More

BP's Stock Plunges To 18-Year Low As Company's Survival Could Hang In The Balance

Bp Stock

JANE WARDELL   06/ 1/10 05:25 PM ET   AP

LONDON — Shares in BP PLC plummeted on Tuesday, wiping billions off the British company's market value, after the failure of its latest attempt to stop the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Speculation about the London-based company's future mounted as the share rout – taking the stock to its lowest level in more than a year – was compounded by BP's revelation that its costs relating to the accident are approaching $1 billion.

Some analysts believe that BP's stock will rebound if renewed efforts to contain the spread of oil from the broken Deepwater Horizon well are successful, but others suggest that the company could become a takeover target.

"This situation has now gone far beyond concerns of BP's chief executive Tony Hayward being fired, or shareholder dividend payouts being cut – it's got the real smell of death," said Dougie Youngson, oil analyst at Arbuthnot.

"Given the collapse in the share price and the potential for it to fall further, we expect that it could become a takeover target, particularly if its operating position in the U.S. becomes untenable," he added.

BP shares closed down 13 percent at 429.9 pence ($6.31) on the London Stock Exchange on Tuesday – making it the biggest fall on the exchange on the first day of trading since the company's unsuccessful attempts at a "top kill" operation, shooting mud and other debris into the leaking well, over the weekend. The London bourse was closed on Monday for a public holiday.

On the New York Stock Exchange, BP closed down $6.43, or almost 15 percent, at $36.52.

BP said the $990 million costs so far related to spill containment, relief well drilling, grants to Gulf states, claims already paid and federal costs.

The company said it has received 30,000 claims and made more than 15,000 payments, totaling some $40 million. It added it was too early to quantify other costs and liabilities.

Raymond James analyst Pavel Molchanov said that costs had spiraled dramatically higher from earlier estimates, leading the stockbroker to raise its cost assumptions substantially. It now assumes cash outlays net to BP of $5.2 billion in 2010, compared to its earlier estimate of $1.6 billion, and $2.3 billion in 2011.

Molchanov said much could hinge on BP's current efforts to stem the spill, which has dumped between 18 and 40 million gallons into the Gulf, according to U.S. government estimates.

BP is now attempting to use remote-controlled submarines to cut pipes before placing a containment cap over the leak, a procedure known as a lower marine riser package, or LRMP.

"It's important to underline that halting the oil leak does not mark the end of BP's problems as a result of the oil spill," Molchanov said in a note.

"The specter of a web of litigation – both from the private sector and from governments – and the challenge of cleaning up the oil that has already been spilled should not be underestimated," he added. "However, if the LMRP ultimately proves successful, we believe it's likely that the shares of BP will see a near-term move higher."

Analysts at Killik & Co. stockbrokers in London, highlighted the wider potential implications of the spill on the US oil industry and the oil price, noting that the U.S. government is looking to increase investment to develop domestic reserves.

"Following this spill, it may be more difficult to achieve this aim as environmental groups step up their opposition," they said in a note. "We believe any increased concerns over the supply/demand imbalance will place upward pressure on crude prices and plays well to our long-term theme of being overweight the sector."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
LONDON — Shares in BP PLC plummeted on Tuesday, wiping billions off the British company's market value, after the failure of its latest attempt to stop the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Spe...
LONDON — Shares in BP PLC plummeted on Tuesday, wiping billions off the British company's market value, after the failure of its latest attempt to stop the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Spe...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 412
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:21 AM on 06/03/2010
Cheer up stockholders - I have little doubt that our 401K brokers will be buying it up ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Montgomery
The forces of fear do not scare me
05:22 PM on 06/02/2010
Given everything that's going on now with the clean up, stopping the spill, stock price plunging, if allowed they would make the same decisions tomorrow on another well with the short sighted view that it would save them time and money.
photo
DoctorGreeves
Leading-link suspension
01:10 PM on 06/02/2010
I wonder if BP is having second thoughts about their decision to alter the drilling mud/cementing procedures at the last minute on the Deep Water Horizon to save a day's rent on the platform?

This is what happens when you let bean counters make engineering decisions, guys.
12:55 PM on 06/02/2010
To correct this problem, we don't necessarily need more regulation, as liberal birdsong calls for, nor do we necessarily need less regulation, as conservative hacks continue to chant, but we could use some smarter regulation with less of a focus on GDP growth and more of a focus on creating a happy, healthy, society. The word "regulate" originally meant "to keep regular". The Media's visceral coverage of the oil spill should show Americans that our times and our policies are anything but regular:

http://www.theinductive.com/blog/2010/6/2/coherence.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
03:10 PM on 06/02/2010
I couldn't not agree with you more, Christopher Carr.

WELL SAID.
04:40 AM on 06/03/2010
Well, government regulation means intervention of some sort, and "smarter regulation" means more regulation. Unless you mean the aggregate, which means you would have to cut some regulations, which I don't think is a good idea at all.

I'm sorry, but when a foreign oil company destroys an entire Gulf Coast, more regulation is necessary. This could have been prevented for pittance of what is happening now, but greed unchecked leads to nothing good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
12:32 PM on 06/02/2010
falll baby fall
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
12:22 PM on 06/02/2010
did wall street give there ok yet?lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RonRutherford
11:47 AM on 06/02/2010
I think we can all safely assume that the cost of this catastrophe will be higher than BP's total worth, even if stock levels stayed the same. It's not looking good for BP, or those who will seek compensation.

http://therationalreport.blogspot.com/
12:30 PM on 06/02/2010
considering AngloPersian goes back over a hundred years, has been at the nexus of every armed conflict since WWI, and is the single largest corporation in G Britain....my bet is that BP will find its way out of this mess just fine.

not that I'm a BP apologist...they are just too big and too intrinsically entrenched in the economic mechanisms of world finance to die off because of an oil spill...

I mean really, these are the kinds of guys that can covertly begin huge wars just to gain access to oil or to sell more oil....

my bet would be to keep buying more shares as the stock continues to plummet....

regardless of their liabilities, the moment the leak is stopped, their stock will soar......
photo
Puller58
Man of Mystery
08:57 AM on 06/02/2010
I'd love to hear the Foxbots yowl about this. I remember Britt Hume years ago when Enron was on the ropes. He argued that the market had meted out the correct punishment for the situation. Bet he'd be singing the blues for BP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smurf Daddy
Don't just listen to those you agree with.
05:46 AM on 06/02/2010
I just read the headline. My response? BUY NOW!!!!! They will NOT let Big Oil go down like that. Foreign owned or not!!! Like Bill Cosby said, "Come on people!"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ravyn
02:38 AM on 06/02/2010
On Rachel Maddow's show tonight (Tuesday) she showed a clip from a British TV news station which was saying that BP could go bankrupt from the oil spill and that it's stock in Britain took an even bigger dive there than here in response to their failure to cap the leak last week. British press is speculating the company's demise.
12:51 AM on 06/02/2010
"Wah dee hah, boo hoo dee doo' says BP. Now we'll file for bankruptcy so we don't have to pay for ALL the damage we have caused.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kcwookie
Well behaved workers seldom prosper.
11:45 PM on 06/01/2010
Don't forget who's trying to make sure the damages cap is nice and low. Also remember who is complaining the Obama has his boot on their throat. You can blame the democrats as much as you want, but unfortunately you won't have the fact to back you up.
10:47 PM on 06/01/2010
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/06/01/cheney-bp-flack/

"Under threat of receivership and criminal investigation for its destruction of the Gulf of Mexico, foreign oil giant BP has hired a former top aide for Vice President Dick Cheney to be their new spokeswoman. Anne Womack-Kolton has been hired to be “head of U.S. media relations.” A rising star in the Bush-Cheney White House since the 2000 campaign, Womack-Kolton served as Cheney’s press secretary during the 2004 election before running public affairs in the Bush Department of Energy:"

This is probably a good hire for BP: It was press aides to Cheney that made us think that there was WMD in Iraq; outted CIA operative Valerie Plame, and also pushed the idea of giving taxpayer money from the war to private contractors for Iraq.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2008/03/06/top_iraq_contractor_skirts_us_taxes_offshore/

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/02/25/cheneys_unprecedented_power/

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/what-did-bush-tell-gonzales/7064/

http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scott456
09:06 PM on 06/01/2010
"...taking the stock to its lowest level in more than a year..."

That's it? Shouldn't it have fallen much more to elicit all this talk of folding??
04:43 AM on 06/03/2010
It's in freefall, with no end in sight. They are in serious trouble.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
08:23 PM on 06/01/2010
On CNBC last week, some analysts were talking of buying BP stock after it was hit initially. I thought it was too early and now the company may be taken down entirely, if this article is correct.
04:45 AM on 06/03/2010
Well, considering the source, I would stay the h*** away from BP stock. We all know how inept Cramer is at picking stocks.