More

Gulf Oil Spill Cleanup: Boom Hasn't Been As Effective As Hoped

BRIAN SKOLOFF   05/28/10 09:22 AM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill

GRAND ISLE, La. — Globs of sticky brownish ooze soil miles of sensitive shoreline and marsh from Alabama to Louisiana. Pelican rookeries are awash in oil. Oyster beds and shrimp nurseries face certain death. All the while, long, slender barriers intended to protect the shoreline float twisted, tangled or sometimes just broken apart, unable to stop the creeping crude.

Since last month's rig explosion and spill of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico – now the largest spill in U.S. history, surpassing the Exxon Valdez – more than 3 million feet of so-called boom has been deployed along the coast. But it's not a fail-safe method of keeping the oil from washing ashore. It's not always sturdy enough and high winds and waves can send the slime cascading over the barriers.

The key line of defense is sometimes defenseless itself against the elements.

"Even if it's working properly, the best it will do is move the problem somewhere else," said Doug Helton, incident operations coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Emergency Response Division.

"It might be moving it somewhere that's not boomed or it might be moving it 100 yards away where there's a failure in the boom," Helton said. "The use of booms is just one tool but all the boom does is deflect oil, and that's if it functions properly."

BP says it has spent more than $800 million on cleanup and containment efforts since its Deepwater Horizon rig exploded April 20 and sank 50 miles off the Louisiana coast. Since then, an estimated 19 million gallons or more of crude has spewed into the sea.

While BP couldn't immediately provide a figure for how much money has been spent purchasing and deploying the booms, industry estimates put costs around $20 a foot for the basic product – totaling at least $60 million just to buy it, not to mention the cost to hire people to deploy it.

Experts say while the boom isn't perfect, it provides one necessary line of defense. It also offers a psychological boost to those who feel helpless.

Because the oil spill is so widespread, manpower needed to maintain the boom and regularly collect oil from its constraints is stretched thin, Helton said. And as the barriers break apart, he said, response time to repair them must be quick because once the oil seeps past, it's a losing battle.

The spill's impact on shorelines now stretches across 150 miles, from Dauphin Island, Ala., to Grand Isle, La., and has begun to creep inland into sensitive marshland.

"Normally, a spill would affect a smaller geographic area so you'd have more people per linear mile of boom to maintain it, but here the pressure was on to get the boom deployed," Helton said. "It's a difficult situation and people have very high expectations.

"There's no silver bullet," he added.

Regardless of the setbacks, BP spokesman John Curry said the booms are still proving to be an effective tool.

"Booms, by and large, do work. They're not fail-safe, but they're our best protection to contain the oil and protect the coast," Curry said.

Stephen Reilly, CEO of Slickbar Products Corp., one of the world's largest manufacturers of oil spill equipment, including boom, acknowledged the product has limitations based on wind, waves and currents.

He said Slickbar has so far provided several hundred thousand feet of boom to the Gulf oil spill effort, and calls it "absolutely worth it."

"You have to put something in there," Reilly said. "You have to at least make an attempt to deflect it away from these sensitive areas ... The key is to at least try to contain it."

Inexperience may also be taking a toll on the effectiveness of the booms, said Ed Overton, a Louisiana State University professor of environmental sciences.

Hundreds of people, including fishermen and shrimpers who have never deployed boom, have mobilized to help.

"People are frustrated and they want to do something so they say, 'I'll go out and lay the boom.' But if you don't know what you're doing, you're not going to do it right," Overton said. "I'm certain there's a significant percentage of boom deployment that is basically a wasted effort. I've seen shrimp boats just pulling boom and it's not doing anything."

Jefferson Parish Sheriff Newell Normand said neither BP nor the federal government is listening to the locals, who know these waters, about where to lay the booms.

"We're still deploying boom in areas that in many cases don't make sense to us, but that's where they want it," Newell said. "They're not asking us for input. Someone else is commanding this ship and they're not taking input from the local commercial fishing industry that knows these waters better than anybody.

"We don't have a command post that's totally unified where they're actually listening to the locals," he added.

But even beyond the environmental effort to contain the oil, effective or not, the booming serves another crucial purpose, providing a psychological boost to those who feel helpless, Overton said.

"It's an ecological incident but this is also a sociological disaster," he said. "It's helping people think they're helping the environment, and there's a lot of good to that. I'm talking about getting to their psyche. They don't know what the future will bring.

"Booming is not just about protecting the environment," he added. "It's also to help the people and that should not be considered trivial or a waste of time."

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Brown, Jason Dearen and Greg Bluestein and Video Journalist Jason Bronis in Louisiana, and Holbrook Mohr in Mississippi contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

GRAND ISLE, La. — Globs of sticky brownish ooze soil miles of sensitive shoreline and marsh from Alabama to Louisiana. Pelican rookeries are awash in oil. Oyster beds and shrimp nurseries face c...
GRAND ISLE, La. — Globs of sticky brownish ooze soil miles of sensitive shoreline and marsh from Alabama to Louisiana. Pelican rookeries are awash in oil. Oyster beds and shrimp nurseries face c...
Filed by Gazelle Emami  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 90
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:23 PM on 05/29/2010
They must be given the equipment to build barrier equipment. I has to be built from the bottom up since we don't know where the oil is under the water.
photo
MyFatCat
Slacktivist no longer
01:08 AM on 05/29/2010
HOPED?

As in, "not projected, not estimated based on data, not forecast, but HOPED?"

It's almost as if the emotional need to be rescued from reckless endangerment of the environment, to say nothing of personal cupidity and stupidity, replaced actual engineering and science. How strange. If I didn't know any better, I'd say BP was envious of Massey's ability to cut corners to maximize profits, and took a crash course in how to win the race to the bottom.

But that would be cynical of me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimmicommonsense
12:32 AM on 05/29/2010
This almost seems deliberate...with all of the physics available why can't these leaks be stopped? We can travel millions of miles into space, but can't figure out how to stop a leak? Wake up America!! The poor (mostly Democratic) fishermen in these regions are the ones who'll end up migrating elsewhere, because their industry is dead. The price of seafood there has gone way up. And once Haliburton decides that it will clean it up, it'll be a total Republican region....
11:50 PM on 05/28/2010
There was not a single piece of boom in the GULF....so no oil company was prepared for a disaster. How could the regulators allow that to happen?

They should have had at least one super tanker sucking up the water/oil like they did in Saudi Arabia.
maxfax
Taa - dah!
11:35 PM on 05/28/2010
How could it be effective, there has never been an oil spill disaster this size ever in this country, British Petroleum was not prepared. How foolish to claim "boom not as effective as hoped." They were not prepared to drill oil either, operational and costly BOP anyone?
10:14 PM on 05/28/2010
Pictures are better than Obama's blah blah inaction...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/anderson_cooper_360/
10:12 PM on 05/28/2010
These floating barriers are just a fig leave. They won't stop the oil from getting to shore. The oil has to be removed. I haven't seen one photo of any ship removing the oil. It appears they are just using floating barriers to temporary contain the oil. Where are the photos of ships pumping the oil into tankers?
10:06 PM on 05/28/2010
Really? Is it really the effectiveness of the boom? Might it simply be the amount of oil that's continually rushing into the ocean? This isn't an infinite supply. Could it be that the boom itself wasn't designed to handle such large quantities? Couldn't it be that people aren't changing them enough? Could it be that there isn't enough supply? Let's face it folks (and the press, and the bloggers), this is an unprecedented amount of oil. Let's not simply claim "oh, the booms aren't as effective as hoped" they are as effective as they can be.
photo
Heartlight3
Every act is an act of self-definition.
09:03 PM on 05/28/2010
Why aren't they trying the microbes that consume oil that they used on the spill off Texas a while back? The Texas Land Office and Texas Water Commission tested it and found it works. If I were in charge I would try anything with any possibility of working.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VfypUzx1tI&feature=youtube_gdata
10:26 PM on 05/28/2010
My best friend works for a company that manufactures oil eating microbes. A number of years ago she sent me a small batch of this EPA approved powder. I used it on my oil stained driveway (lots of oil stains from years of oil changes). It took several weeks, but all the oil disappeared.

http://www.obio.com/biozorb.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
aDelphinium
Occupy with heart
10:28 PM on 05/28/2010
This is too big for microbes.
photo
Heartlight3
Every act is an act of self-definition.
02:05 AM on 05/29/2010
Apparently the people who developed it have warehouses full of it. You mix it with water, shoot it out into the ocean with fire hoses and it keeps eating the oil until it's gone and then they die off and don't harm the marine life. sounds like it might even help with the underwater plumes. If it's not too big for dispersants, it's not too big for microbes. I think they should try everything that might help. Maybe the combination of all the different things will work. (Provided the dispersants don't kill the microbes.)
08:43 PM on 05/28/2010
If this true, the whole boom and cleanup operation has been designed for PR only and there is no intent to clean anything up. Collect some oil offshore, maybe let it sit there for a few days and evaporate, hey 50% evaporates right? BP doesn't have to clean it up, The public gets tired of the story and we can all move on to lawyers agruing over who did it. Where are th skimmers and the burn booms and where is doing all we can possibly do?
This is very, very lame...

"Even if it's working properly, the best it will do is move the problem somewhere else," said Doug Helton, incident operations coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Emergency Response Division.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Scott Knell
08:13 PM on 05/28/2010
"BP Fails Booming School 101 Gulf Oil Spill"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx8kMXufu3w
09:27 PM on 05/28/2010
I'm a little suspicious of anonymous experts. Maybe she's right, maybe she's not. I see no reason why she should remain anonymous though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Scott Knell
08:12 PM on 05/28/2010
Boom School. Everyone in the Oil Biz is required to go to Boom School.
Mostly though, the go out to Bars instead though.
SEE THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx8kMXufu3w
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nickfromla
08:00 PM on 05/28/2010
This site has coverage from the beginning with great video of all the BP Oil Spill news reports: http://www.frequency.com/topic/bp-oil-spill/33855
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
02:43 PM on 05/30/2010
"see this on FoxNews" is on the top page.

Uhhh, I don't think so. Who are you?

BZ.
07:23 PM on 05/28/2010
If the Feds are taking charge of booming, do it right. There's a video out there showing that deploying it parallel to the shore is pointless. It needs to be zig-zagged to channel the oil to concentrate the flow onto specific sites for easier collecting. like this:

shore
______________
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
booms, two rows,

BP should be trained in this (ha ha) but it only takes a 5 minute briefing to get the concept. Someone can coordinate this, then get more boats, manpower, to manage it. If I can find this out in 5 minutes of i-net searching, why can't these professionals and beaurocrats figure it out?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Scott Knell
08:32 PM on 05/28/2010
I posted a link to that video above and if I'm not mistaken, she explains the proper way to set them up then she also states that when a little 2 foot surf comes rollin' in, they're useless anyway.
*sigh*
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aspiecelia
06:39 PM on 05/28/2010
President Obama should watch this, he could get Rahm and Biden to interpret some of the words for him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx8kMXufu3w
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
02:48 PM on 05/30/2010
Yeah, that's good. Everyone needs to hear this :D All the vocabulary and grammar.

I have seen this before recently, but you get fanned anyhoo.

BZ.
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
02:49 PM on 05/30/2010
I am saving the audio for my descendants so they can hear how they got to live in the dismal world they will be living in 2050.

BZ.