iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

SpaceX Falcoln 9 Launch Success: Elon Musk Rocket Reaches Orbit On First Try

MARCIA DUNN   06/ 4/10 08:06 PM ET   AP

Spacex Falcoln Launch
The SpaceX Falcon 9 test rocket lifts off from complex 40 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Cape Canaveral, Fla., Friday, June 4, 2010. The rocket is carrying a mock-up of the company's spacecraft, named Dragon. The goal is to put the capsule into orbit. NASA hopes to use the Falcon-Dragon combo for hauling cargo and possibly astronauts to the International Space Station, once the shuttles stop flying. SpaceX, or Space Exploration Technologies, was founded eight years ago by Elon Musk,

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A multimillionaire's test rocket blasted off on its maiden voyage Friday and successfully reached orbit in a dry run for NASA's push to go commercial.

SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket achieved Earth orbit nine minutes into the flight as planned, drawing praise from NASA, the White House and others eager for the company to start resupplying the International Space Station.

"This has really been a fantastic day," said an exuberant Elon Musk, SpaceX's founder. He said Friday's launch helps vindicate President Barack Obama's plan to give private companies the job of ferrying cargo and ultimately people to the space station, freeing up NASA to aim for true outer space.

"This bodes very well for the Obama plan," said Musk, the co-founder of PayPal. "It shows that even a sort of small new company like SpaceX can make a real difference."

In a telephone news conference, Musk said celebratory margaritas were on his immediate radar. But he's already looking ahead to the next Falcon 9 launch this summer and, hopefully, the first cargo run to the space station next year. Astronauts could follow within three years of the company getting a contract from NASA, he said, and quite possibly average citizens in five to six years.

"This is the dawn of a new era in space exploration, I think a very exciting era and one which I think will lead to the democratization of space, making space accessible to everyone eventually," Musk said. "Yeah, I think this is really a historic moment."

SpaceX's brand new rocket soared off its launch pad into thin clouds at mid-afternoon, carrying a test version of the company's spacecraft, named Dragon. The goal was to put the capsule into a 155-mile-high orbit, which it did. The capsule will remain in orbit for a year before descending and burning up in the atmosphere.

"A near bull's-eye," Musk said.

The first attempt to launch the 158-foot rocket was aborted in the final few seconds earlier in the afternoon because of questionable readings with the engine-ignition system.

NASA hopes to use the Falcon-Dragon combo for hauling supplies and possibly astronauts to the space station, once the shuttles retire later this year or early next.

Hawthorne, Calif.-based SpaceX – or Space Exploration Technologies – is one of several companies vying for NASA's business. It was founded eight years ago by Musk, 38, a South African-born entrepreneur.

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden called Friday's launch "an important milestone in the commercial transportation effort" and said it puts the company a step closer to supplying the space station.

And the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy shot out this tweet: "what a show!"

"My e-mail box has gone bonkers," Musk said, "and my phone has been ringing off the hook."

Along with all the congratulations, there were cautionary words from critics like Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, who noted "this modest success" does not mean commercial companies are ready to step in and replace NASA.

Musk acknowledged Friday's flight to orbit does not mean the commercial space industry can do anything, anytime, but noted it should provide "a huge boost of confidence" for the industry.

The Planetary Society shares his assessment.

"Hats off," the society said in a statement. "Today's flight of Falcon 9 could be the first small step toward relieving NASA launchers of the burden of low-Earth orbit, thus freeing the U.S. space agency to reach new worlds."

Both Musk and the former space shuttle and space station commander in charge of astronaut safety and mission assurance for SpaceX, Kenneth Bowersox, repeatedly told reporters that they would learn from the test flight, no matter what the outcome and that it would help improve future Falcon flights.

The next Falcon 9 launch is targeted for sometime this summer from the same pad at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, less than five miles from NASA's shuttle launch pads at Kennedy Space Center. That rocket will hoist a true Dragon vessel on a test flight. The Dragon test vehicle launched Friday will remain in orbit for a year before re-entering the atmosphere and burning up.

SpaceX has poured close to $400 million into its two lines of Falcon rockets. The Falcon 1 successfully flew in 2008 after three failed attempts, and again in 2009.

The Falcon takes its name from Han Solo's spaceship in the "Star Wars" film saga, the Millennium Falcon. Musk chose the name Dragon because of how some viewed his unlikely venture, borrowing from Puff the Magic Dragon.

___

Online:

SpaceX: http://www.spacex.com/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A multimillionaire's test rocket blasted off on its maiden voyage Friday and successfully reached orbit in a dry run for NASA's push to go commercial. SpaceX's Falcon 9 r...
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A multimillionaire's test rocket blasted off on its maiden voyage Friday and successfully reached orbit in a dry run for NASA's push to go commercial. SpaceX's Falcon 9 r...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 223
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
07:25 PM on 06/07/2010
SpaceX Illustrates Privatization Risk
Mr. Musk's closely held company still needs a cash infusion of more than $1 billion in the next year or two to reach its goal of transporting astronauts to the international space station later this decade. That's twice the total investment by SpaceX, as the company is known, since its creation in 2002. And while Mr. Musk tapped his own fortune for some $100 million of that, U.S. taxpayers are the most likely source of future assistance.

Mr. Musk boldly predicted he could provide reliable crew-escape hardware for less than $350 million, a projection that was ridiculed within the industry. "That was, in retrospect, naively low," Mr. Musk now concedes.

Since President Obama has asked Congress to fund commercial manned flights, SpaceX has recalibrated its estimate, saying it needs about $1 billion to develop and deploy an emergency escape system.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704726104575290604217670696.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories


The NASA chief was also asked whether he told Armstrong and Cernan during a briefing last week that the commercial space effort may need a bailout like the one given to America's auto industry. Bolden wasn't sure he said that, but Cernan was sure that he did. "As a matter of fact, it may be the largest bailout in history," Cernan quoted Bolden as saying.
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/05/12/4350721-space-pioneers-fight-policy

BP-Massey-Toyota-in-space, really?
11:14 PM on 06/07/2010
What's better: a project that might fail or a project that is certain to fail?

Ares I and Orion need tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer funding, and they're managed out of a part of NASA (Marshall Spaceflight Center) that has produced nothing but failure for the past 20 years (NLS, X-33, SLI, NASP, OSP, and now Ares).

Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Sierra Nevada (SpaceDev) are each developing commercial crew spacecraft that could be selected instead of Dragon if SpaceX runs into financial difficulties.

However, SpaceX has been profitable for the past three years. They've just signed a contract to launch numerous private communications satellites for the new Iridium constellation, and there's more where that came from. There are rumors of a highly-anticipated IPO for SpaceX.

Shuttle costs over $1 billion per launch. *That's* unreasonable. $1 billion to develop a new abort system for Dragon amortized over the life of the program isn't that bad at all. Orion development costs are projected at $15 billion or more!
03:17 AM on 06/08/2010
That Shuttle costing is inaccurate-think it was Sally Ride that did a cost analysis for the commission.

What's better? Neither.

"faster-better-cheaper" in space is certain to fail, sooner or later, from the math alone:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carl-pope/strange-attractors-on-par_b_554440.html

Outsourcing NASA astronaut transport work to commercial companies or other countries (Russia) will be just like Neil Armstrong said "a slow slide to mediocrity" for US Space human spaceflight operations (more like a slow slide to nothingness, imho).

Constellation is not the right answer either because it was horribly implemented, as were the other failed projects, as several GAO and Safety Advisory reports can attest too.

NASA and their traditional contractors do have folks with the right stuff to do a new hsf project well (or pick up and run with one of the newbie designs, but under the traditional NASA-contractor role).

What NASA really needs is to review the basics from their extensive history of lessons learned, do a rethink, and a replan, imho:
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/58855/title/Preventing_disastrous_offshore_spills_may_require_space-program_diligence

Much better to let the Shuttle workforce rethink a new plan themselves instead of some ivory tower academic deep thinkers up in DC.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:40 AM on 06/14/2010
Musk disagrees with the claims in this article.
photo
angrymanspokane
Just a regular guy
01:24 PM on 06/07/2010
... and it's illegal for me to buy bottle rockets, geeze.
03:36 PM on 06/07/2010
You should see the hoops that the Air Force and the FAA make these companies jump through to ensure that their rockets are operated safely. It's a very tightly regulated industry, and generally for good reason. If you filed even 1% of the paperwork and certifications with the government that SpaceX does, you'd be given license to fire off as many bottle rockets as you wish!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:02 PM on 06/07/2010
This was actually the 2nd try, since the first launch attempt was scrubbed. But, good job nonetheless.
03:16 PM on 06/07/2010
This is SpaceX standard operating procedure for test flights. They set the launch commit criteria really tight at first and then incrementally loosen up some of the constraints if they hit an abort on parameters just barely out of limits. This is how they determine what is "normal" before they have any actual flight data to use as a performance benchmark.

This time it was an ignition parameter on engine 3. They looked at the telemetry data and determined that the signature wasn't anomalous, just a little bit different than what they predicted from their static fire testing. So they adjusted the limits and reset the clock.

Falcon 1 had a very similar process with some pad aborts before they nailed down the appropriate limits. It's a part of their conservative testing approach, which is enabled by the design of their vehicle and pad. Those Merlin engines can be restarted over and over again on the ground if need be. They're very robust (and designed for reusability).

Shuttle can't do this. RSLS abort on main engine start requires rollback to the VAB and manual servicing of the engines.

Delta IV can't do this. Just last week they had a 48-hour scrub turnaround after a late pad abort because they needed to replace the ROFI "sparklers" that ignite the main engine.

That Falcon 1 and Falcon 9 can abort and recycle so easily on the pad is a tremendous design feature that sets SpaceX apart from other launch services.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:59 PM on 06/07/2010
This is awesome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunfighter
Unapologetic member of the Christian Left.
11:37 AM on 06/07/2010
Bravo!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Jason Abdon
12:55 AM on 06/07/2010
Bravo! Well done. This should be on the front page.
02:15 AM on 06/07/2010
Absolutely. But I don't think people come here to read good news. The bad news is what really captures our attention. That's what drives the page hits and ad views.

There's a lot to be upset about with the economy, the gulf disaster, foreign policy, etc. But at a time when the American workforce is under attack and small businesses face terrible odds, SpaceX is a glimmer of hope. A triumph of American entrepreneurship and engineering.

And we couldn't care less.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
love8rockets
12:28 AM on 06/06/2010
Well last i heard NASA was shutting down(mass layoffs) so This IS the next frontier.
01:30 AM on 06/06/2010
The proposed budget would actually increase NASA's funding and add jobs, but there would be some "internal displacement".

I don't agree with some aspects of the budget, particularly the decision to drop the lunar landing as a near-term exploration objective, but I absolutely agree with the overarching premise that NASA must be reorganized in order to stop ineffective management and political meddling from betraying its considerable talent and resources.

I envision NASA as a consumer union that purchases aerospace goods/services on behalf of the American people, who share an interest in space but lack the means to pursue that interest as individual consumers.

NASA is how we decide where we're trying to go and what we're trying to accomplish as a space-faring nation. How we accomplish these objectives should be for the private sector to propose and for NASA to select.

In other words, NASA should operate on the level of requirements rather than specifications. When NASA gets involved in specifications, it inevitably becomes a political battle, because Congress cares more about who gets the money than what the money buys.

Shuttle was an unfortunate compromise of numerous political interest, but it's a miracle it didn't turn out worse than it did. In today's political environment, the tug of war for NASA contracts is so bad that the designs are absurd and sometimes unworkable.

The budget proposal mitigates the worst of the political horse-trading that has been crippling NASA and short-changing the American people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:07 PM on 06/07/2010
The miracle of the shuttle is that it turned out AT ALL, not just as well as it did. Replacements have been proposed, debated, funded, started, and then killed midway through since the very beginnings of the shuttle era in the early 80s. Think of the DCX, the National Aerospace Plane, and the Constellation program. It's become increasingly difficult for NASA to operate on a consistent track for any period of time due to the constant political wrangling and ridiculous discussions regarding government spending wherein anything that isn't easily understood (particularly in science and engineering research) is considered wasteful.

Despite the other complications, it seems clear that with the recent move, NASA is moving to a more sensible role of developing advanced technologies and doing advanced research, rather than monopolizing the well-known role of access to LEO. This will allow it to accomplish meaningful work without having an overly vulnerable (and overly large) budget and keep the focus on pushing the boundaries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogden192
12:10 AM on 06/06/2010
Wish I were young again. Go to SpaceX website and check out their job listings. Sigh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoMoFearNoMoHate
11:52 PM on 06/05/2010
But you still can't get the Tesla Model S to market yet... WTF Elon!?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:54 PM on 06/06/2010
Elon has now attained God status I see. H8trs
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoMoFearNoMoHate
08:21 PM on 06/06/2010
You're kidding me, right?

Wait. No. You know what? You're right. When you have an army of followers to call people h8trs for ribbing you on something... you have achieved god status!

peace out!
-NoMo (who's just a guy that wants a Model S)
10:26 PM on 06/06/2010
Both of Elon's businesses operate on a shoestring budget given what they're trying to do. According to the golden triangle of business (cheap, quality, soon; pick two), that means he has to sacrifice schedule in order to achieve quality. He's not capitalized to deliver any faster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam Bomb
11:27 PM on 06/05/2010
....and the sum of our automobile technology still averages a combined 24 mpg. Now, I'm no doctor, but something seems out of balance here.
12:08 AM on 06/06/2010
Elon Musk is working on that, too. As a physics major at UPenn, he did his undergrad thesis on electrical energy storage for automotive vehicles, and he went on to found Tesla Motors.
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
12:12 AM on 06/06/2010
Yes indeed, Mr. Musk is sitting on two pretty hot companies today -- and that's after selling off his other hot company, PayPal.

I've spent hours of my time of HuffPo railing against corporate greed, but I have to say that I do admire CEO Musk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogden192
12:09 AM on 06/06/2010
Yup, been saying for years, how come we still have to go to the pump for car energy, yet our communications, music etc. have gone through revolution after revolution in the span of the same 100 years?
12:21 AM on 06/06/2010
Human civilization really hasn't changed that much since the steam engine and the telegraph. It's mostly been elaborations on those themes. Ultimately, the manipulation of energy presents greater physical challenges than the manipulation of information. Moore's Law is more favorable than Newton's Laws.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mooklyn
My micro-bio is full of stars!
09:09 PM on 06/05/2010
The head line should have read "First Private rocket launch doesn't blow up or kill anyone."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam Bomb
11:27 PM on 06/05/2010
LOL!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoMoFearNoMoHate
11:54 PM on 06/05/2010
With more than half a century of rocket technology to go on - you'd hope not.

Let's see how they do after a few dozen more shots and carrying human cargo.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:08 PM on 06/05/2010
One giant leap for NASA one small step for humanity.

Congratulations Mr. ex-PayPal visionary man.
One small advise; the lunch pad looks homemade and needs improvement for Floridian’s sake. Good luck with your future endeavors.
11:32 PM on 06/05/2010
What are you talking about? The F9 launch pad is genius!

The rocket rolls out of the horizontal integration hangar on a transporter-erector that hooks into the launch pad, rotates the rocket into the vertical position, and then retracts at a 15° angle to serve as the umbilical tower. It's the ultimate in ground support elegance.

I guess it's the kind of thing that appeals to engineers more than anybody else. But LC40 also has a visually-appealing circular perimeter and four lightning towers flanking the launch pad in the center. I think it looks really nice in the aerial shots.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:51 AM on 06/06/2010
I hate to admit beforehand but I could be wrong, please disregard my impulsive remark, base merely on this picture: http://www.spacex.com/falcon9.php

I am not to familiar with this project so a rather not make any comments but since you did invoke my curiosity I’ll try to learn a bit more and comment later.
07:33 PM on 06/05/2010
PutYourDogInOrbit.com. I'd pay. If it didn't cost a fortune. Now that's a conversation piece. Folks drop by and you can go, "See that dog over there?"
05:00 PM on 06/05/2010
"...poured more than $400 million..." into the effort - and got two workable, orbit-capable rockets out of it! He*l! I'm certain NASA spent more than that simply designing a test stand for the now-officially-cancelled Constellation program!
05:16 PM on 06/05/2010
NASA spent $445 million on the Ares I-X test flight, which featured an aerodynamic mockup of the Orion spacecraft and a fake upper stage on a barely-modified Shuttle SRB launched on a suborbital trajectory.
04:52 PM on 06/05/2010
Now Elon should leverage his PayPal/eBay connections to launch (no pun intended) a space tourism lottery sponsored by SpaceX and Bigelow Aerospace.

Very few private individuals have the means to purchase trips to space, but many people would be willing to pay an affordable price for a chance of winning a trip to space.

People would pay whatever amount they choose into the lottery. When the pot reaches the target price of a seat on the spacecraft, a dollar is randomly selected, and whoever paid that particular dollar wins the seat.

SpaceX provides the Falcon 9 launch vehicle, the Dragon spacecraft, and a professional astronaut to serve as the Commander responsible for crew safety. Bigelow provides the orbital hotel, based on Sundancer modules launched on Falcon 9, and a professional astronaut to serve as the Host responsible for customer experience. The winning customers fill the remaining five seats on the Dragon spacecraft.

This makes space tourism accessible to the working class in a manner compatible with the oft-irrational optimism of the American Dream. As they raise the money to increase flight rates, they build up the economies of scale and gradually push down costs.

The only way to make spaceflight economical is to drive increased demand. It can't be pursued from the supply side to any groundbreaking extent. In order to "democratize" spaceflight, we have to employ a collective demand scheme, hence the lottery.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Romeover
Civilization is for weaklings.
08:38 PM on 06/05/2010
Let me be the first to buy one of those lottery tickets for Rush Limbaugh.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Jason Abdon
01:01 AM on 06/07/2010
I'll contribute. Where do I send the donation.