iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Texas Board Of Education Approves More Conservative Curriculum

Texas Textbooks

APRIL CASTRO   05/21/10 11:43 PM ET   AP

AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas State Board of Education adopted a social studies and history curriculum Friday that amends or waters down the teaching of religious freedoms, America's relationship with the U.N. and hundreds of other items.

The new standards were adopted after a final showdown by two 9-5 votes along party lines, after Democrats' and moderate Republicans' efforts to delay a final vote failed.

In one of the most significant curriculum changes, the board dilutes the rationale for the separation of church and state in a high school government class, noting that the words were not in the Constitution and requiring students to compare and contrast the judicial language with the First Amendment's wording.

The ideological debate over the guidelines, which drew intense scrutiny beyond Texas, will be used to determine what important political events and figures some 4.8 million students will learn about for the next decade.

The standards, which one Democrat called a "travesty," also will be used by textbook publishers who often develop materials for other states based on guidelines approved in Texas, although teachers in the Lone Star state have latitude in deciding how to teach the material.

The board attempted to make more than 200 amendments this week alone, reshaping draft standards that had been prepared over the last year and a half by expert groups of teachers and professors.

As new amendments were being presented just moments before the vote, Democrats bristled that the changes had not been vetted.

"I think we're doing an injustice to the children of this state by piecemealing together, cutting and pasting, coming up with new amendments as late as today," said Mary Helen Berlanga, a Democrat. "What we have done today and what we did yesterday is something that a classroom teacher would not even have accepted."

During the monthslong revision process, conservatives strengthened requirements on teaching the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation's Founding Fathers and required that the U.S. government be referred to as a "constitutional republic," rather than "democratic." Students will be required to study the decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, including the abandonment of the gold standard.

They also rejected language to modernize the classification of historic periods to B.C.E. and C.E. from the traditional B.C. and A.D., and agreed to replace Thomas Jefferson as an example of an influential political philosopher in a world history class. They also required students to evaluate efforts by global organizations such as the United Nations to undermine U.S. sovereignty.

Former board chairman Don McLeroy, one of the board's most outspoken conservatives, said the Texas history curriculum has been unfairly skewed to the left after years of Democrats controlling the board and he just wants to bring it back into balance.

"I'm proud to have my name on this document," Republican board member Barbara Cargill said shortly before the vote.

Another Republican board member, David Bradley, said the curriculum revision process has always been political – but this time, the ruling faction had changed since the last time social studies standards were adopted.

"We took our licks, we got outvoted," he said referring to the debate from 10 years earlier. "Now it's 10-5 in the other direction ... we're an elected body, this is a political process. Outside that, go find yourself a benevolent dictator."

GOP board member Geraldine Miller was absent during the votes.

Educators have blasted the curriculum proposals for politicizing education. Teachers also have said the document is too long and will force students to memorize lists of names rather than thinking critically.

The curriculum dispute contributed to McLeroy's defeat in the March state Republican primary.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan said school officials "should keep politics out" of curriculum debates.

"We do a disservice to children when we shield them from the truth, just because some people think it is painful or doesn't fit with their particular views," Duncan said in a statement. "Parents should be very wary of politicians designing curriculum."

After the vote, the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas urged the state Legislature to place more control over the board.

"At the end of three long days, the State Board of Education has amended, re-amended and approved curriculum standards that are more ideological than ever, despite pleas to not politicize what is taught to Texas school children," said the state ACLU's executive director, Terri Burke.

At least one lawmaker vowed legislative action to "rein in" the board.

"They have ignored historians and teachers, allowing ideological activists to push the culture war further into our classrooms," said Rep. Mike Villareal, a San Antonio Democrat. "They fail to understand that we don't want liberal textbooks or conservative textbooks. We want excellent textbooks, written by historians instead of activists."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10,898
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (197 total)
12:17 PM on 07/06/2010
I have perused, as they say, a couple of Texas American History textbooks of 2003. I quickly found stements that were factually wrong and attempts to mislead. The direction of the errors was always to villify white Americans.

So now the "conservatives" changed some things in the textbooks; I spent a few hours seeing what they had done. They added many more Hispanics and got rid of a few of the patently false and misleading statements in the textbooks. (Note that it is obvious that the recent newspaper writers from New York and California failed to do their homework before opining on the Texas textbook issue.)
05:45 PM on 06/14/2010
For the real facts about the Texas Social Studies standards, go to www.juststatethefacts.com.
04:09 AM on 05/26/2010
It's unfortunate that more people don't see the need to continue debating this, to continue to raise a stink about what the TBOE has done. It's way more obnoxious than Arizona's SB 1070 or HB 2281. The most objectionable part has to do with the TBOE's having the arrogance to challenge the legal doctrine of separation of church and state. They want children to be taught that separation of church and state is not a valid doctrine. That's substituting their own opinion for established legal precedent. It's been almost 50 years since the Supreme Court declared recitation of prayers in public schools to be unconstitutional. It's extremist to want to turn the clock back almost 50 years. Some of the respondents in this forum were so extremist that they even made excuses for the Inquisition.
photo
TheSojourner
My blog is up and running.
06:34 PM on 05/25/2010
Here's some info on the wingnut Cynthia Dunbar:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6092712.html

This is what is on the TBOE? I also understand she is a grad of Regent (Pat Robertson's sterling contribution to education), and is currently a visiting associate professor of law at Liberty University (Jerry Falwell's ) School of law. She teaches foundations of law.( WTF?)

Oh...that explains her clarity of purpose and mind (snark). "Edumacation" at it's finest. I'll bet she wouldn't have been accepted at any legitimate universities.
05:58 PM on 05/26/2010
Yes, here's what your link had to say about Cynthia Dunbar: "In a column posted on the Christian Worldview Network Web site, Dunbar wrote that a terrorist attack on America during the first six months of an Obama administration 'will be a planned effort by those with whom Obama truly sympathizes to take down the America that is threat to tyranny.'" Her point of view is amazingly extremist. Her physical appearance is curious. In "The Pit and the Pendulum", I believe Edgar Allen Poe had the central character, a victim of the Inquisition, thinking of what thin lips the judges of the Inquisition had. Cynthia Dunbar's lips are very thin too. She certainly looks the part of a fanatic. Of course, her claim that there was going to be a coup was wrong, but that's not going to stop idiots from believing in her.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:06 PM on 05/24/2010
I have always been an advocate for public schools but having followed this story for weeks now, I'm beginning to see the benefits of "elite" private schools. In the past I felt that if all those who could afford to pay for private schools took their children out of public schools then those left behind would be the losers. However, I do not want any political or religious agenda taught in a public schools. This should be neutral territory since tax dollars from all political and religious views fund public schools. If our current school board adopts any new textbooks from this Texas board, I will absolutely abandon the public system. What a shame for the children who cannot afford to attend private schools.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
commentsareus
12:33 PM on 05/24/2010
This issue, like no other, is making my blood boil!! The fact that a few maniacal religious zealots have so much control over what our children are exposed to, makes me literally sick. I will be part of any boycott of texas, sign any petition, or donate money or time for any cause that keeps this poison out of our nations children's textbooks. I would be part of an effort to force the publisher to print the texas revisions in a separate section, that can be torn out... , or only have the texas version for texas only.. something.. this cannot be allowed. I say do away with textbooks altogether. Use laptops and download textbook programs. Whatever happens I Will be boycotting texas for the foreseeable future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
12:42 PM on 05/24/2010
One answer would for states to REFUSE to purchase these texts, and have a supplement pamphlet printed with up to date reality.

Save a bundle by only investing in duct tape to fix the older volumes and continue to preserve class sizes by paying teachers with the money saved.

Student do not need to have new books if they are being delivered filled with partial truths, no truths or downright selected lies.

What kind of system do we have when the TEXAS board of ed is given this kind of power?? This is insane.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
12:46 PM on 05/24/2010
yada, yada, yada. And are you just like the last Huffbagger who was so infuriated about the Texas changes...you know...like the changes that are voted on every ten years ion Texas??
What ever happens you'll be boycotting Texas for the foreseeable future??
and may i ask... of the hundreds of changes, what are the top ten that really make you sick??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dfranz
With Liberty and Justice for all
01:25 PM on 05/24/2010
We should stop teaching American History altogether and go back to the days of yore, and only speak about it in stories and folklore. That way History will always be what the speaker wants it to be.
06:24 PM on 05/24/2010
So, you think removing Thomas Jefferson as an influential thinker is a good thing? You think teaching separation of church and state isn't important? Do you care at all about facts, or do you think that just because things are voted on every 10 years, that it makes every decision totally acceptable?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:06 AM on 05/24/2010
I guess next they are going to argue that the Civil War was not about slavery but state rights not to have the federal law being supreme.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
12:38 PM on 05/24/2010
It is not the next thing already...................it is one of The things. I was recently loaned a book called The South Was Right by James and Walter Kennedy........ It is on that subject and somewhat interesting.

To me, I really do not think this is the time to rewrite what we know as history.

I have seen enough of the harm and what I consider "really bad " ideas, to put it mildly, that the GOP, Conservatives and religous zealots have shoved down our throats. I want no part of their agenda. Call it what we may, it is a plan by some individuals to twist things to conform to their current ideas.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
01:07 PM on 05/24/2010
Agreed. One thing I always find a hoot is when someone complains the confederacy was formed to protect the states from the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution. But if one reads the Confederate Constitution one finds a Supremacy Clause there - so obviously this was not the real issue they rebelled.
10:52 AM on 05/24/2010
Here's some questions that may be on a history test in Texas in the future.

1. A Communist Supreme Court justice who erroneously decided that school prayer was unconstitutional was A) Earl Warren B) Hugo Black C) William O. Douglas D) all of the above

2. In the 17th century, the goodness of Christianity was exemplified by A) the Salem witchcraft trials B) repeal of the Edict of Nantes C) the Thirty Years' War D) all of the above

3. In the 1980's, a judge who was unfairly, irrationally, and unpatriotically denied a seat on the Supreme Court was A) Robert Bork B) Orrin Hatch C) Jeremiah Denton D) Tina Turner

ESSAY: Explain why the doctrine of separation of church and state is wrong.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyeshinka
10:20 AM on 05/24/2010
I feel sorry for the young people of Texas. They have no idea how dumb their state wants them to be.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
10:56 AM on 05/24/2010
and yet, you have already formed your opinion of the Texas changes without reading what the changes are...
I guess that is because you are a huffbagger
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamsparticus
smaller government does not mean inside my vagina
12:49 PM on 05/24/2010
Except that the huffpost has been updating this story for a while now, and most of us have read those updates, as what is decided in Texas can have a huge impact on how the rest of the nation is able to teach, given that most textbooks are printed in Texas, and therefore conform to Texas standards.

But, the bigger point is not that Texas now wants to return the Judeo-Christian religion to the textbooks, but more that the education of our young people should not be politically motivated. It should be about what happened in history to get us where we are today. Saying that the UN tried to take US sovereignty is a load of bunk, and negates all the good that body has done throughout its history. Removing Thomas Jefferson as an important philosophical leader in the history of this nation is a travesty. If nothing else, how are they going to explain that they gave the writing of one of the most important documents in our country's history to someone who was not important? These changes cause a disconnect between our history and our children.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyeshinka
02:04 PM on 05/24/2010
Huffbager? It doesn't work when you do it. Anyway, I've been to Texas and seen classrooms. They were dumb even before these changes.
09:49 AM on 05/24/2010
This must be the "re-education" camps that Bachmann is always talking about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul - WW
03:58 PM on 05/24/2010
Oh now this good! :)
09:48 AM on 05/24/2010
Not only is this a disservice to the children but employers in other states in reviewing the type of education or lack of education in the state may not want to employ people who grew up under this curriculum.

These children will grow up and go to other states to live and work or go to other colleges and will be in for a rude awakening when they find no one believes like they do and that they were lied to.

It will become very difficult for them to adapt to other environments if they are kept sheltered and lied to.

They will eventually have to learn the realities anyway and if they go through this curriculum and want to major in history what will happen once they go to a college or university in another state only to find they know nothing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul - WW
06:58 AM on 05/24/2010
Texas Board of Education
a.k.a
Texans Before Enlightenment
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Bee
A robot in disguise
05:25 AM on 05/24/2010
Its like the far right has figured out a way to build their "ignorant army" from the ground up. Indoctrinate them at a young age with stupidity so they are more easily accessible to the far-right platform later in life. Ironically, its genius!
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
07:43 AM on 05/24/2010
i do not suppose that you have 3-4 examples of the ignorant changes that Texas plans to use for their stupidity platform?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
09:24 AM on 05/24/2010
No but if you have a link to the actual changes it would better make your point..............do not come back with the you tell me rebuttal.............if you know it all........you tell us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnabella
someday, my prints will come . . .
07:57 AM on 05/24/2010
Ding ding ding ding!!!! We have a winner! You hit the proverbial nail on the head with your observation...
04:31 AM on 05/24/2010
Back in the early 1960's, the Supreme Court decided that government-sponsored recitation of prayers in public schools was unconstitutional. I'm sure the justices were well aware that the Constitution did not explicity prohibit such activities. It was enough to give a convincing proof that such activities were inconsistent with what the Constitution required. By contrast, a majority of the TBOE has made it abundantly clear that they disagree with almost fifty years of legal precedent. They obviously think that those Supreme Court decisions should be reversed. That is their right. They can have opinions as to how the First Amendment should be interpreted, and opinions as to what is satisfactory proof of unconstitutionality. But when they mandate that these opinions be taken as fact, and leave out opinions different from theirs -- that is an abuse of their authority.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
07:45 AM on 05/24/2010
I was not aware of the Texas change that addressed the 1st amendment. what changes are you referring to??
08:37 AM on 05/24/2010
Well, here's what the article says: "In one of the most significant curriculum changes, the board dilutes the rationale for the separation of church and state in a high school government class, noting that the words were not in the Constitution and requiring students to compare and contrast the judicial language with the First Amendment's wording."
What else but attempting to cast doubt on the Supreme Court's decisions could this amount to? When they want students to be "noting that the words were not in the Constitution", aren't they insinuating that the decision was wrong? When they want students to "contrast the judicial language with the First Amendment's wording", it seems to me they are inserting their opinion that this "proves" the Supreme Court was wrong. If they thought the Supreme Court was right, I doubt very much if they would have wanted the students to ponder the difference between judicial language and Constitutional text.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CJCalgirl
nothing breeds faster than stupid
02:50 AM on 05/24/2010
When history is converted to political doctrine, and is a victim of it, we all lose. This has been going on for some time now, and the proof is in books as old as 50 years. The complete truth about our country has never been told in school texts, but this latest aberration is a distinct effort not just to hide truth but completely invalidate it. Home school with real history from a number of sources may be the choice we're left with if we want kids who know how to study, how to use a bibliography, how to THINK. Philosophy doesn't have a chance in this climate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
09:27 AM on 05/24/2010
We have found it very difficult to find home school materials that do not spread the religous and conservative ideas and teachings.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CJCalgirl
nothing breeds faster than stupid
12:18 PM on 05/24/2010
coveark, Depending on the ages of your children, it can vary, but I would shop online and make sure you know who the authors are, what their agendas may be. Generally, well respected authorities have been writing a while. Start with googling something like 'textbooks for ages (blank to blank), then select topics. Used books are a real deal! Don't limit it just to textbooks, so you don't limit things. Autobiographies are great and they make the person real and more interesting, science, history, philosophy especially teach a lot about world affairs just by that persons place in history. Albert Schweitzer, Thomas Paine, Jefferson, Churchill, Einstein, Curie, etc. Go to a big city library, ask about their recommendations. Librarians LOVE books, and know a lot! Good luck! You could also start a book club for kids! Good luck!
photo
ie
ugh.
01:22 PM on 05/24/2010
Have you tried Curriculum Associates?