Huffpost Politics

Funeral Protests Should Not Be Protected Say 48 States: Amicus Brief Filed In Supreme Court Case

Posted: Updated:

WASHINGTON — Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia have submitted a brief to the Supreme Court in support of a father who sued anti-gay protesters over their demonstration at the 2006 funeral of his son, a Marine killed in Iraq.

Only Virginia and Maine declined to sign the brief by the Kansas attorney general.

Albert Snyder sued over protests by the Kansas-based Westboro Baptist Church at his son's funeral in Maryland. The church pickets funerals because they believe war deaths are punishment for U.S. tolerance of homosexuality.

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether the protesters' message is protected by the First Amendment.

In the brief filed Tuesday, the states argued they have a compelling interest in protecting the sanctity of funerals.

Around the Web

Cuccinelli says funeral protest case could curtail free speech

"We are in danger of losing the battle for freedom of speech": Salman Rushdie

High Court: Justices to consider 'funeral protests' in free-speech case

Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church Picketed Marine's Funeral; Court to ...

High Court: Justices to consider 'funeral protests' in free-speech case