iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pakistan Blocks YouTube, Facebook: Muslim Nation Cracks Down On 'Sacrilegious' Content

CHRIS BRUMMITT   05/20/10 03:52 PM ET   AP

Pakistan Youtube
Pakistan is blocking 'sacrilegious' YouTube content.

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan blocked YouTube and many other Internet sites Thursday in a widening crackdown on online content deemed offensive to Islam, reflecting the secular government's sensitivities to an issue that has ignited protests in the Muslim country.

The move came a day after the government obeyed a court order to block Facebook over a page called "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day!" that encourages users to post images of Islam's Prophet Muhammad. Most Muslims regard depictions of the prophet, even favorable ones, as blasphemous.

Supporters of an Islamist political party protested against Facebook in at least three cities in small and peaceful rallies. The government, which is unpopular among many Islamists for siding with the United States in the war against the Taliban and al-Qaida, is hoping that the website bans will lessen anger in the days ahead.

"We are ready to die protecting the honor of our beloved Prophet Muhammad," said Aysha Hameed, one of 1,000 female protesters in Multan city.

Others – mostly members of the more secular, educated elite – accused the government of blocking freedom of expression and hurting small businesses that use Facebook for marketing. Many questioned need for the entire Facebook and YouTube sites to be blocked, instead of individual pages on them.

About 20 million of Pakistan's 180 million people are Internet users and social networking sites are among the most popular, especially among those younger than 25. Pakistan's Internet service providers' association said usage had dropped by about 25 percent since Wednesday.

The offending Facebook page encourages users to post images of the prophet on May 20 to protest threats made by a radical Muslim group against the creators of the American TV series "South Park" for depicting Muhammad in a bear suit during an episode earlier this year.

"Such malicious and insulting attacks hurt the sentiments of Muslims around the world and cannot be accepted under the garb of freedom of expression," Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Basit said.

Pakistan and other Muslim nations saw large and sometimes violent protests in 2006 when a Danish newspaper published cartoons of Muhammad, and again in 2008 when they were reprinted. Later the same year, a suspected al-Qaida suicide bomber attacked the Danish Embassy in Islamabad, killing six people.

The telecommunications authority did not say what material on YouTube prompted it to block the site and more than 450 other unidentified pages, only citing "growing sacrilegious contents." Wahajus Siraj, the head of the Internet service providers' association, said the ban was because images of the Prophet Muhammad were also cropping up on the video-sharing site.

Blackberry service was halted for around 10 hours as efforts were made to stop mobile access to Facebook.

The government acted against Facebook and YouTube after it failed to persuade the websites to remove the offensive material, the telecommunications authority said. It said representatives from the two websites were welcome to contact the Pakistani government to resolve the dispute.

Facebook said the page was not a violation of its terms, but suggested it may be prepared to take it down.

"In cases like this, the approach is sometimes to restrict certain content from being shown in specific countries," it said in a statement.

In Washington, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters Thursday that the United States respects Pakistan's legal efforts to protect citizens from offensive speech. He said many images on Facebook were deeply offensive to Muslims. But he said Pakistan must also be sure not to restrict the speech of those using the Internet.

Pakistan is governed by a secular political party that has little time for Islamic issues. But arguing against the court order would leave it open to accusations by its political opponents of siding with those blaspheming the prophet.

"The Islamist parties have been on the back foot for a while, this is a nice little issue for them to campaign about," said Cyril Almeida, a liberal media columnist. "There is no way you can have a rational debate in Pakistan about freedom of speech when one side is talking about blasphemy."

The five customers in the Dandy Net Cafe in Islamabad late Thursday afternoon agreed with the ban.

"We are very happy our government and our court has taken these actions," said Mohammad Aamir Chohan, a 28-year-old engineer. "I know blocking these sites is not a solution to the problem, but we have sent a message to the world not to hurt the feelings of Muslims."

Feelings were just as intense among those opposed to the ban.

"Sad and embarrassing day in the history of Pakistan," one user posted on the microblogging site Twitter.

Reba Shahid, the editor of Spider, a monthly print magazine about the Internet, said the government "might as well take away cell phones and shut off electricity, do the whole thing."

"You're stemming the flow of information, you're stemming my growth as an intellectual, you're stemming my access to the rest of the world. I might as well go home and sleep," she said.

Pakistan blocked access to YouTube for two days in 2008 because of what it said was unIslamic content. Turkey, Thailand, Indonesia and Morocco have all blocked access to YouTube in the past for various reasons, while China routinely bans Facebook and YouTube.

It remains to be seen how successful the government will be at keeping Internet users away from the blocked sites. Citizens often have little trouble working around a ban by using proxy servers and other means.

"What's common to Facebook and Lashkar-e-Taiba?" one user on Twitter wrote, referring to a Pakistani militant group that is banned but has an alleged front group that operates openly. "They are both banned in Pakistan, but Pakistanis can still find them if they want to."

___

Associated Press writers Sebastian Abbot, Zarar Khan and Anita Chang in Islamabad and Foster Klug in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan blocked YouTube and many other Internet sites Thursday in a widening crackdown on online content deemed offensive to Islam, reflecting the secular government's sensitivities...
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan blocked YouTube and many other Internet sites Thursday in a widening crackdown on online content deemed offensive to Islam, reflecting the secular government's sensitivities...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 393
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:22 PM on 05/23/2010
Perhaps I misunderstand. Defenders of Christianity here say their religion is better than Islam because throughout history Christians killed, say, only 200 million people, whereas Muslims killed 500 million - or some numbers like that. Is that the reasoning? Is it a matter of body counts to determine who is a true believer and who is not? If I murder 3 people my hands are bloody; if you murder 6 your hands are bloody. Which one is cleaner, more holy, closer to God, acceptable to God? Or is it possible that both are rejected?
09:39 AM on 05/23/2010
Since the lsIamic world have blocked these sites, we are now free to say what we want. They won't be offended anymore since they won't get to see or read what we post.

Win Win for All!

:)
12:57 PM on 05/31/2010
true!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
12:17 AM on 05/23/2010
Offensive to Islam. Islam is the most offensive brutal and oppresive existence around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peta51
Humane Rights Advocate
11:42 PM on 05/22/2010
I suspect with Internet Power we can export/import a hacker to snake under the Pakistani fascist firewall. We are blessed to still have Internet Power here now inside the United States.
01:14 PM on 05/22/2010
Net Neutrality
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 PM on 05/22/2010
Net Neutrality, Pakistan Style. This is what governments due when they have control over information.
12:19 AM on 05/22/2010
Followers of Islam have brutally and repeatedly destroyed ancient monuments /temples/ carvings in the name of Allah. modus operandi of Islamic invasion. Slash/burn/destroy/terrorize then convert. Islam dictates its laws be followed universally , muslims through out the ages have had no respect for non muslim beliefs and sacred symbols. The religion starts with the assumption that every one is born a muslim, hence they must obey muslim laws !! How convenient. Whats more among the so called moderates there has never been an acceptance of the destructive nature of spread of Islam, or the violence inherent in Islam.
01:00 AM on 05/22/2010
Hey Comrade, that's just what the western powers have gone. Ravage and pillage the Asian religious bastards who forgot to buy enough Maxim guns, (because they had too much faith) then after they have been shredded by force of arms, send in the priests to control them by the soothing influence of a religion which espouses turning the other cheek. And maybe burn the library at Alexandria. How about those crusades, or in modern times "sanctions"! Or the new most hilarious "Spreading Democracy" or "Regime Change" And how about the Christian church and Europeans who came to the Americas and together started exterminating the native populations. If there was a tally, who would be ahead? My money would be on the Christians, they have always had better weapons.
02:00 AM on 05/22/2010
Christianity rulz yeah. But peaceful mantra reciting Budhists are also not that far off. Nanjing massacre, Pol Pot.. If it wasn't for a million Armenians murdered a century ago, I'd say Muslims would rank number three.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:37 AM on 05/22/2010
Well, here's the tally for Muslims.

http://www.politicalislam.com/tears/pages/tears-of-jihad/
http://www.hinduwebsite.com/history/holocaust.asp

Combined total: 270 million. Just the numbers for India alone, 80 million, exceed the combined total deaths of WWI, WWII, and the Stalin and Mao purges by a significant factor. I would appear that, in terms of total numbers killed, Islam wins the global murder sweepstakes hands down.

If you have some counter numbers, would love to see them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andman0121
07:57 PM on 05/21/2010
Oh I see. We invade Afghanistan, shove aside the Taliban, while getting our troops killed just so that they could move next door and dictate Pakistani policy?? Tell me again why we are in Afghanistan and not Pakistan?
01:05 AM on 05/22/2010
Comrade, for oil pipeline protection. And...

For 17 years, Washington poured $4 billion into the pockets of some of the most brutal men on earth - with the overall aim of exhausting and ultimately destroying the Soviet Union in a futile war.

CIA director William Casey backed a plan by Pakistan's intelligence agency, the ISI, to recruit people from around the world to join the Afghan jihad. More than 100,000 Islamic militants were trained in Pakistan between 1986 and 1992, in camps overseen by the CIA and Britain's MI6, with the British SAS trained future al Qaeda and Taliban fighters in bomb-making and other black arts. Their leaders were trained at a CIA camp in Virginia. This was called Operation Cyclone and continued long after the Soviets had withdrawn in 1989.
John Pilger, The Guardian (September 20, 2003)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:27 AM on 05/22/2010
Yep, we brought snakes onto the plane to exterminate some rodents...without thinking ahead about when the rodents were gone...
03:01 AM on 05/22/2010
pakistan has been dectating taliban since their creation. We just sent them back to their home country
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
socialiq
03:54 AM on 05/22/2010
it's always the ignorant racists who misspell when they rant....

I am having trouble "detecting" any signs of intelligence in drinkingguy666...

Perhaps a dictionary is in order. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zach Broussard
Comedian
07:52 PM on 05/21/2010
Blocking YouTube?! I always forget that Islam speaks strongly against cats mingling with pianos.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
San Juan Wolf
radical
07:42 PM on 05/21/2010
whats fcacebook?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
06:43 PM on 05/21/2010
Interesting how protests arise whenever the image issue hits the news, but not one peep against suicide bombers, some of whom are kids, killing in the big M's name... or is it just me?
04:28 PM on 05/21/2010
Louis Pasteur should have found the cure for rabies of the mind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George K
02:22 PM on 05/21/2010
One of my thoughts last night was to consider the problem that many have trying to seperate the actions of the few from branding the many.

The actions of a few in this case, may have resulted in branding many. By such actions, they may have inadvertantly made it more dangerous for those who are serving in harms way.
06:43 PM on 05/21/2010
Very strong point, I still don't even know what to say about all this... Feels like the countries are on a school playground or something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
socialiq
03:43 AM on 05/22/2010
Excellent point, George K!
10:36 AM on 05/21/2010
Here's an idea! Why not just take Pakistan off the web altogether!

Then we won't need to put up with all the spam coming from there.

Then the Taliban and Al-Qaeda won't be able to email or send messages to websites outside Pakistan

Then Pakistan can go back to medieval times as is the Taliban's goal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:39 AM on 05/22/2010
Great idea! But why just the web? Why not boot them off the Internet altogether? It would be win-win for everyone.
09:00 AM on 05/21/2010
Today has proven that even moderate Muslims will side with the radical fundamentalists when it comes to suppressing even basic human rights. What an incredibly frightening thought.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:49 AM on 05/21/2010
What the h ell are you talking about? Do you know any moderate Muslims? I have a Pakistani friend who does not want to go back there because of the situation, he is a moderate Muslim. I have friends who are Muslim that pray five times a day and no way in h ell do they condone anything terrorists and those extremists are doing. The people in Pakistan who want to ban FB and youtube and not moderate Muslims
05:20 PM on 05/21/2010
moderate muslims are closet fundamentalists. Is your "moderate" friend anti-government and anti-army of his country, who are promoting fundamentalism and terrorism?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Jason Abdon
01:50 AM on 05/24/2010
Praying five times a day is a bit fanatical. Put the term religous deprograming int o your search engine. I recomend rational emotive therapy as a base.
02:58 PM on 05/21/2010
this would surely cause an outroar if suppressed for a long time
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Junaid Saima
08:59 AM on 05/21/2010
how modrenization and freedom of speech works for holocaust.the equalancy is on the basis that we love our Prophet Muhamamd peace be upon him and you think holocaust is something sacred to you.
Muslims respect all Prophets.Adam,Nuh,Abraham.Jesus and Moses.we respect all of them and a muslim never can think about insulting a Prophet.as the student of comparative religion we sort out all the positive and negative things in a religion.
one more importent thing.jews and christians made changes and diversions in their religion according to human intelligence and mind.
we have Quran as it was revealed on Prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him and His life and teachings are also recorded and saved with great care and research.
neither any muslim scholar nor any common muslim can make any change what is allowed and what is forbidden.
only ALLAH almighty can tell what is allowed and what is forbidden because HE is creator and all knower.
we love our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him more than our parents,more than our children and more than ourselves.for His respect we don't draw Him.
on that page one just didn't draw Prophet but they showed their actual pictures in those images.
any picture that is drawn doesn't have any resamblance to our Prophet those were the reflections of the makers.
Muslims did't start it.frist the image of Prophet was drawn and then it all started.
if you want respect for yourself you respect others.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrphantastyque
10:14 AM on 05/21/2010
I have respect for all religions. I don't have respect for anyone who threatens violence or censorship based on their religious belief. No one can impose islamic, hebrew, or christian law upon me.
08:11 PM on 05/21/2010
amen to that. or amin, etc. whatever.
02:57 AM on 05/22/2010
well said. abrahmics are totalitarian
photo
Sacchinftw
Isn't it sad...?
12:28 PM on 05/21/2010
No one thinks the holocaust is something sacred. It's a dismal period of human history that shows just how disgusting fanaticism can be. Are you trying to say that Muhammad or that Islam is somehow also a dismal period in human history that shows just how disgusting fanaticism can be? Because if that's the case, then I agree with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
farmerlady
Blonde, Democratic socialist, and unwilling expat
10:11 AM on 05/22/2010
Well Said!