More

Anti-Washington Anger Triggers Highest Number Of Candidates To Run For Congress In 35 Years

BEN EVANS   06/ 2/10 09:57 AM ET   AP

Election Day

WASHINGTON — Discontent with incumbents and anti-Washington anger are adding up to a potentially record-breaking crowd of congressional challengers this election year.

More than 2,300 people are running for 471 House and Senate seats in the midterms. It's the highest number of candidates in at least 35 years, according to data provided to The Associated Press by the Federal Election Commission, which began tracking candidates in 1975.

Frustration, particularly on the right, with President Barack Obama and his Democratic agenda appears to have contributed to the surge. The field is heavily Republican, with almost twice as many GOP candidates as Democrats, and several hundred independent and third-party challengers.

A strong anti-incumbent sentiment and disenchantment with the way the federal government operates and spends money are prevailing forces this election year. The latest USA Today/Gallup Poll showed near-record lows in favorable ratings for the parties – 36 percent for Republicans in May, 43 percent for Democrats.

The mood has created a rush on elective office.

Some candidates are seasoned politicians looking to make the jump from local or state government to Congress; others are little-known, underfunded novices driven by the tea party movement. With several veteran lawmakers already tossed out in primaries – three-term Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, and five-term Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., among them – incumbents are keeping an eye on all the challengers.

"I had to sell my four-wheeler to pay (the filing fee), and I did. It's worth it," said Bruce Ray Riggs, a tea party sympathizer and first-time candidate who spent $6,960 to get on the ballot in Florida's Senate race, which is crowded with two dozen names.

Riggs, 43, whose campaign slogan is "No suit, no tie, no political lies," said he wanted to abolish most federal functions and give more power to the states.

"They've railroaded the American people," the independent says of Congress, arguing that Washington is operating an unconstitutional government.

Riggs is among the 2,341 people who have filed statements of candidacy with the FEC for the 2010 House and Senate elections, compared with 1,717 in 2008 and 1,588 in 2006.

The tally is still climbing, with more than a dozen states still allowing candidates to file, and the true number of candidates is probably higher, since some ignore requirements to file with the FEC. Close to 40 states still haven't held their primaries, including nine with primaries in September. The general election is Nov. 2.

The field is significantly larger than in 1976, two years after the Watergate scandal took down President Richard Nixon, and 1994, the year the GOP took control of Congress for the first time in four decades.

The next-largest field – of 2,159 candidates – was in 1992, when Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush and Ross Perot battled for the White House.

"I guess it's a mild form of civil unrest," said Tom Parrott, a 59-year-old accountant who is making his first run for office as one of nine candidates in central Georgia's 7th Congressional District race.

"Do I think I'm going to win? Maybe not. But do I get a pulpit? Yes," he said. "I'm willing to spend 30 or 40 grand of my own money to get the chance to speak to people and maybe get my point across that we're really, really in trouble."

Parrott, who is running as a Republican and identifies with the tea party, said he has a strong libertarian bent. Obama's health care law was the "straw that broke the camel's back" in his decision to run, he said.

"I'm not a wacko," he said. "I just think the government would be better if they just butt out and do the things they're supposed to do like running an army and maintaining waterways and keeping our borders safe."

Democrat Scott Withers, another rookie candidate, sees things differently.

Running in Michigan's 5th Congressional District around Flint, with staggering unemployment from the decline of the automotive industry, Withers said government can be part of the answer. He's trying to unseat a 34-year incumbent from his own party, Rep. Dale Kildee.

"When we just keep rubber-stamping the same person, we're not getting any new ideas or new perspectives for our problems," said Withers, 37, who has worked in journalism and public relations but is unemployed after being laid off from a website startup.

"I don't believe the government should be interfering in our lives. There are areas, though, where the government can play a positive role," he said. "We can't keep increasing our deficit, but we need to look at moving our money around to areas that can have a bigger impact."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Discontent with incumbents and anti-Washington anger are adding up to a potentially record-breaking crowd of congressional challengers this election year. More than 2,300 people ar...
WASHINGTON — Discontent with incumbents and anti-Washington anger are adding up to a potentially record-breaking crowd of congressional challengers this election year. More than 2,300 people ar...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 906
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
sunshine14 12:31 PM on 06/02/2010
Whether repub or dem or conservative all are the same choosing the party they agree with what they are doing right? Just more of the same. Who will agree and continuing doing the same, no matter which party they join with. No one is bringing change, just a different face that is all, maybe younger or older, but all the same. Why over years years year things are getting worst instead of better.

 Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
davcrock
03:34 AM on 06/03/2010
The good thing about outsiders running is that it makes all the professional politicians owned and operated by the two corporate parties look over their shoulders and have to wonder who's gaining on them. It's like what Perot did in '92. It might make them more responsive and responsible -- for a while. Once the threat is gone though, it'll be back to business as usual, representing special interests and money.
08:44 PM on 06/02/2010
Running ain't winning!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mahi Joe
Think critically...not blindly conform
08:32 AM on 06/03/2010
Running may not always produce a winner but it does reflect the attitude of the voter. People are angry, frustrated and disappointed in our current two party political system and are looking outside of it for change. Maybe people/voters are just tired of business as usual and are really tired of voting for the lesser of two evils and seek a candidate outside the establishment who actually has the interest of their constituents in mind. I would love to see more Progressives run as Independents and challenge this dysfunctional Congress we have today.
08:25 PM on 06/02/2010
I dont get the logic. The health care bill is supposed to bring down the cost of health care, make it more affordable and universal...and that is bad?

I think most got motivated with Obama getting elected....the thinking is: "hey, if a black man can become President, why cant I make it to Washington?

Where was the outrage during 2001-2009?...... Thery're full of it...up to the neck!
02:54 AM on 06/03/2010
"The health care bill is supposed to bring down the cost of health care, make it more affordable and universal...and that is bad?"

I'll bet you that the new law will actually raise US per capita medical spending, not decrease it. There simply are no serious cost controls.
04:07 PM on 06/03/2010
yeah health care bill will for sure raise costs. will surely cover more people, but will not make health care cheaper.

I think the outrage during 2001-2009 culminated with the election of barack obama, and has carried through since obama outwardly promised to change business as usual, and there's very few people who think that he's doing it.
07:58 PM on 06/02/2010
Yes, they've railroaded the American people...into the future
07:51 PM on 06/02/2010
The picture of Charles Djou under the heading about "anti-washington fervor" is silly. Djou ran for a seat vacated by a guy who's running for governor, and he was the only (R) candidate on the ballot. (And, hey, he isn't going to win the general election in November....he doesn't even stand a chance!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danusgram
supporter of Mitt robbed me for President
07:51 PM on 06/02/2010
Its a free forall they have no real party or agenda for this country so they said hmm self let's run for election....lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjcc1987
Too many freaks, not enough circuses
07:14 PM on 06/02/2010
The interesting part is that most are not really being vetted or researched by the local press because there is no local press. Only those unfortunate enough to run for say senator or congresswipe may get vetted by bloggers or sites such as Hufo, TPM, or even WAPO. The buyer's remorse will be after they are elected (case in point, Virginia AG)
07:01 PM on 06/02/2010
A study recently said that 170 were verified as lobbyists, meaning they were compromised to serve the American People as objective. They had established themselves as voting for special interests they had made deals with. I have for weeks posted, "turn them all out to pasture!" as we need new people who are not bought and sold who will represent us as we voted for them and told them what we need an want. That is what a representative government is meant to do. If this is done, it well send a very clear message to the administration, who might, just might listen to the people of America a little more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
inthedesert
Those who never question will fall for anything.
06:48 PM on 06/02/2010
To be elected next time around all a candidate has to say is: "Elect me and I will go to Washington and clean up the cesspool of corruption, lies and double-dealing...trust me on this".
SORRY.....I've "been there done that" last time around with the CURRENT INCOMPETENT ONE.
I won't be fooled again....I don't plan to ever vote again...why bother. LOL. Once in office they only do what the lobbyists and money men want them to do. At some point, an intelligent human being needs to wake up to the fact that actually voting for the person who most matches your own feeling of what direction America needs to take.....means nothing...absolutely nothing.
02:56 AM on 06/03/2010
I suggest at least voting against the incumbent. Psychological research shows that power corrupts. Best to limit the length of time and certainty that politicians are in power to limit their corruptness.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mahi Joe
Think critically...not blindly conform
08:37 AM on 06/03/2010
Corporate donations also corrupt. I would start with Campaign Reform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
inthedesert
Those who never question will fall for anything.
06:39 PM on 06/02/2010
Actually this is kind of scary. All these 20 and 30 somethings who know nothing but anger for the "establishment" running for office. And, you just know that once in D.C. they are RIPE for corruption by the lobbyists....LOL. It's a never ending story folks...don't you get it yet?? LOL.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:45 PM on 06/02/2010
Until some rules are changed, corruption in politics will continue. These yahoos will be no different.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madHenry
05:16 PM on 06/02/2010
Imagine a country run by teabagging "philosopher kings (and queens)." The horror....oh, the horror!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
04:52 PM on 06/02/2010
Newbies are a complex proposition. On one hand, they haven't been corrupted by years in DC. On the other hand, they'll have to rely on staffers who likely have been in DC for years. Throw in corrupt leadership and lobbyists, and you have to wonder how they'd remain independent enough to make a difference, or if they'd even know how?
04:48 PM on 06/02/2010
80% of our country leans to the right and thinks for themselves with common sense. The politicians R and D need to keep this "their bad no, their bad" in fighting to divide us and keep power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillForObama
Hail to the Chief! HAIL, he is the Chief!!!
05:10 PM on 06/02/2010
"80% of our country leans to the right and thinks for themselves with common sense."

_________________________________________________________________________________

Then why is our country in such a bad way?
05:40 PM on 06/02/2010
Because the polls say we don't want something but Washington does it anyways
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madHenry
05:19 PM on 06/02/2010
First, beware of any "authority" that begins his/her rambling with a percentage. "80% of all gays are really gay; the other 20% are just a little cheery"

Second, "...thinks for themselves with common sense."

Do words mean absolute nothing anymore? Can we just string them together in whatever fashion we choose, intersperse say "you know," and pretend we have SAID something?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dnalpahs
05:49 PM on 06/02/2010
You mean like;

"Imagine a country run by teabagging "philosopher kings (and queens)." The horror....oh, the horror!"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
04:40 PM on 06/02/2010
Any solutions from the newcomers ?

Anything ?

Anything at all ?