More

Justice Department: Expect 'Vigorous' Scrutiny Of Health Insurance Mergers

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   05/24/10 07:15 PM ET   AP

Doj Health Insurance Mergers

WASHINGTON — In a blunt warning to the health insurance industry, the Obama administration said Monday it won't hesitate to block mergers that threaten to stifle competition.

Justice Department antitrust chief Christine Varney told a lawyers' conference that vigorous enforcement of anti-monopoly laws is vital to the success of the new health care law, particularly in trying to control rising premiums.

The antitrust division "is committed to vigorously, but responsibly, scrutinizing mergers in the health care industry that appear to present a competitive concern," Varney told a joint meeting of the American Bar Association and the American Health Lawyers Association.

"If we determine that our initial concerns were well-founded, we will not hesitate to block the merger or to require the settlement concessions necessary to protect consumers," she added.

Varney also put hospitals on notice that the government will investigate mergers "likely to reduce competition."

Big insurers are steadily getting bigger, and in many states one or two large carriers dominate the market. Groups representing doctors and consumers have protested the trend, blaming industry consolidation for rising costs. Insurers counter that larger companies save money by being more efficient administrators, and they fault doctors and hospitals for driving up medical costs be performing too many tests and procedures.

New competitive insurance markets are a cornerstone of President Barack Obama's health care law. They'll open for business in 2014 to serve consumers who buying their policies directly, as well as small businesses.

Varney said the goals of health care overhaul "cannot be achieved" if insurer mergers reduce competition, or if big companies use their market clout to keep out upstarts.

She gave a preview of the Justice Department's strategy through a case study of a recent merger proposal that failed after the government opposed it.

In March, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Physicians Health Plan of Mid-Michigan dropped their plan to consolidate in Lansing. Blue Cross had nearly 70 percent of the market, while leading competitor Physicians controlled about 20 percent.

"Our investigation found that it was competition between the two companies that had led them to offer lower prices, better service, and more innovative products ... even though Blue Cross-Michigan already enjoyed a substantial market share," she said. "The acquisition also would have given Blue Cross-Michigan the ability to control physician reimbursement rates in a manner that could harmed the quality of health care."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — In a blunt warning to the health insurance industry, the Obama administration said Monday it won't hesitate to block mergers that threaten to stifle competition. Justice Department...
WASHINGTON — In a blunt warning to the health insurance industry, the Obama administration said Monday it won't hesitate to block mergers that threaten to stifle competition. Justice Department...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:29 AM on 05/26/2010
A little less talk and a lot more action is in order.
iridium53
Semper Fi
10:20 AM on 05/26/2010
Vigorous? This doesn't pass the laugh test.

Team Obama doesn't vigorously pursue companies. Ever.
He does precisely what the executives of companies tell him to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oakland
06:10 AM on 05/26/2010
More BS. Watch them huff and puff and do nothing again. Mergers? As if the corporations are already too big. What a joke. If this is the best Obama and his corporate Democrats can do, they should be fired. I truly regret voting for Obama won't make the same mistake twice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:39 AM on 05/26/2010
Actually great, but like all other measures to control costs in the hc bill, things can easily go down the hill for consumers as soon as republicans get their hands on government again. What are the requirements for lower costs? Always wondered what can happen to the minimum(and it will be minimal benefits) insurance mandate amount down the road? Looks like it can probably be increased by a mere majority in congress.
10:07 PM on 05/25/2010
note they said vigorous not rigorous
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
inthedesert
Those who never question will fall for anything.
05:51 PM on 05/25/2010
Uh huh...ok...right...great....wonderful........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
Send the kids off to die, bleed their country dry.
03:42 PM on 05/25/2010
*yawn*
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
evalela
02:39 PM on 05/25/2010
Lets not forget about lawyers with their lawsuits that drive up the cost of mal-practice insurance.Many doctors opt out of providing certain types of health care(obgyn,pediatrics,etc,because its just too risky!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OleProfessor
"Ours is not a system based upon trust"
12:13 PM on 05/25/2010
Obama sold us out the to the Health Insurance Industry!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magnoliabird
04:47 PM on 05/25/2010
I am not feeling your post. I personally, do not tend to agree that Obama sold us out. Who sold us out were those Blue Dog Democrats and the Republicans who would not participate at all, eventhough Obama used some of their suggestions. The Repubs would not even consider playing fair and participating in anything but No, No, No! The Blue Dogs and their own special wants were for their own wants and not the wants of the people. Obama wanted things in this health care bill and hoped that Congress would commit to it but as we all know, Congress did not put things in it that Obama initially wanted. Could not get enough votes. Obama does not vote in Congress to pass anything. I blame Congress. They are the real culprits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
evalela
05:23 PM on 05/25/2010
No! corporations threw us to the health insurance industry wolves so they could both pick our bones clean! Who's the winners the corporations that cut your health care benefits,then the insurance companies that give you fewer benefits for more money,then turn around and deny or dely benefits,hoping you'll give up or die before they have to pay!They're both making out like bandits!!!!!!!!!
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
08:32 PM on 05/25/2010
Read Status Syndrome....it is all part of Shock Doctrine and the Buffetts and Gates of this world will not be happy until they are picking our bones.....
12:05 PM on 05/25/2010
I am sure the scrutiny will be just as vigourous as the SEC scrutinized Madoff, as the banking regulators scrutinized the sub-prime fiasco, and as the energy department regulators scrutinized BP.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
08:34 PM on 05/25/2010
Exactly and that is EXACTLY why we need the Eisenhouer TAX RATES back in effect....We need them MORE now that we did back in the 1950s....The last 30 years have absolutely eliminated any middle class in this country, we have NO JOB SECURITY, NO PENSIONS and our 401Ks have been DESTROYED and our time off has been seriously reduced.....Let alone NO HEALTH SECURITY.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaquaroSue
12:04 PM on 05/25/2010
Would that be anything like the "vigorous scrutiny" of oil drilling platform safety?
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
08:35 PM on 05/25/2010
Great comment!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rogo99
Has the world changed, or have I changed?
12:00 PM on 05/25/2010
Thankfully the merger of Independence Blue Cross/Blue Shield and Highmark in PA did not go through last year. The PA insurance commissioner put too many stipulations on the new company to make it worthwhile. The singular company would have given maybe 80% of the PA health insurance market to one company, caused employment redundancies, and only been good for the bank accounts of the CEO's. They tried to spin it as being an economically beneficial consolodation, and jumped the gun with a new name and logo before the deal was approved. Thank you, PA. Now if only they'd get over the "unwritten rule" of not competing across the state.
11:59 AM on 05/25/2010
Hey Sebelius, why don't you spend your time SCRUTINIZING rising healthcare COSTS, instead?
That's what Obamacare failed to do.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eddw88
11:50 AM on 05/25/2010
Love this change, but man is it slooooowwww.....
11:59 AM on 05/25/2010
this is NOT change, by any means.
11:48 AM on 05/25/2010
"Vigorous scrutiny" means were going to spend six months and hundreds of thousands of dollars researching before we let them do whatever they want anyway.
12:05 PM on 05/25/2010
That is how congressmen squeeze out all those extra campaign dollars.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
08:36 PM on 05/25/2010
Exactly how the Bush Administration shook down the corporations for contributions.....Where are the contributions to the BUSH familia for the last 50 years....