iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Oil Tax Increase By Congress Would Fund Federal Cleanup, Response To Oil Spills

Oil Spill Tax

STEPHEN OHLEMACHER   05/24/10 09:07 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Responding to the massive BP oil spill, Congress is getting ready to quadruple – to 32 cents a barrel – a tax on oil used to help finance cleanups. The increase would raise nearly $11 billion over the next decade.

The tax is levied on oil produced in the U.S. or imported from foreign countries. The revenue goes to a fund managed by the Coast Guard to help pay to clean up spills in waterways, such as the Gulf of Mexico.

The tax increase is part of a larger bill that has grown into a nearly $200 billion grab bag of unfinished business that lawmakers hope to complete before Memorial Day. The key provisions are a one-year extension of about 50 popular tax breaks that expired at the end of last year, and expanded unemployment benefits, including subsidies for health insurance, through the end of the year.

The House could vote on the bill as early as Wednesday, though Democrats were still working Monday to round up the votes. Democratic leaders had wanted to hold a vote Tuesday.

There has been little public opposition to the oil tax from the petroleum industry. But the overall bill would add about $134 billion to the federal budget deficit, drawing opposition from Republicans and some Democrats.

Senate leaders hope to complete work on the bill before Congress goes on a weeklong break next week. The Obama administration issued a statement Monday supporting the bill.

Lawmakers want to increase the current 8-cent-a-barrel tax on oil to make sure there is enough money available to respond to oil spills. At least 6 million gallons of crude have spewed into the Gulf of Mexico since a drilling rig exploded April 20 off the Louisiana coast.

President Barack Obama and congressional leaders have said they expect BP to foot the bill for the cleanup.

"Taxpayers will not pick up the tab," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday.

BP executives told Congress last week they would pay "all legitimate claims" for damages. But the government needs upfront money to respond to spills, as well as money to pay for cleanups when the responsible party is unable to pay, or is unknown. Money spent from the fund can later be recovered from the company responsible for the spill.

The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund has about $1.5 billion available. Under current law, only $1 billion can be spent from the fund on a single incident. The bill would increase the spending limit to $5 billion.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said the tax increase was hastily put together, without adequate study, to help pay for an unrelated bill. The tax increase was unveiled Thursday, without any congressional hearings to study its impact.

"I have seen no analysis on how this would impact energy security, how this would impact domestic production, how this would impact the overall economics in the country," said Christopher Guith, vice president of the chamber's energy institute. "There hasn't been any sort of deliberation on this."

Guith said the tax could be passed on to consumers, depending on the ability of oil companies to raise gas prices in response to a tax increase.

Lawmakers felt the tax increase, to 32 cents a barrel, was reasonable, said Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee.

"We just decided to take a look at what we thought would be a reasonable increase," Levin said.

The American Petroleum Institute has not taken a position on the tax increase, though a spokeswoman said Congress should study the ramifications before acting.

"We understand we need to have an insurance policy in order to cover people in the event of a spill," said the spokeswoman, Cathy Landry. "At the same time we need to have a vital oil and gas industry."

The bill does not address a federal law that caps liability at $75 million for economic damages beyond direct cleanup costs. Democratic Senators tried to pass a bill last week that would have increased the cap to $10 billion, but they were blocked by Republicans.

The oil industry says such a high cap would make it difficult, if not impossible, to insure oil rigs.

BP said Monday its costs for responding to the spill had grown to about $760 million.

___

The bill is H.R. 4213

Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Responding to the massive BP oil spill, Congress is getting ready to quadruple – to 32 cents a barrel – a tax on oil used to help finance cleanups. The increase would ra...
WASHINGTON — Responding to the massive BP oil spill, Congress is getting ready to quadruple – to 32 cents a barrel – a tax on oil used to help finance cleanups. The increase would ra...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AceNewsServices
Changing The World One Step At A Time
07:35 AM on 05/27/2010
As the people of America start to realise that it will be their taxes that will pay the price of BP`s failings in making adequate protection by allocating profits under a fund-guarantee scheme that would protect both the livelihoods of the people in parts of the world whose lives have been devastated by the overall impact of oil companies making massive profits at their expense.

And as this ability to pass the buck and make other people pay the cost of their damage has become the norm in today`s world and by allowing this to happen time after time we are opening the door to other companies to destroy our eco-system and damage our environment in the pursuit of power and money, it is time for them to pay not us.
06:09 PM on 05/26/2010
Republicans everywhere are trying to do the math and are figuring out that Obama is going to make them pay $.24 more per gallon. This confirms all the constant talk about Obama raising taxes which in turn proves everything other bad thing they've ever heard about him. Democrats need to SHOUT at the top of their lungs that it is less than $.01 per gallon increase, the $.24 is per BARREL. Republicans usually don't think for themselves and when they do they usually screw it all up. So go out there and tell a republican it's $.01 not $.24. This will be a huge issue with everyday republicans, this will matter. It's the everyday stuff that actually effects them directly that motivates them to vote.
05:56 PM on 05/26/2010
Here we go...... Once again we foot the bill. When is enough enough already?

I know it's inevitable we'll pay for it but I truly wonder how that would work in my business. I do something to screw up and I charge the customer for the repair?

I am struggling to get my arms around all this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:22 PM on 05/25/2010
Are you effin' kidding me? ALREADY working on tax payers footing the bill for this?

This is truly a disgusting place to live...it really is.

BOYCOTT BP!
08:09 AM on 05/25/2010
There was never any doubt in my mind that we would pick up the tab for this disaster....one way or another. Obviously, the government wants BP to remain in control of this heartbreaking disaster. Should the government take the reigns on this mess, liability would shift, at least to a degree. And, the creeps at BP would simply say: " Had the government not taken control, we could have had the well capped sooner. ". I still feel that the government should have taken control of keeping oil off the shores, and cleaning up the oil that reached them, with BP picking up the tab. Leave the BP the job of capping the well since the government is even more clueless about how to stop the gusher than BP is! Man, this is just breaking my heart. If the top kill attempt fails, the gulf is ruined...
02:33 PM on 05/25/2010
"Taxpayers will not pick up the tab," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday--You can bet we're going to pay for this. Tell me again how that won't be passed down. This is all about saving BP's (financial) arse. There should be immediate asset seizure and criminal charges filed. A 50m dollar a day fine might prompt them for a quicker solution. A friend of mine was a consultant on that rig. He said(the next day) "this will take months to fix, BP is clueless how to plug the well". And since the blowout, Obama has signed 17 more per
03:51 AM on 05/25/2010
This is *not* an "oil spill" in the way that a life-threatening injury is not a "boo boo" or an "ouchie"!

Author Dominique Browning has recently suggested giving this disaster a name that will stick - and one that includes the name of the perpetrator, just as the name "Exxon Valdez" eternally linked the company.

I totally agree with her. To leave out BP's name is ridiculous. Let's start calling this what it is:
The 2010 BP-Gulf Gusher.

I invite you to take note of this name, use it in any and all comments and references. Perhaps we can begin to erode BP's brilliant PR strategy (perhaps they've spent more time and money trying to manipulate the coverage for this purpose than address the problem?!) and link them to this disaster forever more.

Are you in?
05:42 PM on 05/25/2010
I couldn't agree more. I'm in!
03:23 AM on 05/25/2010
If there is a way to ensure that BP makes money back from it's failure in the Gulf, it will be by reducing capacity, to increase the cost of the barrel, or to collude with other energy companies. I have worked at Shell, Gulf and Chevron (back when I saw Condi Rice's name in the Global Address List) and I know what the business is all about. They don't make billions by selling a barrel of oil at the price that we hear about.

This "spill" is going to affect all of us. Not just the fisherman that catch off of the coast of Lousiana, or all of the creatures that inhabit the areas that the oil has now, or will, infest, but the entire Gulf of Mexico area. Travel to countries in the area will be destroyed, thus vital dollars lost.

So much lost... Because the Obama administration didn't seize control of the operations of a Company that doesn't care about what happened, it only cares about what it can lose. Poor BP...

This is Obama's Katrina (or Chernobyl)... Bush was an idiot (no doubt), not just with Katrina, but he made his death blow with that destruction, but Obama (who I supported north of the border) has an even worse disaster on his hands and he let's oil companies call the shots.

Good luck all. This is going to be a bad deal for everyone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
One more Thing
02:16 AM on 05/25/2010
I suppose the recent SCOTUS decision prohibits congress from restricting oil companies from financing campaigns for elected officals, but what about ethical and criminal relationships? Can't they be tightened up?
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
12:32 AM on 05/25/2010
Wow, someone finally pointed out the elephant in the room! Oil is too cheap, because we don't pay for the externalized costs at the point of sale.

Personally, I'd prefer a more honest accounting of the true cost of oil. The costs of oil spills are just one of many hidden costs we eventually must pay.

But, it's a start.

Remind me -- which oil company uses that particular slogan?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
One more Thing
02:19 AM on 05/25/2010
They say people won't cut back much on gasoline until the price reaches over $9.25 per gallon so we could afford to raise the tax per gallon at the pump another $6.00 before people got really strapped.
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
02:42 AM on 05/25/2010
I've often said this: phase in a petroleum tax, $2.50 / barrel at a time -- say, every three months. Raise taxes on coal and natural gas in parallel. This avoids abrupt price shocks, but still sends a clear message, namely, to prepare to find alternatives to fossil fuels.

Once fossil-fuel use has demonstrated a sustained decline -- say, eight quarters in a row -- stop raising the tax for a while, and see what happens.

I think that people will respond very differently to oil at $140 / barrel, with all of that going into the oil companies' pockets, versus oil at $80 / barrel with $60 in surtaxes. They can always HOPE that oil prices will fall if the companies are gouging them. The 2008 price spike and subsequent drop will help convince them that they're right to hope, so why change?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
12:28 AM on 05/25/2010
As evidenced by Cathy Landry's comment, oil still rules us and we are oil's peons.
photo
Scoppertop
Sunny Side
10:40 PM on 05/24/2010
No F-ing Way! Democrats should definitely counter with an 'income tax' on the oil companies.
05:31 PM on 05/25/2010
I would agree, but the consumer will just end up paying that as an increased cost at the pump. The problem is that the Government takes it's queue from Big Oil (and bankers, etc.). Big Oil will not suffer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eyeful
Virtuous Raconteur
10:02 PM on 05/24/2010
GOP pissants!

"The bill does not address a federal law that caps liability at $75 million for economic damages beyond direct cleanup costs. Democratic Senators tried to pass a bill last week that would have increased the cap to $10 billion, but they were blocked by Republicans."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
One more Thing
02:23 AM on 05/25/2010
You don't expect Democrats to do any more about it do you? They would never challenge Republicans on anything ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 PM on 05/24/2010
"...But the government needs upfront money to respond to spills, as well as money to pay for cleanups when the responsible party is unable to pay, or is unknown. Money spent from the fund can later be recovered from the company responsible for the spill..."

Jeeeeze Louise......
If the responsible party is 'unable to pay' they shouldn't have gotten a permit in the first place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
One more Thing
02:31 AM on 05/25/2010
Right and the fee for the permit should be the cost of a potential clean up. Heaven forbid any oil company would fail to pay for a clean up, but should that happen , the leader of the Tea Baggers says cleaning up spills and gay marriage are the responsiblity of the individual states.
07:00 PM on 05/24/2010
"Taxpayers will not pick up the tab," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday.

Won't the extra tax on the oil just be passed on to everyone else in the form of higher heating oil and gasoline prices so the taxpayers will pick up the tab?

Instead of taxing the oil, just make the BP shareholders pay for the cleanup by giving up dividends for 5 years or however long it takes to pay 100% of the cleanup. When you buy stock in a company, you must take the good with the bad.

Have all oil companies contribute to a superfund for cleaning up oil spills.
photo
Scoppertop
Sunny Side
10:52 PM on 05/24/2010
We're going to pay for it anyway. Big oil has big accountants to cook the books.
05:32 PM on 05/25/2010
You got that right!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dawg100
05:54 PM on 05/24/2010
BP spills it; you get to pay to clean it up!