More

BP 'Cut-And-Cap' Plug Attempt Suffers Setback: Saw Is Stuck, Shears Next

Cut And Cap

GREG BLUESTEIN   06/ 4/10 12:59 AM ET   AP

METAIRIE, La. — BP used underwater robots a mile beneath the ocean Thursday to try to put a lid on the Gulf oil gusher.

Live video showed that an inverted funnel-like cap slightly wider than a severed pipe was being maneuvered into place over the oil spewing from a busted well. However, the gushing oil made it difficult to tell if the cap was fitting well. BP spokesman Toby Odone said he had no immediate information on whether the cap was successfully attached.

A rubber seal on the inside will attempt to keep oil from escaping, though engineers acknowledge some crude will still come out.

BP sliced off the main pipe on the leaking oil well with giant shears in the latest bid to curtail the worst oil spill in U.S. history, but the cut was jagged, and a looser fitting cap will be needed.

"We'll have to see when we get the containment cap on it just how effective it is," said Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the government's point man for the disaster.

BP PLC turned to the giant shears after a diamond-tipped saw became stuck in the pipe halfway through the job, yet another frustrating delay in the six-week-old spill.

If the cap can be put on successfully, BP will siphon the oil and gas to a tanker on the surface.

"It's an important milestone, and in some sense, it's just the beginning," BP CEO Tony Hayward said.

This latest attempt is risky because slicing away the section of the 20-inch-wide riser removed a kink in the pipe, and could temporarily increase the flow of oil by as much as 20 percent.

Live video footage showed oil spewing unimpeded from the top of the blowout preventer, but Allen said it was unclear whether the flow had increased.

"I don't think we'll know until the containment cap is seated on there," he said. "We'll have to wait and see."

Crews will also use methanol to try to prevent icylike crystals from forming on the inside of the cap. At this depth a mile underwater, the near-freezing temperatures can cause a buildup up of hydrates, which foiled the company's attempt to place a 100-ton, four-story dome over the leak about a month ago.

Meanwhile, newly disclosed internal Coast Guard documents from the day after the explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig about 50 miles off the Louisiana coast indicated that U.S. officials were warning of a leak of 336,000 gallons per day of crude from the well in the event of a complete blowout.

The well didn't have such a failure. But the volume turned out to be much closer to that figure than the 42,000 gallons per day that BP first estimated. Weeks later that was revised to 210,000 gallons. Now, an estimated 500,000 to 1 million gallons of crude is believed to be leaking daily.

The Center for Public Integrity, which initially reported the Coast Guard logs, said it obtained them from Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said the president was worried about a leak much greater.

"Which is exactly why he ordered the entire federal government – on the day the rig collapsed – to treat this as the No. 1 priority and to devote every resource needed to respond to this incident and investigate its cause."

The logs also showed early in the disaster that remote underwater robots were unable to activate the rig's blowout preventer, which was supposed to shut off the flow from the well in the event of such a catastrophic failure.

BP has failed so far to plug the well.

The damage to the environment was chilling on East Grand Terre Island along the Louisiana coast, where workers found birds coated in thick, black goo. Images shot by an Associated Press photographer show Brown pelicans drenched in thick oil, struggling and flailing in the surf.

Anywhere between 21 million and 46 million gallons of oil has spewed into the Gulf, according to government estimates.

BP's Hayward promised Thursday that the company would clean up every drop of oil and "restore the shoreline to its original state."

"BP will be here for a very long time. We realize this is just the beginning," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Eileen Sullivan in Washington and Paul J. Weber in Houston contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

METAIRIE, La. — BP used underwater robots a mile beneath the ocean Thursday to try to put a lid on the Gulf oil gusher. Live video showed that an inverted funnel-like cap slightly wider than a ...
METAIRIE, La. — BP used underwater robots a mile beneath the ocean Thursday to try to put a lid on the Gulf oil gusher. Live video showed that an inverted funnel-like cap slightly wider than a ...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 122
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:02 PM on 06/03/2010
So, it turns out all those darned environmentalists and "treehuggers" did know just exactly what they were warning about all this time. This should completely change the political discussion, what it won't.
03:09 PM on 06/03/2010
http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/gulf_oil_spill/wala-oil-spill-volunteer-opps-lr
Favorite (0) Flag as Abusive (0) Permalink Bama Girl 0 minute ago (3:01 PM) 99 Fans http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/05/26/us/20100527-gulf-usergen-slideshow-8.html
Favorite (0) Flag as Abusive (0) Permalink Bama Girl 0 minute ago (2:59 PM) 99 Fans http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/federal_environmental_official.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
Ron Paul -More Liberty, Less Government, No Fed
11:37 PM on 06/03/2010
There was a big fine for the barge that spilled oil up in Mass. I don't think BP will get that much fine per barrel - too many bought-off politicians.

http://newsblog.projo.com/2010/03/buzzards-bay-oil-spill-lawsuit.html


From all the dead fish washing up, the next five years of fishing will not be as plentiful:

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/05/26/us/20100527-gulf-usergen-slideshow-17.html
02:23 PM on 06/03/2010
For those who like their underwater CAM access this link will show you virtually all of the ROV cams being used on the gusher. Click on individual thumbnail brings it full screen and esc returns you to the thumbnails

http://www.sanaracreations.fi/rov-feeds/index.html
photo
StevenM
Chess Coach
01:00 PM on 06/03/2010
STOP THE LEAK NOW!! It is time to blow the well. They could stop the leak at any time. Of course, if they demolish the well using explosives, the investment's gone. BP is being allowed to pollute in the hope of re-claiming their well. This is an immoral act, it is time to blow up this well and end this crisis now!!. See: http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/it-time-blow-leaking-gulf-oil-well-b
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rynox
My patience is over taxed.
02:05 PM on 06/03/2010
Explosives wouldn't work and could possibly make it worse.
10:20 PM on 06/03/2010
Basically, it won't work. But don't take my word for it. Keith O. has a couple of experts on his show talking about it tonight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalOrgonian
12:48 PM on 06/03/2010
My advice to Bp, keep your wallet open.
Your check book at close range.
This is going to cost you everything you got to restore the USA and our waters.
You attacks on our homeland with oil will be Bp's oily grave.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:51 PM on 06/03/2010
faved & (re) fanned :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:00 PM on 06/03/2010
No amount of money can restore the coastal wetlands and the gulf waters. A few centuries will be a start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalOrgonian
12:50 AM on 06/04/2010
Sadly, you are right.
Many will need to relocate away from the toxic oil soaked areas.
Dead zones on and off the water.
12:42 PM on 06/03/2010
Okay People want to see pictures here......... and after this post I'm out...... I'm shattered

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-oil-spill-html,0,6610369.htmlstory
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hollybork
12:27 PM on 06/03/2010
I would like to see more coverage of this on TV, like full time. Not just the President's visit or his speeches.

This is a vast story, with deeply emotional overtones.
There is Big Oil;
The coral reef;
The fishing and shrimping and tourism angle;
The lost canneries and allied businesses angle.

The environmental disaster itself should provoke more scientific coverage, on the dispersants and their toxicity, water dispersion, weather conditions, currents and fluid dynamics. There is the issue of what has been learned from Valdez in 89, the Ixtoc blow out in 79. The press hasn't yet dealt with the Rachel Carson/pollution affect on bird and wild life reproduction.

There is the issue of corruption and cronyism in the MMS, Congress and the Oil Industry.

What do we know about Dick Cheney and his oil buddies writing national energy policy and affecting off shore drilling?

The politics have taken center stage with more political reporters on scene from the cable channels. But this story could generate copy if they sent 60 people from NBC. They should be filling half a hour every night and two full hours each morning on NBC with this. I wish people would wake up and see how big this is.

It is in the nature of things that few will see the whole picture, and usually those few are historians or environmentalists who have seen it before and have "an inkling." This is a disaster, possibly a cataclysmic disaster.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:56 PM on 06/03/2010
Yes indeed -- the coverage is fairly extensive at times, but it's as if a series of nuclear bombs has gone off in American cities, and some days the ongoing disaster makes it into the news, and other days it's deemed too boring to take notice of. Which is remarkable -- this is a HUGE disaster that could destroy half the U.S. coastline for decades and perhaps longer, and it keeps getting treated like something containable that need not occupy our attention too much. Just when we feel like it, you know. I also get the sense that a fair number of interested parties are "interested" more than they should be in making sure we don't hear or see too much about all this.... Out of sight, out of mind, eh? Unless you happen to live in the Gulf states and can see the tarballs and poor dead animals washing ashore.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PaganCanuck
12:17 PM on 06/03/2010
Does anyone know what they are doing now? An arm has been jiggering around with a nonspinning saw blade perpendicular to the pipe end for a while. I can't figure out what it's trying to do.
pissedmichael
The name was an accident, please excuse
11:32 AM on 06/03/2010
In all the methods proposed, it seems the biggest problem is true aim--how to attach one pipe of similar size to another. Why don't they use a device similar to that we have all seen of mid-air refueling? There is a large funnel at the end of the pipe, which is targeted by the plane receiving fuel, which has a small nozzle, which is guided into the funnel. Can't they attach a funnel shaped device at the end of the 'plug' pipe, and guide it over the leak pipe?
12:16 PM on 06/03/2010
I wonder if the extreme pressure is an issue there...
photo
PatLow
A karate man bruises on the inside
12:37 PM on 06/03/2010
What they are trying to do is essentially that. The issue is with trying to siphon the oil to the surface. The first attempt failed due to ice crystals forming which prevented the oil from traveling through the pipe to the surface. I expect that will be an issue with this procedure as well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:05 AM on 06/03/2010
One page with 12 different ROV feeds:

http://mxl.fi/bpfeeds2/
photo
PUAAN
antibiotics wiped out my micro-bio
12:34 PM on 06/03/2010
Thank you!
batguano
As Long As Grass Grow, Wind Blow & The Sky Is Blue
10:35 AM on 06/03/2010
One aspect (among others) has especially bothered me, & I have not seen or heard any commentary on this issue; maybe someone can comment.

The drilling platform was a floating structure, much like a huge boat. After the explosion & resulting fire, firefighting crews & boats pumped vast quantities of seawater into the floating platform to such an extent that the platforms ability to float was overcome & it was essentially sunk by the water used to fight the fire. The platform went lower and lower in the water until it sunk. That seems terribly incompetent & unprepared for an oil company. Where were the special foam fire retardant systems to control the fire that would not sink the platform? Were there government requirements for foam or other systems that would not cause the platform to sink (& rupture the well-head/pipe), & if not why not? Why were there not special fireboats equipped with something other than seawater, so that the platform was not sunk & the spill created? Who was responsible for the policy of pumping of so much water that the buoyancy was overcome & the platform sunk? How exactly did the incompetent sinking of the drilling platform contribute to the present disaster & oil spill? Did the sinking of the platform actually CAUSE the failure of the well-head & pipe & the beginning of the oil spill?

Why have I not heard any commentary on this specific aspect to this incredibly destructive "accidental" spill & corporate/governmental incompetence?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
Ron Paul -More Liberty, Less Government, No Fed
11:05 AM on 06/03/2010
The fire was feed by the gusher exiting at the drill platform from the riser. That can cause a lot of damage to the hull and with all the oil and gas they just could not get the fire out. But it is surprising they could not keep it afloat somehow. That might have made the whole scenario a lot less disastrous.

They are supposed to be able to disconnect quickly in an emergency to escape this torrent of fire. I can only guess main generators, burnt wiring and any back-up power were damaged and causes this mechanism to fail. I don't know if it uses explosive bolts or strain reliefs that let go but something detaches either at the BOP or the ship end of the riser or maybe both - I'm not in the know about this other than it obviously didn't happen

BP seems to have a lot of things failing lately. That’s probably the understatement of the year right there !
12:22 PM on 06/03/2010
On the National Geographic Special, they said that the structural steel of the vessel got so hot it gave out. Like the Twin Towers, I guess.
I suspect that when a fire is being fed by a well spewing gas and oil, retardants (sp?) aren't effective, particularly when the fire is so hot, you cannot get close to it for any length of time.
On the special noted above, the Coast Guard and Rescue people appeared to feel physical pain when the vessel sank. It's a "seaman" thing, I believe. These boats are like people to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
Ron Paul -More Liberty, Less Government, No Fed
10:21 AM on 06/03/2010
One of the camera bots was observing a cut end of the riser and it had TWO smaller pipes in it. Like two drill strings.

What is that all about - and how would a BOP annular seal on that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:30 AM on 06/03/2010
well remember, the annular had already been damaged before the blowout occured.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
Ron Paul -More Liberty, Less Government, No Fed
10:37 AM on 06/03/2010
Maybe the lowest poorly cemented casing was ejected upward into the BOP.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 AM on 06/03/2010
looks like the riser pipe has been cut free. crude is now blasting straight up out of the BOP.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:17 AM on 06/03/2010
yup, pipe has been cut free... but what a MESS it is down there now.

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/bp-live-oil-spill-cam.html
12:23 PM on 06/03/2010
Hard to watch. But you almost want to "will" the operation to success...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:38 PM on 06/03/2010
seeing all that crude spew into the ocean hits me right in the gut. even a child looking at that poisonous mess would instinctively know... this is very bad. we can't 'eat the oil'... after the Gulf becomes a giant tar pit, and we've killed-off the fish.

so long and thanks for all the fish:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x895i0_so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-fish_people
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
Ron Paul -More Liberty, Less Government, No Fed
10:12 AM on 06/03/2010
I can see it now, They will pump all their hydraulic oil out into the sea and then will not be able to OPEN the shear. It will stay stuck blocking all progress and Tony Hayward will emerge in front of cameras to say "we've run into another little snag ...."

The Admiral then steps up to the mic and says BP is better equiped to handle this with their magnificent equipment and is doing a wonderful job.

The NOAA administer steps up and say "What plumes . we only see anomolies."

And Obama will say "we were here from day one following"

What is wrong with this picture?
12:24 PM on 06/03/2010
A wee bit pessimistic? *chuckle*
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hollybork
12:39 PM on 06/03/2010
You are right about that. They ran out of drilling mud because they miscalculated the pressure coming up from the well head. A guy from Cal Berkley engineering school had calculated that the amount they needed was five times what they thought. He was the same guy who figured out how much actual oil was being spewed into the Gulf. Too bad that guy isn't working for BP. They seem to have the C team in there. This couldn't happen with Exxon. I HOPE>
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
Ron Paul -More Liberty, Less Government, No Fed
09:57 AM on 06/03/2010
I see wisps of oil comming out of the back of the shear - how long with this delay things.

Plasma Torch anybody? Hydrogen/oxygen or even an oxygen lance - it would self light with all the oil around. BP probably knows better.