More

The Main Line Church and its Uneasy Relationship to Change

First Posted: 06/01/10 09:48 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:40 PM ET

Life Change

By Tom Ehrich
Religion News Service

NEW YORK (RNS) As I watched ABC's "helicam" pan along the main straightaway at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway on my television, I could see my seats in the Paddock, across from the pits, and wished I were there.

Sure, you see more on television, but nothing matches the intensity and drama of being in the stands with 275,000 rapt fans as 33 Honda engines roar to life and low-slung racing machines turn laps of 221 mph.

Alas, this wasn't the year to use my four seats. With my youngest son's high school graduation and oldest son's wedding both happening in two weeks, I am tapped out for time, energy and travel funds. Hopefully next year.

Or maybe not. Things change, you know. If I have learned nothing else as a lifelong fan of the Indianapolis 500, everything changes. Race fans were aghast when four-cylinder front-mounted engines were replaced by six- and eight-cylinder rear-mounted engines. But the cars went faster and held the track better.

Every year brings more innovations. Some fail and are abandoned. Some succeed and become part of the lore.

If only other institutions were this flexible and willing to try new ways. But people fight hard to stop change. Even when sales tank, pews empty, audiences evaporate and self-defeating behaviors drag us down, we continue in the delusion that change is a choice and, if we feel like it, can be stopped.

Change happens. Sometimes for the better, sometimes not. Change happens because life is dynamic, the human spirit restless, our minds inventive, our yearnings and empty places never quite filled, and we are surrounded by forces we cannot control.

As a lifelong mainline Christian, I have seen the stop-change delusion up close. In one generation, we went from full pews to half-empty pews, because we couldn't deal with change. We wore ourselves out fighting over internal changes that didn't matter. Meanwhile, the world we should have been serving was changing, and we chose not to adapt.

Instead of sticking to our self-defined plans and protecting our facilities and traditions, we should have done what Jesus did when he saw death undo the life of a widow. He stopped his journey and stepped into the need. He had compassion and gave away his own safety.

His self-sacrificial gift enabled a young man to live. Our self-serving preservation of tradition and inheritance, by contrast, has brought mainline Christianity to its knees, to the verge of bankruptcy. It is tragic, and it is wasteful.

Yet I sense a better day. As I work with churches, I sense a new spirit of compassion, a fresh and risky willingness to experience the world's pain. I hear less interest in fussing about changes that don't matter and more desire to see the lonely and broken, even if that means seeing our own loneliness and brokenness.

I see a new solidarity with the unjustly treated and less noblesse oblige. I see real engagement with need and not symbolic gestures. I hear preachers moving beyond eloquence and style and wanting simply to connect, even if connecting exposes them to being known as human.

It's not about guilt or good intentions or better planning. The key is compassion, the sharing of pathos. Compassion changes everything, opening doors we can't easily close again.

(Tom Ehrich is a writer, church consultant and Episcopal priest based in New York. He is the author of "Just Wondering, Jesus," and the founder of the Church Wellness Project, http://www.churchwellness.com. His Web site is http://www.morningwalkmedia.com.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Filed by Clay Chiles  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 118
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
04:06 PM on 06/15/2010
Organized religion, mainline or otherwise, having anything to do with God is purely coincidental. It has to do with pleasure, feeling good, assuaging guilt, feeling empowered, and being part of the elect, or a special group with special , gifts, talents,etc. It surely is a narcotic which lulls you into not thinking for yourself.

Dogma is the enemy of thought and searching for answers. It is always the weapon of those seeking authority over others. The unthinking and the unquestioning will always be slaves to dogmatists and the power they wield in this world.

However, the process of trying to find God is a lonely journey and religion cannot help.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 90%.
09:33 AM on 06/15/2010
Nice pic of the autumn trees and sky.
01:56 AM on 06/13/2010
Super vague.

Wonderinig if "change" is code word for something else the author doesnt want to come right out and name.

There is 'nothing new under the sun' according to Ecclesiates
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beth Boyle
02:31 AM on 06/10/2010
I think this is pretty lame.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beth Boyle
02:31 AM on 06/10/2010
Care racing is like religion??? I don't think so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beth Boyle
02:30 AM on 06/10/2010
Change is good when there is genuine need for it but tradition and continuity in religion in many ways are what we are looking for in worship and religion. Most people want something that has nothing to do with fashion or fads or social experimentation. Faith is about the human condition and about the timeless nature of God and God's creation. The extremely rapid change of the last 40 years has in many ways left people dizzy and disoriented and longing for something of quality that has nothing to do with pop culture or our disposable corporate culture. When I go to a place of worship I connect with all those who have gone before who have been faithful to God. The race car analogy is pretty lame for me. Connecting with God and humanity is simple and it requires no gimmicks or technology. If religion to reinvent itself and change its very fabric to keep people interested it has out lived its purpose and should be left to die. If you want philosophy or theatre seek them out but worship and prayer are not theatre.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
08:01 PM on 06/09/2010
The closer "change " bings us to "Truth" the more resistant to change mainstream Christians will become.
photo
KCM7
“I am of a sect by myself, as far as I knowâ€
06:42 PM on 06/06/2010
Never heard of the Mainline Church. Who is that, what denomination?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWM
aka The Wrong Monkey
12:51 PM on 06/07/2010
It's WASP's, basically.
photo
ez duz it
οá½Îº ἔστιν θεός
03:22 PM on 06/06/2010
Tom - It takes bravery, steadfast determination, thick skin and a commitment to the spirit of Jesus' message to bring abut the kind of change in the Church you are talking about.

Frankly, one of the reasons I am not a Christian is the legalistic rigor so many of the mainline denominations and evangelical-mega churches apply to the reading of Scripture in their condemnation of Gay persons - while turning a blind eye to their own hypocrisy when it comes to adultery, divorce and judgmentalism.

I saw a quote sometime back, which read something like this: "Christianity has little to do with Christ and probably never has - unless Christ was a closed-minded, misogynistic, homophobic, war-loving, imperialistic, aggressive hater of anything he didn't agree with."

I admire your ideal of "compassion, the sharing of pathos. Compassion changes everything, opening doors we can't easily close again." I wish you - and all who share your vision - the very best. Maybe the Spirit of Life will win out over legalistic hypocrisy. However, I, and most gay people I know, have moved on long ago...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWM
aka The Wrong Monkey
01:58 PM on 06/05/2010
Is it just me, or does anyone else feel that this post says basically nothing at all about anything? Surely someone must agree at least that it says very little that is specific or useful. Maybe the Rev. Ehrich was under deadline pressure, and tried to say SOMETHING -- and failed.

Or maybe if I too were a mainline Episcopalian, the post would have said much to me. It could be a matter of my not knowing the secret handshake.

For now I'm going with the deadline-and-failure thesis.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
way2sunny
08:41 PM on 06/08/2010
I thought exactly the same thing. About as useful as daily affirmations for the vaguely dissatisfied.

Fanned.
11:06 PM on 06/04/2010
Change is the most difficult issue a religion can face. To little flexibility and parishioners may move to a more liberal church. To much and people begin to follow the train of thought discussed above.
If all you need to get into heaven is to be compassionate, why bother going to church? It is necessary to toe the line, preaching compassion while maintaining the church's intrinsic value the psyche of the people.
06:49 PM on 06/04/2010
Maybe Tom ought to look into "changing" his concept of Jesus' existence, I mean if he really wants to change . . .

The world has been for a long time engaged in writing lives of Jesus... The library of such books has grown since then. But when we come to examine them, one startling fact confronts us: all of these books relate to a personage concerning whom there does not exist a single scrap of contemporary information -- not one! By accepted tradition he was born in the reign of Augustus, the great literary age of the nation of which he was a subject. In the Augustan age historians flourished; poets, orators, critics and travelers abounded. Yet not one mentions the name of Jesus Christ, much less any incident in his life.
-Moncure D. Conway [1832 - 1907] (Modern Thought)

Tom, baby! You'd think that some dude going around curing lepers with a wave of his hand, turning water into wine and handing out Popeil Pocket Fishermen to lazy louts who'd rather have their fish handed to them would have at least deserved a mention by at least one of the excellent chroniclers of the Augustan age . . . but no.
I think it may be time for you to go shopping for another god.
11:15 PM on 06/05/2010
There's Cornelius Tacitus, Josephus ben Mattathias, Lucian of Samosate, Suetonius, and others.

This link is from a Christian website, but they include direct quotes from the works of these secular scholars so you can check it out for yourself if you like.

http://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Historical%20evidence%20on%20the%20exhistance%20of%20Jesus.htm
photo
ez duz it
οá½Îº ἔστιν θεός
06:42 PM on 06/06/2010
“As the Jews were making continuous commotions at the instigation of Chrestus, he expelled them from Rome.†--Suetonius

"Chrestus," as Suetonius spells it, is the correct form of a name quite commonly given to slaves. It is not noted elsewhere that Suetonius misspells the names of his other subjects. It is clear that Chrestus was inciting the Roman Jewish population to civil disturbance. The identity of “Chrestus†is not further developed by Suetonius. The conjecture by some Christians who are eager to provide a Sitz-im-Leben for Jesus, the Christ, within first-century Claudian Rome is extremely weak, at best.
02:41 AM on 06/07/2010
None of those are contemporary accounts. The earliest one in that list is Josephus, born 37 CE (at least four years after Jesus supposedly died). The authenticity of Josephus' accounts are disputed, and all others are decades (if not centuries) after Jesus was purported to have lived. There are no contemporary outside accounts of Jesus ever having existed.

Don't you think that the Romans, who kept many detailed records of their empire, would have left SOMETHING about a Jewish priest who performed miraculous healings and rose from the dead? One paragraph in one of their many volumes? What about other contemporary writers?

No doubt, there probably was a guy named Yeshua that lived during that period in Palestine. But he wasn't the one from the New Testament.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Marvin Hadley Jr
Blinding Insight
04:45 PM on 06/04/2010
if u really, really want to understand what it means to be without religion, please go to the comments of ontopicofftopic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kathryn Maver
02:56 PM on 06/04/2010
The mainline church is really, really bad at delivering its message. Come to think of it, not so sure anymore what that message is. You can change the method of delivery all you want, but if you don't really have anything to say, well. Fail.
06:50 PM on 06/04/2010
Think collection plate and then you'll understand the message.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
11:05 PM on 06/03/2010
Change requires thought, facts, and reason............very scarey concepts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mommadona
I paint. I blog. Therefore, I am.
11:59 PM on 06/03/2010
3 ways to go at it:

"Clueless" (but full of hope)

http://a-s.clayton.edu/spence/old_site/3720/project1/fool-tarot-card.jpg

"Prepared" (but a battle virgin)

http://www.sacred-texts.com/tarot/pkt/img/ar07.jpg

Or, with the help of someone who's 'been there done that' themselves (their way~just a guide)

http://www.themeparksushi.com/images/Hard_Rock_Park/hermit.jpg
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kathryn Maver
02:58 PM on 06/04/2010
Change doesn't necessarily require any of those things. Sometimes the only thing change requires is a good PR campaign.