More

Dan Maes, Ken Buck, Andrew Romanoff Prevail As Party Activists Boost 'Outsider' Candidates

AP     First Posted: 05/22/10 10:18 PM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 05:35 PM ET

(AP) BROOMFIELD, Colo. — The Republican front-runner to win the party's nomination in the Colorado governor race and the state's Democratic senator were dealt setbacks in party assemblies on Saturday.

Republicans voted to place businessman Dan Maes ahead of former congressman Scott McInnis on the August primary ballot for governor, while Democratic challenger Andrew Romanoff will get top billing on the ballot over incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet after winning the most votes at the state Democratic assembly.


(Story Continues Below)

Party Assemblies
1 of 20
An unidentified volunteer carries away signs used to mark county delegations at the close of the Colorado Republican State Assembly in Loveland, Colo., on Saturday, May 22, 2010. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)
Total comments: 53 | Post a Comment
1 of 20
Rate This Slide

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

Both gatherings were marked by the nationwide anti-incumbent and anti-political insider mood that has led to the recent primary election defeats of longtime Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Trey Grayson, who had been backed by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in the Kentucky GOP Senate primary.

Maes, who has never held elected office, received a handful of votes more than McInnis. He criticized his own party as he addressed Republican activists.

"You keep telling the machine that this is about the people, not the politicians," Maes said to cheers after his win was announced.

One Maes fan said she decided to back the first-time candidate after growing disillusioned with Republican insiders.

"We want a real person, not a Washington politician," said Beverly Werner, who owns an auto body shop in suburban Aurora. "He wasn't hand-picked by the GOP, and we like that."

Though Bennet and McInnis earned enough support Saturday to make the Aug. 10 primary ballots, coming in second was a setback. Each holds wide fundraising advantages and has been considered the favorite in their races.

Former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton also enjoys a large financial advantage over Weld County prosecutor Ken Buck in the GOP Senate race. Norton didn't participate in Saturday's assembly and will petition onto the primary ballot.

Romanoff, the former state House Speaker, got 60 percent of the Democratic delegate votes Saturday, while Bennet got 40 percent.

Romanoff, who also trumped Bennet in Democratic caucus primaries in March, told delegates he would support Bennet if he wins the nomination.

But he said Bennet wasn't entitled to the seat just because he is an incumbent.

"This Senate seat doesn't belong to him any more than it belongs to me," Romanoff told hundreds of cheering delegates. "It belongs to the people of Colorado, it belongs to you."

Bennet was appointed to the seat in 2009 when Ken Salazar was named Interior Secretary. He has President Barack Obama's backing and had gathered petitions in case he failed to earn enough votes at Saturday's assembly.

Bennet told reporters during a phone conference after the assembly that he plans to continue to collect petitions as a sign of his grassroots support.

"It allows us a real opportunity to talk to thousands of people," he said.

Bennet, the former Denver Public Schools superintendent, said he hasn't been tainted by the backlash against Washington because "from the very beginning, we were the complete outsider."

The state assemblies are just one step in a what can be a long convoluted process in Colorado to get elected. Not winning top ballot billing in the state's party assemblies doesn't necessarily signify that a candidate's campaign is doomed.

In 2004, Colorado Springs Schools Superintendent Mike Miles got top billing over Salazar in the Senate Democratic primary. But Salazar went on to win the primary and the general election.

Adding to the confusion, the two top parties have different systems for getting on the state ballot.

While Democrats can participate in the assemblies and get signatures at the same time, Republican candidates have to pick one process or the other. Either way, they need 1,500 signatures from each congressional district by May 27.

The only front-runner to cruise to victory Saturday was Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Hickenlooper. The Denver mayor had no opposition in the Democratic contest to replace Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter, who is not seeking re-election.

Hickenlooper accepted the Democratic nomination with a quirky speech, wearing a jacket with a zebra lapel to poke fun at a negative television ad that compares him to Ritter and calls the two men politicians of the same stripe.

The Denver mayor – who was elected largely because of his attacks on Denver's hated parking meters – promised to be a politician of "a different stripe."

___

Wyatt reported from Loveland, Colo.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DENVER

(AP) BROOMFIELD, Colo. — The Republican front-runner to win the party's nomination in the Colorado governor race and the state's Democratic senator were dealt setbacks in party assemblies on Sat...
(AP) BROOMFIELD, Colo. — The Republican front-runner to win the party's nomination in the Colorado governor race and the state's Democratic senator were dealt setbacks in party assemblies on Sat...
Filed by Ethan Axelrod  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:36 AM on 05/24/2010
The Institution has met the Revolution in the Republican party and boy are we ready for real leadership. Dan Maes did an amazing thing this last Saturday beating McInnis who has name recongnition tons of money and power with politicians. We The People are done with that nonsense and are taking our party back and bringing us back to sanity in government.

Good job to you democrats in not accepting the status quo either and having someone "appointed" be your party's candidate. Both parties must come back to make America great again and not turn our country into another solicalist utopia which is collapsing in Europe right now due to the weight of Unions and power straved politicians.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sals
09:47 AM on 05/24/2010
Would anyone in their right mind want anyone they know from the republican parties--the party of no no nooooo. I do believe we need more than 2 parties, maybe 5-6 and a cap on campaign finances.
04:54 PM on 05/23/2010
HuffPo commenters are of the same stripe as assembly participants -- party purists. But I hate to break it to you, Bennet, McInnis, and probably Norton are all gonna win their primaries.

I was a delegate for Bennet, and what I saw at the Assembly confirmed what I have seen from meeting both candidates several times before. Bennet makes a fine Democratic Senator, and Romanoff has a bright future in Colorado politics. Perhaps he'll be governor after Hickenlooper.
06:53 PM on 05/23/2010
Mm, well, I was there, too, and I thought the passion ran a lot higher for Romanoff. I also thought Romanoff's speech and film were superior to Bennet's at all levels. Guess the next few months will demonstrate which of us had the more accurate perception.

One thing we can both agree on, however. Both of them are light years ahead of their Republican opposition! I have great confidence that whether it's Romanoff or Bennet who prevails in August, they should be able to emerge victorious in November.
10:02 AM on 05/24/2010
Right. Whether it's Romanoff or Bennet, it'll still be sanity vs. whack job in November.
photo
GirlOutWest
I hope to be the person my dog thinks I am.
10:31 AM on 05/24/2010
I was there also and though Romanoff did a wonderful job and certainly does have a big future in Colorado but I still stand with Bennett. He may not have the flair of Romanoff but he's a good man with ideals I share and experience we need now. We are lucky to have two such great candidates. Go Hicklenlooper he is by far the best Governor candidate!!!
04:08 PM on 05/23/2010
And tell me, please, how long Bennet was the Denver Schools Superintendent before he was appointed to the Senate by Ritter????

And how long did Sen. Bennet live in Colorado before he was appointed its' Senator?

And where are Sen. Bennet's political roots?

And why did Sen. Bennet only support a health care public option after it was conveniently too late to change the bill?

Senator Bennet has little credibility in Colorado. Perhaps he should run for Senate in the midwestern state he hails from...
10:00 AM on 05/24/2010
Bennet was Superintendent of DPS long enough to drive the system into the red. He didn't step up on the health care bill until Romanoff announced his candidacy.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
alicante
03:23 PM on 05/23/2010
Romanoff's win Sat. was huge. It should be the headline. Now, let's get to work for him. Donate time and money if you can. Talk to about him to everyone you know. The difference between these two candidates is big.
01:37 PM on 05/23/2010
Why aren't we hearing more about Romanoff? This is great news. There are headlines about Maes, but not about Romanoff.
04:10 PM on 05/23/2010
excellent point. We need to see a national feature on Romanoff.
09:59 AM on 05/24/2010
That's because the Denver Post took over being the right wing newspaper in town after the demise of the Rocky Mtn News. All the local TV news follows their lead.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jalapeno
Atheist and lovin' it!
01:17 PM on 05/23/2010
Ken Buck's son is smokin' hot. He needs to run for office, and hopefully tea bag some of the ladies along the way...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dbos
Single payer universal health insurance agent
01:46 PM on 05/23/2010
cant teabag ladies
11:29 AM on 05/23/2010
Is it true that the name Maes once was Maestas?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
09:21 AM on 05/23/2010
Republican voters in Kentucky rebuffed Mitch McConnell's Party of No strategy by rejecting McConnell's surrogate candidate, Trey Grayson, and nominating Rand Paul, the demon spawn of the Tea Party and Sarah Palin, instead.

Kentucky voters in the primary election also sent another message to Republicans. More than two thirds, or 68 percent, of those voting in the primary registered as Democrats.

Next senator from Kentucky will likely be Democrat Jack Conway.
08:02 AM on 05/23/2010
Sorry , Romanoff is a long time political insider...so is Maes! Both have been 'local' party favorites--especially Romanoff who was in the state house and wanted the Senate appoinment that was given to Micheal Bennet...

This is strictly activists verse the voter....
10:01 AM on 05/23/2010
But Bennett is a Beltway insider, coming from DC to begin with.
Romanoff is a "local boy" and it appears a true Democrat not yet ruined by winning DC.
(What about Diana DeGette? Does she still have real roots here or has she been tainted by DC?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Hanson
Skeptical of the *pseudo-skeptics*
12:17 PM on 05/23/2010
Romanoff is much less political insider than Bennet who has the banking of Obama and the Washington elite. We told them yesterday we weren't interested. We're voting in Romanoff.
02:40 PM on 05/23/2010
Romanoff is grass-roots; Bennet is Astroturf. He is owned by Silverado Swindler and Republican money-man Larry Mizel (who raised $1M for Reagan during one event, back in the day); the payoff was a $300,000 earmark for a neo-con "terrorism exhibit."
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
alicante
11:33 PM on 05/22/2010
I was there today and saw Romanoff's speech. He truely reflects the needs of Colorado. Bennett used a lot of footage of Obama supporting him which is all he really has. He takes too much pac-money and Romanoff takes none. I walked into the event with a Bennett delegate from Pueblo that said all he sees on TV is Bennett ads and he is tired of him and all the money he is throwing into ads.. He said he was changing his vote to Romanoff. I wouldn't be surprised if this happened alot today. I think voters should take a real good look at Romanoff and his record of working for Colorado before they decide.
11:10 AM on 05/23/2010
I also attended the event in Broomfield as a Bennett delegate, and ended up commiting to Romanoff. Bennett's failure to commit one way or another on the Employee free choice act made my decision. As a retired IUOE local 3 crane operator, I enjoy the retirement benefits that other people in this nation should be able to enjoy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnnC0725
10:28 PM on 05/22/2010
Obama..still appears to be the kiss of death..within the Dem PArty..it appears everyone Dems and Independents and Repubs want real outsiders in Nov..
10:02 AM on 05/23/2010
Mr. Obama is not the kiss of death.
Being a shill for corporate or other wealthy interests is the kiss of death.
And that pretty much includes all incumbents.
photo
Intolerantcentrist
No thanks…I brought my own air.
10:39 AM on 05/23/2010
Isn’t incumbent synonymous moneyed interests?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Turtleposer
I have micro-bios in my tummy.
10:26 PM on 05/22/2010
The big news is that Tea Party Candidate got 0.46% more delegates over McInnis. Romanoff beats Bennet by 20% & so what?
11:12 AM on 05/23/2010
One can only hope it translates to a Romanoff victory in November.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Turtleposer
I have micro-bios in my tummy.
12:18 PM on 05/23/2010
I hope so too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
09:26 PM on 05/22/2010
the email I received from the bennet campaign (even though I was a delegate for Romanoff) spun it this way, something like "good news! Bennet made it on the ballot!".

it was great being there.
09:53 AM on 05/24/2010
Right. I got one of those too. That was like saying "water is wet!"
Of course he got on the ballot. He just got second billing.
I'm glad I was at the assembly too.
photo
foxbat
Don't jump to conclusions
09:20 PM on 05/22/2010
What's currently happening reminds me a lot of what happened when the conservative movement became the Conservative movement. The late William Buckley used to talk about small "c" conservatives and big "C" Conservatives. The little "c" conservatives were traditional conservatives in ideology and, to some degree, practice. Along came the folks like the MoralMajority and ChristianRight. First they co-opted the conservative message and then hijacked the GOP, forming the Conservative movement. As such, issues like limited spending, etc. which were much more associated with conservatives went by the wayside with Conservatives. Instead of the song remaining the same, the lyrics remained the same, but the tone changed dramatically.

Fast forward to today ... the TeaParty movement, which is really turning out to be a lot of overlap members with ClubForGrowth, especially the louder members, co-opted the general tenets of libertarians and are again making the move to hijack the GOP. Another shift for the GOP of this magnitude and folks may well forget that this was the party of Eisenhower, Goldwater, and even Reagan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnnC0725
10:30 PM on 05/22/2010
But it is happening in the Democratic Party too..people want real outsiders..
photo
foxbat
Don't jump to conclusions
11:24 PM on 05/22/2010
Not really. This is not a grassroots movement as that statement asserts. Make no mistake about what's happening in/to the TeaParty movement. Yes, there are some genuine citizens who want change, but what's driving the narrative, and the results, are things that have been in the works for years on the Conservative side. A ClubForGrowth by any other name is exactly what's happening and using the excuse of TeaParty. While "surveys" are saying that the TeaParty "looks like the electorate" it looks much more like the ClubForGrowth folks.

The MoralMajority and ChristianRight used that same argument about outsiders, but you know who won't be replaced? JimDeMint. JimInhofe. TomCoburn. OrinHatch. JohnCornyn. JeffSessions. Those are all Senatorial establishment guys.

While there will be Democrats that might be replaced by voters in 2010/2012, on the GOP side the voters are the MEANS to the end of something that has an "institutional" push behind it. Why else would Bennett be gone? And Crist? And keep an eye on Snowe and Collins. There was/is nothing corrupt or inept about those guys.
08:06 AM on 05/23/2010
Romanoff is a INSIDER long time...He is small time but the little ole ladies like him. and were bent when he was not appointed to the Senate seat...Never believe he is anything but the activists insider candidate...
10:06 AM on 05/23/2010
Very interesting history summary. Makes sense to me. Is this just your perception or do you have a "source"?

Of course, Democrats no longer support original democratic platform either. Any ideas about that?
photo
foxbat
Don't jump to conclusions
11:05 AM on 05/23/2010
This is more "spidey sense" than tables and numbers at this point. Also, things are pretty much in their infancy right now, in terms of fruition, but we'll have a lot more data points as more of these primaries finish up and we see who the casualties are. In particular, watch traditionally red states and bloodletting of folks that have been considered conservative and reasonable. The more of those that are forced out for folks that are even more conservative and untested or almost extremist in thought/practice, the more it's going to mirror the little "c" to big "C" movement. Now whether or not it goes beyond the transformation of the party and actually results in actually altering the Legislative Branch is a whole other animal entirely. Recall that ClubForGrowth measures progress not so much by extreme conservatives winning office, but just by the number of extreme conservatives in the party. They are happy to burn down the house and perish with it rather than allow a moderate conservative stay in that house.