iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Oil Spill: Cleaning Wetlands May Be Impossible, Scientists Say

MATTHEW BROWN   05/22/10 09:28 PM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill Wetlands

NEW ORLEANS — The gooey oil washing into the maze of marshes along the Gulf Coast could prove impossible to remove, leaving a toxic stew lethal to fish and wildlife, government officials and independent scientists said.

Officials are considering some drastic and risky solutions: They could set the wetlands on fire or flood areas in hopes of floating out the oil.

They warn an aggressive cleanup could ruin the marshes and do more harm than good. The only viable option for many impacted areas is to do nothing and let nature break down the spill.

More than 50 miles of Louisiana's delicate shoreline already have been soiled by the massive slick unleashed after the Deepwater Horizon rig burned and sank last month. Officials fear oil eventually could invade wetlands and beaches from Texas to Florida. Louisiana is expected to be hit hardest.

On Saturday, a major pelican rookery was awash in oil off Louisiana's coast. Hundreds of birds nest on the island, and an Associated Press photographer saw some birds and their eggs stained with the ooze. Nests were perched in mangroves directly above patches of crude.

Plaquemines Parish workers put booms around the island, but puddles of oil were inside the barrier.

"Oil in the marshes is the worst-case scenario," said Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the head of the federal effort to contain and clean up the spill.

Also Saturday, BP told federal regulators it plans to continue using a contentious chemical dispersant, despite orders from the Environmental Protection Agency to look for less toxic alternatives. BP said in a letter to the EPA that Corexit 9500 "remains the best option for subsea application."

The EPA didn't immediately comment on BP's decision.

Oil that has rolled into shoreline wetlands coats the stalks and leaves of plants such as roseau cane – the fabric that holds together an ecosystem that is essential to the region's fishing industry and a much-needed buffer against Gulf hurricanes. Soon, oil will smother those plants and choke off their supply of air and nutrients.

In some eddies and protected inlets, the ochre-colored crude has pooled beneath the water's surface, forming clumps several inches deep.

With the seafloor leak still gushing at least hundreds of thousands of gallons a day, the damage is only getting worse. Millions of gallons already have leaked so far.

Coast Guard officials said the spill's impact now stretches across a 150-mile swath, from Dauphin Island, Ala. to Grand Isle, La.

Over time, experts say weather and natural microbes will break down most of the oil. However, the crude will surely poison plants and wildlife in the months – even years – it will take for the syrupy muck to dissipate.

Back in 1989, crews fighting the Exxon Valdez tanker spill – which unleashed almost 11 million gallons of oil into Alaska's Prince William Sound – used pressure hoses and rakes to clean the shores. The Gulf Coast is just too fragile for that: those tactics could blast apart the peat-like soils that hold the marshes together.

Hundreds of miles of bayous and man-made canals crisscross the coast's exterior, offering numerous entry points for the crude. Access is difficult and time-intensive, even in the best of circumstances.

"Just the compaction of humanity bringing equipment in, walking on them, will kill them," said David White, a wetlands ecologist from Loyola University in New Orleans.

Marshes offer a vital line of defense against Gulf storms, blunting their fury before they hit populated areas. Louisiana and the federal government have spent hundreds of millions of dollars rebuilding barriers that were wiped out by hurricanes, notably Katrina in 2005.

They also act as nursery grounds for shrimp, crabs, oysters – the backbone of the region's fishing industry. Hundreds of thousands of migratory birds nest in the wetlands' inner reaches, a complex network of bayous, bays and man-made canals.

To keep oil from pushing deep into Louisiana's marshes, Gov. Bobby Jindal and officials from several coastal parishes want permission to erect a $350 million network of sand berms linking the state's barrier islands and headlands.

That plan is awaiting approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

After surveying oil-stricken areas Saturday, Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser said the berms were the marshes' last hope.

"It's getting in between all the cane and it's working through from one bayou to the next," he said.

Smaller spills have been occurring in the marshes for decades. In the past, cleanup crews would sometimes slice out oiled vegetation and take it to a landfill, said Andy Nyman with Louisiana State University.

But with the plants gone, water from the gulf would roll in and wash away the roots, turning wetlands to open water.

Adm. Allen said that where conditions are right, crews could set fire to oil-coated plants.

Nyman and other experts, though, warn it's tricky. If the marsh is too wet, the oil won't burn. Too dry, the roots burn and the marsh can be ruined.

BP PLC – which leased the sunken rig and is responsible for the cleanup – said Saturday that cleanup crews have started more direct cleanup methods along Pass a Loutre in Plaquemines Parish. Shallow water skimmers were attempting to remove the oil from the top of the marsh.

Streams of water could later be used in a bid to wash oil from between cane stalks.

In other cases, the company will rely on "bioremediation" – letting oil-eating microbes do the work.

"Nature has a way of helping the situation," said BP spokesman John Curry.

But Nyman said the dispersants could slow the microbes from breaking down the oil.

White, the Loyola scientist, predicted at least short-term ruin for some of the wetlands he's been studying for three decades. Under a worst-case scenario, he said the damage could exceed the 217 square miles of wetlands lost during the 2005 hurricane season.

"When I say that my stomach turns," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS — The gooey oil washing into the maze of marshes along the Gulf Coast could prove impossible to remove, leaving a toxic stew lethal to fish and wildlife, government officials and ind...
NEW ORLEANS — The gooey oil washing into the maze of marshes along the Gulf Coast could prove impossible to remove, leaving a toxic stew lethal to fish and wildlife, government officials and ind...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9,328
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (147 total)
05:35 PM on 05/27/2010
In my opinion, it is impossible to remove the oil from the water; even so, burning the wetlands or flood areas can bring dangerous effects to many living beings.
This is a serious situation!!
12:14 PM on 06/02/2010
I'm not so sure about that. There are products on the market (bio remediation products such as bio boom, etc.) that are environmentally friendly. This technology is amazing. Not only does it absorb the oil from water and terrain, it then biodegrades itself. Check out companies like Green Stream Solutions. My thing is that the products are out there but no one seems to be working hard enough to control it. I think the clean up, spread control and 'plugging' should all be done simultaneously.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrVee
11:03 AM on 05/27/2010
Seems BP reads the Huffington Post. Plugging the leak like this was my idea. Cool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ravyn
10:34 AM on 05/27/2010
Watching Anderson Cooper last night going out on boat into marshes and seeing gunk everywhere and no birds or anything -- and NO cleanup crews, NO coast guard or anyone doing anything -- and not only makes me sick, it makes me feel like the Bushies are still in office. James Carville and others down there are still hopeful Obama is getting bad advice and once he gets there on Friday, he'll take charge, but I'm not so sure he gets it (and I voted for him). And yet he didn't rush down to Louisiana on Wednesday but went out to California for some fund raising. Meanwhile endangered brown pelicans, turtles, dolphins and other creatures are dying. Maybe only BP can plug the leak, but where are supertankers that were used successfully in the Persian Gulf to suck up 85% of the oil spills there? Why can't the Army Corp of Engineers get approval for $360 million dollars so they can try dredging to try to save the wetlands when billions of dollars will be lost in tourism and fishing for years to come? Obama needs on Friday to have a General George Patton moment when he puts on his commander in chief hat, aggressively takes charge and goes on the offensive ordering agencies into action, otherwise he's going to be like those guys in charge of the battle of Gallipoli in WWI.
09:59 PM on 05/25/2010
Stating that cleaning the marshes is unacceptable. They need to do what ever it takes to restore the areas, if it takes years, we have the time. There are plenty of unemployed people that could possible be trained as 'clean up' specialists.

Lets shove some BP executives in the pipe to stop the leak!!!!

http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=129499320397132
06:46 PM on 05/25/2010
Gosh, they need detergent to clean birds. I guess BP has been too busy to deliver ten times the amount they need. F BP x 10,000
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ravyn
10:45 AM on 05/27/2010
Probably BP figures using all that toxic stuff will kill all the birds and sea creatures and they'll all sink to the bottom so no one will ever know and there won't be any bill to clean or care for them. Then kill all the wetlands and marshes with this gunk and you don't have to spend money trying to save them since everyone says its impossible to clean them. Keep in mind in Alaska there are still rocks, stones, shoreline still coated with oil from the Exxon Valdez from 21 years ago and that's considered easy to clean in comparison to wetlands.

By the time this is over I hope BP finds itself billions of dollars in the red and, at a minimum, a few people on their payroll wind up in jail for criminal negligence. It won't bring back extinct sea birds and sea creatures, or bring back fisheries (many in Alaska still haven't come back), or bring back tourists who don't want to wipe tar off their feet when they go to the beach, but at least it would be some minimal justice. And some people in the U.S. government should also probably be wearing orange jumpsuits when this is over.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:11 PM on 05/25/2010
Anyone who's ever tried to clean an oil stain off their driveway knows.... it IS impossible to clean wetlands....unless you do it with a toothbrush and acetone....or whatever lovely chemical BP is pumping into the ocean.

When I think EPA as a regulator... I want to vomit. "ECG" is what is hould be called.... environmental call girl.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Clark Taylor
02:47 PM on 05/25/2010
The EPA is helpless to stop this...coastal regions of the world from Africa to Siberia are at risk. At this time, I know of no global organization policing and/or protecting the environment. The human race has claimed it lock, stock, and barrel and will use it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ravyn
10:51 AM on 05/27/2010
Haven't cleaned tar off a driveway (because I never have had a driveway) but tried cleaning tar off beach towels and bathing suits after swimming on Long Island beaches as a child some decades ago: never could get it all off even using turpentine (which you obviously can't use on sea creatures or birds). Tar is sticky, smelly. I remember after storms at sea sometimes carefully walking the NY beaches trying not to step in the globs of wet tar. There were major sea lanes off the coast and the old freighters and oil ships often dumped into the water -- the sea water sometimes even looked brownish and was oily (I don't know if this still happens at places like Reese Park or not) and we couldn't go in swimming.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JavaManiac
...with liberty and justice for all
03:31 AM on 05/25/2010
If you want to help - follow this group on twitter

http://twitter.com/gulfvolunteers
08:56 PM on 05/24/2010
In the meantime, is there a place we can send some Dawn dishwashing detergent? They're going to need a lot of it. (used for bird washing)

Does anyone know if they're going to try and re-locate some of the wildlife?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowfiron
09:59 PM on 05/24/2010
You can't separate 'wildlife' from their habitat, other similar environments already have their own 'wildlife' there are no unused marshes available.
11:37 PM on 05/24/2010
Actually, sometimes you can. Otherwise there would be no rehab and release programs. At this point, it would be sheer idiocy to say that some of these birds and others would be better off here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JavaManiac
...with liberty and justice for all
03:30 AM on 05/25/2010
http://twitter.com/gulfvolunteers

This group - looking for people power and dawn dishwashing liquid.
11:31 AM on 05/25/2010
Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
07:52 PM on 05/24/2010
"Also Saturday, BP told federal regulators it plans to continue using a contentious chemical dispersant, despite orders from the Environmental Protection Agency to look for less toxic alternatives. BP said in a letter to the EPA that Corexit 9500 "remains the best option for subsea application."

The EPA didn't immediately comment on BP's decision." -- A direct quote from this post.

Let me translate this into common English:

The EPA told BP that it was alarmed that they intended to use highly toxic chemicals to disperse the oil slick and expressed their wishes for BP to find a safer alternative.

BP told the EPA to @#$^&* off! and that they knew better and was going to use the poisonous stuff anyway.

The EPA waffled.
11:33 AM on 05/25/2010
I believe the EPA had a specific suggestion, but the suggested product is not available in the kind of quantities required.
02:03 AM on 05/26/2010
http://www.biogreenclean.com/
100% Chemical Free, Plant derived, 100 % Biodegradeable... Check it out.
01:54 AM on 05/26/2010
Why? of all things, are they using a dispersant ? Wouldn't it make more sense to use a coagulant, so that the oil would 'clump up' and be easier to deal with? Is it because they didn't want people to see how bad this 'spill' really is? I think the term 'spill' is now very inappropriate and minimizes the severity of the situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ravyn
10:55 AM on 05/27/2010
I think you've got it: they don't want people to see how bad the spill is. Probably is at least 10-20x (maybe even a lot more than that) as much as they're saying it is. But given how much is coming ashore now after only a month, I'm afraid we've seen only the tip of the proverbial iceberg of the oil out there even if they manage to seal the well this week. And if they don't seal it and this continues into August...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Clark Taylor
07:33 PM on 05/24/2010
The problem of the Gulf of Mexico is the problem for the world's coastal regions owned more and more by oil companies. Google it. African coasts now are contracted to oil companies. Check it out at sites like this one: http://www.ghanabusinessnews.com/2010/04/17/ghana-racing-against-the-oil-curse/
07:10 PM on 05/24/2010
Ha! The gulf is now a toilet bowl as a result of 50 years of American activity and policy in "the zone". YOU are not a fish or an amphibian. Let me tell you something buster...Oh forget it. You'll probably starve before I do. Larry Fishburn, fish, currently 90km n/w of Cuba and thinkin' about Rio!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JavaManiac
...with liberty and justice for all
03:33 AM on 05/25/2010
Keywest or are you on your boat?
05:33 PM on 05/24/2010
“If anyone wants to help here......

http://www.nwf.org/Wildlife/Wildlife-Conservation/Threats-to-Wildlife/Oil-Spill/Mobile-Giving.aspx

I have done it the max amount of times you can”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Clark Taylor
07:16 PM on 05/24/2010
Thank you!! I hope everyone will give!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlot
04:22 PM on 05/24/2010
All of this makes me so sick, and so depressed. It is an utter nightmare, and just one more thing in the growing list of things that makes me ashamed of my country. What have we done?
In a perfect world, the personal fortunes of all of those who have ever uttered the words "Drill, Baby, Drill" (paging Sarah Palin) would be taken from them and put toward cleaning up this disaster (if that's even possible at this point).
...and I still don't understand why charges are not being brought against those responsible for this horror.
11:32 PM on 05/24/2010
Well, in your country, one usually waits until all of the evidence is in, then develops a case. Some lawsuits have been filed already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ravyn
11:01 AM on 05/27/2010
But it took up to 20 years to resolve some law cases involving the Exxon Valdez disaster.
03:31 PM on 05/24/2010
It looks like chocolate milk! What's the problem?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ravyn
11:03 AM on 05/27/2010
Nothing remotely funny about this. Have you seen what an endangered brown pelican or sea turtle looks like covered in this? Or what beaches look like covered with gunk? Or how about not being able to fish for anything in the Gulf because it will be so toxic for maybe 20 years or so. Is that funny enough for you?
02:22 PM on 05/24/2010
Until society makes a stand against the large global organisations who lobby politicians across the world, mankind will never be more than a victim of its own excess. http://www.pierredelamare.co.uk
11:40 AM on 05/25/2010
We use oil for survival. That's part of the problem. There are many places in this country that if they don't heat their homes in the winter, they could die. Most of us also rely on autos for all survival activities such as working and providing food.
Calling oil an "addiction" is as silly as calling food and water addictions.
Implying that it's a "luxury" or self-indulgence is just so much liberal tripe.
We cannot solve our problems unless we stay firmly rooted in reality.
Obama's plan to spread our needs across a wide variety of energy options, thus far is as reasonable as anything else I've heard.