. Don't let them push you into a corner. You work for the People not for Senators with their own agendas. They want to water it down, to a worthless document. Stand your ground and thank you, from one of the little guys, who is only heard around election time.
02:39 PM on 05/20/2010
They need to go.
11:49 PM on 05/20/2010
They who?
01:17 PM on 05/20/2010
Freelancerighter,
Thank you,
In regard to Payday lending:

Have to thank Senators Whitehouse, Merkley, Durbin, Levin and Sanders for their efforts:

These are simply unconscionable and unjustifiable practices that must be responsibly curbed by our representatives if economic recovery has any hope of reaching all socioeconomic levels. This debt-trap could be incredibly damaging to families and children in particular. There is substantial reason why history has considered this among the most serious of crimes.

*Eye Opening Site on the History of Usury:
http://www.affil.org/consumer_rsc/usury2.php
01:20 PM on 05/20/2010
IF they are going to regualt those then shouldn't they regulate the rapid refund loans on federal tax returns. The rates are outrageous on those.
photo
4TJefferson
Promote the General Welfare
01:15 PM on 05/20/2010
Ok HP, this is headline bait. Cantwell and Feingold voted NO to no more talking about the bill so that they could try to improve the bill. Gopers voted NO because they don't want to regulate banks or anything.
12:51 PM on 05/20/2010
ask yourself, "what would Jeff Merkely do?" Then support that position. That guy (and OREGON) rule.
12:47 PM on 05/20/2010
*Senators please resist the temptation to move to closure without fixing this ineffectual and potentially damaging bill. The grave import of the issues before you demand your attention. If you must stay past Memorial Day to responsibly deal with issues that could again bring the world to the brink then so be it. You must get this bill right. Further, you must use regulation responsibly and incentivize positive economic outcomes. At a minimum, you simply must restore Glass Steagall and separate commercial and investment banking. For long term economic growth among all sectors you must get functioning commercial banking and lending back for the small business and entrepreneurs of Main Street. With the firewall of Glass Steagall restored-- investment banks and Wall Street could be largely free to innovate and gamble away…only without access to FDIC insured funds, the discount window or the moral hazard of guaranteed bailouts. The market itself, may again serve to limit their growth and power after separation---just like pre-1999.

*Senator Shelby "especially" please work to encourage your colleagues to support Senators Cantwell and McCain’s critical effort to restore Glass Steagall as you were one of the few from either party who responsibly warned of the dangers of this course of action and did not vote to repeal it in 1999:

Thank you,

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Senate Vote:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-354

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act House Vote:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1999-570
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
freelancerighter
writer
01:07 PM on 05/20/2010
While you're at it, ask Senator Shelby why he's blocking the amendment to protect people from payday lenders.

Nicely done though, your writing.
12:46 PM on 05/20/2010
2 Outstanding “Must Watch” MSNBC “The Dylan Ratigan Show” Segments:

“Make Believe Financial Reform”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31510813/ns/msnbc_tv-the_dylan_ratigan_show#37239734

Powerful comment from the segment from Dylan Ratigan:
“The bill ensures that the next bailout is not only a crisis away and more importantly that the corporate communism and the extraction of money by the mega-banks at the expense of real innovator-investor capitalism on our country will continue to be eaten alive by the thieves that our running our Senate with the banksters.”

“A Changing Tide in Washington”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31510813/ns/msnbc_tv-the_dylan_ratigan_show#37240222

Especially moving sentiments expressed by Senator Tom Colburn from this segment:
“They don’t care what party were in---What They want is the future secure for their kids and were not doing it. And this Bill doesn’t do it…”

**Again, "Thank you" Mr. Ratigan…You have simply become the media’s most effective and honest voice on financial reform.
12:42 PM on 05/20/2010
way to go Scott Brown - you came around real quickly
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mahi Joe
Think critically...not blindly conform
01:10 PM on 05/20/2010
That lil maverick. I bet the voters in MA are regretting his win. Mr. Bigshot Brown talking all this cr@p about being his own man, blah, blah, blan, and the first time he makes a decision on his own the GOP tells him no no no and turns him around lol. Just another political hack.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AwShucks
Obama-Biden 2012 Let's Do it Again
03:21 PM on 05/20/2010
yes they are. Dirty Brown has really shown his true colors.